Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Again, further reference to the evidence of systematic, patient and painstaking changes to federal law pertaining to “public health” over many years, which has made the obviously criminal, “legal on paper”.
As I recently observed publicly, those at the sharp end of this fight all know & have done for well over a year, perhaps it’s two, that FDA action in relation to the so-called vaccines is a pantomime.
Best wishes
Mike
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/the-fdas-sham-support-of-poisoning
As I recently observed publicly, those at the sharp end of this fight all know & have done for well over a year, perhaps it’s two, that FDA action in relation to the so-called vaccines is a pantomime.
Best wishes
Mike
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/the-fdas-sham-support-of-poisoning
Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposing the Global Predators
The FDA's sham support of poisoning the American public
Conversation with Katherine Watt--unmasking the FDA
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/interview-with-peter-and-ginger-breggin?utm_medium=reader2
Now, this article is contained as a link in the last post. But I guess few will explore all the links (I rarely do, unless someone points me specifically to something & for a good reason, because time is always so short and what will you learn after almost four years, eh?
Well, a lot, in this case. I know quite a bit of this detail, but not well enough to recapitulate it when I’m speaking, other than to talk vaguely about steady amendments to public health laws.
If you take the 10-15min to read the article, you’ll know more than 99% of the world’s population how it is that evil people are going about their deception.
Armed with that information, who knows what good you’ll do with it?
Best wishes,
Mike
Ps: I greatly dislike the phrase “public health”. I think it’s a charade. There’s really no such thing, except statistically, because it’s nothing more than the aggregate of all the private health situations, by which I mean the aggregate of the personal area under the curve of myriad decisions that you’ve mostly made & each of us has made, that bear on our individual health, measured in a very large number of ways. All that’s lost in this ghastly pretence that there’s a monolithic “public health”, that perhaps in some way affects yours. Of course, it might, but it’s absolutely not inevitable. The aggregation of the outcomes of all those individual can loosely be called “public health”, but it’s close to meaningless, once you really start to think about it.
Consider mean / mode BMI of the adult population in a Western country over the last 60 years. It’s moved up several points. Does that mean we’re all fatter / heavier? Not necessarily. That’s one possible finding. But you can’t tell it from the “public health” numbers, and there’s little to nothing you can do, top down, to alter it. The only thing that works is when individuals & small groups, say families or a group of friends, decide something, and then it can move. I’m fortunate to be pretty much the same BMI now as 40 years ago. So is Joanna. Our kids call us affectionately “The Sticks”, but we haven’t done anything special, just not got deeply into eating factory “food”, and ee happen to like moving around a lot. That’s all it’s taken. I don’t know what public health is in relation to this. Or in relation to likelihood of becoming sick. It’s not a top down phenomenon. It’s a useful pretence for the powerful to seek to wage war on the individual.
Now, this article is contained as a link in the last post. But I guess few will explore all the links (I rarely do, unless someone points me specifically to something & for a good reason, because time is always so short and what will you learn after almost four years, eh?
Well, a lot, in this case. I know quite a bit of this detail, but not well enough to recapitulate it when I’m speaking, other than to talk vaguely about steady amendments to public health laws.
If you take the 10-15min to read the article, you’ll know more than 99% of the world’s population how it is that evil people are going about their deception.
Armed with that information, who knows what good you’ll do with it?
Best wishes,
Mike
Ps: I greatly dislike the phrase “public health”. I think it’s a charade. There’s really no such thing, except statistically, because it’s nothing more than the aggregate of all the private health situations, by which I mean the aggregate of the personal area under the curve of myriad decisions that you’ve mostly made & each of us has made, that bear on our individual health, measured in a very large number of ways. All that’s lost in this ghastly pretence that there’s a monolithic “public health”, that perhaps in some way affects yours. Of course, it might, but it’s absolutely not inevitable. The aggregation of the outcomes of all those individual can loosely be called “public health”, but it’s close to meaningless, once you really start to think about it.
