Forwarded from freedomtirade
LISTEN...
...the floodgates of truth are bursting... getting louder and bolder as the world wakes up..
"Any doctor who pushed the jabs and doesn't apologise for their error is not to be trusted."
- Tucker Carlson
In almost five minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/listen:98
Mike Yeadon predicted the inherent nature of the covid jab chemicals being injected into everyone right at the outset, but he was silenced like any and all who dared to challenge a fraudulent, unethical narrative.
Pursue HEALTH
Resist TYRANNY
...the floodgates of truth are bursting... getting louder and bolder as the world wakes up..
"Any doctor who pushed the jabs and doesn't apologise for their error is not to be trusted."
- Tucker Carlson
In almost five minutes:
https://odysee.com/@FreedomTirade:f/listen:98
Mike Yeadon predicted the inherent nature of the covid jab chemicals being injected into everyone right at the outset, but he was silenced like any and all who dared to challenge a fraudulent, unethical narrative.
Pursue HEALTH
Resist TYRANNY
...
The Covid fraud is slowly becoming visible to everyone
A good summary of the deadly lies 2020-2023.
An article in German that is worth translating. It's worth investing your limited personal time here.
https://apolut.net/der-covidbetrug-wird-langsam-fuer-alle-sichtbar-von-uwe-froschauer/
The Covid fraud is slowly becoming visible to everyone
A good summary of the deadly lies 2020-2023.
An article in German that is worth translating. It's worth investing your limited personal time here.
https://apolut.net/der-covidbetrug-wird-langsam-fuer-alle-sichtbar-von-uwe-froschauer/
This is epic. 😂
A massive compilation of failed contagion studies.
https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
A massive compilation of failed contagion studies.
https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In 1974, Robert Welch—founder of The John Birch Society—gave a speech warning of the globalist plan to destroy America, which has since proven to be chillingly accurate.
"A part of that plan... is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty, piece by piece and step by step, to various international organisations, of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example."
VIDEO :
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13282
"A part of that plan... is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty, piece by piece and step by step, to various international organisations, of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example."
VIDEO :
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13282
Forwarded from Andrija Klarić
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
GDR RENATE HOLZEISEN, IT: "We have two official documents from European institutions that are enough to initiate prosecution for fraud. It is the contract with Pfizer https://bit.ly/pfizerEUcontract which clearly confirms that they knew from the beginning that the vaccine was not safe and efficiently.
The second is a letter from the EMA confirming to members of the EU parliament that it has never licensed a C19 vaccine to prevent the spread of the virus. Therefore, the imposition of vaccination had no medical justification https://voorwaarheid.nl/.../2023-010-03-uspension...
A European human rights lawyer based in South Tyrol is fighting the Corona measures legally. Board member of Children's Health Defense Europe. She argues that any newly developed vaccine cannot be made mandatory based on the rationale used for their approval. She is also a lawyer before the Supreme Courts and specializes in European and international law. She is a huge force in cases at the European and national level, uniting, sharing and coordinating initiatives. He actively deals with issues of fundamental rights and freedoms.
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/
The second is a letter from the EMA confirming to members of the EU parliament that it has never licensed a C19 vaccine to prevent the spread of the virus. Therefore, the imposition of vaccination had no medical justification https://voorwaarheid.nl/.../2023-010-03-uspension...
A European human rights lawyer based in South Tyrol is fighting the Corona measures legally. Board member of Children's Health Defense Europe. She argues that any newly developed vaccine cannot be made mandatory based on the rationale used for their approval. She is also a lawyer before the Supreme Courts and specializes in European and international law. She is a huge force in cases at the European and national level, uniting, sharing and coordinating initiatives. He actively deals with issues of fundamental rights and freedoms.
You can follow the SHOW via livestream - www.z1tv.hr/hr/livestream
CHANNEL of the show "SLOBODNI" with all episodes - https://rumble.com/user/SLOBODNIpodcast
Join http://t.me/andrijaklaric
Follow https://twitter.com/andrija_klaric
https://bit.ly/facebookandrijaklaric
https://instagram.com/andrijaklaric/
https://www.tiktok.com/@slobodni_podcast
https://app.clouthub.com/#/users/u/SLOBODNIpodcast
https://www.winn.press/
...
A rough suggestion of the argument for “intent” and why the narrative can be crucial.
In my opinion, the effective strategy can only be found by those who keep an eye on the big picture. This is not just about the deadly mRNA technology, but also about CBDC for the enslavement of humanity. The only chance that the CBDC will be rejected by people is if people understand how criminal the power structure from which such changes come actually is. To do this, the truth must be published far and wide. Only by understanding the “harmful intent” narrative can we be protected from the next, perhaps even more damaging, scam. With the “mistake” and “lack of supervision” narrative, I don’t see a good chance of this happening.
