Forwarded from Gas axe
DO NOT eat pineapple unless certified organic please.
Mango is another you shouldn't ever eat unless organic certified.
Bananas are normally laced with pesticides FYI.
Papaya also only organic certified.
I'm telling you this because i grow these fruits and most are toxic unless they are grown organically
Some fruits are prone to pest and insect attacked this they use pesticides to control it.
Avacados, jackfruit bread fruit all super foods have natural protection and need no pesticides in my experience.
The list is kind of crazy of toxic laced fruits and vegetables.
Also certain fruits are seasonal like a mango but they can be prevoked to flower using hormones in un natural seasonal period but must be fumigated constantly.
My local farmers di this because the value and demand is ver high. We as locals refuse to eat them because we know they are toxic..
Mango is another you shouldn't ever eat unless organic certified.
Bananas are normally laced with pesticides FYI.
Papaya also only organic certified.
I'm telling you this because i grow these fruits and most are toxic unless they are grown organically
Some fruits are prone to pest and insect attacked this they use pesticides to control it.
Avacados, jackfruit bread fruit all super foods have natural protection and need no pesticides in my experience.
The list is kind of crazy of toxic laced fruits and vegetables.
Also certain fruits are seasonal like a mango but they can be prevoked to flower using hormones in un natural seasonal period but must be fumigated constantly.
My local farmers di this because the value and demand is ver high. We as locals refuse to eat them because we know they are toxic..
Forwarded from Saralimonadevancitroenen
I am a singer and singingteacher. So my body is my instrument and very sensitive and ‘finetuned’.
I have felt this, for over a 100 times, since the beginning of the shots, so clearly.
In rooms where lot’s of recently vaxed people are, or after hugging a recently vaccinated person, and, depressingly enough, also very much so with the people whom I suspect have severe side effects as in ‘long covid’ (developed after the shot) for example.
I get: a headache, very loud and brutal sneezes- hayfever-like complaints, dripping nose, nausea, stomach ache, and a strange sensation on my skin, a subtle prickling, especially on the face after kisses on cheeks. And often in the evening on the verge of feeling a bit under the weather.
I figured: perhaps I’m crazy, perhaps it’s because of my distrust of the stuff like a reversed placebo effect, psychosomatic.
Or perhaps it is so that I am just sensitive and sharp because I know my body and I should trust my instincts and fysical reactions and my bullshit radar works just fine.
I decided to run with all the options. 🤷🏻♀️
No use being hysterical about it. I am not scared. I am angry, yes.
I hugged those morons knowing they could make me sick, while they scorned me for potentially making them sick. That wasn’t such a great period.
I take extra vitamine C, D, selenium and zinc, sometimes NAC for a couple days/ a week, once every half year whenever under the weather ivermectine for a couple of days and extra stuff like kurkuma, garlic, ginger, onions, peppers, pineapple on the menu, added sugar to a minimum, a period of intermitted fasting every couple of months, that kind of stuff. That was the stuff i could think of to integrate in my life to try to try to protect myself and my kid against other peoples poor judgement and lifechoices.
I have felt this, for over a 100 times, since the beginning of the shots, so clearly.
In rooms where lot’s of recently vaxed people are, or after hugging a recently vaccinated person, and, depressingly enough, also very much so with the people whom I suspect have severe side effects as in ‘long covid’ (developed after the shot) for example.
I get: a headache, very loud and brutal sneezes- hayfever-like complaints, dripping nose, nausea, stomach ache, and a strange sensation on my skin, a subtle prickling, especially on the face after kisses on cheeks. And often in the evening on the verge of feeling a bit under the weather.
I figured: perhaps I’m crazy, perhaps it’s because of my distrust of the stuff like a reversed placebo effect, psychosomatic.
Or perhaps it is so that I am just sensitive and sharp because I know my body and I should trust my instincts and fysical reactions and my bullshit radar works just fine.
I decided to run with all the options. 🤷🏻♀️
No use being hysterical about it. I am not scared. I am angry, yes.
