Increasing Psychopathic Behavior is a Sign That Society is on the Verge of Breaking Down
When psychopaths feel protected, total upheaval quickly follows.
https://vigilantnews.com/post/increasing-psychopathic-behavior-is-a-sign-that-society-is-on-the-verge-of-breaking-down/
When psychopaths feel protected, total upheaval quickly follows.
https://vigilantnews.com/post/increasing-psychopathic-behavior-is-a-sign-that-society-is-on-the-verge-of-breaking-down/
Vigilant News Network
Increasing Psychopathic Behavior is a Sign That Society is on the Verge of Breaking Down
When psychopaths feel protected, total upheaval quickly follows.
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
I’ve been going back over some recent articles & discussions because I’m trying to build the best arguments against the “brain eating, pangolin-derived, genetically modified coronavirus, which John Campbell warns us “killed 100% of the mice that were infected with it”.
He then speculated about transmission and lethality in humans.
Obviously, it’s lies & propaganda.
I stumbled on a reflective piece by Peter & Ginger Breggin, about the adverse effects of trying to control people’s thoughts, words, explorations of competing ideas.
Below it was a long comment from me, and it’s still useful to me as a summary of aspects of what’s gone on.
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/gingerbreggin/p/it-is-time-for-freedom-of-speech
……………………….
I am “discouraged” from opening up questioning whether there even was a pandemic (there was not), which automatically leads into questioning whether a genetic sequence claiming to represent “SARS-cov-2” exists outside of a computer) by many I thought were on the side of freedom.
For me, it was stumbling upon the literature in which attempts were made to demonstrate contagion / transmission of acute, respiratory illness to people who were well, none of which concluded in the way we’ve been accustomed to expect, that forced me to question the entire foundation of “transmissible of illness via sub-microscopic particles called respiratory viruses”.
Denis Rancourt has been questioning whether or not there’d been a pandemic, given we knew that clinical diagnostics based on the PCR method are unreliable. So he & his team chose to study only the count of deaths, ie all causes mortality (ACM) drawing upon individual US states public records (age, sex, date of death). This is the cleanest way to examine the effects of a population level pathological insult. Rancourt shows there was no increase in ACM prior to WHO calling in my opinion a fraudulent pandemic.
There simply could not be a novel, lethal, transmissible agent spreading through the population yet see no increase in deaths in the elderly and vulnerable, yet there it wasn’t. As far as I know, his work has not been rebutted.
This, that there’s not been a pandemic, seems particularly troublesome to many colleagues. Those who’ve made a name for themselves by developing new treatments perhaps feel they’ll be made fools of if this is true. I disagree. They do appear to have found new ways to save the lives of some people, acutely unwell with respiratory problems of recent onset. No honour is lost in accepting that the underlying causes of their patients’ illness is unknown rather than due to a “virus”.
Many people appear not to want to let me say this, not only to challenge the fear based PsyOp itself, a pandemic, but even more people do not want me to publicly open the can of worms that is to challenge the model of acute respiratory disease and say I do not accept that respiratory viruses as described are the cause. Effectively, they don’t exist in the sense that these illnesses cannot be caused by such entities. To those who demand I explain the cause of these acute respiratory illnesses if not caused by viruses, I say I bear no such obligation. I don’t need to have an alternative explanation as a precondition of pointing out that the existing model doesn’t fit the facts.
There’s another matter than almost nobody wants me to opine on & that’s the design purpose of the so-called vaccines. First let’s recognize that if these illnesses do not appear to be caused by submicroscopic pathogens, it makes no sense to attempt to immunise against them. Oddly enough, some people have known for years that claimed influenza vaccines do not do what is claimed for them. Cochrane metaanalyses show they do not reduce hospitalization and deaths. It that a fault of the products or of the underlying disease mechanisms?
[post continues here https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/495 ]
He then speculated about transmission and lethality in humans.
Obviously, it’s lies & propaganda.
I stumbled on a reflective piece by Peter & Ginger Breggin, about the adverse effects of trying to control people’s thoughts, words, explorations of competing ideas.
Below it was a long comment from me, and it’s still useful to me as a summary of aspects of what’s gone on.
Best wishes
Mike
https://open.substack.com/pub/gingerbreggin/p/it-is-time-for-freedom-of-speech
……………………….
