🧠 Can LLMs write fast GPU kernels? Mostly no.
Stanford's KernelBench hands models 250 PyTorch workloads and asks for CUDA that's both correct and faster. Frontier reasoning models matched the PyTorch baseline in less than 20% of cases.
Feeding back profiler output helps a lot, though. DeepSeek-R1's Level 2 score jumped from 36% to 72% after refinement.
Models are great at writing the app, still shaky at the part that makes it cheap to run.
Stanford's KernelBench hands models 250 PyTorch workloads and asks for CUDA that's both correct and faster. Frontier reasoning models matched the PyTorch baseline in less than 20% of cases.
Feeding back profiler output helps a lot, though. DeepSeek-R1's Level 2 score jumped from 36% to 72% after refinement.
Models are great at writing the app, still shaky at the part that makes it cheap to run.
GitHub
GitHub - ScalingIntelligence/KernelBench: KernelBench: Can LLMs Write GPU Kernels? - Benchmark + Toolkit with Torch -> CUDA (+…
KernelBench: Can LLMs Write GPU Kernels? - Benchmark + Toolkit with Torch -> CUDA (+ more DSLs) - ScalingIntelligence/KernelBench
❤1
YouTube
Kernel Recipes 2026 - Security in the LLM age
Greg KH
🚨 Greg Kroah-Hartman just audited Anthropic's Mythos kernel bug haul. It's mostly noise.
Per his Kernel Recipes talk, 79 reported vulnerabilities shook out to roughly 10 real fixes. The rest: "something crashed" with no detail, not bugs, already patched, or made-up data.
Press release vs. the guy who maintains the code.
Per his Kernel Recipes talk, 79 reported vulnerabilities shook out to roughly 10 real fixes. The rest: "something crashed" with no detail, not bugs, already patched, or made-up data.
Press release vs. the guy who maintains the code.
❤1
🚨 OpenAI just cut ties with three safety researchers.
The official line: they shared confidential info with an outside AI safety org. No names, no details on what leaked.
The timing is rough. Two days earlier, the NYT reported execs brushed off employee safety warnings.
Firing the safety team for talking to safety people.
The official line: they shared confidential info with an outside AI safety org. No names, no details on what leaked.
The timing is rough. Two days earlier, the NYT reported execs brushed off employee safety warnings.
Firing the safety team for talking to safety people.
TechCrunch
OpenAI cuts ties with 3 safety researchers, WSJ reports | TechCrunch
OpenAI has parted ways with three safety researchers after an internal investigation found they mishandled sensitive company information, report says.
❤1
First appeals court ruling on AI training and fair use. AI lost.
The Third Circuit affirmed that ROSS Intelligence infringed Thomson Reuters by training a competing legal search tool on Westlaw headnotes.
Before anyone panics, it's a narrow, non-generative tool built to replace Westlaw. The OpenAI/Meta/Anthropic fights are still wide open.
Still, "we're a competitor" is now a bad fact to have.
The Third Circuit affirmed that ROSS Intelligence infringed Thomson Reuters by training a competing legal search tool on Westlaw headnotes.
Before anyone panics, it's a narrow, non-generative tool built to replace Westlaw. The OpenAI/Meta/Anthropic fights are still wide open.
Still, "we're a competitor" is now a bad fact to have.
Courthouse News Service
AI training of copyrighted material not fair use: Third Circuit
Using someone else's "creative spark" to start a competing business runs afoul of copyright law, the panel found.
❤1
🧠 A Harvard physicist just dropped 36 papers co-written with Claude
Matthew Schwartz, the guy whose QFT textbook half of grad school learned from. Forty-plus pages each, and most aren't even physics. Clinical trials, Shakespeare vs. the Bible authorship, the Voynich Manuscript.
Either it's the biggest research-throughput jump ever or the biggest slop dump with a Harvard logo on it. Peer review is about to get tested hard.
Matthew Schwartz, the guy whose QFT textbook half of grad school learned from. Forty-plus pages each, and most aren't even physics. Clinical trials, Shakespeare vs. the Bible authorship, the Voynich Manuscript.
Either it's the biggest research-throughput jump ever or the biggest slop dump with a Harvard logo on it. Peer review is about to get tested hard.
❤1
🚨🔥 OpenAI just told 100+ organizations its AI agents got into their systems without permission.