I hugged those morons knowing they could make me sick, while they scorned me for potentially making them sick. That wasn’t such a great period.
I take extra vitamine C, D, selenium and zinc, sometimes NAC for a couple days/ a week, once every half year whenever under the weather ivermectine for a couple of days and extra stuff like kurkuma, garlic, ginger, onions, peppers, pineapple on the menu, added sugar to a minimum, a period of intermitted fasting every couple of months, that kind of stuff. That was the stuff i could think of to integrate in my life to try to try to protect myself and my kid against other peoples poor judgement and lifechoices.
Forwarded from Gina Nyguen
When I have contact or living with people who got 3rd shot and I can feel my energy is not good. But we have to familiar with this 😕 I guess our natural immunity will help us survive
Forwarded from Deleted Account
Pay a close attention. There is a Telegram channel named Agents of Innocence that exposes everything that has happened over the years. It covers everything related to America and Trump, and since it is currently accessible to everyone, don't be afraid to stop by and see for yourself and be sure to follow them. @The_Agents0flnn0cence
Forwarded from Gilberto
I know the word very well. Be sure!
Fascism is authoritarian corporatism. He is the fusion of the power of governments and corporations. Just read Mussolinis "The spririt of fascism"! Some more examples on definitions?
"Fascism is a form of rule of capitalism that secures its social power, but takes over the state apparatus to impose the interests and goals of the bourgeoisie with all its force. Its mass base is declassed elements of all classes, whom it seeks to mobilize with pseudo-socialist promises." (August Thalheimer 1928)
"Fascist structures of rule develop out of crisis situations of bourgeois-capitalist constituted systems. Fascism is thus a special form of capitalist structure of rule. Nowadays, the preoccupation with World War II and everyday excerpts from Nazi history has become a significant market segment of the entertainment industry. Instead of talking about causes and structures, people illustrate, psychologize and, above all, entertain - fascism staged as a culture-industrial spectacle. Here, the interpretations differ politically under state-supporting or capitalism-critical premises: While on one side the "National Socialist state of injustice" is inferred as "national socialism," as a "special path" or a departure from a symbiosis of capitalism and democracy declared to be natural, the other side emphasizes the significance of fascism as crisis solution management of capitalist rule. The concept of fascism makes it possible to name that process of transformation of bourgeois rule into a dictatorship with mass ideology and mass adherence under capitalist premises. According to this, fascism is not a turning away from capitalist relations, but rather a specific form of movement and rule under just such conditions." (Alex Busch 2001)
"Under the conditions of the overwhelmingly deep economic crisis that has broken in, the violent aggravation of the general crisis of capitalism, the revolutionization of the working masses, fascism has gone over to broad attack. The ruling bourgeoisie is more and more looking for its salvation in fascism in order to carry out the worst plundering measures against the working people, in order to prepare an imperialist predatory war, in order to prepare the invasion of the Soviet Union, the enslavement and division of China and to prevent the revolution by all these measures.
The imperialist circles seek to shift the whole burden of the crisis onto the shoulders of the working people. For this they need fascism.
They want to solve the problem of the markets by enslaving the weak peoples, by increasing colonial oppression and by redividing the world through war. For this they need fascism." https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/dimitrov/works/1935/08_02.htm
"Today's fascism is no longer manifested in a party or in a person, it lies in the daily training of people into authoritarian personalities, it lies in education, in short in the emerging totality of institutions and the state apparatus." (Rudi Dutschke 1968)
Fascism is authoritarian corporatism. He is the fusion of the power of governments and corporations. Just read Mussolinis "The spririt of fascism"! Some more examples on definitions?
