...
So funktioniert Global Governance: Singapur ändert für G30 und Weltwirtschaftsforum seine Verfassung

" (...) So funktioniert Global Governance. So funktionieren all die „informellen“ Regierungsclubs und öffentlich-privaten Clubs von Regierungsvertretern und Konzernen, die weltweite Standards für die Politik setzen, die zwar formell unverbindlich sind, aber komischerweise – wenn nötig – doch von fast allen Parlamenten beschlossen und fast allen Verwaltungen umgesetzt werden. Denn einerseits haben die Regierungsvertreter das in den informellen Runden versprochen, andererseits haben diejenigen in den Machtzentren, insbesondere in Washington, starke Druckmittel, um diejenigen, die nicht mitmachen wollen, umzustimmen.(...)."

https://norberthaering.de/macht-kontrolle/singapur-g30-wef/

...
Bone loss approximately 1 year after the toxic mRNA injection

Doctors Warn Millions Of Patients Experiencing ‘Lifetime of Bone Loss’ One Year After Jab

26 November 2023 Sean Adl-Tabatabai

https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/doctors-warn-millions-of-patients-experiencing-lifetime-of-bone-loss-one-year-after-jab/

...
In 2021, a total of 879,429 deaths were registered in the Philippines, an increase of 43.2 percent from 613,936 in 2020.

https://t.me/freedragonuk/8514

https://psa.gov.ph/content/registered-deaths-philippines-2021

...
Wer sich für die imperialen Kriege im Interesse der Kapitalklasse einsetzt, steht rechts. Wo steht Putin ? Eine kleine Einführung in den politischen Kompass von Marx, übersetzt aus dem Deutschen :

Was ist „Rechts“, was ist „Links“? | Von Rainer Rupp

" (...) Es kann nicht schaden, sich dabei an Marx als Kompass zu erinnern. Gegen Krieg ist links – und deshalb sind die Grünen rechts. Wer für die Rettung der Bankprofite eintritt, ist rechts, wer für bessere Arbeitsbedingungen im Gesundheitswesen, in der Altenpflege kämpft, ist links. Wer Abrüstung, den Abzug der ausländischen Truppen aus Deutschland und den Austritt aus der NATO fordert, ist links, wer Kriegskredite bewilligen lässt, wie Herr Scholz und seine Entourage, ist rechts. Wer den Notstand der Demokratie verordnet und wer dazu strammsteht, ist rechts, wer dagegen opponiert und die demokratischen Rechte verteidigt, ist links. Solche einfach zu begreifenden Inhalte führen nicht zu einer abgehobenen Theoriedebatte, das ist kein Laborprogramm, sondern ein praktisches Aktionsprogramm.

Ergänzen sollte man noch: Wer Russenhass predigt und antislawischen Rassismus, der ist rechts. Wer für Völkerverständigung, wer für Freundschaft mit Russland und China eintritt, der ist links.

Und wer dann fragt, ist Putin eigentlich rechts? – dem sage ich: Der Putin ist natürlich ein absoluter Linker: Er steht auf der Seite des Antifaschismus. Er ist ein Antiimperialist. Er ist ein Verteidiger der UN-Charta. Er tritt für eine multipolare Weltordnung gleichberechtigter, souveräner Staaten ein. Und er hat das Wirtschaftssystem in Russland dahingehend verändert, dass dort jetzt Staatskapitalismus besteht, also nicht die Kapitalisten bestimmen, was der Staat zu tun hat, sondern umgekehrt, der Staat bestimmt, was die Oligarchen als Staatsbeamte zu tun haben.

Die uns geläufigen linken Forderungen, alle Verstaatlichungsforderungen für die Bodenschätze, die Grundstoffindustrie, die Energieversorgung, die Verkehrswege – alles umgesetzt, alles ist wieder in staatlicher Hand. Das sind alles Gründe, warum Putin dem Imperialismus als Feind gilt. Deshalb ist der russische Präsident für die imperialistische Propaganda ein „Rechter“, aber damit haben wir selbst hierzulande zur Genüge Erfahrungen.

Klaus Hartmann ist stellvertretender Bundesvorsitzender des Deutschen Freidenker-Verbandes. "

https://apolut.net/was-ist-rechts-was-ist-links-von-rainer-rupp/

...
Anyone who supports imperial wars in the interests of the capital class is on the right. Where is Putin? A small introduction to Marx's political compass, translated from German :

What is “right” and what is “left”? | By Rainer Rupp

" (...) It can't hurt to remember Marx as a compass. Against war is on the left - and that's why the Greens are on the right. Those who advocate saving bank profits are on the right, those who advocate better working conditions in the healthcare system, who fights in elderly care is on the left. Anyone who calls for disarmament, the withdrawal of foreign troops from Germany and the withdrawal from NATO is on the left; anyone who approves war loans, like Mr. Scholz and his entourage, is on the right. Anyone who decrees a democratic emergency and those who stand up for it are right-wing, those who oppose it and defend democratic rights are left-wing. Such easy-to-understand content does not lead to a detached theoretical debate, this is not a laboratory program, but a practical action program.

