Deutschland steht offiziell vor einer KATASTROPHE und gerät in eine Rezession

Die größte Volkswirtschaft Europas befindet sich offiziell in einer Rezession, nachdem eine Reihe katastrophaler, vom Menschen verursachter Klima- und Sanktionsmaßnahmen die deutsche Wirtschaft zerstört haben. Der akademische Forscher Ralph Schoelhammer nimmt an Redacted teil, um sich mit dem Niedergang Deutschlands und der Beyond Growth-Konferenz zu befassen, die das „Degrowth“ Europas fördert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3-2EXlVTUM

I watched my patients get sicker & sicker over the decades & to me, the common factor was the jabs. In the older population, the flu jab is the one thing that no one needs, yet the Dr's here are pushing.

Certainly, I was working for an airline before I took up flying, in 1965 the airline decreed that all pilots had to have the new flu jab but the ground staff, like me, had a choice.
I watched what happened, being sceptical back then about the medical profession.
All of the jabbed people finished up being off work, in bed, for a week.
I have refused all jabs since then.
I have flown and sailed all over the world, even into places with pandemics and I just don't get sick.
I am 79 now, in perfect health with no medications whatsoever.

Their job is to play hero, draw attention to themselves, lull people into not fighting the actual threats and to distract to proxies instead of the people pulling the strings https://t.me/VoiceOfWales/6721

Battelle team wins DARPA contract for injectable brain control technology
https://www.army-technology.com/news/darpa-injectable-brain-control-technology/

My late father ALWAYS said we should never trust any government because they never have your best interests at heart. It is about money and power. He said the second they start pushing anything at you "for your own good".... you should immediately say NO then if you don't know already, do your research and find out what the sneaky, conniving bastards are up to! None of my immediate family fell for it and we lost Dad just as this rubbish was getting started so his legacy of advice served us well and we went on to justify our stance!

💥⚠️💥 Sie glauben, dass Richter an bundesdeutschen Gerichten nur ihrem Gewissen verpflichtet und unabhängig sind?

Wir sind 🔻die 5🔻 Gewalt

ⓁⓀ Ⓝⓔⓦⓢ 🔻 🔻🔻

🇩🇪 https://t.me/LKNews2/ 🇩🇪

ⓁⓀ Ⓝⓔⓦⓢ 🔺 🔺🔺

STOP THE TREATY: Dr. Mike Yeadon Issues Grave Warning Against WHO’s Looming Health Dictatorship

“The WHO ... are seeking to get lots of countries to sign up to an amended International Health Regulations and a new Treaty,” informed former Pfizer executive Dr. Mike Yeadon.

“I have a few problems with this,” he expressed. “If you centralize in a novel situation, you won’t get an optimum outcome. Worse, you won’t even know what optimum is.”

If the WHO gets its way, “that’s the end of democracy in relation to health,” Dr. Yeadon attested. “So, if they decide you’ve to be locked down or you’ve to be injected — remember, in the slave system of digital ID and cash for CBDC, if the WHO decides it, it will just happen.”

#ExitTheWHO

Watch the full episode with doctors Mike Yeadon and Jessica Rose on #CHDTV:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/how-cbdcs-will-affect-you-with-michael-yeadon-phd/

Follow @ChildrensHD
Trending News | Donate

http://www.concordgrovepress.org/books/social_vision/Moral_Political_Thought_Mahatma_Gandhi.php

The Moral and Political Thought of Mahatma Gandhi | Raghavan N. Iyer

From "Satyagraha" (p. 258-260):

...Gandhi wanted to find place in his conception of the State both for active loyalty and for the sacred right of disobedience. He no doubt came closer to the anarchist than to the absolutist view of the State, insofar as he thought a stateless society was conceivable, but he wished to leave it open to the citizen to decide in any given State, inevitably imperfect and unavoidably coercive, whether he felt obliged to show active loyalty or total opposition to that particular State, to resist none or all or a few of its laws. The onus of responsibility lies upon the conscience of the citizen, who is required to uphold satya and display ahimsa. The citizen cannot relinquish a portion of this responsibility in the name of a social contract or legal sovereignty or tacit consent or the rule of law or similar notions implicit in democratic constitutionalism. For Gandhi there can be no unconditional consent for the sake of peace, even if secured under majority rule, nor can the limits of State action be laid down in advance in a manner that will automatically secure the citizen his natural rights. Gandhi showed a Marxist distrust of even a democratic state under conditions of class conflict, and he also had a Rousseauite suspicion of mere institutional safeguards, especially when factions are strong. He felt that the majority could easily be wrong, regardless of the nature of the political system. It is true that the theory of consent moralizes political authority and obligation by admitting their legitimacy only when certain moral criteria are satisfied, but it cannot let the individual, as Gandhi wanted to, retain the power of veto over State action at all times.