"Fascism is a form of rule of capitalism that secures its social power, but takes over the state apparatus to impose the interests and goals of the bourgeoisie with all its force. Its mass base is declassed elements of all classes, whom it seeks to mobilize with pseudo-socialist promises." (August Thalheimer 1928)
"Fascist structures of rule develop out of crisis situations of bourgeois-capitalist constituted systems. Fascism is thus a special form of capitalist structure of rule. Nowadays, the preoccupation with World War II and everyday excerpts from Nazi history has become a significant market segment of the entertainment industry. Instead of talking about causes and structures, people illustrate, psychologize and, above all, entertain - fascism staged as a culture-industrial spectacle. Here, the interpretations differ politically under state-supporting or capitalism-critical premises: While on one side the "National Socialist state of injustice" is inferred as "national socialism," as a "special path" or a departure from a symbiosis of capitalism and democracy declared to be natural, the other side emphasizes the significance of fascism as crisis solution management of capitalist rule. The concept of fascism makes it possible to name that process of transformation of bourgeois rule into a dictatorship with mass ideology and mass adherence under capitalist premises. According to this, fascism is not a turning away from capitalist relations, but rather a specific form of movement and rule under just such conditions." (Alex Busch 2001)
"Under the conditions of the overwhelmingly deep economic crisis that has broken in, the violent aggravation of the general crisis of capitalism, the revolutionization of the working masses, fascism has gone over to broad attack. The ruling bourgeoisie is more and more looking for its salvation in fascism in order to carry out the worst plundering measures against the working people, in order to prepare an imperialist predatory war, in order to prepare the invasion of the Soviet Union, the enslavement and division of China and to prevent the revolution by all these measures.
The imperialist circles seek to shift the whole burden of the crisis onto the shoulders of the working people. For this they need fascism.
They want to solve the problem of the markets by enslaving the weak peoples, by increasing colonial oppression and by redividing the world through war. For this they need fascism." https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/dimitrov/works/1935/08_02.htm
"Today's fascism is no longer manifested in a party or in a person, it lies in the daily training of people into authoritarian personalities, it lies in education, in short in the emerging totality of institutions and the state apparatus." (Rudi Dutschke 1968)
www.marxists.org
The Fascist Offensive and the Tasks of the Communist International in the Struggle of the Working Class against Fascism
Frankfurter Schule: Theorie des autoritären Charakters
Die Theorie des autoritären Charakters der Kritischen Theorie der Frankfurter Schule von Horkheimer und Adorno beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, warum Teile der Gesellschaft „für faschistische Propaganda oder, allgemeiner, für autoritäre Meinungen“ empfänglich sind. „Sie geht davon aus, dass die Empfänglichkeit für solche Meinungen stärker vom Charakter als von bewussten politischen Überzeugungen oder Überlegungen abhängig sind. Diese Einsicht half verstehen, wie es historisch möglich war, dass die Unterstützerfront des Faschismus keineswegs vor der Arbeiterklasse halt machte. Die Gesellschaftstheorie war daher, wenn sie sich der Erklärung des Autoritarismus nicht verschließen wollte, auf Psychologie verwiesen.“[36] Unterschieden wird hierbei zwischen einem schwachen Ich und einem starken Ich. Danach ist bei dem schwachen Ich die Fähigkeit zur Selbstreflexion nur gering ausgeprägt. Es nimmt „gesellschaftliche Verhältnisse projektiv“ (Weyand) wahr und neigt somit zu Vorurteilen. Diese Theorie baut auf der Freud'schen Theorie auf: „Sie unterstellt ein spezifisch Historisches, nämlich die Existenz einer patriarchalen familiären Konstellation, in der sich aus dem Konflikt zwischen dem Kind und einem starken, übermächtigen Vater eine sadomasochistische Triebstruktur ausbildet und verfestigt.“ (Weyand) Das gilt ebenso für die freudsche Massenpsychologie, so wie sie von Adorno rezipiert wird. Nach Adorno hat „[d]ie faschistische Agitation ihr Zentrum in der Vorstellung des Führers (…), weil nur dies psychologische Bild die Idee des allmächtigen und drohenden Urvaters wiedererwecken kann.“[37]
