Wir müssen nicht weit in der Zeit zurückgehen, sondern nur das Erwachsenenleben der gegenwärtigen älteren amerikanischen Generation, um Täuschung nach Täuschung aufzuzählen.

Wir erlebten die Ermordung von Präsident John F. Kennedy und seinem Bruder Robert Kennedy durch die CIA und deren Vertuschung durch beide politischen Parteien und die Warren-Kommission.

Nachdem JFK aus dem Weg geräumt war, hatten wir den Fake-News-Vorfall im Golf von Tonkin, den das Johnson-Regime und die Demokraten nutzten, um den Vietnamkrieg zu beginnen, der den USA 50.000 amerikanische Leben und unseren Ruf kostete. https://www.history.com/topics/vietnam-war/gulf-of-tonkin-resolution-1

Danach explodierten die Gräueltaten. Um nicht alle zu nennen: Wir hatten die Verletzung des Wortes der US-Regierung durch das Clinton-Regime, als Clinton die Schwäche Russlands beim Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion infolge der Verhaftung von Präsident Gorbatschow durch Hardliner-Mitglieder des Politbüros ausnutzte und die NATO zu Russland verlegte Grenze. Amerikanische Patrioten begrüßten diesen fatalen Fehler als „einen entscheidenden Schlag für den Kommunismus“.

Dann hatten wir den Insider-Job vom 11. September, der den US-Neokonservativen ihr „neues Pearl Harbor“ bescherte, um ihre Kriege gegen Länder im Nahen Osten zu beginnen, die die israelische Expansion in den Südlibanon und darüber hinaus einschränkten.

Dann kam es zur Invasion Südossetiens, einem russischen Protektorat, durch die von den USA ausgerüstete und ausgebildete georgische Armee. Georgien, der Geburtsort Josef Stalins, war vor dem Zusammenbruch der Sowjetunion lange Zeit eine russische Provinz.

Dann kam es 2014 zur inszenierten „Maidan-Revolution“ in der Ukraine, die eine im Frieden mit Russland lebende Regierung stürzte, zu der die Ukraine jahrhundertelang gehört hatte, und sie durch eine von Washington geführte Neonazi-Regierung ersetzte. Dieser dumme und unverantwortliche Akt der US-amerikanischen Neokonservativen hat zu zunehmenden unnötigen Provokationen Russlands geführt, die in einem Atomkrieg enden werden.

Dann hatten wir die inszenierte „Covid-Pandemie“, die Propaganda und Angst einsetzte, um die westlichen Völker daran zu gewöhnen, ihre Freiheiten und den verfassungsmäßigen Schutz der Bürgerrechte aufzuheben, um „sicher“ zu sein. Und wieder fielen die unbekümmerten westlichen Völker darauf herein und schränkten erneut ihre Freiheiten ein.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2023/05/25/insouciant-americans-have-doomed-america-to-tyranny/

THE DISINFORMATION DOZEN

Why platforms must act on twelve leading online anti-vaxxers

"Just twelve anti-vaxxers are responsible for almost two-thirds of anti‑vaccine content circulating on social media platforms. This new analysis of content posted or shared to social media over 812,000 times between February and March uncovers how a tiny group of determined anti-vaxxers is responsible for a tidal wave of disinformation—and shows how platforms can fix it by enforcing their standards."

https://counterhate.com/research/the-disinformation-dozen/

Words are strong weapons. They just have to be used.

On the CCDH website we find almost all the signs of a typically lying propaganda:
1. The circle of active opponents of vaccination is described as "small" in order to serve the herd instinct.
2. The opposition to vaccination is mistakenly linked to "fighting hate" (framing).
3. Any damage caused to society is conveyed between the lines (?).
4. The alleged "anti-vaccination industry" is being talked about here, although we all know that the people mentioned voluntarily and out of their own conviction educate society and suffer high financial losses in the process, which they accept. They sacrifice much of their time for humanity instead of looking after their own interests. Nevertheless, the obviously professional propaganda here aims at the base feeling of envy, as if it were about alleged big earners. But we know the truth about which side belongs to big money and on what scale it makes the money: the big pharma.

Other tricks are also used here. For a society made up of supposedly concerned citizens, this organization seems far too professional when it comes to propaganda. As is often known from other such organizations, here too the donors remain in the dark and the funding does not look transparent at all. But professional communication is very visible. The time is too bad to go into the details here..