The success of persuasion depends on the type of arguments chosen, true to the motto: “He who seeks finds”. The more understandable the argument, the more convincing it can seem.
In my opinion, the “devil’s advocate strategy” in the following form is ideal for this:
1.
Please name me a single component of the so-called mRNA “vaccination” that has a positive effect on human health, or at least could only theoretically have a positive effect.
The same question applies to effect:
2.
Please tell me a single positive effect of this gene preparation for a healthy person. To put it precisely: A positive effect is the result of the interaction between the components of the "vaccination" and the immune system, which helps more than harms.
The result of this consideration is devastating. None of the components can be useful for protecting health, because every part is both THEORETICALLY and PRACTICALLY toxic and I see EXCLUSIVELY a lot of negative effects on the body. Everything in this genetic soup is toxic and nothing here promotes your health.
I am convinced that every scientist and every layman cannot easily refute, reject or push such simple arguments out of consciousness.
As long as people do not understand the "intention", they will not be able to understand the seriousness of the situation and will fall into the next trap.
I doubt it is a universal principle, but in this area truth seems to me to be the very best and most effective strategy.
Good arguments expressing a different opinion are welcome.
P.S.
The only thing that might seem incomprehensible here is: how can anyone claim that such a concentration of toxic effects on almost all organs of the body will not shorten lifespan? How the constant repetition of the simple phrases of propaganda could prevent so many doctors from logical thought and research is the next miracle in this tragedy of humanity. Apart from the natural LNPs, which were only used by AstraZeneca, this toxic mixture appears to be completely unnatural and therefore only life-shortening. The life-extending effects of mRNA arise exclusively from propaganda phrases and have not been supported by a single piece of evidence.
This results in a serious contradiction. It is illogical to claim that, on the one hand, there was no excess mortality in 2020 and, on the other hand, that there was no harmful, life-shortening intention through injections based on completely unnatural, foreign substances. With this conclusion, even the level of toxicity would be secondary.
A rough suggestion of the argument for “intent” and why the narrative can be crucial.
In my opinion, the effective strategy can only be found by those who keep an eye on the big picture. This is not just about the deadly mRNA technology, but also about CBDC for the enslavement of humanity. The only chance that the CBDC will be rejected by people is if people understand how criminal the power structure from which such changes come actually is. To do this, the truth must be published far and wide. Only by understanding the “harmful intent” narrative can we be protected from the next, perhaps even more damaging, scam. With the “mistake” and “lack of supervision” narrative, I don’t see a good chance of this happening.
The success of persuasion depends on the type of arguments chosen, true to the motto: “He who seeks finds”. The more understandable the argument, the more convincing it can seem.
In my opinion, the “devil’s advocate strategy” in the following form is ideal for this:
1.
Please name me a single component of the so-called mRNA “vaccination” that has a positive effect on human health, or at least could only theoretically have a positive effect.
The same question applies to effect:
2.
Please tell me a single positive effect of this gene preparation for a healthy person. To put it precisely: A positive effect is the result of the interaction between the components of the "vaccination" and the immune system, which helps more than harms.
The result of this consideration is devastating. None of the components can be useful for protecting health, because every part is both THEORETICALLY and PRACTICALLY toxic and I see EXCLUSIVELY a lot of negative effects on the body. Everything in this genetic soup is toxic and nothing here promotes your health.
I am convinced that every scientist and every layman cannot easily refute, reject or push such simple arguments out of consciousness.
As long as people do not understand the "intention", they will not be able to understand the seriousness of the situation and will fall into the next trap.
I doubt it is a universal principle, but in this area truth seems to me to be the very best and most effective strategy.
Good arguments expressing a different opinion are welcome.
P.S.
The only thing that might seem incomprehensible here is: how can anyone claim that such a concentration of toxic effects on almost all organs of the body will not shorten lifespan? How the constant repetition of the simple phrases of propaganda could prevent so many doctors from logical thought and research is the next miracle in this tragedy of humanity. Apart from the natural LNPs, which were only used by AstraZeneca, this toxic mixture appears to be completely unnatural and therefore only life-shortening. The life-extending effects of mRNA arise exclusively from propaganda phrases and have not been supported by a single piece of evidence.
This results in a serious contradiction. It is illogical to claim that, on the one hand, there was no excess mortality in 2020 and, on the other hand, that there was no harmful, life-shortening intention through injections based on completely unnatural, foreign substances. With this conclusion, even the level of toxicity would be secondary.