Consider mean / mode BMI of the adult population in a Western country over the last 60 years. It’s moved up several points. Does that mean we’re all fatter / heavier? Not necessarily. That’s one possible finding. But you can’t tell it from the “public health” numbers, and there’s little to nothing you can do, top down, to alter it. The only thing that works is when individuals & small groups, say families or a group of friends, decide something, and then it can move. I’m fortunate to be pretty much the same BMI now as 40 years ago. So is Joanna. Our kids call us affectionately “The Sticks”, but we haven’t done anything special, just not got deeply into eating factory “food”, and ee happen to like moving around a lot. That’s all it’s taken. I don’t know what public health is in relation to this. Or in relation to likelihood of becoming sick. It’s not a top down phenomenon. It’s a useful pretence for the powerful to seek to wage war on the individual.
Bailiwick News
Interview with Peter and Ginger Breggin
Link to audio recording; transcript excerpts.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This chart needs to be shared everywhere. It shows how truly dangerous the COVID shots are.
Drug Adverse Event Comparison (01/01/1996 - 12/29/23):
Ivermectin - 4,297
HCQ - 29,415
Flu Vaccine - 223,663
Dexamethasone - 113,686
Tylenol - 139,025
Remdesivir - 9,478
COVID Vaccines - 1,621,120
Naysayers will say this number is so high because billions of COVID-19 shots were administered. However, Senator Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS ran a calculation, and he found that the COVID shots were 55 times more lethal (25.1 vs 0.46 deaths per million doses) than the flu vaccines.
Drug Adverse Event Comparison (01/01/1996 - 12/29/23):
Ivermectin - 4,297
HCQ - 29,415
Flu Vaccine - 223,663
Dexamethasone - 113,686
Tylenol - 139,025
Remdesivir - 9,478
COVID Vaccines - 1,621,120
Naysayers will say this number is so high because billions of COVID-19 shots were administered. However, Senator Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS ran a calculation, and he found that the COVID shots were 55 times more lethal (25.1 vs 0.46 deaths per million doses) than the flu vaccines.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's not real, but it's funny.
...
Why H.G. Wells' World Brain and Yuval Harari's Hackable Human Will Not Succeed
ORIG. IN ENGLISH :
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-hg-wells-world-brain-and-yuval
IN GERMAN :
Warum H.G. Wells' 'World Brain' und Yuval Hararis Hackable Human scheitern werden
https://ganzmenschsein.substack.com/p/warum-hg-wells-world-brain-und-yuval
Why H.G. Wells' World Brain and Yuval Harari's Hackable Human Will Not Succeed
ORIG. IN ENGLISH :
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-hg-wells-world-brain-and-yuval
IN GERMAN :
Warum H.G. Wells' 'World Brain' und Yuval Hararis Hackable Human scheitern werden
https://ganzmenschsein.substack.com/p/warum-hg-wells-world-brain-und-yuval
Substack
Why H.G. Wells' World Brain and Yuval Harari's Hackable Human Will Not Succeed
A Study on the Abolition of Man
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tedros von der WHO wird in Davos von einem Australier mit "Krankheit X", COVID-Lockdowns und Impfstoffen konfrontiert!
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡 JUST IN : 🤡 WEF 🤡 : Climate Scientist Carlos Nobre says 2023 was the hottest year in 125,000 years, but he doesn't understand why so many people no longer trust the science.
From climate science to C-19 mRNA shots.
He asks, why are people voting for populist anti-science candidates?
The World Economic Forum's 2024 Global Risks Report lists "misinformation and disinformation" as humanity's number one risk.
This reminds me of the Catholic Church and European monarchies discussing how to control the printing press in the 17th century to prevent the spread of dangerous ideas.
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
From climate science to C-19 mRNA shots.
He asks, why are people voting for populist anti-science candidates?
The World Economic Forum's 2024 Global Risks Report lists "misinformation and disinformation" as humanity's number one risk.
This reminds me of the Catholic Church and European monarchies discussing how to control the printing press in the 17th century to prevent the spread of dangerous ideas.