Das schwache Ich bildet den widersprüchlichen Wunsch, sowohl Teil der Autorität und des dominanten Kollektivs zu sein, als auch sich dieser Autorität zu unterwerfen. Das „führt gemäß der damaligen Auffassung weiterhin dazu, dass das schwache Ich seine Aggressionen gegen Fremdgruppen richten muss, weil es nicht in der Lage ist, sie gegen Autoritäten der eigenen Gruppe zu richten. Indem das schwache Ich sich zum Mitglied eines geschichtsmächtigen Kollektivs phantasiert, setzt es sich zugleich ins Einverständnis mit der Autorität der eigenen Gruppe. Dieser Mechanismus erklärt, warum das schwache Ich als autoritäres nur auftritt, wenn es sich des heimlichen oder ausgesprochenen Einverständnisses der Autorität der Eigengruppe gewiss sein kann. Es rebelliert, aber es rebelliert konformistisch.“ (Jan Weyand)[38] Mit der konformistischen Rebellion ist eine außerordentliche narzisstische Befriedigung verbunden (Narzissmus der kleinen Differenzen nach Freud).[38][39] Vor diesem Hintergrund schreibt Horkheimer, sei „das Vorurteil des Hasses unverrückbar, weil es dem Subjekt gestattet, schlecht zu sein und sich dabei für gut zu halten.“[40]
Siehe auch: Autoritäre Persönlichkeit
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faschismustheorie#Die_Dimitroff-These
Die Theorie des autoritären Charakters der Kritischen Theorie der Frankfurter Schule von Horkheimer und Adorno beschäftigt sich mit der Frage, warum Teile der Gesellschaft „für faschistische Propaganda oder, allgemeiner, für autoritäre Meinungen“ empfänglich sind. „Sie geht davon aus, dass die Empfänglichkeit für solche Meinungen stärker vom Charakter als von bewussten politischen Überzeugungen oder Überlegungen abhängig sind. Diese Einsicht half verstehen, wie es historisch möglich war, dass die Unterstützerfront des Faschismus keineswegs vor der Arbeiterklasse halt machte. Die Gesellschaftstheorie war daher, wenn sie sich der Erklärung des Autoritarismus nicht verschließen wollte, auf Psychologie verwiesen.“[36] Unterschieden wird hierbei zwischen einem schwachen Ich und einem starken Ich. Danach ist bei dem schwachen Ich die Fähigkeit zur Selbstreflexion nur gering ausgeprägt. Es nimmt „gesellschaftliche Verhältnisse projektiv“ (Weyand) wahr und neigt somit zu Vorurteilen. Diese Theorie baut auf der Freud'schen Theorie auf: „Sie unterstellt ein spezifisch Historisches, nämlich die Existenz einer patriarchalen familiären Konstellation, in der sich aus dem Konflikt zwischen dem Kind und einem starken, übermächtigen Vater eine sadomasochistische Triebstruktur ausbildet und verfestigt.“ (Weyand) Das gilt ebenso für die freudsche Massenpsychologie, so wie sie von Adorno rezipiert wird. Nach Adorno hat „[d]ie faschistische Agitation ihr Zentrum in der Vorstellung des Führers (…), weil nur dies psychologische Bild die Idee des allmächtigen und drohenden Urvaters wiedererwecken kann.“[37]
Das schwache Ich bildet den widersprüchlichen Wunsch, sowohl Teil der Autorität und des dominanten Kollektivs zu sein, als auch sich dieser Autorität zu unterwerfen. Das „führt gemäß der damaligen Auffassung weiterhin dazu, dass das schwache Ich seine Aggressionen gegen Fremdgruppen richten muss, weil es nicht in der Lage ist, sie gegen Autoritäten der eigenen Gruppe zu richten. Indem das schwache Ich sich zum Mitglied eines geschichtsmächtigen Kollektivs phantasiert, setzt es sich zugleich ins Einverständnis mit der Autorität der eigenen Gruppe. Dieser Mechanismus erklärt, warum das schwache Ich als autoritäres nur auftritt, wenn es sich des heimlichen oder ausgesprochenen Einverständnisses der Autorität der Eigengruppe gewiss sein kann. Es rebelliert, aber es rebelliert konformistisch.“ (Jan Weyand)[38] Mit der konformistischen Rebellion ist eine außerordentliche narzisstische Befriedigung verbunden (Narzissmus der kleinen Differenzen nach Freud).[38][39] Vor diesem Hintergrund schreibt Horkheimer, sei „das Vorurteil des Hasses unverrückbar, weil es dem Subjekt gestattet, schlecht zu sein und sich dabei für gut zu halten.“[40]
Siehe auch: Autoritäre Persönlichkeit