👍1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
...
They are covering their tracks...
Dr. Scott Jensen :
"More than 300 medical journal articles have disappeared within the last year."
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13286
They are covering their tracks...
Dr. Scott Jensen :
"More than 300 medical journal articles have disappeared within the last year."
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13286
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel
Remarkable. Posted by Jonathan Engler.
I’d mentioned to him that John O’Loonie, undertaker, had noticed something I hadn’t previously heard or noted.
The dead from hospitals were delivered jn body bags and almost all of them were awash with fluid in the bag & tissues oedematous.
Suspecting iatrogenic renal failure, remembering that remdesivir is pretty nasty, with kidney damage uppermost in adverse effects, I developed a highly tentative hypothesis that it was sedation plus ventilation plus remdesivir that doomed many.
Continuing with saline drips and with GFR falling, the patient would just die in front of the helpless physician who wasn’t aware of what was happening.
Now, this is but an hypothesis. But Fauci recommended remdesivir.
Gilead created it and I’m even wondering did they create a known renal toxin with this ultimate application in mind.
Overnight, Jonathan posts this discussion.
Completely different mode of death in this young intensivists experience anyway.
We’ve no idea if remdesivir was ubiquitous or whether other protocols were introduced with similar side effects.
Preliminary & hypothetical only. Because we know this is all intentional and we don’t yet understand how they did it.
Best wishes
Mike
https://pedsintensiva.libsyn.com/surviving-covid19-in-nyc-feat-sam-parnia-liz-crowe
#MYpost 324
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
I’d mentioned to him that John O’Loonie, undertaker, had noticed something I hadn’t previously heard or noted.
The dead from hospitals were delivered jn body bags and almost all of them were awash with fluid in the bag & tissues oedematous.
Suspecting iatrogenic renal failure, remembering that remdesivir is pretty nasty, with kidney damage uppermost in adverse effects, I developed a highly tentative hypothesis that it was sedation plus ventilation plus remdesivir that doomed many.
Continuing with saline drips and with GFR falling, the patient would just die in front of the helpless physician who wasn’t aware of what was happening.
Now, this is but an hypothesis. But Fauci recommended remdesivir.
Gilead created it and I’m even wondering did they create a known renal toxin with this ultimate application in mind.
Overnight, Jonathan posts this discussion.
Completely different mode of death in this young intensivists experience anyway.
We’ve no idea if remdesivir was ubiquitous or whether other protocols were introduced with similar side effects.
Preliminary & hypothetical only. Because we know this is all intentional and we don’t yet understand how they did it.
Best wishes
Mike
https://pedsintensiva.libsyn.com/surviving-covid19-in-nyc-feat-sam-parnia-liz-crowe
#MYpost 324
https://t.me/DrMikeYeadonsolochannel
Libsyn
Pediatrica intensiva: Art & Science of Pediatric Critical Care: Surviving COVID19 in NYC feat. Sam Parnia & Liz Crowe
Surviving COVID19 in NYC feat. Sam Parnia (intensivist at NYC Langone) & Liz Crowe (social worker & world-leading resilience expert). At the time of recording in April 2020, only Wuhan, Italy and NYC had sizeable COVID-19 epidemics. We knew it was going to…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tony Blair admits Digital ID is about the ability to force vaccinate the population.
Must watch new 100-second video truth bomb about vaccine deaths
Bright Light News trailer from ICS4
Denis Rancourt
08.12.2023
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/must-watch-new-100-second-video-truth
Bright Light News trailer from ICS4
Denis Rancourt
08.12.2023
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/must-watch-new-100-second-video-truth
Denis’s Substack
Must watch new 100-second video truth bomb about vaccine deaths
Bright Light News trailer from ICS4
Pathologist Arne Burkhardt Final Interview – Revealing The Grave Dangers Of MRNA Vaccines
With videos / Prof. Arne Burkhardt speaks in English :
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/arne-burkhardt-interview-12-23-23/
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13299
With videos / Prof. Arne Burkhardt speaks in English :
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/arne-burkhardt-interview-12-23-23/
https://t.me/QueueForBrain/13299
The Last American Vagabond
Pathologist Arne Burkhardt Final Interview – Revealing the Grave Dangers of mRNA Vaccines
Podcast: Play in new window | Download | EmbedSubscribe: Apple Podcasts | Email | RSS“Autopsy is not only a service to the doctors who were responsible for the patient, but it is a public service for our health system.” – Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt Many cases…
Forwarded from Prof.Dr.Stefan Hockertz Original Wissenschaft
Pfizer - Von denen lässt man sich doch gern impfen {Ironie aus}
1️⃣ 1994 zahlte Pfizer freiwillig 10,75 Millionen Dollar, um die Vorwürfe des Justizministeriums beizulegen. Der Konzern habe gelogen, um die staatliche Zulassung für eine mechanische Herzklappe zu erhalten, und dann Sicherheitsbedenken vertuscht, obwohl das Gerät Patienten tötete.