I am “discouraged” from opening up questioning whether there even was a pandemic (there was not), which automatically leads into questioning whether a genetic sequence claiming to represent “SARS-cov-2” exists outside of a computer) by many I thought were on the side of freedom.
For me, it was stumbling upon the literature in which attempts were made to demonstrate contagion / transmission of acute, respiratory illness to people who were well, none of which concluded in the way we’ve been accustomed to expect, that forced me to question the entire foundation of “transmissible of illness via sub-microscopic particles called respiratory viruses”.
Denis Rancourt has been questioning whether or not there’d been a pandemic, given we knew that clinical diagnostics based on the PCR method are unreliable. So he & his team chose to study only the count of deaths, ie all causes mortality (ACM) drawing upon individual US states public records (age, sex, date of death). This is the cleanest way to examine the effects of a population level pathological insult. Rancourt shows there was no increase in ACM prior to WHO calling in my opinion a fraudulent pandemic.
There simply could not be a novel, lethal, transmissible agent spreading through the population yet see no increase in deaths in the elderly and vulnerable, yet there it wasn’t. As far as I know, his work has not been rebutted.
This, that there’s not been a pandemic, seems particularly troublesome to many colleagues. Those who’ve made a name for themselves by developing new treatments perhaps feel they’ll be made fools of if this is true. I disagree. They do appear to have found new ways to save the lives of some people, acutely unwell with respiratory problems of recent onset. No honour is lost in accepting that the underlying causes of their patients’ illness is unknown rather than due to a “virus”.
Many people appear not to want to let me say this, not only to challenge the fear based PsyOp itself, a pandemic, but even more people do not want me to publicly open the can of worms that is to challenge the model of acute respiratory disease and say I do not accept that respiratory viruses as described are the cause. Effectively, they don’t exist in the sense that these illnesses cannot be caused by such entities. To those who demand I explain the cause of these acute respiratory illnesses if not caused by viruses, I say I bear no such obligation. I don’t need to have an alternative explanation as a precondition of pointing out that the existing model doesn’t fit the facts.
There’s another matter than almost nobody wants me to opine on & that’s the design purpose of the so-called vaccines. First let’s recognize that if these illnesses do not appear to be caused by submicroscopic pathogens, it makes no sense to attempt to immunise against them. Oddly enough, some people have known for years that claimed influenza vaccines do not do what is claimed for them. Cochrane metaanalyses show they do not reduce hospitalization and deaths. It that a fault of the products or of the underlying disease mechanisms?
[post continues here https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/495 ]
Substack
It Is Time for Freedom of Speech in the Freedom Movement
We need to be disciplined enough to be present with the discomfort that comes with disagreement as we listen and communicate about all the critical issues of the day with each other~
...
Kary Mullis on the paid "government idiots", Fauci and others
VIDEO in English, with German subtitles :
https://twitter.com/Thomas_Binder/status/1740469557259575790?t=IzSbihU0PMecWWuox6Hd1g&s=19
Kary Mullis on the paid "government idiots", Fauci and others
VIDEO in English, with German subtitles :
https://twitter.com/Thomas_Binder/status/1740469557259575790?t=IzSbihU0PMecWWuox6Hd1g&s=19
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
[2nd half of post https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel/494 Continued]
The alleged “covid19 vaccines”, I have repeatedly argued are designed intentionally to cause harm. I won’t elaborate again here the details.
Suffice to say that, if you’re involved in “rational drug design”, you cannot fail to know that several, obvious mechanisms of toxicity are built into the design choices. I’m not the only person pointing this out but I think I am the only person claiming that these designed in toxicity conferring features are intentional.
No one wants this to be true, least of all me. But it is true. Unfortunately, this very neatly fits the first unpopular topic with which this post began. No pandemic, no lab-made pathogen, no need for intentionally toxic injections. No need for fear, but instead anger would be wholly appropriate.
Best wishes
Mike
The alleged “covid19 vaccines”, I have repeatedly argued are designed intentionally to cause harm. I won’t elaborate again here the details.
Suffice to say that, if you’re involved in “rational drug design”, you cannot fail to know that several, obvious mechanisms of toxicity are built into the design choices. I’m not the only person pointing this out but I think I am the only person claiming that these designed in toxicity conferring features are intentional.