One should add: Anyone who preaches hatred of Russians and anti-Slavic racism is right-wing. Anyone who advocates international understanding and friendship with Russia and China is on the left.

And who then asks, is Putin actually right-wing? – I say to him: Putin is of course an absolute leftist: he is on the side of anti-fascism. He is an anti-imperialist. He is a defender of the UN Charter. He advocates a multipolar world order of equal, sovereign states. And he changed the economic system in Russia so that there is now state capitalism there. Now it is not the capitalists who determine what the state has to do, but vice versa, the state determines what the oligarchs as state officials have to do.

The left-wing demands that we are familiar with, all the demands for nationalization of natural resources, the basic industry, the energy supply, the transport routes - everything has been implemented, everything is back in state hands. These are all reasons why Putin is considered an enemy of imperialism. That's why the Russian president is a "right-winger" for imperialist propaganda, but we have enough experience with that ourselves in this country.

Klaus Hartmann is deputy federal chairman of the German Freethinkers Association. "

https://apolut.net/was-ist-rechts-was-ist-links-von-rainer-rupp/

Pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, interviewed by Andrija Klaric (who is the organiser of a conference in Croatia next weekend).
Dr Cole describes the likely mechanism of increased cancers after these intentionally toxic injections, suppression of normal “immune surveillance”, which routinely detects cells that express mutated, no longer self proteins on their surfaces & kills them.
If that host protection mechanism is hindered, very rapidly developing cancers will arise. Unfortunately that’s what the data is showing, notably in young people.
Best wishes
Mike

This is my friend and colleague, Dr Sucharit Bakdhi, speaking at the same event in the German parliament that I spoke last in.
This was organised by the political party, Alternative fur Deutschland. This is the party of firebrand MEP Christine Anderson.
Best wishes
Mike

Ivor Cummins explains very clearly how not only has the “pandemic” been a crock of lies, but that “climate change” is if possible an even worse fraud.
This is a clip from his interview with my colleague, Andrija Klaric of Croatia. I’m sure you can find the full interview easily enough if of interest.
I concur with Ivor.
Best wishes
Mike

If you’ve not heard of Dr John Coleman, a former intelligence officer, and his book, “The Committee of 300”, I strongly recommend that you acquaint yourself with him and his work of decades.
Best wishes
Mike

https://x.com/spartajustice/status/1649130156420657163?s=46&t=WSMLCQNckomGtNidcKiTmw

https://archive.org/details/coleman-john-the-conspirators-hierarchy-the-committee-of-300

https://correlation-canada.org/covid-19-vaccine-associated-mortality-in-the-southern-hemisphere/

This is the origin of the extraordinary statement that the covid19 injections have saved no lives & caused 17 million deaths to date.

Best wishes
Mike

Honestly, I often feel I’m living in the time of Kafka.
If passed by both chambers of the French parliament, it will become a serious offence in France to share even expert opinion & to tell the truth about a medical intervention, if that opinion is deemed to have the effect of promoting people to discontinue a medical practice that is arguably dangerous.
The ghastly problem with laws like this is, if applied the way they clearly intend, are so-called absolute offences.
If you commit them, you’re guilty.
So if I was to share my expert opinion as someone with 30y+ in applied drug discovery, and was to point out a number of objectively well-established mechanisms of toxicity, if that caused (or was deemed likely to cause) people to henceforth decline mRNA injections, which of course is my hope, I could be sent to jail and/or fined EU 15,000.
I look at this with foreboding. Not because it will in any way discourage me from speaking out when we’re in France (as we are often, being fortunate enough to have a flat over there). That’s not the problem.
It’s the general chilling effect on free speech that’s the problem.
Often there are gatherings & for reasons I don’t understand, I’m more often recognized when walking around in France than anywhere in U.K. with possible exception of London.
Imagine you’re a curious member of the French public. You’d have been thumped about the head about the “mental ill-health of conspiracy theorists” and warned not to interact with them.
It’s so madcap bonkers that half of me is roaring with laughter about the whole thing.
Please look at the commonplace attributes that the piece (if not the bill) asserts are often found in these dangerous, non-compliant people.
Whh not go the whole hog and say “If you fail to vote for either of the two largest parties, you may be sent to prison”.
Best wishes
Mike

Tim Ball - The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Owm25OHGglk

Kary Mullis Interview Except (1993)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8fVSiUO66k

Ein Kommentar vom Prof. Hockertz dazu :

https://t.me/ProfHockertz/3159