The scam relies on an improper framing : the environmental damage has been mixed together with the climate issue to drive us mad and divide us. I don't know anyone who doesn't believe in the extinction of animal species and insects.. Toxic chemical pollution and artificial genetic modification were the causes of species extinction. However, these environmental problems come from the same big business players who are also pushing the hysterical environmental and climate activism. With their propaganda slogans and appeals to conscience they try to impose a slavish system of social points and additional taxes on us. If some people can't think that far, then we can't help them.

At the latest during the fake pandemic, slogans like: "You should get vaccinated so that your grandma doesn't die, otherwise you're a murderer" should shaken us awake. A thinking person becomes particularly suspicious of such appeals to the conscience and checks whether logic and reason exist outside of the question of conscience. The propagandists know that our emotion reacts immediately, that is, before the cerebral cortex is activated, and that is why the emotionalized appeals are effective. Human evolution has given us a means of quickly escaping danger before the imminent danger is understood and perceived. It is our emotional mentality that does not want to investigate further, but wants to react immediately.

I think that the intentional confusion artificially introduced by the propaganda would have to be unraveled first in order for us to be able to entertain properly. For this purpose, we should treat the problem of environmental pollution and environmental damage separately. The subject of "climate" and the allegedly anthropogenic global warming is something completely different here. In order to avoid confusion, it would be good to first ask the interlocutor: "What do you mean, the environment or the climate?". Otherwise you will argue for so long that you will not realize that the fraudulent perpetrators have already won this information war. We seem to have fallen victim to the false framing imposed on us by scammers. Environmental and climate activism must be separated. But the emotionalized activists are unable to do so. You have to treat them like the mentally handicapped, with a lot of understanding for their underdeveloped cerebral cortex. Perhaps this is also the point why some well-educated people have not grasped the Corona scam and why their fear of dying dominated their logical thinking. If the environmental and climate activists (or the vaccinating doctors) are inaccessible to rational reasoning, their emotionality seems to be at least dominant. In addition, many people cannot think differently (excuse me, actually : "feel"") because it will damage their wallets.

"Yeadon, Delingpole and the pandemic myth"
By Kathy Gyngell

"JAMES DELINGPOLE: You and I would agree that the human immune system is a marvel of God’s creation.

DR MICHAEL YEADON: Yeah.

JD: So marvellous that we never needed vaccines. Even in the days of cowpox and smallpox, we never needed vaccines to protect us from things that our body was perfectly capable of dealing with all by itself?

MY: Yes. We’ve even got the evidence in the case of influenza, whatever that really is, that the industry made vaccines against influenza, which is at least similar to the claims for Covid, in that we were told they were both respiratory viruses transmitted in your breath, I guess, and the people who are most at risk are the ones who are elderly and they’re already ill. I think that profile is the same. And in fact, in my view, there’s never been a pandemic, and Covid-19 is a psy-op, and it’s really just flu-like illness misattributed by using an untrustworthy diagnostic method, the PCR.

I remember thinking, immunologically, ‘Why is it that elderly people are vulnerable to these illnesses?’ And I think the answer is because they don’t respond well to the illness, whether it’s viral or whether it’s not viral. Either way their homeostatic mechanisms to return them to good health are either not responsive enough or they’re almost clipping the trees already in terms of health – and a small deficit and they die. In which case, if they won’t respond well to whatever this disease is, why in the world would anyone think they would respond well to a piece of the organism?

And the answer is you’d be mad to think so, because they wouldn’t, would they? If you don’t respond to the whole illness, you’re not going to respond to a bit of the illness and suddenly become protected. It’s illogical. It’s so illogical. And I remember people saying to me, ‘Oh well, you clever dick, we’ve got flu vaccines and they work.’ And I said, ‘No, no, the boot’s on the other foot, they don’t work.’ And that might be why they don’t work, that the people they’re given to are not capable of responding to them, because it’s the same problem for why they’re vulnerable in the first place. In other words, back to your comment, James, [Covid] vaccination was never an appropriate . . . was never, ever an appropriate response."