No one wants this to be true, least of all me. But it is true. Unfortunately, this very neatly fits the first unpopular topic with which this post began. No pandemic, no lab-made pathogen, no need for intentionally toxic injections. No need for fear, but instead anger would be wholly appropriate.
Best wishes
Mike
Telegram
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
I’ve been going back over some recent articles & discussions because I’m trying to build the best arguments against the “brain eating, pangolin-derived, genetically modified coronavirus, which John Campbell warns us “killed 100% of the mice that were infected…
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
THIS JUST OUT:
https://www.truthforhealth.org/2024/01/disease-x-weapon-of-fear-for-geopolitical-control-of-humanity/
Though not part of this team, Dr Makis is in touch with him via Adrija Klaric. Here’s what Dr Makis makes “Disease X”.
He said it so well that I lead with it here.
Best wishes
Mike
<<And even more powerfully describing the global predators’ Machiavellian scheme, Dr. William Makis, Canadian research and clinical oncologist, said “I think all the discussion about “Disease X” right now is a distraction to leave most people completely unprepared for a black swan event, that could then immediately initiate a catastrophic financial system collapse (stock markets, banking) in an “exponential manner”. Then, in the midst of a financial catastrophe and chaos, “Disease X” hits, just in time for the WHO Pandemic Treaty to take effect, accompanied by lockdowns and shutdown of all travel. It would be more pain than most people could handle. And the population would then be begging for the new “Disease X” mRNA vaccine which could easily be made mandatory to continue getting govt’s financial support payments, perhaps in the form of Universal Basic Income, and with a promise that if enough people take the mandatory vaccine, they will release us from lockdowns again.”>>
https://www.truthforhealth.org/2024/01/disease-x-weapon-of-fear-for-geopolitical-control-of-humanity/
Though not part of this team, Dr Makis is in touch with him via Adrija Klaric. Here’s what Dr Makis makes “Disease X”.
He said it so well that I lead with it here.
Best wishes
Mike
<<And even more powerfully describing the global predators’ Machiavellian scheme, Dr. William Makis, Canadian research and clinical oncologist, said “I think all the discussion about “Disease X” right now is a distraction to leave most people completely unprepared for a black swan event, that could then immediately initiate a catastrophic financial system collapse (stock markets, banking) in an “exponential manner”. Then, in the midst of a financial catastrophe and chaos, “Disease X” hits, just in time for the WHO Pandemic Treaty to take effect, accompanied by lockdowns and shutdown of all travel. It would be more pain than most people could handle. And the population would then be begging for the new “Disease X” mRNA vaccine which could easily be made mandatory to continue getting govt’s financial support payments, perhaps in the form of Universal Basic Income, and with a promise that if enough people take the mandatory vaccine, they will release us from lockdowns again.”>>
Truth for Health Foundation
DISEASE X: Weapon of FEAR for Geopolitical Control of Humanity
The annual meeting of the World Economic Forum began January 15, 2024 in Davos Switzerland with the predictable fear-mongering broadcasting the WHO/WEF/UN cabal’s continued assault on the health, freedom, and …
...
My article about the trolls in Mike and Tim's Telegram channel and about the extraordinary symptoms of "Disease X".
Probably not good English, but with a bit of dark humor.
The spike proteins in the brain and uncontrollable laughter at the mourning ceremony.
The tasteless Telegram trolls.
The cabal obviously has two main perverse lies in its repertoire that have similar goals...
👇🏿
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-spike-proteins-in-the-brain-and
My article about the trolls in Mike and Tim's Telegram channel and about the extraordinary symptoms of "Disease X".
Probably not good English, but with a bit of dark humor.
The spike proteins in the brain and uncontrollable laughter at the mourning ceremony.
The tasteless Telegram trolls.
The cabal obviously has two main perverse lies in its repertoire that have similar goals...
👇🏿
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-spike-proteins-in-the-brain-and
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/bailiwicknews/p/interview-with-maria-zeee
I haven’t listened to the interview but I did read Katherine’s article below in which she explains a few of the points that she is keen to communicate carefully.
It’s quicker to read her article than to listen to an interview. I think Katherine makes many great points.
I echo that I do not find faintly plausible that technology currently exists that enables remote control of people beyond gross controls, like injuring people. The main reason for pushing these in the narrative in fear.