Big Pharma's fear of losing sales obviously also applies to conventional "vaccines". Without the Corona lie, I would never find out that all the other "vaccines" are also frauds and should be written with : " .... " . My newly acquired knowledge is now based on extremely time-consuming research that hardly anyone who has to work and look after their children can afford. Among other things, I read many scientific studies and got to know official statistics. There were also official, scientific works, such as the so-called "Pentagon Flu Study", which has been censored for years and is difficult to find on the Internet. The useless flu "vaccination", which is also harmful to the immune system, is one of the main sources of income for these corrupt criminals. I am so convinced of the correctness of my conclusions that I can and will communicate them publicly with a clear conscience.

I ask you all not to be intimidated and not to give in to criminal censorship and propaganda. The word of truth (a familiar theme from the Bible to religious people) is a means far more potent than the best weapon. Silence is the biggest mistake in the current situation. Those who remain silent are negligently selling the future of their own children to this perverse mafia! In this way, the one who speaks the truth openly protects those who heroically enlighten us. That's the least we should give these people in gratitude.

https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2023/26-may/books-arts/book-reviews/spiritual-intelligence-in-seven-steps-by-mark-vernon

Spirituelle Intelligenz in sieben Schritten von Mark Vernon
26. Mai 2023

Spirituelle Intelligenz impliziert dies, sagt John Saxbee

WIR SIND keine Menschen, die spirituelle Erfahrungen machen, sondern spirituelle Wesen, die menschliche Erfahrungen machen. So schrieb Pierre Teilhard de Chardin. In diesem wichtigen und herausfordernden Cri de Coeur bestätigt der Psychotherapeut und ehemalige anglikanische Priester Mark Vernon, dass „spirituelle Intelligenz grundlegend für das Menschsein ist.“
Aber er befürchtet, dass „es in der modernen Welt so übersehen und ins Abseits gedrängt wird, dass die Menschen dazu neigen …“ . . leugnen, dass es überhaupt existiert.“ Wir müssen uns also darüber im Klaren sein, bevor es zu spät ist: Unsere Zukunft als Spezies könnte davon abhängen. . In einer Zeit, in der der reduktionistische Szientismus und der Materialismus bestimmen, wie unsere Menschlichkeit und die Umwelt, in der wir physisch, emotional und intellektuell leben, verstanden, artikuliert und bedroht werden, besteht für den Homo Spirituali die Gefahr der Unterdrückung
Aber was ist spirituelle Intelligenz? Nun, jeder, der Gedanken, Gefühle und Erfahrungen hat, kann dies nur tun, weil die Seite des Lebens, die die spirituelle Intelligenz sieht, wirksam und aktiv ist. Es handelt sich um eine Art Wahrnehmung, „die das Gefühl vermittelt, dass unsere Erfahrung der Dinge mit einer umfassenderen Vitalität verbunden ist.“ . . dass es mehr zugrunde liegende Existenz gibt, und diese scheint bei näherer Betrachtung unveränderlich, universell und energetisch vorhanden zu sein.“
Entscheidend ist, dass es nicht das Gegenteil des Materiellen ist, sondern vielmehr der Grund dafür, dass die materielle Welt so strahlend sein kann. Es ist von grundlegender Bedeutung für das Verständnis der Natur des Seins und „man kann sagen, dass es vor der Religion steht“.
In einem Ansatz, der an die einflussreichsten Weisheitstraditionen erinnert, führt uns Vernon durch eine Reihe von sieben Schritten, die darauf abzielen, das Verständnis der spirituellen Intelligenz und ihres Platzes in unserem Leben zu vertiefen. Es ist eine Einladung, „in eine andere Beziehung mit der Welt einzutreten, die reicher und eine Erweiterung ist“.
von Anfang an Homo sapiens war Homo spiritis , und aus diesem Ausgangszustand entstand die Individualität. Aber in der Neuzeit wurde die Subjektivität der sogenannten „objektiven Wahrheit“ untergeordnet – ein Schritt, den die spirituelle Intelligenz radikal in Frage stellt. Schritt vier verbindet spirituelle Intelligenz mit dem Konzept der Seele, und Schritt fünf bietet eine zutiefst bewegende Reflexion darüber, wie spirituelle Intelligenz unsere Herangehensweise an Tod und Sterben beeinflusst.
Die letzten beiden Schritte argumentieren dafür, dass Tugend die am besten geeignete moralische Artikulation spiritueller Intelligenz ist und wie sie unsere Beziehung zur Zeit und „die Fähigkeit, Krisen und Einbrüche anzunehmen“ kreativ prägen kann.
Während er als Agnostiker glaubt, dass „unsere Zeit für eine Art Umkehr gekommen ist“, behauptet er, dass dies nicht „für irgendein theologisches System oder eine bestimmte Offenbarung“ sein sollte. Dennoch treten regelmäßig religiöse Persönlichkeiten wie Jesus, Buddha und Konfuzius auf, auch wenn er weiterhin skeptisch gegenüber der Wirksamkeit der heutigen Kirche bei der Förderung spiritueller Intelligenz ist.
Diese bemerkenswerte Reise beschäftigt sich mühelos mit östlicher Mystik, westlichen Filmen und Fiktion, persönlicher Biografie und professioneller Psychotherapie und zitiert Koryphäen von Sokrates bis William Blake – und sogar eine aufschlussreiche Einkaufstour für Tomatensuppe.
Wenn unsere Zeiten spirituell verarmt sind, dann bietet Vernon einen Weg zur Wiederentdeckung, Wertschätzung und Aktivierung spiritueller Intelligenz als wesentlich für unsere grundlegende Menschlichkeit und entscheidend für unser zukünftiges Gedeihen.