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faschismustheorie#Die_Dimitroff-These
Wikipedia
Faschismustheorie
wissenschaftliche Theorien über das Phänomen des historischen Faschismus
Authoritarian Personality
The authoritarian personality theory designates a typical pattern of attitudes and personality traits that are said to form a potential for anti-democratic and fascist attitudes and behavior. the facets of authoritarian behavior or authoritarianism While many authors describe in a similar way, the theoretical explanations of how these authoritarian traits arise through specific psychological processing patterns of important emotional experiences during childhood and adolescence ( puberty and adolescence ) differ.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorit%C3%A4re_Pers%C3%B6nlichkeit
The authoritarian personality theory designates a typical pattern of attitudes and personality traits that are said to form a potential for anti-democratic and fascist attitudes and behavior. the facets of authoritarian behavior or authoritarianism While many authors describe in a similar way, the theoretical explanations of how these authoritarian traits arise through specific psychological processing patterns of important emotional experiences during childhood and adolescence ( puberty and adolescence ) differ.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autorit%C3%A4re_Pers%C3%B6nlichkeit
Wikipedia
Autoritäre Persönlichkeit
Theorie
Forwarded from Toby French
It is a very low percentage, but it has nearly doubled since the industrial revolution.
There are many scientific studies which claim CO2 is a nad thing and then there are studies which say it isn't.
The ones which do are proclaimed as MSM propaganda and the ones which don't are blindly believed as being carried out by honest ethical scientists.........
I am not claiming to know all the answers, but I do believe that if you only pick and choose things that support your argument (and if you are fully one side or another), then you are probably wrong.
There are vested interests from oil and gas companies, green energy advocates, basically I see the world as not being one giant plan, it is thousands and thousands of powerful actors all trying to get what they want and the best for them and their industry / company.
As I said, I like being here to read opposing points of view and I am sceptical about things from all sides.
Although in the end it's all rather academic as I am not going to spend my life trying to fight for one cause or another as I would rather spend my life enjoying my life! 😂
There are many scientific studies which claim CO2 is a nad thing and then there are studies which say it isn't.
The ones which do are proclaimed as MSM propaganda and the ones which don't are blindly believed as being carried out by honest ethical scientists.........
I am not claiming to know all the answers, but I do believe that if you only pick and choose things that support your argument (and if you are fully one side or another), then you are probably wrong.
There are vested interests from oil and gas companies, green energy advocates, basically I see the world as not being one giant plan, it is thousands and thousands of powerful actors all trying to get what they want and the best for them and their industry / company.
As I said, I like being here to read opposing points of view and I am sceptical about things from all sides.
Although in the end it's all rather academic as I am not going to spend my life trying to fight for one cause or another as I would rather spend my life enjoying my life! 😂
ANSWARE :
You can't get half pregnant !
I'm telling about the toxicity of mRNA "vaccinations" to a woman who works at the post office near me. She answered me: "Oh, you know, some say this, some say that". I told her there was only one truth and it was worth knowing. After all, it's about people's health. But she did not understand the importance of this matter. I'm obviously not intelligent enough to know how can a human underestimate such a matter. I can only assume that if so many people get "vaccinated", that's why others think "then it can't be that poisonous". That is the herd instinct and not thinking. In relation to this, someone told me: "Hot-Dogs" are also poisonous and he "vaccinated" himself for the third time in order to be able to travel.