For Gandhi, as for Kant, the individual alone is a moral personality, and this no institution and no State could ever be or become. He could never agree with Durkheim's view that the State is an entity, the principal function of which is to think for the sake of guiding collective conduct. He was deeply attracted to the Socratic standpoint in regard to the State. The citizen can always, like Antigone, appeal to the eternal unwritten laws against the laws of men and of States and the commandments of religion, but he must, like Socrates, willingly accept the consequences of his challenge to the laws of States. Gandhi felt that such an attitude was even more, not less, necessary in the States of today, with their increasing centralization of power and greater impersonality, their augmented power of material himsa, their cynical disregard of satya, even in representative democracies in mass societies.

The State, as an institution, has gradually acquired an immense prestige in the long period since the doctrine of jure divino gave way. The religious aura of authority around the State in modern society is not unconnected with the monarchic and monistic conception of God in the cosmogony of early theological systems. If the State is viewed as a monadic whole superimposed on the body politic or absorbing it into itself, it comes to be credited with a quasi-mystical sovereignty, a supreme power which is absolute and may be exercised without accountability even when there are institutional safeguards and political fictions meant to prescribe limits to State authority. The rapid increase of State activity and the diminution of social power is more and more seen as one of the greatest dangers facing the mass societies of today. The whole of life becomes bureaucratized and the individual citizen feels helpless before the governmental machine. Since the late nineteenth century there has been a strong tendency to set off civil laws from all rules which, like the principles of morality, are enforced by an indeterminate authority, and the idea has even grown up that social morality consists solely or mainly in respect for the laws of the State.

It is in the context of present-day attitudes to the State and the seeming impotence of the individual citizen that Gandhi's view of the State and the citizen must be seen. The Nuremberg trials have raised the question whether men are to be held responsible for heinous acts which they were required to perform by the laws of tyrannical States. No doubt, a legal system cannot exist without a widely diffused sense of moral obligation to obey the law, but morality itself becomes meaningless if this cannot be overridden by a stronger obligation not to obey particular iniquitous laws, or to oppose wholeheartedly a wholly unjust or corrupt or tyrannical State. No authority can be absolute because no set of individuals can lay claim to absolute truth. The derivative authority of any institution, as apart from its force or power, presupposes the moral authority of its members, their right to recognize its commands as reasonable or unreasonable, as worthy or unworthy of acceptance, as morally and legally valid or invalid. The final court of appeal must be truth and right, satya and ahimsa, not as disembodied archetypes but as embodied, however partially, in individual citizens, and the right to resist an oppressive measure or system must belong equally to all in a just and free society.


From "Means and Ends in Politics" (p. 370-371):

Gandhi did not lay down the law for all men or impose on nature a rigid, teleological pattern of his own. He merely argued from the proposition that all men have some idea of truth (satya) but no adequate conception of Absolute Truth (Sat), to the prescription that society should regard the pursuit of satya as a common end. He further pointed out that in seeking the truth, we cannot help being true to our "real" natures (identical with that of all others) and this means exemplifying a measure of nonviolence in our attitudes and relations toward others. It is possible (though questionable) for people to argue that the unhappiness of some is required to maximize collective happiness, that individual citizens have to be coerced for the sake of general freedom, that the maintenance of public virtue sometimes requires subjects to choose (or support) privately corrupt but efficient and outwardly respectable rulers. It would, however, be difficult to contend that the collective pursuit of truth is compatible with the adoption of dishonest devices or the condoning of untruth. This could be advanced if a preordained, collectivist conception of truth were imposed on the members of a society. A dogmatic ideology may be propagated by dishonest and ruthless methods. Asatya necessitates himsa.

Gandhi explicitly believed that no person or group could speak in the name of Sat or Absolute Truth for the very reason that all are entitled to their relative truths, to satya as it appears to different people. As truth in this conception is identical with integrity (fidelity to one's own conscience), Gandhi could claim that no man can pursue greater integrity as an end by adopting means involving a sacrifice of the integrity he already has. The test of one's immediate moral integrity is nonviolence; it is a test of one's genuineness in the pursuit of truth (i.e., of intellectual integrity) through one's actions in the midst of society. If we understand the concept of satya and accept its pursuit as a common end, we cannot make a hard-and-fast distinction between this end and the means toward it that we employ. On the other hand, it is particularly if we regard the promotion of happiness as the whole duty of man that we become careless about the means and violate the "laws of morality." "The consequences of this line of thinking are writ large on the history of Europe," said Gandhi in his introduction to his paraphrase of Ruskin's Unto This Last. For Gandhi the polis is nothing more or less than the domain in which all men are free to gain skill in the art of action and learn how to exemplify satya and ahimsa; the arena in which both the individual quest could be furthered and the social virtues displayed among the masses of citizens in a climate of tolerance and civility; a morally progressive society in which neither the State nor any social organization is allowed to flout with impunity the sacred principle that every man is entitled to his relative truth and no one can claim the right to coerce another, to treat him as a means to his own end.