I’m also of the view that pandemics of acute respiratory diseases are between implausible and impossible. Do I think there’s going to be a Disease X pathogen released? No, I don’t.
The moment such a release occurred, the perpetrators will have lost control. They couldn’t know for sure what would happen. It might fizzle out. It might spread in a patchy manner. It might kill so many people the world they rely upon would collapse. The thing they appear to dislike the most is lack of control, or predictability. How could you hope to completely change the world in such a chaotic setting? Much easier to create the illusion of a fearful pandemic. After all, I’m sure that’s what they did in 2020.
We’ve a few weeks, probably, perhaps months, before this blows up again and it’s as before only very much worse.
If it wasn’t so serious, it would be laughable. It’s so absurd that I struggle to believe people will just accept it. Unfortunately they probably will.
Please try to create around you a pool of fearless derision. That’s all their ridiculous stories deserve.
Best wishes
Mike
I haven’t listened to the interview but I did read Katherine’s article below in which she explains a few of the points that she is keen to communicate carefully.
It’s quicker to read her article than to listen to an interview. I think Katherine makes many great points.
I echo that I do not find faintly plausible that technology currently exists that enables remote control of people beyond gross controls, like injuring people. The main reason for pushing these in the narrative in fear.
I’m also of the view that pandemics of acute respiratory diseases are between implausible and impossible. Do I think there’s going to be a Disease X pathogen released? No, I don’t.
The moment such a release occurred, the perpetrators will have lost control. They couldn’t know for sure what would happen. It might fizzle out. It might spread in a patchy manner. It might kill so many people the world they rely upon would collapse. The thing they appear to dislike the most is lack of control, or predictability. How could you hope to completely change the world in such a chaotic setting? Much easier to create the illusion of a fearful pandemic. After all, I’m sure that’s what they did in 2020.
We’ve a few weeks, probably, perhaps months, before this blows up again and it’s as before only very much worse.
If it wasn’t so serious, it would be laughable. It’s so absurd that I struggle to believe people will just accept it. Unfortunately they probably will.
Please try to create around you a pool of fearless derision. That’s all their ridiculous stories deserve.
Best wishes
Mike
Bailiwick News
Interview with Maria Zeee.
With essay about historical-legal arc of globalist programs, foundational lies, and need for discernment.
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
Again, further reference to the evidence of systematic, patient and painstaking changes to federal law pertaining to “public health” over many years, which has made the obviously criminal, “legal on paper”.
As I recently observed publicly, those at the sharp end of this fight all know & have done for well over a year, perhaps it’s two, that FDA action in relation to the so-called vaccines is a pantomime.
Best wishes
Mike
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/the-fdas-sham-support-of-poisoning
As I recently observed publicly, those at the sharp end of this fight all know & have done for well over a year, perhaps it’s two, that FDA action in relation to the so-called vaccines is a pantomime.
Best wishes
Mike
https://gingerbreggin.substack.com/p/the-fdas-sham-support-of-poisoning
Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposing the Global Predators
The FDA's sham support of poisoning the American public
Conversation with Katherine Watt--unmasking the FDA
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/interview-with-peter-and-ginger-breggin?utm_medium=reader2
Now, this article is contained as a link in the last post. But I guess few will explore all the links (I rarely do, unless someone points me specifically to something & for a good reason, because time is always so short and what will you learn after almost four years, eh?
Well, a lot, in this case. I know quite a bit of this detail, but not well enough to recapitulate it when I’m speaking, other than to talk vaguely about steady amendments to public health laws.
If you take the 10-15min to read the article, you’ll know more than 99% of the world’s population how it is that evil people are going about their deception.
Armed with that information, who knows what good you’ll do with it?
Best wishes,
Mike
Ps: I greatly dislike the phrase “public health”. I think it’s a charade. There’s really no such thing, except statistically, because it’s nothing more than the aggregate of all the private health situations, by which I mean the aggregate of the personal area under the curve of myriad decisions that you’ve mostly made & each of us has made, that bear on our individual health, measured in a very large number of ways. All that’s lost in this ghastly pretence that there’s a monolithic “public health”, that perhaps in some way affects yours. Of course, it might, but it’s absolutely not inevitable. The aggregation of the outcomes of all those individual can loosely be called “public health”, but it’s close to meaningless, once you really start to think about it.