Why am I saying this in relation to CO2 ? Because a woman cannot get half pregnant and half not. A "vaccination" cannot be half toxic. And the amount of CO2 that is in our atmosphere cannot be half harmful and half healthy.Again, it's worth taking a closer look to see what the truth is. People who don't inquire have to live like slaves and do what others tell them. They allow themselves to be exploited, send their children to war and are still schiziophrenically proud of having given their own children to a corporate monopoly. Terrible, but "normal".
I understand that some people are confused and don't know who to believe. But I don't understand at all why some people take the trouble to research, and why some people don't care. But I understand what is causing one of the worst problems in the world right now. It's ignorance and not CO2. I imagine you are on the Titanic. But you're also the one who sits in front of a mirror when the ship sinks and puts on makeup to look beautiful later. But there will be no "later". That's what I call "the ignorance". I'm afraid you wouldn't be able to finish your makeup.
You can't get half pregnant !
I'm telling about the toxicity of mRNA "vaccinations" to a woman who works at the post office near me. She answered me: "Oh, you know, some say this, some say that". I told her there was only one truth and it was worth knowing. After all, it's about people's health. But she did not understand the importance of this matter. I'm obviously not intelligent enough to know how can a human underestimate such a matter. I can only assume that if so many people get "vaccinated", that's why others think "then it can't be that poisonous". That is the herd instinct and not thinking. In relation to this, someone told me: "Hot-Dogs" are also poisonous and he "vaccinated" himself for the third time in order to be able to travel.
Why am I saying this in relation to CO2 ? Because a woman cannot get half pregnant and half not. A "vaccination" cannot be half toxic. And the amount of CO2 that is in our atmosphere cannot be half harmful and half healthy.Again, it's worth taking a closer look to see what the truth is. People who don't inquire have to live like slaves and do what others tell them. They allow themselves to be exploited, send their children to war and are still schiziophrenically proud of having given their own children to a corporate monopoly. Terrible, but "normal".
I understand that some people are confused and don't know who to believe. But I don't understand at all why some people take the trouble to research, and why some people don't care. But I understand what is causing one of the worst problems in the world right now. It's ignorance and not CO2. I imagine you are on the Titanic. But you're also the one who sits in front of a mirror when the ship sinks and puts on makeup to look beautiful later. But there will be no "later". That's what I call "the ignorance". I'm afraid you wouldn't be able to finish your makeup.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
The notion that a ruthless monopolistic software salesman, who tried to swindle his business partner when absent from cancer, teamed up with "stakeholders" & governments to save humanity from diseases via "vaccinations" is one of the most absurd conspiracy theories of all time.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1668519945825574914
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1668519945825574914
Twitter
The notion that a ruthless monopolistic software salesman, who tried to swindle his business partner when absent from cancer, teamed up with "stakeholders" & governments to save humanity from diseases via "vaccinations" is one of the most absurd conspiracy…
Forwarded from PsyOps Memes
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Mike Batayeh: "I'm a card carrying member of the "New World Order."
Breaking Bad Star Mike Batayeh dead at 52 after ‘suffering a heart attack in his sleep.’
Breaking Bad Star Mike Batayeh dead at 52 after ‘suffering a heart attack in his sleep.’