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
17.01.2024
German Bundestag against Taurus delivery to Ukraine
In the debate about the delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine, which was attacked by Russia, the Bundestag opposed corresponding demands from the CDU and CSU. A motion from the Union parliamentary group, which expressly calls on the federal government to deliver Taurus, was rejected by the majority on Wednesday evening.
485 votes were against, 178 were in favor and 3 abstained.
https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/ukraine-krieg-bundestag-lehnt-taurus-lieferung-an-die-ukraine-ab/27982126.html
German Bundestag against Taurus delivery to Ukraine
In the debate about the delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine, which was attacked by Russia, the Bundestag opposed corresponding demands from the CDU and CSU. A motion from the Union parliamentary group, which expressly calls on the federal government to deliver Taurus, was rejected by the majority on Wednesday evening.
485 votes were against, 178 were in favor and 3 abstained.
https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/ukraine-krieg-bundestag-lehnt-taurus-lieferung-an-die-ukraine-ab/27982126.html
WEF is already preparing the next plandemic game
Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 17, 2024, the program item “Preparing for Disease X” will be on the WEF agenda. WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and AstraZeneca chairman Michel Demaré were there.
The WHO warns that an unknown “Disease X” can cause 20 times more deaths than Covid. In Davos the question arises as to what new measures are necessary to prepare health systems for the “multifaceted challenges”.
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Backup in WEB archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240116030531/https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 17, 2024, the program item “Preparing for Disease X” will be on the WEF agenda. WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and AstraZeneca chairman Michel Demaré were there.
The WHO warns that an unknown “Disease X” can cause 20 times more deaths than Covid. In Davos the question arises as to what new measures are necessary to prepare health systems for the “multifaceted challenges”.
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Backup in WEB archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240116030531/https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Geopolitical Risk in a Contested Asia Pacific
The article doesn't go into the matter in depth. This also has advantages, because the short text makes it easier to understand the topic from a bird's eye view: the fight between China and the USA and its geopolitical consequences.
https://chinasecuritysummary.substack.com/p/geopolitical-risk-in-a-contested?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
The article doesn't go into the matter in depth. This also has advantages, because the short text makes it easier to understand the topic from a bird's eye view: the fight between China and the USA and its geopolitical consequences.
https://chinasecuritysummary.substack.com/p/geopolitical-risk-in-a-contested?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
China Security Summary
Geopolitical Risk in a Contested Asia Pacific
Weekly Commentary on Chinese Defence Affairs
...
The universities are so dependent and corrupt ! 😱
70 of 800 Top U.S. Colleges Still Following Fauci’s Advice to Mandate COVID Vaccines
"... while we have all come to understand that mandating students to take COVID-19 vaccines does very little if anything to protect the vulnerable members of the community, this remains the single biggest reason colleges put forth to explain why they mandate(d) them." — Lucia Sinatra
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/70-us-colleges-universities-mandate-covid-vaccine-students/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
The universities are so dependent and corrupt ! 😱
70 of 800 Top U.S. Colleges Still Following Fauci’s Advice to Mandate COVID Vaccines
"... while we have all come to understand that mandating students to take COVID-19 vaccines does very little if anything to protect the vulnerable members of the community, this remains the single biggest reason colleges put forth to explain why they mandate(d) them." — Lucia Sinatra
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/70-us-colleges-universities-mandate-covid-vaccine-students/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Children's Health Defense
70 of 800 Top U.S. Colleges Still Following Fauci’s Advice to Mandate COVID Vaccines
While an official transcript of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s testimony in private sessions held last week by the U.S. Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has yet to be released, the Select Subcommittee posted on X (formerly Twitter) that one of the highlights…
...
The intent to harm
The components, structure, design and effect of the Covid injections leave no other possibility than that these genetic injections were deliberately designed to harm people and shorten their life expectancy. Acceptance of such a reality can greatly increase stress levels and therefore be harmful, at least in the beginning. That's why this response is automatically strongly suppressed by the psyche. We unconsciously protect ourselves from this and don't want to believe it. I also looked for other answers for a long time... Also Dr. Yeadon couldn't believe it at first. However, all other logical explanation attempts fail.