2️⃣ Im Jahr 1996 verabreichte Pfizer 200 Kindern in Nigeria ein experimentelles Medikament, ohne die Eltern darüber zu informieren, dass ihre Kinder Gegenstand eines Experiments waren. 11 der Kinder starben und viele erlitten Nebenwirkungen wie Gehirnschäden und Organversagen.
3️⃣ Im Jahr 2008 veröffentlichte die NYT den Artikel " Experten folgern, dass Pfizer Studien manipuliert hat". Pfizer verzögerte die Veröffentlichung negativer Studien, rückte negative Daten in ein positiveres Licht und kontrollierte den Fluss der klinischen Forschungsdaten, um Neurontin zu fördern.
4️⃣ Im Jahr 2009 musste Pfizer 2,3 Milliarden US-Dollar zahlen und gestand, das Schmerzmittel Bextra in betrügerischer Absicht oder mit der Absicht der Irreführung falsch gekennzeichnet zu haben, Schmiergelder an willfährige Ärzte gezahlt zu haben und auch für drei andere Medikamente illegal geworben zu haben.
5️⃣ Im Jahr 2009 zahlte Pfizer 750 Millionen Dollar, um 35.000 Klagen beizulegen, dass sein Medikament Rezulin für 63 Todesfälle und Dutzende von Leberversagen verantwortlich sei. Die FDA stellte sich hinter das Medikament, obwohl die Zahl der Todesfälle zunahm und kein lebensrettender Nutzen nachgewiesen werden konnte.
7️⃣ Im Jahr 2010 wurde Pfizer zur Zahlung von 142,1 Millionen US-Dollar Schadensersatz verurteilt, weil es durch den betrügerischen Verkauf und die Vermarktung von Neurontin für nicht von der FDA zugelassene Verwendungszwecke gegen Bundesgesetze zur Bekämpfung von Betrug verstoßen hatte.
6️⃣ Im Jahr 2010 gab Pfizer zu, dass es in den letzten sechs Monaten des Jahres 2009 rund 20 Millionen Dollar an 4.500 Ärzte und andere medizinische Fachkräfte gezahlt hatte. Die Offenlegung war erforderlich, um eine Bundesuntersuchung wegen illegaler Arzneimittelwerbung beizulegen.
7️⃣ Im Jahr 2010 reichte Blue Cross eine Klage gegen Pfizer ein, in der das Unternehmen beschuldigt wurde, 5.000 Ärzte mit üppigen Karibikurlauben, Massagen und anderen Freizeitaktivitäten illegal bestochen zu haben, um Ärzte davon zu überzeugen, Bextra für den Off-Label-Gebrauch einzusetzen.
8️⃣ Im Jahr 2012 erhob die SEC Anklage gegen Pfizer wegen Verstoß gegen den Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, als seine Tochtergesellschaften ausländische Regierungsärzte in Bulgarien, China, Kroatien, der Tschechischen Republik, Italien, Kasachstan, Russland und Serbien bestachen, um Aufträge zu erhalten.
9️⃣ Bis 2012 hatte Pfizer 1,2 Milliarden Dollar gezahlt, um die Klagen von fast 10.000 Frauen beizulegen, die der Meinung waren, dass das Medikament Prempro Brustkrebs verursacht. Dazu gehörte auch ein Strafschadenersatz für die Zurückhaltung von Informationen über das Brustkrebsrisiko durch den Arzneimittelhersteller.
🔟 Im Jahr 2013 zahlte Pfizer 55 Millionen US-Dollar, um die strafrechtlichen Vorwürfe zu klären, Patienten und Ärzte nicht vor den Risiken von Nierenerkrankungen, Nierenschäden, Nierenversagen und akuter interstitieller Nephritis zu warnen, die durch den Protonenpumpenhemmer Protonix verursacht werden.
1️⃣1️⃣ Im Jahr 2013 bezahlte Pfizer 288 Millionen Dollar, um die Klagen von 2.700 Personen beizulegen, denen zufolge das Medikament Chantix Selbstmordgedanken und schwere psychische Störungen verursacht.
1️⃣ 1994 zahlte Pfizer freiwillig 10,75 Millionen Dollar, um die Vorwürfe des Justizministeriums beizulegen. Der Konzern habe gelogen, um die staatliche Zulassung für eine mechanische Herzklappe zu erhalten, und dann Sicherheitsbedenken vertuscht, obwohl das Gerät Patienten tötete.