Forwarded from Suavek
The left is not the left
The "Lefts" we see today cannot be real Lefts because they work for and are paid by capital/oligarchy.These are people who have no idea what they are doing and, like dream dancers, help the oligarchs with the agendas assigned to them.. They have no idea of the damage they are causing themselves. They are actually apolitical, but believe they are left-wing because they have no political education and because they were told so. PLEASE don't let the terms fool you. These terms are being changed in politics just like the definition of mRNA "vaccination" ( which is not a vaccination ) in medicine. In fact, given who these people work for, one could even say that those whom propaganda successfully presents to us as "leftists" are in fact ultra-rightists. But that's not all. These "leftists" only serve the oligarchs to create a kind of "leftist saturation feeling", to portray these stupid people as failures and idiots, in order to later calmly and with the consent of the general public abolish the governments and introduce stakeholder fascism. For it to come to this, the outrage must be great and the economy must be devastated. It would then say: "The left are to blame and they have to go". This is a trick. Real leftists have nothing to do with it at all, but are demonized and thrown out like a child with the dirty bathwater. The monopolists thereby got rid of the only ones who were wide awake enough to regulate excesses of power. The year 1933 in Germany is repeated, but this time worldwide. And the naïve people would then be just as enthusiastic about fascism as the Germans were then. But they would have no idea that it is fascism. You would think they finally defeated and got rid of the bad leftists. They would rejoice in their own demise.As the Germans did then, they will celebrate and give their fascist "saviors" flowers. As it was then, this joyful mood will not last long. Only then does disillusionment set in and they will say they didn't know.
The "Lefts" we see today cannot be real Lefts because they work for and are paid by capital/oligarchy.These are people who have no idea what they are doing and, like dream dancers, help the oligarchs with the agendas assigned to them.. They have no idea of the damage they are causing themselves. They are actually apolitical, but believe they are left-wing because they have no political education and because they were told so. PLEASE don't let the terms fool you. These terms are being changed in politics just like the definition of mRNA "vaccination" ( which is not a vaccination ) in medicine. In fact, given who these people work for, one could even say that those whom propaganda successfully presents to us as "leftists" are in fact ultra-rightists. But that's not all. These "leftists" only serve the oligarchs to create a kind of "leftist saturation feeling", to portray these stupid people as failures and idiots, in order to later calmly and with the consent of the general public abolish the governments and introduce stakeholder fascism. For it to come to this, the outrage must be great and the economy must be devastated. It would then say: "The left are to blame and they have to go". This is a trick. Real leftists have nothing to do with it at all, but are demonized and thrown out like a child with the dirty bathwater. The monopolists thereby got rid of the only ones who were wide awake enough to regulate excesses of power. The year 1933 in Germany is repeated, but this time worldwide. And the naïve people would then be just as enthusiastic about fascism as the Germans were then. But they would have no idea that it is fascism. You would think they finally defeated and got rid of the bad leftists. They would rejoice in their own demise.As the Germans did then, they will celebrate and give their fascist "saviors" flowers. As it was then, this joyful mood will not last long. Only then does disillusionment set in and they will say they didn't know.
Out of the ideological cage - Part 2 :
The "invisible hand" and what the Chicago Mafia ( sorry : "school" ) made of it
The shortest explanation :
Normal, benevolent leftists :
The real left tries to put a stop to the excesses of power (since 2020 visible to the blind) through regulations.
She knows that no monopoly regulates itself and must be regulated. These people know that a giant theory was made out of a casual subordinate clause from Adam Smith ("The Invisible Hand"). This theory represents one of the greatest scams of the 20th century and has been taught for years as the false foundation of economics. The purpose is to prevent government regulation of monopolies. The real left knows the fraud, but unfortunately has no influence on the corrupted universities to publicly denounce this fraud (similar to what is currently happening in the medical field). This left wants to regulate the monopolies so that such criminal mafia structures as Pfizer (monopoly mafia) cannot rules dictate to your government (see: compulsory vaccination). This left does not exaggerate with the regulations and does not hinder the economy. But she knows that not everything can regulate itself. Have you seen a criminal monopoly that regulates itself? Is that maybe Big Pharma? Have you seen a market shark self-regulate to the point where it wouldn't eat governments? Like any theory, the "invisible hand" mentioned in passing by Adam Smith has limitations in its applicability. That's what the theories are all about. But to make an axiom or a kind of religion out of this theory was unscientific and the worst scientific fraud of the 20th century.
The "evil" / not benevolent left :
currently stupid actors and puppets who are set up and paid for by the monopolists to defame the old, good idea of "left" (unfortunately with success) and finally to abolish the "bad left" governments. They are to be replaced by stakeholder fascism. The old, good function of a government (which has been supposed to create a consensus between left and right for centuries) is also to be abolished. These are not real leftists!