P.S.
An additional information :
AstraZeneca and the Chinese and Russian "vaccines" (Sputnik and CoronaVac/Sinovac) do not use mRNA technology.
The “pandemic” was an invention and therefore every medical layperson can well understand that all of these substances can only bring disadvantages. My emphasis is on "only" because there was no additional or unusual danger. These substances cannot have extended anyone's life either.
In situations that seem extremely unlikely, it is good to remember the following sentence, which I luckily remembered in time in 2020 :
"At some point there can always be the first time that a very unlikely situation occurs."
Therefore, when it comes to life and death, research is always better than ignorance.
Please forward this video :
ORIG. IN ENGLISH.: https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13612
ENGLISH. WITH GERMAN DUBBING : https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13613
https://www.ukcitizen.org/video-dr-mike-yeadon-speaks-to-uk-members-of-parliament-4th-december-2023/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13611
The intent to harm
The components, structure, design and effect of the Covid injections leave no other possibility than that these genetic injections were deliberately designed to harm people and shorten their life expectancy. Acceptance of such a reality can greatly increase stress levels and therefore be harmful, at least in the beginning. That's why this response is automatically strongly suppressed by the psyche. We unconsciously protect ourselves from this and don't want to believe it. I also looked for other answers for a long time... Also Dr. Yeadon couldn't believe it at first. However, all other logical explanation attempts fail.
P.S.
An additional information :
AstraZeneca and the Chinese and Russian "vaccines" (Sputnik and CoronaVac/Sinovac) do not use mRNA technology.
The “pandemic” was an invention and therefore every medical layperson can well understand that all of these substances can only bring disadvantages. My emphasis is on "only" because there was no additional or unusual danger. These substances cannot have extended anyone's life either.
In situations that seem extremely unlikely, it is good to remember the following sentence, which I luckily remembered in time in 2020 :
"At some point there can always be the first time that a very unlikely situation occurs."
Therefore, when it comes to life and death, research is always better than ignorance.
Please forward this video :
ORIG. IN ENGLISH.: https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13612
ENGLISH. WITH GERMAN DUBBING : https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13613
https://www.ukcitizen.org/video-dr-mike-yeadon-speaks-to-uk-members-of-parliament-4th-december-2023/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13611
UKCitizen - For the People by the People
Video - Dr Mike Yeadon Speaks To UK Members of Parliament - 4th December 2023 - UKCitizen - For the People by the People
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ENGLISH WITH GERMAN DUBBING
Forwarded from Dr. Michael Nehls
Dr. Nehls: ALGENÖL - essentiell für unsere Gesundheit! 🌿
Welches Omega-3 ist das beste?
🟢 Zum Interview auf Youtube
Warum wird die Gesellschaft immer kränker? Der Arzt und Molekulargenetiker Dr. Michael Nehls erklärt die Zusammenhänge und präsentiert einen einfachen und effektiven Lösungsansatz.
🟩 Jetzt Newsletter abonnieren.
🟩 Jetzt Kanal abonnieren: @MichaelNehls (tn)
Welches Omega-3 ist das beste?
🟢 Zum Interview auf Youtube
Warum wird die Gesellschaft immer kränker? Der Arzt und Molekulargenetiker Dr. Michael Nehls erklärt die Zusammenhänge und präsentiert einen einfachen und effektiven Lösungsansatz.
🟩 Jetzt Newsletter abonnieren.
🟩 Jetzt Kanal abonnieren: @MichaelNehls (tn)
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
As a comment, it’s important to recognize that soon, if not already, creation of deepfake video so convincing that it doesn’t occur to you to consider whether or not it’s genuine will be routine.
I add this caveat because there are several clips from WEF in Davos 2024 that are rather surprising.
Did Schwab really say something along these lines?
“Predictive power of AI is at such a level that proscriptive mode applies. Why have elections if you can already predict the resources?”
It appears he did. Apparently.
Best wishes
Mike
I add this caveat because there are several clips from WEF in Davos 2024 that are rather surprising.