2️⃣ Im Jahr 1996 verabreichte Pfizer 200 Kindern in Nigeria ein experimentelles Medikament, ohne die Eltern darüber zu informieren, dass ihre Kinder Gegenstand eines Experiments waren. 11 der Kinder starben und viele erlitten Nebenwirkungen wie Gehirnschäden und Organversagen.
3️⃣ Im Jahr 2008 veröffentlichte die NYT den Artikel " Experten folgern, dass Pfizer Studien manipuliert hat". Pfizer verzögerte die Veröffentlichung negativer Studien, rückte negative Daten in ein positiveres Licht und kontrollierte den Fluss der klinischen Forschungsdaten, um Neurontin zu fördern.
4️⃣ Im Jahr 2009 musste Pfizer 2,3 Milliarden US-Dollar zahlen und gestand, das Schmerzmittel Bextra in betrügerischer Absicht oder mit der Absicht der Irreführung falsch gekennzeichnet zu haben, Schmiergelder an willfährige Ärzte gezahlt zu haben und auch für drei andere Medikamente illegal geworben zu haben.
5️⃣ Im Jahr 2009 zahlte Pfizer 750 Millionen Dollar, um 35.000 Klagen beizulegen, dass sein Medikament Rezulin für 63 Todesfälle und Dutzende von Leberversagen verantwortlich sei. Die FDA stellte sich hinter das Medikament, obwohl die Zahl der Todesfälle zunahm und kein lebensrettender Nutzen nachgewiesen werden konnte.
7️⃣ Im Jahr 2010 wurde Pfizer zur Zahlung von 142,1 Millionen US-Dollar Schadensersatz verurteilt, weil es durch den betrügerischen Verkauf und die Vermarktung von Neurontin für nicht von der FDA zugelassene Verwendungszwecke gegen Bundesgesetze zur Bekämpfung von Betrug verstoßen hatte.
6️⃣ Im Jahr 2010 gab Pfizer zu, dass es in den letzten sechs Monaten des Jahres 2009 rund 20 Millionen Dollar an 4.500 Ärzte und andere medizinische Fachkräfte gezahlt hatte. Die Offenlegung war erforderlich, um eine Bundesuntersuchung wegen illegaler Arzneimittelwerbung beizulegen.
7️⃣ Im Jahr 2010 reichte Blue Cross eine Klage gegen Pfizer ein, in der das Unternehmen beschuldigt wurde, 5.000 Ärzte mit üppigen Karibikurlauben, Massagen und anderen Freizeitaktivitäten illegal bestochen zu haben, um Ärzte davon zu überzeugen, Bextra für den Off-Label-Gebrauch einzusetzen.
8️⃣ Im Jahr 2012 erhob die SEC Anklage gegen Pfizer wegen Verstoß gegen den Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, als seine Tochtergesellschaften ausländische Regierungsärzte in Bulgarien, China, Kroatien, der Tschechischen Republik, Italien, Kasachstan, Russland und Serbien bestachen, um Aufträge zu erhalten.
9️⃣ Bis 2012 hatte Pfizer 1,2 Milliarden Dollar gezahlt, um die Klagen von fast 10.000 Frauen beizulegen, die der Meinung waren, dass das Medikament Prempro Brustkrebs verursacht. Dazu gehörte auch ein Strafschadenersatz für die Zurückhaltung von Informationen über das Brustkrebsrisiko durch den Arzneimittelhersteller.
🔟 Im Jahr 2013 zahlte Pfizer 55 Millionen US-Dollar, um die strafrechtlichen Vorwürfe zu klären, Patienten und Ärzte nicht vor den Risiken von Nierenerkrankungen, Nierenschäden, Nierenversagen und akuter interstitieller Nephritis zu warnen, die durch den Protonenpumpenhemmer Protonix verursacht werden.
1️⃣1️⃣ Im Jahr 2013 bezahlte Pfizer 288 Millionen Dollar, um die Klagen von 2.700 Personen beizulegen, denen zufolge das Medikament Chantix Selbstmordgedanken und schwere psychische Störungen verursacht.
web.archive.org
Pfizer Unit to Settle Charges Of Lying About Heart Valve (Published 1994)
Peter Duesberg's website on AIDS :
https://www.duesberg.com/
Peter Duesberg's cancer website :
https://mcb.berkeley.edu/labs/duesberg/pages/index.html#
https://www.duesberg.com/
Peter Duesberg's cancer website :
https://mcb.berkeley.edu/labs/duesberg/pages/index.html#