A shocking statement from the Archbishop.
Despite that, nothing seems wholly implausible today, imo.
Best wishes
Mike

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/archbishop-vigano-catholics-must-seriously-consider-the-possibility-that-francis-isnt-the-pope/

"This [Denis Rancourt's mortality analysis] doesnt mean a virus (detectable with PCR and Antigen tests) isn’t circulating,
It just means people are dying with C19 not from it.
Until the Vax hits and it gets worse."

Kevin McKernan
Founder of Medicinal Genomics
https://x.com/Kevin_McKernan/status/1709400680140620261

This DNA contamination is just a further confirmation that these jabs aren't safe. By now we know that several aspects of this experimental injection aren't safe:

- chemicals used in the LNP
- pseudo uridine in the modified RNA.
- the chosen part if the virus: the spike protein

So, now we can add:
- DNA contamination

And now just imagine this. 👇

1) During these winter periods you tell all of the people that experience winter season illnesses and symptoms that they cannot go to a doctor for early diagnosis and treatment but they have to be tested by the government.

2) After that you tell them they are all sick and they have to isolate themselves and their loved ones for at least 14 days.

Totally ignoring all possible other realistic causes and at the same time preventing early treatments of these other causes.

3) You have effectively created concentration camps at home behind the states propaganda box by denying them early diagnosis and treatment.

4) The old and weak and those with comorbidities will either die during this period or become so sick and weak that treatment will be to late.

All of those that complied will also help spread Infectious diseases like bacterial pneumonia because they are allowed to get worse and worse without receiving proper treatment. Infecting their loved ones at home etc

5) This is in essence a strategy to help spread, increase, extend all kinds of disease.

This strategy is also much cheaper and more effective than having to drag people out of their homes in winter time to put them on trains and transport them to concentration camps.

They are doing it all by themselves because you have misled them and scared the shit out of them.

NET ZERO has never been about ecology, environmentalism, or science. Net Zero has ALWAYS been only about one thing: MONEY.

https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1709458310590550199

This clip from Denis Rancourt is a MUST WATCH.

He looks into all-cause mortality before the rollout of the vaccine and after the rollout of the vaccine.

The “Covid” dead live longer !

The population of every country is growing, so there are more deaths every year than the previous year. The statistics often did not take this into account and, for example, all people who died of cancer and had previously tested positive for Corona were incorrectly included in the statistics of alleged Covid deaths. In addition, the secondary disease pneumonia (after the flu or cold) was not treated with effective antibiotics as usual. The life-threatening intubation combined with opiates, morphine and other sedatives often resulted in the death of patients. Early treatment at home or at the doctor's office was specifically prevented. The fear of death fueled by the media and politics and the locking of people at home without sunlight and exercise have negatively influenced the immune system. This had nothing to do with health or real science. Nevertheless, the perpetrators (the supranational murderers) in Europe did not manage to achieve the excess mortality as evidence of the invented "plandemic". There was and is a lot of evidence of the fake statistics and pseudoscientific studies. And in recent years there have been many people who were taken to hospital with harmless bone fractures and died there.

In Austria, the alleged “Covid deaths” were older than the average life expectancy. Here is a fragment from a magazine that wanted to stir up fear against "Covid" and coincidentally correctly stated the age of those who died in Austria :

„The average age of those who died from Covid-19 was 81.2 years for men and 85.5 years for women.“

Source :

Here you can compare the average life expectancy in Austria:
https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/18642/umfrage/lebenserwartung-in-oesterreich/

Here are the ages of the “Covid” deaths in Austria:
https://www.derstandard.de/story/2000144509691/weniger-corona-tote-im-jahr-2022-aber-hoehere-sterblichkeit

🔥 Russia's PMI outperforms the world

Following the release of S&P Global's PMI data for September, J.P.Morgan put together their own report summarizing some of the results.

Thus, it turned out that the Russian manufacturing sector is blooming. In fact, Russia ranks first in the world in terms of manufacturing PMI, followed by Kazakhstan.

In contrast, Germany finds itself at the bottom of the ranking, confirming that manufacturing in the country is now on the verge of disaster.

Follow us on Telegram and Twitter

Steps:
1) Credit downgrade so nations dump US treasuries
2) Rapidly raise rates
3) Restrict swap lines causing Dollar shortage
4) Stage "incident"
5) Dollar skyrockets
6) Panic spreads to financial system
7) Nations collapse
7) Print trillions & buy your cheap debt
8) Great Reset

Herzinfarkte steigen um 30 % !

https://twitter.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1625759153623912448

🔥To watch Brighteon University Summit you have to fill up the form. A name and email nothing else. Well Worth it.🔥

Brighteon University - BrightU.com
https://www.brightu.com/

PART 1 ( SOURCE : https://t.me/robinmggroup/1294407 ) :

Step 1. was this 🔽

On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten, along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charite Hospital, along with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study claiming to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus identified first only days before in Wuhan. The Drosten article was titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020).

The news was greeted with immediate endorsement by the corrupt Director General of WHO, Tedros Adhanom, the first non-medical doctor to head WHO. Since then the Drosten-backed test for the virus, called a real-time or RT-PCR test, has spread via WHO worldwide, as the most used test protocol to determine if a person might have COVID-19, the illness.