Consider mean / mode BMI of the adult population in a Western country over the last 60 years. It’s moved up several points. Does that mean we’re all fatter / heavier? Not necessarily. That’s one possible finding. But you can’t tell it from the “public health” numbers, and there’s little to nothing you can do, top down, to alter it. The only thing that works is when individuals & small groups, say families or a group of friends, decide something, and then it can move. I’m fortunate to be pretty much the same BMI now as 40 years ago. So is Joanna. Our kids call us affectionately “The Sticks”, but we haven’t done anything special, just not got deeply into eating factory “food”, and ee happen to like moving around a lot. That’s all it’s taken. I don’t know what public health is in relation to this. Or in relation to likelihood of becoming sick. It’s not a top down phenomenon. It’s a useful pretence for the powerful to seek to wage war on the individual.
Now, this article is contained as a link in the last post. But I guess few will explore all the links (I rarely do, unless someone points me specifically to something & for a good reason, because time is always so short and what will you learn after almost four years, eh?
Well, a lot, in this case. I know quite a bit of this detail, but not well enough to recapitulate it when I’m speaking, other than to talk vaguely about steady amendments to public health laws.
If you take the 10-15min to read the article, you’ll know more than 99% of the world’s population how it is that evil people are going about their deception.
Armed with that information, who knows what good you’ll do with it?
Best wishes,
Mike
Ps: I greatly dislike the phrase “public health”. I think it’s a charade. There’s really no such thing, except statistically, because it’s nothing more than the aggregate of all the private health situations, by which I mean the aggregate of the personal area under the curve of myriad decisions that you’ve mostly made & each of us has made, that bear on our individual health, measured in a very large number of ways. All that’s lost in this ghastly pretence that there’s a monolithic “public health”, that perhaps in some way affects yours. Of course, it might, but it’s absolutely not inevitable. The aggregation of the outcomes of all those individual can loosely be called “public health”, but it’s close to meaningless, once you really start to think about it.
Consider mean / mode BMI of the adult population in a Western country over the last 60 years. It’s moved up several points. Does that mean we’re all fatter / heavier? Not necessarily. That’s one possible finding. But you can’t tell it from the “public health” numbers, and there’s little to nothing you can do, top down, to alter it. The only thing that works is when individuals & small groups, say families or a group of friends, decide something, and then it can move. I’m fortunate to be pretty much the same BMI now as 40 years ago. So is Joanna. Our kids call us affectionately “The Sticks”, but we haven’t done anything special, just not got deeply into eating factory “food”, and ee happen to like moving around a lot. That’s all it’s taken. I don’t know what public health is in relation to this. Or in relation to likelihood of becoming sick. It’s not a top down phenomenon. It’s a useful pretence for the powerful to seek to wage war on the individual.
Bailiwick News
Interview with Peter and Ginger Breggin
Link to audio recording; transcript excerpts.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
This chart needs to be shared everywhere. It shows how truly dangerous the COVID shots are.
Drug Adverse Event Comparison (01/01/1996 - 12/29/23):
Ivermectin - 4,297
HCQ - 29,415
Flu Vaccine - 223,663
Dexamethasone - 113,686
Tylenol - 139,025
Remdesivir - 9,478
COVID Vaccines - 1,621,120
Naysayers will say this number is so high because billions of COVID-19 shots were administered. However, Senator Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS ran a calculation, and he found that the COVID shots were 55 times more lethal (25.1 vs 0.46 deaths per million doses) than the flu vaccines.
Drug Adverse Event Comparison (01/01/1996 - 12/29/23):
Ivermectin - 4,297
HCQ - 29,415
Flu Vaccine - 223,663
Dexamethasone - 113,686
Tylenol - 139,025
Remdesivir - 9,478
COVID Vaccines - 1,621,120
Naysayers will say this number is so high because billions of COVID-19 shots were administered. However, Senator Ron Johnson @SenRonJohnsonUS ran a calculation, and he found that the COVID shots were 55 times more lethal (25.1 vs 0.46 deaths per million doses) than the flu vaccines.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's not real, but it's funny.
...