Raghavan N. Iyer

http://www.concordgrovepress.org/books/social_vision/Moral_Political_Thought_Mahatma_Gandhi.php

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-moral-and-political-thought-of-mahatma-gandhi-9780195651959?q=moral%20and%20political%20thought%20of%20mahatma%20gandhi&lang=en&cc=gb

Also important :

https://philosophybites.com/2012/09/richard-sorabji-on-mahatma-gandhi-as-philosopher.html

...
The Moral and Political Thought of Mahatma Gandhi | Raghavan N. Iyer

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-moral-and-political-thought-of-mahatma-gandhi-9780195651959?q=moral%20and%20political%20thought%20of%20mahatma%20gandhi&lang=en&cc=gb

Also important :

https://philosophybites.com/2012/09/richard-sorabji-on-mahatma-gandhi-as-philosopher.html

https://reclaimthenet.org/congress-to-investigate-who-plans-surveillance-misinformation
☝️☝️☝️READ THIS
The new document (PRET) of the WHO proposing the treaty states that the new pandemic will be accompanied by a "infodemic", i.e. a flood of people trying to say "no" to the one world biostate, the reign of the Beast (which is Science) and of the Dragon (Power). They plan to write down the new legal framework to implement their genocidal tiranny. Basically it is what they were doing de facto, but now they are "coming out" of the closet with total violence. They plan to surveil "disinformation" on social media (and for sure punish it), and "changing behaviours" via "conditioning" (probably mandates, forced medical treatments, removal of parental rights, stopping the access to work and to own money) and the coordination of official information channels (Academia, media, entertainment, called "civil society", and international agencies). They will implement "social listening" through A.I. that is to say they will prevent every expression of truth. WE MUST SPEAK NOW or literally be quiet for ever.

Es ist unbegreiflich: Die gleichen Leute, die von Rainer Mausfelds Vorträgen schwärmten und die damals wie verrückt herumschickten und allen empfahlen, rennen jetzt wie blöde ausgerechnet den Härtesten von der Fraktion hinterher, die Mausfeld durchaus trefflich entlarvte: Die Neoliberalen mit ihren asozialen Agenden, organisiert in Think Tanks und Clubs der Marke "von Hayek", von der schon Thatcher abgekupfert und damit unfassbares Elend in GB produziert hatte.

Ich fasse es wirklich nicht. Wie Kasper aus der Kiste ploppen überall die extremistischsten Neoliberalen a la Krall und Konsorten auf, predigen den totalitären Markt, der uns genau dahin gebracht hat, wo wir jetzt sind - und vermeintliche "Widerständler", zugleich nicht selten Mausfeld-Fans, feiern sie bis zum Abwinken. Bei manchen muss doch irgendwas mit dem Denken nicht stimmen?

Zum Nachhören:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kLzmatet8w&t=20s

AUGEN-THROMBOSEN NACH „IMPFUNG“ :

Risikobewertung eines retinalen Gefäßverschlusses nach COVID-19-Impfung

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-023-00661-7

❗️"16.05.2023 15:09
Eine Infektion mit Erkältungscoronaviren kann eine breite Kreuzimmunität gegen SARS-CoV-2-Proteine ​​auslösen."
(neue Studie der Uniklinik Hamburg)

😮 NEIN!!! DOCH!!! OOOHH?!

https://idw-online.de/de/news814454

Vaccinated people will be dead in 2 years, says this doctor

Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad explains the vax was tested. On mice and monkeys. He says they all died. share it with a friend.

We have been told that the Corona vaccination is an experimental vaccine that has not yet been tested. That's not true, American doctor Abdul Alim Muhammad said during a question-and-answer session. It has actually been tested. When they tested the mRNA vaccine technology on humanized mice, 100 percent of the mice died within two months, Muhammad said.

The same experiment was performed on monkeys. After the animals were injected with the mRNA technology, they all died. "Same result."

During autopsies, the mRNA was found in every organ, the doctor pointed out. "They ran an experiment to prove that mRNA technology is 100 percent lethal."

Two months of the life of a mouse is equivalent to two human years, Muhammad explained. So if 100 percent of the mice die within two months, the vaccinated ones will be dead in two years, said the doctor, based on statements by Dr. Judy Mikovits and Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier.

"This is a biological weapon. The spike protein is a biological weapon designed to kill you."

https://twitter.com/unhealthytruth/status/1659530254027829249?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1659530254027829249%7Ctwgr%5Eb748ca348601bb3a97a2bbf697472dbcb3d49022%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Funcutnews.ch%2Fgeimpfte-menschen-werden-in-2-jahren-tot-sein-sagt-dieser-arzt%2F