Der Rt Revd Dr. John Saxbee ist ein ehemaliger Bischof von Lincoln.

Deutschland steht offiziell vor einer KATASTROPHE und gerät in eine Rezession

Die größte Volkswirtschaft Europas befindet sich offiziell in einer Rezession, nachdem eine Reihe katastrophaler, vom Menschen verursachter Klima- und Sanktionsmaßnahmen die deutsche Wirtschaft zerstört haben. Der akademische Forscher Ralph Schoelhammer nimmt an Redacted teil, um sich mit dem Niedergang Deutschlands und der Beyond Growth-Konferenz zu befassen, die das „Degrowth“ Europas fördert. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3-2EXlVTUM

I watched my patients get sicker & sicker over the decades & to me, the common factor was the jabs. In the older population, the flu jab is the one thing that no one needs, yet the Dr's here are pushing.

Certainly, I was working for an airline before I took up flying, in 1965 the airline decreed that all pilots had to have the new flu jab but the ground staff, like me, had a choice.
I watched what happened, being sceptical back then about the medical profession.
All of the jabbed people finished up being off work, in bed, for a week.
I have refused all jabs since then.
I have flown and sailed all over the world, even into places with pandemics and I just don't get sick.
I am 79 now, in perfect health with no medications whatsoever.

Their job is to play hero, draw attention to themselves, lull people into not fighting the actual threats and to distract to proxies instead of the people pulling the strings https://t.me/VoiceOfWales/6721

Battelle team wins DARPA contract for injectable brain control technology
https://www.army-technology.com/news/darpa-injectable-brain-control-technology/

My late father ALWAYS said we should never trust any government because they never have your best interests at heart. It is about money and power. He said the second they start pushing anything at you "for your own good".... you should immediately say NO then if you don't know already, do your research and find out what the sneaky, conniving bastards are up to! None of my immediate family fell for it and we lost Dad just as this rubbish was getting started so his legacy of advice served us well and we went on to justify our stance!

💥⚠️💥 Sie glauben, dass Richter an bundesdeutschen Gerichten nur ihrem Gewissen verpflichtet und unabhängig sind?

Wir sind 🔻die 5🔻 Gewalt

ⓁⓀ Ⓝⓔⓦⓢ 🔻 🔻🔻

🇩🇪 https://t.me/LKNews2/ 🇩🇪

ⓁⓀ Ⓝⓔⓦⓢ 🔺 🔺🔺

STOP THE TREATY: Dr. Mike Yeadon Issues Grave Warning Against WHO’s Looming Health Dictatorship

“The WHO ... are seeking to get lots of countries to sign up to an amended International Health Regulations and a new Treaty,” informed former Pfizer executive Dr. Mike Yeadon.

“I have a few problems with this,” he expressed. “If you centralize in a novel situation, you won’t get an optimum outcome. Worse, you won’t even know what optimum is.”

