From : Bud Worthy

I've nearly finished it at last, theres a few niggles in it but it's doing my bit for the resistance

...
Connecting the dots isn't difficult.

Are you still wondering why we are being decimated and sterilized and why the false “overpopulation” narrative is heavily promoted ? Here you will find an almost direct answer. These are, among other things, the reasons for the strong censorship of Dr. Mike Yeadon.

Today, UPS announced it will use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to reduce office workers. It Joins Google, Amazon, and others in the shift. If only we could do the same for government. https://mishtalk.com/economics/companies-turn-to-ai-because-real-intelligence-is-hard-to-find

Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13763

"My contention is that there are multiple deliberate toxicities built into these materials."

Dr. Mike Yeadon, former vice president at Pfizer, tells Dr. Drew that the experimental mRNA injections rolled out en masse from late 2020 onwards, were deliberately designed to cause blood clots, in addition to the immune system attacking itself.

https://twitter.com/wideawake_media/status/1714200496779444389

...
The lawyer from Reiner Fuellmich Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger writes :

Today 1st DAY OF COURT HEARING IN GOTTINGEN Germany -international lawyer Dr Reiner #Fuellmich attacks the public prosecutor office for illegally arresting him 3 months ago in Mexico. The allegations of embezzlement is only a pretext "It's about getting me out of circulation."

https://twitter.com/Stuckelberger/status/1752722569118036048?t=ahAOSLLp265lDxIw-Llx6A&s=19

https://img1.wsimg.com/blobby/go/1ee786fb-3c78-4903-9701-d614892d09d6/taking-screen-june-17.pdf

I hope this is a pdf of David Rogers Webb’s booklet, The Great Taking.

If it doesn’t work, please go to www.thegreattaking.com and download it from there.

If you’ve not yet read it, I cannot recommend more highly that you do so.

Just as public health laws were changed over decades to make legal the absurd and malign things that have happened in relation to gene-based injections, an analogous, patient process of dissolving private property rights in favour of those at the top of the list of creditors in the event of a bankruptcy of any entity against which the private property of all of the public has been used as collateral.

It’s unbelievable that this has happened. As of now, even billionaires who aren’t among the perpetrators will lose everything, as will you and I.

Everything that you think you own, on which you owe any debt at all, will be forfeit in the event of failure of a remote business, where the debts of which rest in part on your assets, because that claim on your assets is being used as collateral.

As Webb says in his excellent interview with James Delingpole, this cannot be run away from. He’s spoken with large numbers of wealthy people, some of whom are billionaires, and none of them had any idea of this. After a flurry of denials, they read his booklet and slumped in defeat.

His hope is that the currently well-off and more than that are being forced to become active. They don’t have a choice. If they do nothing, they will lose everything. For example, if ioj have a private pension, you’ll probably own shares / stocks & bonds. Your broker, nowadays typically “execution-only online brokers”, has followed your instructions to buy and hold on your behalf certain assets. Unfortunately these, too, have been pledged as collateral. The value of collateral based financial instruments is said to be a huge multiple of world GDP, by astonishing amounts. So large that there’s no hope ever of recovering even pennies on the pound. If you’ve a workplace related pension, the assets being used to pay your monthly pension will also be automatically transferred electronically to those on the top of the stack of creditors.

I’m not sure what, if anything, is not forfeit to these diabolical creatures. I understood that assets in your physical possession which are free of debt and were not purchased with now-cleared debt, might be seized.

Saying that, if you car, say, when it was an asset of the manufacturer or of the car retailer, was pledged as collateral for some transaction they’d entered into, it seems absurd but true that your car, too, might never have had its collateral status revoked. If so, even that vehicle might be forfeit.

On cars, it may become moot, because so many cars definitely are assets of finance companies that can be seized. We know how very keen are the perpetrators to find ways to get our car keys out of our cars. I could envisage a situation where demand for petrol & diesel would fall so hard that fuel stations would have to close. At that point, your car becomes a very heavy paperweight.