Did Schwab really say something along these lines?
“Predictive power of AI is at such a level that proscriptive mode applies. Why have elections if you can already predict the resources?”
It appears he did. Apparently.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from RealTimeNews™ (Awkward Mama)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Schwab suggests for AI to Replace Voters: ‘Why Do We Need Elections?’
“Your company is very much involved in it,” Schwab said of Google.
Schwab then continued by laying out his globalist vision for “the next step” for digital technology.
“But then the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections anymore because you can already predict.
“And afterward, you can say, why do we need elections?
“Because we know what the result will be.”
@dailyrealtimenews
“Your company is very much involved in it,” Schwab said of Google.
Schwab then continued by laying out his globalist vision for “the next step” for digital technology.
“But then the next step could be to go into prescriptive mode, which means you do not even have to have elections anymore because you can already predict.
“And afterward, you can say, why do we need elections?
“Because we know what the result will be.”
@dailyrealtimenews
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
What a great remark spotted from a Substack discussion. Apologies that I don’t know the original author & to be clear, while I agree wholeheartedly, they’re not my words.
Best wishes
Mike
“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
Best wishes
Mike
“Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you’re being had. Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it’s consensus, it isn’t science. If it’s science, it isn’t consensus. Period.”
Forwarded from norberthaering.de
————————————————————
Weltwirtschaftsforum und Habeck gründen Zentrum für globale Regierungstechnik in Berlin https://norberthaering.de/macht-kontrolle/ggtc/
Weltwirtschaftsforum und Habeck gründen Zentrum für globale Regierungstechnik in Berlin https://norberthaering.de/macht-kontrolle/ggtc/
norberthaering.de
Weltwirtschaftsforum und Habeck gründen Zentrum für globale Regierungstechnik in Berlin – Geld und mehr
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/petersweden/p/huge-sweden-scrapping-agenda-2030
Watching with interest. I wish I could be less sceptical, but this seems extraordinarily unlikely to be genuinely the start of substantial pushback at the level of a nation.
I had a brilliant medicinal chemistry peer at one point when I was with Pfizer R&D. He used to say “It’s not the disasters that get to you, it’s the hope!”
My own yardstick for a real counterrevolution is the people much more than the politicians. Not saying that large demonstrations alone are enough, but massive farmers and truckers blockades are indicative of a lot of people getting to the ends of their tethers with all this BS.
Fingers crossed, anyway.
Best wishes
Mike
Watching with interest. I wish I could be less sceptical, but this seems extraordinarily unlikely to be genuinely the start of substantial pushback at the level of a nation.
I had a brilliant medicinal chemistry peer at one point when I was with Pfizer R&D. He used to say “It’s not the disasters that get to you, it’s the hope!”
My own yardstick for a real counterrevolution is the people much more than the politicians. Not saying that large demonstrations alone are enough, but massive farmers and truckers blockades are indicative of a lot of people getting to the ends of their tethers with all this BS.
Fingers crossed, anyway.
Best wishes
Mike
The Freedom Corner with PeterSweden
HUGE - Sweden SCRAPPING Agenda 2030 goals
The new right-wing government is dismantling the goals outlined by the UN.
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
Now, why have we not all been taught about this at school? Or at university, those us who studied biological sciences?
It is fake old news? If it’s correct, it’s among the most surprising things I’ve ever read?
“Flu is not apparently contagious”.
Best wishes
Mike
Now, why have we not all been taught about this at school? Or at university, those us who studied biological sciences?
It is fake old news? If it’s correct, it’s among the most surprising things I’ve ever read?
“Flu is not apparently contagious”.
Best wishes
Mike
Ggarchives
The Rosenau Experiment: The 1918 Influenza Pandemic & The Failed Quest to Prove How It Spread
📌 Discover the groundbreaking but baffling 1918-1919 Rosenau Experiment, where scientists failed to transmit the deadly influenza virus under controlled conditions. Learn how this experiment challenged medical assumptions, influenced pandemic research, and…