If the WHO gets its way, “that’s the end of democracy in relation to health,” Dr. Yeadon attested. “So, if they decide you’ve to be locked down or you’ve to be injected — remember, in the slave system of digital ID and cash for CBDC, if the WHO decides it, it will just happen.”

#ExitTheWHO

Watch the full episode with doctors Mike Yeadon and Jessica Rose on #CHDTV:

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/good-morning-chd/how-cbdcs-will-affect-you-with-michael-yeadon-phd/

Follow @ChildrensHD
Trending News | Donate

http://www.concordgrovepress.org/books/social_vision/Moral_Political_Thought_Mahatma_Gandhi.php

The Moral and Political Thought of Mahatma Gandhi | Raghavan N. Iyer

From "Satyagraha" (p. 258-260):

...Gandhi wanted to find place in his conception of the State both for active loyalty and for the sacred right of disobedience. He no doubt came closer to the anarchist than to the absolutist view of the State, insofar as he thought a stateless society was conceivable, but he wished to leave it open to the citizen to decide in any given State, inevitably imperfect and unavoidably coercive, whether he felt obliged to show active loyalty or total opposition to that particular State, to resist none or all or a few of its laws. The onus of responsibility lies upon the conscience of the citizen, who is required to uphold satya and display ahimsa. The citizen cannot relinquish a portion of this responsibility in the name of a social contract or legal sovereignty or tacit consent or the rule of law or similar notions implicit in democratic constitutionalism. For Gandhi there can be no unconditional consent for the sake of peace, even if secured under majority rule, nor can the limits of State action be laid down in advance in a manner that will automatically secure the citizen his natural rights. Gandhi showed a Marxist distrust of even a democratic state under conditions of class conflict, and he also had a Rousseauite suspicion of mere institutional safeguards, especially when factions are strong. He felt that the majority could easily be wrong, regardless of the nature of the political system. It is true that the theory of consent moralizes political authority and obligation by admitting their legitimacy only when certain moral criteria are satisfied, but it cannot let the individual, as Gandhi wanted to, retain the power of veto over State action at all times.

For Gandhi, as for Kant, the individual alone is a moral personality, and this no institution and no State could ever be or become. He could never agree with Durkheim's view that the State is an entity, the principal function of which is to think for the sake of guiding collective conduct. He was deeply attracted to the Socratic standpoint in regard to the State. The citizen can always, like Antigone, appeal to the eternal unwritten laws against the laws of men and of States and the commandments of religion, but he must, like Socrates, willingly accept the consequences of his challenge to the laws of States. Gandhi felt that such an attitude was even more, not less, necessary in the States of today, with their increasing centralization of power and greater impersonality, their augmented power of material himsa, their cynical disregard of satya, even in representative democracies in mass societies.

The State, as an institution, has gradually acquired an immense prestige in the long period since the doctrine of jure divino gave way. The religious aura of authority around the State in modern society is not unconnected with the monarchic and monistic conception of God in the cosmogony of early theological systems. If the State is viewed as a monadic whole superimposed on the body politic or absorbing it into itself, it comes to be credited with a quasi-mystical sovereignty, a supreme power which is absolute and may be exercised without accountability even when there are institutional safeguards and political fictions meant to prescribe limits to State authority. The rapid increase of State activity and the diminution of social power is more and more seen as one of the greatest dangers facing the mass societies of today. The whole of life becomes bureaucratized and the individual citizen feels helpless before the governmental machine. Since the late nineteenth century there has been a strong tendency to set off civil laws from all rules which, like the principles of morality, are enforced by an indeterminate authority, and the idea has even grown up that social morality consists solely or mainly in respect for the laws of the State.

It is in the context of present-day attitudes to the State and the seeming impotence of the individual citizen that Gandhi's view of the State and the citizen must be seen. The Nuremberg trials have raised the question whether men are to be held responsible for heinous acts which they were required to perform by the laws of tyrannical States. No doubt, a legal system cannot exist without a widely diffused sense of moral obligation to obey the law, but morality itself becomes meaningless if this cannot be overridden by a stronger obligation not to obey particular iniquitous laws, or to oppose wholeheartedly a wholly unjust or corrupt or tyrannical State. No authority can be absolute because no set of individuals can lay claim to absolute truth. The derivative authority of any institution, as apart from its force or power, presupposes the moral authority of its members, their right to recognize its commands as reasonable or unreasonable, as worthy or unworthy of acceptance, as morally and legally valid or invalid. The final court of appeal must be truth and right, satya and ahimsa, not as disembodied archetypes but as embodied, however partially, in individual citizens, and the right to resist an oppressive measure or system must belong equally to all in a just and free society.