Webb doesn’t offer a prediction on timing or the way that has been (or will be) chosen to create a new global financial crisis & implode the globeconomy, taking everything with it. He does, however, list a set of preconditions necessary to initiate this global heist. He was quite sure that this is what is going to happen.

As mentioned above, he puts all his hopes onto the shoulders of wealthy but uninvolved people. I know two billionaires personally (one through old business connections and the other was a major donor to a campaigning organization that I was helping). They’re just like you and me other than that they have huge numbers in the “net worth” category. Webb knows that an ever-widening set of wealthy (but uninvolved) people are becoming very upset about this whole situation. Enlightened self-interest being what is, they’ll have to get active.

Best wishes
Mike

.

This component of the coup is obviously the one that is designed to render us, as the publicity goes, “By 2030, you will own nothing and be happy”.

My worry is, as always, you don’t attempt a worldwide coup d’etat without being very sure that all the bases are covered.

Best wishes
Mike

https://delingpole.podbean.com/

https://miri.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-national-newspaper

What a truly terrific public letter, written to the person who wrote an article about compulsory vaccination in U.K.

Miri AF completely disembowels, eviscerates and defenestrates the authors “argument”, to the extent they ever had one!

It’s the sort of article that is worth printing out and keeping, because many of her points will apply to the next fake pandemic.

Best wishes
Mike

The following is a multi-part message from Dr Mike Yeadon quoting the court statement from CJ Hopkins :

( Here are the links to his original message:
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/569 ,
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/570 ,
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/571 ) .

Bravo!

Berlin District Court, January 23, 2024
My name is CJ Hopkins. I am an American playwright, author, and political satirist. My plays have been produced and received critical acclaim internationally. My political satire and commentary is read by hundreds of thousands of people all over the world. 20 years ago, I left my own country because of the fascistic atmosphere that had taken hold of the USA at that time, the time of the US invasion of Iraq, a war of aggression based on my government's lies. I emigrated to Germany and made a new life here in Berlin, because I believed that Germany, given its history, would be the last place on earth to ever have anything to do with any form of totalitarianism again.
The gods have a strange sense of humor. This past week, thousands of people have been out in the streets all over Germany protesting against fascism, chanting "never again is now." Many of these people spent the past three years, 2020 to 2023, unquestioningly obeying orders, parroting official propaganda, and demonizing anyone who dared to question the government's unconstitutional and authoritarian actions during the so-called Covid pandemic. Many of these same people, those who support Palestinian rights, are now shocked that the new form of totalitarianism they helped usher into existence is being turned against them.
And here I am, in criminal court in Berlin, accused of disseminating pro-Nazi propaganda in two Tweets about mask mandates. The German authorities have had my speech censored on the Internet, and have damaged my reputation and income as an author. One of my books has been banned by Amazon in Germany. All this because I criticized the German authorities, because I mocked one of their decrees, because I pointed out one of their lies.
This turn of events would be absurdly comical if it were not so infuriating. I cannot adequately express how insulting it is to be forced to sit here and affirm my opposition to fascism. For over thirty years, I have written and spoken out against fascism, authoritarianism, totalitarianism etc. Anyone can do an Internet search, find my books, read the reviews of my plays, read my essays, and discover who I am and what my political views are in two or three minutes. And yet I am accused by the German authorities of disseminating pro-Nazi propaganda. I am accused of doing this because I posted two Tweets challenging the official Covid narrative and comparing the new, nascent form of totalitarianism that it has brought into being -- i.e., the so-called "New Normal" -- to Nazi Germany.
Let me be very clear. In those two Tweets, and in my essays throughout 2020 to 2022, and in my current essays, I have indeed compared the rise of this new form of totalitarianism to the rise of the best-known 20th-Century form of totalitarianism, i.e., Nazi Germany. I have made this comparison, and analyzed the similarities and differences between these two forms of totalitarianism, over and over again. And I will continue to do so. I will continue to analyze and attempt to explain this new, emerging form of totalitarianism, and to oppose it, and warn my readers about it.
The two Tweets at issue here feature a swastika covered by one of the medical masks that everyone was forced to wear in public during 2020 to 2022. That is the cover art of my book. The message conveyed by this artwork is clear. In Nazi Germany, the swastika was the symbol of conformity to the official ideology. During 2020 to 2022, the masks functioned as the symbol of conformity to a new official ideology. That was their purpose. Their purpose was to enforce people's compliance with government decrees and conformity to the official Covid-pandemic narrative, most of which has now been proven to have been propaganda and lies.
Mask mandates do not work against airborne viruses. This had been understood and acknowledged by medical experts for decades prior to the Spring of 2020. It has now been proven to everyone and acknowledged by medical experts again.