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/yeadon-delingpole-and-the-pandemic-myth/

Yep and adding double has little effect. An analogy I use is to image water flowing one way and another down (day/night) Sticking a pole into the river bed is adding Co2, the water still flows around it since Kirchhoff's laws are absorbers of heat are also emitters.
Adding more logs doesn't block the water or make a dam as each is behind the other covering that same "band" of reflectivity (in all directs)
Holmes's paper actually destroys GHG theory.
A good example being Titan and Saturn having the same TSI. Titan has 8000X more methane than earth or more relevant 3X that of Saturn. Titan is colder 😊

𝗔𝗟𝗔𝗥𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗚: ‘Unusual Surge’ in Severe Myocarditis Cases Strikes Newborns and Infants in the UK

The WHO issued a warning regarding an “unusual surge” of myocarditis cases in babies that were born within the United Kingdom.

The increase in myocarditis has been dramatic. A hospital in the South Wales region reported only one myocarditis case in infants and newborns over the past six years.

However, over a span of less than a year, between June 2022 and April 2023, “ten babies under 28 days of age presented with symptoms of myocarditis” at that same hospital.

“I know what you’re thinking at this point,” said Epoch Times host Roman Balmakov. “What could have possibly led to this increase in myocarditis cases in babies during the years 2022 to 2023? Could it have anything to do with the large-scale push to get everyone in the country, including pregnant women, fully vaccinated?”

Full Video: https://bit.ly/Oscar-Adames

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Socials

‘Long Vax’ Enters Mainstream Conversation: Harvard and Yale Investigate Its Liked to the Shots

Some 11% of previously-infected Americans are still reporting long COVID symptoms. You have to wonder, how much of that 11% is actually “long vax” instead?

Article: https://bit.ly/44flsG2

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Socials

---
ONLY FOR "VACCINATED"

‘Alarming’ Sevenfold Increase in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome Linked to COVID-19 and Vaccine

“Of the 14 reported cases ... not a single case of SJS/TEN (Stevens-Johnson Syndrome) was reported in an unvaccinated individual.”

Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis are usually caused by drugs or infections. Typical symptoms of both diseases include peeling skin, fever, pain, a flat, red rash, and blisters and sores on the mucous membranes .

https://t.me/VigilantFox/9613

I've belatedly realised Crichton's brilliance, and intend to read State of Fear ASAP. Here is Crichton demolishing 'consensus science':

"Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period."

Agree. Did you read his excellent book State of fear? All about the falsification of climate data. He provides by the way,a complete appendix of papers cited at the end. The novel is an excuse to explain this giant hoodwink. He died shortly after...a heart attack or cancer ,can't remember but it was fast...and convenient...I can't help but imagine what novel he could have written about the past three years. He could have connected the dots like no one else.

Peru declares national emergency amid rising cases of Guillain Barre Syndrome

https://www.opindia.com/2023/07/national-emergency-declared-in-peru-amid-guillain-barre-syndrome-post-covid-complications/

...
Did you know that beauty spots were often used to conceal smallpox scars and syphilis sores? Or that powdered wigs were a way to disguise baldness from venereal disease ?

https://artuk.org/discover/stories/love-is-contagious-how-sexual-diseases-contaminated-art-history

" (...) Although historians dispute the origins of the disease, many believe that syphilis was first brought to Europe when Christopher Columbus returned from the New World in 1493.

Alternatively, it has been argued that the disease originated during the Italian War of 1494–1498, breaking out amongst the French troops of Charles VIII who besieged Naples. Upon realising there were chancres upon their genitals, the soldiers then experienced itchy rashes and weeping pustules.

Consequently, the Italians called it the 'French disease' and the French called it the 'Neapolitan disease'.

In the aftermath of the battle, it swept across the entirety of Europe. Spreading from east to west, the Russians called it the 'Polish disease' and the Poles called it the 'German disease'. In Britain (perhaps because our neighbours were further away) it became widely known as 'the great pox', although many referred to it as the 'French disease'.(...)."

https://artuk.org/discover/stories/love-is-contagious-how-sexual-diseases-contaminated-art-history

...
By the seventeenth century, a severe and widespread phobia of the disease came into existence and was coined 'syphilophobia'. In 1676, the physician Richard Wiseman described the emergence of this paranoia. He wrote 'many of these hypochondriacks have come to [me]. They commonly went away... unsatisfied, nor could they quiet their minds til they found some undertake that would comply with them.'

During this period, quack doctors often made a profit by trading on the fears of syphilophobes.

https://artuk.org/discover/stories/love-is-contagious-how-sexual-diseases-contaminated-art-history