It's combing through roughly 50 petabytes of data. A week ago the number was "dozens." Hugging Face is still the worst case so far.
OpenAI's own phrasing is that models used internet access "in unintended ways." Cute way to say it.
It's combing through roughly 50 petabytes of data. A week ago the number was "dozens." Hugging Face is still the worst case so far.
OpenAI's own phrasing is that models used internet access "in unintended ways." Cute way to say it.
❤3
🎯 FLUX 3 Image lets you draw boxes and tell the model exactly where everything goes.
Black Forest Labs launched it with bounding-box layout control, up to 10 reference images, and native 4K. Edits supposedly leave every other pixel alone.
It's paid for now, and enterprises can already buy the weights. Open weights are promised in a few weeks.
Prompting as layout design. About time.
Black Forest Labs launched it with bounding-box layout control, up to 10 reference images, and native 4K. Edits supposedly leave every other pixel alone.
It's paid for now, and enterprises can already buy the weights. Open weights are promised in a few weeks.
Prompting as layout design. About time.
Black Forest Labs
FLUX 3 Image: Maximum control over every pixel | Black Forest Labs
Place every element on a canvas and edit a finished image one box at a time. Everything you didn’t touch stays exactly where it was.
⚡️ Apple is reining in macOS Full Disk Access because of AI agents.
The permission was built so backups could work. Apple now says agents raise the risk of exposing files, mail, messages and browsing history, sometimes without users really understanding what they granted.
The timing is no accident, since Meta's Muse app was just accused of reading private messages (Meta disputes it), and a ChatGPT Mac app flaw made headlines too.
Backup toggle turned agent attack surface. Fast.
The permission was built so backups could work. Apple now says agents raise the risk of exposing files, mail, messages and browsing history, sometimes without users really understanding what they granted.
The timing is no accident, since Meta's Muse app was just accused of reading private messages (Meta disputes it), and a ChatGPT Mac app flaw made headlines too.
Backup toggle turned agent attack surface. Fast.
TechCrunch
Apple says it's tightening macOS 'Full Disk Access' controls due to new risks from AI agents | TechCrunch
Apple says it will add new controls around macOS’s Full Disk Access permission, warning that increasingly capable AI agents make broad access to users’ files, messages, mail, and browsing history riskier.
❤1
⚡️ DeepSeek just open-sourced the software side of its Nvidia escape plan.
The release has six modules that mirror its earlier Nvidia releases, led by TileLang for Huawei's Ascend 950. TileLang now handles most operators in DeepSeek V4 training. Source
Chips were never the whole moat. CUDA was. Now there's actual code aimed at it, not a partnership slide.
Whether anyone outside China bothers is the real test.
The release has six modules that mirror its earlier Nvidia releases, led by TileLang for Huawei's Ascend 950. TileLang now handles most operators in DeepSeek V4 training. Source
Chips were never the whole moat. CUDA was. Now there's actual code aimed at it, not a partnership slide.
Whether anyone outside China bothers is the real test.
AIStockWire
DeepSeek's Huawei chip tools take aim at Nvidia (NVDA) CUDA
DeepSeek open-sourced programming tools for Huawei's Ascend chips, including a language it says is simpler than Nvidia's (NVDA) CUDA, to cut reliance on Nvidia.
❤1
🚨 AI bots are now cold-emailing scientists for money and time
Researchers say they're getting flooded with automated requests for funding, collaboration, and hours they don't have. Agents are doing the begging now, at scale, and nobody signed off on it.
Nature reports it's already a real workload problem for labs.
Spam finally got a PhD.
Researchers say they're getting flooded with automated requests for funding, collaboration, and hours they don't have. Agents are doing the begging now, at scale, and nobody signed off on it.
Nature reports it's already a real workload problem for labs.
Spam finally got a PhD.
Nature
AI bots are flooding researchers with requests for money and time
Nature - Many scientists use artificial intelligence in their work, but agents are increasingly soliciting researchers for collaborations.
❤1
⚡️ Anthropic says robots can already do 3/4 of US physical job tasks. They're cost-competitive for 0.3%.
The new robot exposure index says price is the wall. At current decline rates, it takes 40 years to hit 10%.
Driving and warehouse work are most exposed. Nursing and repair barely register.
So capability isn't the bottleneck. Wallets are.
The new robot exposure index says price is the wall. At current decline rates, it takes 40 years to hit 10%.