The science of mask mandates did not suddenly change in March of 2020. The official narrative changed. The official ideology changed. The official "reality" changed. Karl Lauterbach was absolutely correct when he said, "The masks always send out a signal." They signal they sent out from 2020 to 2022 was, "I conform. I do not ask questions. I obey orders."
That is not how democratic societies function. That is how totalitarian systems function.
Not every form of totalitarianism is the same, but they share common hallmarks. Forcing people to display symbols of conformity to official ideology is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Declaring a "state of emergency" and revoking constitutional rights for no justifiable reason is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Banning protests against government decrees is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Inundating the public with lies and propaganda designed to terrify people into mindless obedience is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Segregating societies is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Censoring dissent is a hallmark of totalitarianism. Stripping people of their jobs because they refuse to conform to official ideology is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Fomenting mass hatred of a "scapegoat" class of people is a hallmark of totalitarianism. Demonizing critics of the official ideology is a hallmark of totalitarian systems. Instrumentalizing the law to punish dissidents and make examples of critics of the authorities is a hallmark of totalitarianism.
I have documented the emergence of all of these hallmarks of totalitarianism in societies throughout the West — including but not limited to Germany — since March of 2020. I will continue to do so. I will continue to warn readers about this new, emerging form of totalitarianism and attempt to understand it, and oppose it. I will compare this new form of totalitarianism to earlier forms of totalitarianism, and specifically to Nazi Germany, whenever it is appropriate and contributes to our understanding of current events. That is my job as a political satirist and commentator, and as an author, and my responsibility as a human being.
The German authorities can punish me for doing that. You have the power to do that. You can make an example of me. You can fine me. You can imprison me. You can ban my books. You can censor my content on the Internet, which you have done. You can defame me, and damage my income and reputation as an author, as you have done. You can demonize me as a "conspiracy theorist," as an "anti-vaxxer," a "Covid denier," an "idiot," and an "extremist," which you have done. You can haul me into criminal court and make me sit here, in Germany, in front of my wife, who is Jewish, and deny that I am an anti-Semite who wants to relativize the Holocaust. You have the power to do all these things.
However, I hope that you will at least have the integrity to call this what it is, and not hide behind false accusations that I am somehow supporting the Nazis by comparing the rise of a new form of totalitarianism to the rise of an earlier totalitarian system, one that took hold of and ultimately destroyed this country in the 20th Century, and murdered millions in the process, because too few Germans had the courage to stand up and oppose it when it first began. I hope that you will at least have the integrity to not pretend that you actually believe I am disseminating pro-Nazi propaganda, when you know very well that is not what I am doing.
No one with any integrity believes that is what I am doing. No one with any integrity believes that is what my Tweets in 2022 were doing. Every journalist that has covered my case, everyone in this courtroom, understands what this prosecution is actually about. It has nothing to do with punishing people who actually disseminate pro-Nazi propaganda. It is about punishing dissent, and making an example of dissidents in order to intimidate others into silence.
That is not how democratic nations function. That is how totalitarian systems function.