Why H.G. Wells' World Brain and Yuval Harari's Hackable Human Will Not Succeed
ORIG. IN ENGLISH :
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-hg-wells-world-brain-and-yuval
IN GERMAN :
Warum H.G. Wells' 'World Brain' und Yuval Hararis Hackable Human scheitern werden
https://ganzmenschsein.substack.com/p/warum-hg-wells-world-brain-und-yuval
Why H.G. Wells' World Brain and Yuval Harari's Hackable Human Will Not Succeed
ORIG. IN ENGLISH :
https://cynthiachung.substack.com/p/why-hg-wells-world-brain-and-yuval
IN GERMAN :
Warum H.G. Wells' 'World Brain' und Yuval Hararis Hackable Human scheitern werden
https://ganzmenschsein.substack.com/p/warum-hg-wells-world-brain-und-yuval
Substack
Why H.G. Wells' World Brain and Yuval Harari's Hackable Human Will Not Succeed
A Study on the Abolition of Man
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tedros von der WHO wird in Davos von einem Australier mit "Krankheit X", COVID-Lockdowns und Impfstoffen konfrontiert!
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤡 JUST IN : 🤡 WEF 🤡 : Climate Scientist Carlos Nobre says 2023 was the hottest year in 125,000 years, but he doesn't understand why so many people no longer trust the science.
From climate science to C-19 mRNA shots.
He asks, why are people voting for populist anti-science candidates?
The World Economic Forum's 2024 Global Risks Report lists "misinformation and disinformation" as humanity's number one risk.
This reminds me of the Catholic Church and European monarchies discussing how to control the printing press in the 17th century to prevent the spread of dangerous ideas.
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
From climate science to C-19 mRNA shots.
He asks, why are people voting for populist anti-science candidates?
The World Economic Forum's 2024 Global Risks Report lists "misinformation and disinformation" as humanity's number one risk.
This reminds me of the Catholic Church and European monarchies discussing how to control the printing press in the 17th century to prevent the spread of dangerous ideas.
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
17.01.2024
German Bundestag against Taurus delivery to Ukraine
In the debate about the delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine, which was attacked by Russia, the Bundestag opposed corresponding demands from the CDU and CSU. A motion from the Union parliamentary group, which expressly calls on the federal government to deliver Taurus, was rejected by the majority on Wednesday evening.
485 votes were against, 178 were in favor and 3 abstained.
https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/ukraine-krieg-bundestag-lehnt-taurus-lieferung-an-die-ukraine-ab/27982126.html
German Bundestag against Taurus delivery to Ukraine
In the debate about the delivery of Taurus cruise missiles to Ukraine, which was attacked by Russia, the Bundestag opposed corresponding demands from the CDU and CSU. A motion from the Union parliamentary group, which expressly calls on the federal government to deliver Taurus, was rejected by the majority on Wednesday evening.
485 votes were against, 178 were in favor and 3 abstained.
https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/ukraine-krieg-bundestag-lehnt-taurus-lieferung-an-die-ukraine-ab/27982126.html
WEF is already preparing the next plandemic game
Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 17, 2024, the program item “Preparing for Disease X” will be on the WEF agenda. WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and AstraZeneca chairman Michel Demaré were there.
The WHO warns that an unknown “Disease X” can cause 20 times more deaths than Covid. In Davos the question arises as to what new measures are necessary to prepare health systems for the “multifaceted challenges”.
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Backup in WEB archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240116030531/https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Tomorrow, Wednesday, January 17, 2024, the program item “Preparing for Disease X” will be on the WEF agenda. WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and AstraZeneca chairman Michel Demaré were there.
The WHO warns that an unknown “Disease X” can cause 20 times more deaths than Covid. In Davos the question arises as to what new measures are necessary to prepare health systems for the “multifaceted challenges”.
https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Backup in WEB archive:
https://web.archive.org/web/20240116030531/https://www.weforum.org/events/world-economic-forum-annual-meeting-2024/sessions/preparing-for-a-disease-x/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Geopolitical Risk in a Contested Asia Pacific
The article doesn't go into the matter in depth. This also has advantages, because the short text makes it easier to understand the topic from a bird's eye view: the fight between China and the USA and its geopolitical consequences.
https://chinasecuritysummary.substack.com/p/geopolitical-risk-in-a-contested?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
The article doesn't go into the matter in depth. This also has advantages, because the short text makes it easier to understand the topic from a bird's eye view: the fight between China and the USA and its geopolitical consequences.
https://chinasecuritysummary.substack.com/p/geopolitical-risk-in-a-contested?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
China Security Summary
Geopolitical Risk in a Contested Asia Pacific
Weekly Commentary on Chinese Defence Affairs
...