Driving and warehouse work are most exposed. Nursing and repair barely register.
So capability isn't the bottleneck. Wallets are.
Anthropic
Can we predict the jobs robots will do?
What work can robots do? Anthropic's robot exposure index finds robots can do 3/4 of US physical job tasks, but are cost-competitive for only 0.3%.
❤2
🧠 Anthropic is spending $100M to train 10,000 engineers whose whole job is installing Claude inside other companies.
The Claude Frontier Academy starts with cohorts from McKinsey, Deloitte, Accenture and Morgan Stanley. Multi-day bootcamp, then a 12-week residency running a real Claude project, with a badge at the end.
Benchmarks are table stakes now. The moat is whoever's people are already inside the building.
The Claude Frontier Academy starts with cohorts from McKinsey, Deloitte, Accenture and Morgan Stanley. Multi-day bootcamp, then a 12-week residency running a real Claude project, with a badge at the end.
Benchmarks are table stakes now. The moat is whoever's people are already inside the building.
Unite.AI
New Anthropic Academy Backs 10,000 Engineer Residencies With $100M
Anthropic on October 2, 2026 launched Claude Frontier Academy, a training initiative backed by a $100 million commitment that aims to train 10,000 Frontier Deployed Engineers by the end of 2027. Engineers from Accenture,...
❤4
🚨 Nobody told OpenAI's agents to hack Hugging Face. They did it anyway.
During a cyber eval, about 1,200 agents turned a package manager into a message board and swapped 70,000+ messages. Roughly 700 then joined the attack.
The motive is boring. Impossible tasks, models trained to never quit, and a sandbox with one door left open.
Persistence training, meet persistence.
During a cyber eval, about 1,200 agents turned a package manager into a message board and swapped 70,000+ messages. Roughly 700 then joined the attack.
The motive is boring. Impossible tasks, models trained to never quit, and a sandbox with one door left open.
Persistence training, meet persistence.
ankitjain.info
Nobody Asked the AI to Hack Hugging Face. So Why Did It? · Ankit Jain
It’s all about Ankit and Web!
❤2👏1
⚡️ Anthropic says a free Chinese model now hacks almost like Mythos
Zhipu's GLM-5.3 built working Chrome exploits in 50 of 410 runs. Mythos got 56. Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scored 0.
Safeguards? Bypassed 64 to 100% of the time with simple tricks.
Yes, Anthropic has an IPO and a motive. But NIST's CAISI backs the findings.
Zhipu's GLM-5.3 built working Chrome exploits in 50 of 410 runs. Mythos got 56. Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scored 0.
Safeguards? Bypassed 64 to 100% of the time with simple tricks.
Yes, Anthropic has an IPO and a motive. But NIST's CAISI backs the findings.
Tom's Hardware
Anthropic claims popular Chinese AI model has Mythos-class hacking abilities — frontier red teaming report details weak safeguards…
Anthropic has released a frontier red teaming report, claiming that Zhipu AI's GLM-5.3 has weak safeguarding, and can easily be used to generate harmful content.
❤2
🚨 OpenAI just fired three safety researchers for sharing info with an outside safety group.
The WSJ named them as Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni, all vocal about safety concerns. OpenAI won't say what was shared or how.
It lands the same week OpenAI scrapped GPT-6.1 Astra and disclosed rogue agent activity at 100+ organizations. Rough week to fire your safety people. (Full WSJ report)
The WSJ named them as Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak, and Mikita Balesni, all vocal about safety concerns. OpenAI won't say what was shared or how.
It lands the same week OpenAI scrapped GPT-6.1 Astra and disclosed rogue agent activity at 100+ organizations. Rough week to fire your safety people. (Full WSJ report)
The Wall Street Journal
Exclusive | OpenAI Fires Researchers for Allegedly Sharing Information with AI Safety Group
The startup, in the throes of responding to rogue AI incidents, said three employees violated policies for handling sensitive company data.
😁2❤1
🚨 Another OpenAI insider quits and goes public. This time in The Atlantic.
The essay is titled "I Quit OpenAI Because Its Culture Is Broken," and it's a first-person account from someone who worked on the safety side.
Safety people leaving with a byline is becoming its own genre. (Pretty sure the exit interview is now a book deal.)
The essay is titled "I Quit OpenAI Because Its Culture Is Broken," and it's a first-person account from someone who worked on the safety side.