On November 27 a highly-respected group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists and related scientists published a call for Eurosurveillance to retract the January 23, 2020 Drosten article. Their careful analysis of the original piece is damning. Theirs is a genuine “peer review.”

They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “fatal” scientific incompetence and flaws in promoting their test.

To begin with, as the critical scientists reveal, the paper that established the Drosten PCR test for the Wuhan strain of coronavirus that has subsequently been adopted with indecent haste by the Merkel government along with WHO for worldwide use–resulting in severe lockdowns globally and an economic and social catastrophe–was never peer-reviewed before its publication by Eurosurveillance journal. The critics point out that,

“the Corman-Drosten paper was submitted to Eurosurveillance on January 21st 2020 and accepted for publication on January 22nd 2020. On January 23rd 2020 the paper was online.”

Incredibly, the Drosten test protocol, which he had already sent to WHO in Geneva on 17 January, was officially recommended by WHO as the worldwide test to determine presence of Wuhan coronavirus, even before the paper had been published.

As the critical authors point out, for a subject so complex and important to world health and security, a serious 24-hour “peer review” from at least two experts in the field is not possible. The critics point out that Drosten and his co-author Dr. Chantal Reusken, did not disclose a glaring conflict of interest. Both were also members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. Further, as reported by BBC and Google Statistics, on January 21 there were a world total of 6 deaths being attributed to the Wuhan virus. They ask, “Why did the authors assume a challenge for public health laboratories while there was no substantial evidence at that time to indicate that the outbreak was more widespread than initially thought?” Another co-author of the Drosten paper that gave a cover of apparent scientific credibility to the Drosten PCR procedure was head of the company who developed the test being marketed today, with the blessing of WHO, in the hundreds of millions, Olfert Landt, of Tib-Molbiol in Berlin, but Landt did not disclose that pertinent fact in the Drosten paper either.

Certainly nothing suspicious or improper here, or? It would be relevant to know if Drosten, the Merkel chief scientific advisor for COVID-19, Germany’s de facto “Tony Fauci,” gets a percentage for each test sold by Tib-Molbiol in their global marketing agreement with Roche.

False Positives?

Since late January 2020, world mainstream media has inundated us all with frightening hourly updates on “the total number of coronavirus infected.” Usually they simply add each daily increase to a global total of “confirmed cases,” presently over 66 million. Alarming, but for the fact that, as Pieter Borger and his fellow scientific collaborators point out, “confirmed cases” is a nonsense number. Why?

PART 2 ( SOURCE : https://t.me/robinmggroup/1294408 )

The Borger report identifies what they call “ten fatal problems” in the Drosten paper of last January. Here we take up the most glaring that can easily be grasped by most laypeople.

Drosten & co. gave confusing unspecified primer and probe sequences. The critics note, “This high number of variants not only is unusual, but it also is highly confusing for laboratories. These six unspecified positions could easily result in the design of several different alternative primer sequences which do not relate to SARS-CoV-2… the confusing unspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol. These unspecified positions should have been designed unequivocally.” They add that

“RT-PCR is not recommended for primary diagnostics of infection. This is why the RT-PCR Test used in clinical routine for detection of COVID-19 is not indicated for COVID-19 diagnosis on a regulatory basis.”

Amplification Cycles

But even more damning for Drosten is the fact that he mentioned nowhere of a test being positive or negative, or indeed what defines a positive or negative result! The Borger report notes, “These types of virological diagnostic tests must be based on a SOP (Standard Operational Protocol), including a validated and fixed number of PCR cycles (Ct value) after which a sample is deemed positive or negative. The maximum reasonably reliable Ct value is 30 cycles. Above a Ct of 35 cycles, rapidly increasing numbers of false positives must be expected… scientific studies show that only non-infectious (dead) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35.” (emphasis added).

The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles and, reportedly, presently the German health officials do as well. Little wonder that as the number of tests is ramped up in the onset of winter flu season, PCR “positives” in Germany and elsewhere explode. As the critical authors point out, were the health authorities to specify 35 cycles maximum, the number of corona positive would be only less than 3% the present number! They note, “an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless (a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30). All this should be communicated very clearly.

It is a significant mistake that the Corman-Drosten paper does not mention the maximum Ct value at which a sample can be unambiguously considered as a positive or a negative test-result. This important cycle threshold limit is also not specified in any follow-up submissions to date.” The authors add,

“The fact that these PCR products have not been validated at molecular level is another striking error of the protocol, making any test based upon it useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” (emphasis added).

In simple English, the entire edifice of the Gates foundation, the Merkel government, the WHO and WEF as well as the case for de facto forced untested vaccines, rests on results of a PCR test for coronavirus that is not worth a hill of beans. The test of Drosten and WHO is more or less, scientific crap.

„«Sie sind Schweinehunde», titelte die linke «Tageszeitung» am 15. November 2021 und meinte damit alle Impfgegner. Im Text ist von «Staatsfeinden», die Rede, «die in voller Absicht an unseliges deutsches demokratiefeindliches Denken und Handeln anknüpfen». Die ehemals liberale «Zeit» identifizierte Massnahmenskeptiker einige Tage später als «zweite Seuche», sie könnten mit Virusvarianten verglichen werden, die mutierten und gefährlicher würden.“

#WirVergessenNicht

https://www.nzz.ch/feuilleton/corona-medien-staatsfeinde-ungeimpfte-lauterbach-ld.1757085

t.me/Rosenbusch