Extreme Left and extreme Right :
Left-wing fanatics who want to over-regulate everything, have no idea about the economy and stall it. In the former Eastern bloc these were Moscow-appointed people who had no idea, just ideological beliefs in justice that they didn't even understand. They were Moscow's puppets. We already know the Russian left of that time: ideology without a brain - just like those who think undifferentiated today and propagate the opposite direction, talk about the alleged "blessing" of the completely deregulated, capitalist market ("because Smith said so "), defame the word "left" and want to abolish the governments in order to introduce stakeholder fascism. Of course they do this on behalf of the monopolists. They are used as propagandists on the Internet and cannot imagine that the legend of the unregulated ( sorry: "FREE") markets was a scam because it has been part of the basics of economics for years. The basics are rarely questioned because the imagination is usually not sufficient.
Medical fraud is just the tip of the iceberg. Look into the economy and macroeconomy !
Please don't say that something is only true because it says so in the book !
The "invisible hand" and what the Chicago Mafia ( sorry : "school" ) made of it
The shortest explanation :
Normal, benevolent leftists :
The real left tries to put a stop to the excesses of power (since 2020 visible to the blind) through regulations.
She knows that no monopoly regulates itself and must be regulated. These people know that a giant theory was made out of a casual subordinate clause from Adam Smith ("The Invisible Hand"). This theory represents one of the greatest scams of the 20th century and has been taught for years as the false foundation of economics. The purpose is to prevent government regulation of monopolies. The real left knows the fraud, but unfortunately has no influence on the corrupted universities to publicly denounce this fraud (similar to what is currently happening in the medical field). This left wants to regulate the monopolies so that such criminal mafia structures as Pfizer (monopoly mafia) cannot rules dictate to your government (see: compulsory vaccination). This left does not exaggerate with the regulations and does not hinder the economy. But she knows that not everything can regulate itself. Have you seen a criminal monopoly that regulates itself? Is that maybe Big Pharma? Have you seen a market shark self-regulate to the point where it wouldn't eat governments? Like any theory, the "invisible hand" mentioned in passing by Adam Smith has limitations in its applicability. That's what the theories are all about. But to make an axiom or a kind of religion out of this theory was unscientific and the worst scientific fraud of the 20th century.
The "evil" / not benevolent left :
currently stupid actors and puppets who are set up and paid for by the monopolists to defame the old, good idea of "left" (unfortunately with success) and finally to abolish the "bad left" governments. They are to be replaced by stakeholder fascism. The old, good function of a government (which has been supposed to create a consensus between left and right for centuries) is also to be abolished. These are not real leftists!
Extreme Left and extreme Right :
Left-wing fanatics who want to over-regulate everything, have no idea about the economy and stall it. In the former Eastern bloc these were Moscow-appointed people who had no idea, just ideological beliefs in justice that they didn't even understand. They were Moscow's puppets. We already know the Russian left of that time: ideology without a brain - just like those who think undifferentiated today and propagate the opposite direction, talk about the alleged "blessing" of the completely deregulated, capitalist market ("because Smith said so "), defame the word "left" and want to abolish the governments in order to introduce stakeholder fascism. Of course they do this on behalf of the monopolists. They are used as propagandists on the Internet and cannot imagine that the legend of the unregulated ( sorry: "FREE") markets was a scam because it has been part of the basics of economics for years. The basics are rarely questioned because the imagination is usually not sufficient.
Medical fraud is just the tip of the iceberg. Look into the economy and macroeconomy !
Please don't say that something is only true because it says so in the book !
«The new relationship between worker and employer». Caricature from 1896 on the poor working conditions in Swiss companies from the point of view of the labor movement in the satirical Zurich magazine "Der Neue Postillon"
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschichte_der_Sozialdemokratischen_Partei_der_Schweiz
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geschichte_der_Sozialdemokratischen_Partei_der_Schweiz