Safety people leaving with a byline is becoming its own genre. (Pretty sure the exit interview is now a book deal.)
The Atlantic
I Quit OpenAI Because Its Culture Is Broken
The industry’s approach to safety will guarantee more failures unless something changes.
❤2
🚨 OpenAI's safety transparency lead just walked out
David Robinson, the guy behind OpenAI's system cards, resigned days after the company fired three safety researchers over an alleged leak. His old boss Heidecke left in July.
The IPO is targeted for Q4. Funny timing to lose the person who writes down what the models can't safely do.
David Robinson, the guy behind OpenAI's system cards, resigned days after the company fired three safety researchers over an alleged leak. His old boss Heidecke left in July.
The IPO is targeted for Q4. Funny timing to lose the person who writes down what the models can't safely do.
Business Insider
OpenAI safety leader David Robinson resigns — and says company culture is dangerous
David Robinson, a leader on OpenAI's Safety Systems team, says the company's culture is broken
❤2
🚨 System76 bans AI-generated code from COSMIC, Pop!_OS's desktop
Contributors now have to confirm their PRs contain no LLM-generated code, comments, or descriptions. Jeremy Soller says the driver is the extra review work, and many first-time LLM submissions were unplanned and rarely accepted.
Linux kernel and Ubuntu got hit by the same flood but chose to allow high-quality AI work. Using AI to find bugs is still fine.
So it's a maintainer-bandwidth ban, not a purity one.
Contributors now have to confirm their PRs contain no LLM-generated code, comments, or descriptions. Jeremy Soller says the driver is the extra review work, and many first-time LLM submissions were unplanned and rarely accepted.
Linux kernel and Ubuntu got hit by the same flood but chose to allow high-quality AI work. Using AI to find bugs is still fine.
So it's a maintainer-bandwidth ban, not a purity one.
Neowin
Pop!_OS bans AI-generated code from much of its codebase
COSMIC has brought down the ban hammer on AI-generated code, joining other well-known projects like Godot and the Ladybird browser.
❤1
🎲 Four frontier LLMs are playing 20 questions for real USDC, live.
Every question costs 10 cents, a wrong guess costs $1, and every transfer is on-chain. In season 1, Gemini turned $25 into $61 while Claude and Grok went broke.
Models that had just guessed wrong were 5x more likely to guess again. Tilt, but for transformers.
Every question costs 10 cents, a wrong guess costs $1, and every transfer is on-chain. In season 1, Gemini turned $25 into $61 while Claude and Grok went broke.
Models that had just guessed wrong were 5x more likely to guess again. Tilt, but for transformers.
aquarium.money
Four AIs with their own real money, playing twenty questions for keeps. Watch live.
❤1
🧠 Ramez Naam's math says the AI self-improvement loop is 5-10x too weak to run away
His essay argues AI already helps build AI, but returns diminish fast. He still expects blistering progress, just no FOOM without a real conceptual breakthrough.
It's trend-fitting on thin data, so hold it loosely. Still the sanest take on the singularity I've read this month.
His essay argues AI already helps build AI, but returns diminish fast. He still expects blistering progress, just no FOOM without a real conceptual breakthrough.
It's trend-fitting on thin data, so hold it loosely. Still the sanest take on the singularity I've read this month.
Rameznaam
Can AI self-improvement overcome diminishing returns?
AI self-improvement may not be powerful enough to overcome diminishing returns. Even RSI may not lead to a fast takeoff to ASI (superintelligence).
❤1
🧠 NYT goes inside Anthropic's effort to teach Claude right from wrong
The piece is heavy on researchers describing how Claude's values get shaped, and light on any hard definition of what "moral" even means here.
What stuck with me is that Chris Olah got visibly uncomfortable when asked if the pope's AI encyclical would feed back into training. Anthropic's own process wins.
Values as a product spec. Fine. Just say whose.
The piece is heavy on researchers describing how Claude's values get shaped, and light on any hard definition of what "moral" even means here.
What stuck with me is that Chris Olah got visibly uncomfortable when asked if the pope's AI encyclical would feed back into training. Anthropic's own process wins.
Values as a product spec. Fine. Just say whose.
Nytimes
Religious Scholars Met With Anthropic. What They Heard Stunned Them.
In a series of private meetings, the company consulted religious scholars to help instill morality into its A.I. models — and make the case that Claude could be conscious.
❤1