The universities are so dependent and corrupt ! 😱
70 of 800 Top U.S. Colleges Still Following Fauci’s Advice to Mandate COVID Vaccines
"... while we have all come to understand that mandating students to take COVID-19 vaccines does very little if anything to protect the vulnerable members of the community, this remains the single biggest reason colleges put forth to explain why they mandate(d) them." — Lucia Sinatra
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/70-us-colleges-universities-mandate-covid-vaccine-students/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
The universities are so dependent and corrupt ! 😱
70 of 800 Top U.S. Colleges Still Following Fauci’s Advice to Mandate COVID Vaccines
"... while we have all come to understand that mandating students to take COVID-19 vaccines does very little if anything to protect the vulnerable members of the community, this remains the single biggest reason colleges put forth to explain why they mandate(d) them." — Lucia Sinatra
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/70-us-colleges-universities-mandate-covid-vaccine-students/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain
Children's Health Defense
70 of 800 Top U.S. Colleges Still Following Fauci’s Advice to Mandate COVID Vaccines
While an official transcript of Dr. Anthony Fauci’s testimony in private sessions held last week by the U.S. Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic has yet to be released, the Select Subcommittee posted on X (formerly Twitter) that one of the highlights…
...
The intent to harm
The components, structure, design and effect of the Covid injections leave no other possibility than that these genetic injections were deliberately designed to harm people and shorten their life expectancy. Acceptance of such a reality can greatly increase stress levels and therefore be harmful, at least in the beginning. That's why this response is automatically strongly suppressed by the psyche. We unconsciously protect ourselves from this and don't want to believe it. I also looked for other answers for a long time... Also Dr. Yeadon couldn't believe it at first. However, all other logical explanation attempts fail.
P.S.
An additional information :
AstraZeneca and the Chinese and Russian "vaccines" (Sputnik and CoronaVac/Sinovac) do not use mRNA technology.
The “pandemic” was an invention and therefore every medical layperson can well understand that all of these substances can only bring disadvantages. My emphasis is on "only" because there was no additional or unusual danger. These substances cannot have extended anyone's life either.
In situations that seem extremely unlikely, it is good to remember the following sentence, which I luckily remembered in time in 2020 :
"At some point there can always be the first time that a very unlikely situation occurs."
Therefore, when it comes to life and death, research is always better than ignorance.
Please forward this video :
ORIG. IN ENGLISH.: https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13612
ENGLISH. WITH GERMAN DUBBING : https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13613
https://www.ukcitizen.org/video-dr-mike-yeadon-speaks-to-uk-members-of-parliament-4th-december-2023/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13611
The intent to harm
The components, structure, design and effect of the Covid injections leave no other possibility than that these genetic injections were deliberately designed to harm people and shorten their life expectancy. Acceptance of such a reality can greatly increase stress levels and therefore be harmful, at least in the beginning. That's why this response is automatically strongly suppressed by the psyche. We unconsciously protect ourselves from this and don't want to believe it. I also looked for other answers for a long time... Also Dr. Yeadon couldn't believe it at first. However, all other logical explanation attempts fail.
P.S.
An additional information :
AstraZeneca and the Chinese and Russian "vaccines" (Sputnik and CoronaVac/Sinovac) do not use mRNA technology.
The “pandemic” was an invention and therefore every medical layperson can well understand that all of these substances can only bring disadvantages. My emphasis is on "only" because there was no additional or unusual danger. These substances cannot have extended anyone's life either.
In situations that seem extremely unlikely, it is good to remember the following sentence, which I luckily remembered in time in 2020 :
"At some point there can always be the first time that a very unlikely situation occurs."
Therefore, when it comes to life and death, research is always better than ignorance.
Please forward this video :
ORIG. IN ENGLISH.: https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13612
ENGLISH. WITH GERMAN DUBBING : https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13613
https://www.ukcitizen.org/video-dr-mike-yeadon-speaks-to-uk-members-of-parliament-4th-december-2023/
Join 👉 https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13611
UKCitizen - For the People by the People
Video - Dr Mike Yeadon Speaks To UK Members of Parliament - 4th December 2023 - UKCitizen - For the People by the People
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ENGLISH WITH GERMAN DUBBING