From "Means and Ends in Politics" (p. 370-371):

Gandhi did not lay down the law for all men or impose on nature a rigid, teleological pattern of his own. He merely argued from the proposition that all men have some idea of truth (satya) but no adequate conception of Absolute Truth (Sat), to the prescription that society should regard the pursuit of satya as a common end. He further pointed out that in seeking the truth, we cannot help being true to our "real" natures (identical with that of all others) and this means exemplifying a measure of nonviolence in our attitudes and relations toward others. It is possible (though questionable) for people to argue that the unhappiness of some is required to maximize collective happiness, that individual citizens have to be coerced for the sake of general freedom, that the maintenance of public virtue sometimes requires subjects to choose (or support) privately corrupt but efficient and outwardly respectable rulers. It would, however, be difficult to contend that the collective pursuit of truth is compatible with the adoption of dishonest devices or the condoning of untruth. This could be advanced if a preordained, collectivist conception of truth were imposed on the members of a society. A dogmatic ideology may be propagated by dishonest and ruthless methods. Asatya necessitates himsa.

Gandhi explicitly believed that no person or group could speak in the name of Sat or Absolute Truth for the very reason that all are entitled to their relative truths, to satya as it appears to different people. As truth in this conception is identical with integrity (fidelity to one's own conscience), Gandhi could claim that no man can pursue greater integrity as an end by adopting means involving a sacrifice of the integrity he already has. The test of one's immediate moral integrity is nonviolence; it is a test of one's genuineness in the pursuit of truth (i.e., of intellectual integrity) through one's actions in the midst of society. If we understand the concept of satya and accept its pursuit as a common end, we cannot make a hard-and-fast distinction between this end and the means toward it that we employ. On the other hand, it is particularly if we regard the promotion of happiness as the whole duty of man that we become careless about the means and violate the "laws of morality." "The consequences of this line of thinking are writ large on the history of Europe," said Gandhi in his introduction to his paraphrase of Ruskin's Unto This Last. For Gandhi the polis is nothing more or less than the domain in which all men are free to gain skill in the art of action and learn how to exemplify satya and ahimsa; the arena in which both the individual quest could be furthered and the social virtues displayed among the masses of citizens in a climate of tolerance and civility; a morally progressive society in which neither the State nor any social organization is allowed to flout with impunity the sacred principle that every man is entitled to his relative truth and no one can claim the right to coerce another, to treat him as a means to his own end.

Raghavan N. Iyer

http://www.concordgrovepress.org/books/social_vision/Moral_Political_Thought_Mahatma_Gandhi.php

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-moral-and-political-thought-of-mahatma-gandhi-9780195651959?q=moral%20and%20political%20thought%20of%20mahatma%20gandhi&lang=en&cc=gb

Also important :

https://philosophybites.com/2012/09/richard-sorabji-on-mahatma-gandhi-as-philosopher.html

...
The Moral and Political Thought of Mahatma Gandhi | Raghavan N. Iyer

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-moral-and-political-thought-of-mahatma-gandhi-9780195651959?q=moral%20and%20political%20thought%20of%20mahatma%20gandhi&lang=en&cc=gb

Also important :

https://philosophybites.com/2012/09/richard-sorabji-on-mahatma-gandhi-as-philosopher.html

https://reclaimthenet.org/congress-to-investigate-who-plans-surveillance-misinformation
☝️☝️☝️READ THIS
The new document (PRET) of the WHO proposing the treaty states that the new pandemic will be accompanied by a "infodemic", i.e. a flood of people trying to say "no" to the one world biostate, the reign of the Beast (which is Science) and of the Dragon (Power). They plan to write down the new legal framework to implement their genocidal tiranny. Basically it is what they were doing de facto, but now they are "coming out" of the closet with total violence. They plan to surveil "disinformation" on social media (and for sure punish it), and "changing behaviours" via "conditioning" (probably mandates, forced medical treatments, removal of parental rights, stopping the access to work and to own money) and the coordination of official information channels (Academia, media, entertainment, called "civil society", and international agencies). They will implement "social listening" through A.I. that is to say they will prevent every expression of truth. WE MUST SPEAK NOW or literally be quiet for ever.