What I hope even more is that this court will put an end to this prosecution, and apply the law fairly, and not allow it to be used as a pretext to punish people like me who criticize government dictates, people who expose the lies of government officials, people who refuse to deny facts, who refuse to perform absurd rituals of obedience on command, who refuse to unquestioningly follow orders.
Because the issue here is much larger and much more important than my little "Tweet" case.
We are, once again, at a crossroads. Not just here in Germany, but throughout the West. People went a little crazy, a little fascist, during the so-called Covid pandemic. And now, here we are. There are two roads ahead. We have to choose ... you, me, all of us. One road leads back to the rule of law, to democratic principles. The other road leads to authoritarianism, to societies where authorities rule by decree, and force, and twist the law into anything they want, and dictate what is and isn't reality, and abuse their power to silence anyone who disagrees with them.
That is the road to totalitarianism. We have been down that road before. Please, let's not do it again.

https://open.substack.com/pub/sashalatypova/p/how-to-fake-pandemics-part-2-i-do

Another fine piece from Sasha Latypova.

May I direct your attention to the comments?

There’s a very long comment from one gentleman about the PCR tests.

I’ve taken the liberty for the first time of writing a long comment myself on a topic I’ve never seen discussed: the methods used to claim to detect viral proteins and antibodies to said viral proteins in samples from humans.

I outline how such methods could be developed. Its been a considerable period since I last did work like this, but unlike PCR, which didn’t exist, at least as a routine analytical approach for PhD students when I was doing my own PhD research, I did develop & use immunoassays to measure things including circulating antibodies to things, so I know how easily they can be subverted (usually by accident of course!).

I believe that these test methods could easily have been subverted. My assumption is that they have been, just as the PCR based tests were. Why would they not be?

So a claim that “there must have been a spreading virus because viral proteins were detected at such and such a date & location” or “there must have been a contagious new virus because antibodies to parts of the virus have been extremely widely reported” are both nonsense until the methods used to detect the things claimed have been pored over and shown unequivocally to be correctly set up & beyond reproach.

Anyone believe that latter scenario is likely? Or might we again detect the hidden hand of deception?

Best wishes
Mike

...
My comment on Sasha Latypova's article, linked in the message:
This is work whose importance cannot be overstated. Please don't miss out on reading it.

Flawed studies desperately attempting to prop up the ‘official’ covid narrative are getting worse

Norman Fenton and Martin Neil 24.01.2024

https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/flawed-studies-desperately-attempting

What happened to Hollywood ?

https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/02/uks-online-safety-act-officially-grants-msm-permission-to-publish-lies/

Apparently, credentialed media organisations & individuals and exempted from this new law. Astonishing. You can deduce who they really want to shut up.

I doubt they’d bother to imprison me for my factually correct opinions which are nevertheless classifiable as “malinformation” or otherwise defined as an offence in this “Online SAFETY Act” (its always for your safety, isn’t it?). But they might charge me, fine me and threaten me. I’m not sure it would make any difference at this point.

Best wishes
Mike

Sent to me via American colleagues.
A most odd note.
I can’t recall ever seeing anything like it.
You decide if it’s significant.
The use of the word curfew wouldn’t immediately spring to mind, I suggest, as a reason a renal dialysis patient might not be able to get in for their life-maintaining procedure.
Not unless the author knew something was afoot. Then it definitely would occur to you.
Best wishes
Mike

https://open.substack.com/pub/denisrancourt/p/my-response-to-tracy-beth-hoegs-criticisms

I don’t remember if I already posted this well done rebuttal of criticisms that Denis Rancourt’s paper received.

Best wishes
Mike

"For your safety"

I'm not quite sure why the SA judgement of August last year is doing the rounds again. We did post about it on the channel last October, and the meaning of it. You can find the post here

So again to clarify:

The judgment was handed down in the Pretoria High Court on 17 August 2023

The National Department of Health were compelled to provide access to the COVID-19 vaccine procurement contracts

In para 5.5 of the Pfizer contract it states, "Purchaser further acknowledges that the long-term effects and efficacy of the vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the vaccine that are not currently known."

"The Purchaser" was the government

All statements of 'safe and effective' by the government were a fabrication and deliberate misinformation giving the disclaimer in the contracts

Likely all governments throughout the world signed similar contracts, with similar disclaimers. Therefore all statements of 'safe and effective' by all governments were a fabrication and deliberate misinformation.

The contract can be downloaded from here https://healthjusticeinitiative.org.za/pandemic-transparency/#contracts