Forwarded from AffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
Я сделал свой бесплатный антидетект-браузер и протестировал его запуск вместе с топ‑3 популярными антиками, Долфин, Вижен, Гоу Логин и не много Окто!
37 сборок, тестовый трафик, профили и прокси — всё работает.
Подробности и ссылка на скачивание и полное описание в моем канале про арбитраж трафика и работу:
👉 https://t.me/+4fUGi5DPcmdhZmEy
Когда я завяжу пить, я выебу всех, а пока что.... пока что ебу локально, но антики уже выебал!
37 сборок, тестовый трафик, профили и прокси — всё работает.
Подробности и ссылка на скачивание и полное описание в моем канале про арбитраж трафика и работу:
👉 https://t.me/+4fUGi5DPcmdhZmEy
Когда я завяжу пить, я выебу всех, а пока что.... пока что ебу локально, но антики уже выебал!
Phoenix.ink — твои Google и Apple Developer аккаунты🟧 Смотри наличие @phoenixapps_store🟧 Забирай консоли @phoenix_seller_bot
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Q: Exclusive partner codes or public discount codes for affiliates?
Use exclusive, partner-specific codes whenever a code is attached to a partner. Here's why it beats public codes for attribution.
A public 'SAVE20' code leaks everywhere — coupon aggregators scrape it, customers find it via search, and you pay commission on sales no partner influenced. Worse, it lets last-click coupon sites claim credit for traffic your content partners drove.
— Give each meaningful partner a unique code (PARTNERNAME15). Now attribution is clean even when their tracking link gets stripped, and you can shut off one leaky code without nuking the campaign.
— Reserve public codes for owned channels (email, on-site) where you don't pay commission.
This also fixes the influencer problem: their audience uses the code instead of a link, and you can still pay correctly.
Caveat: monitor for code leakage to aggregator sites. A partner's 'exclusive' code on RetailMeNot is just an expensive public code.
Got a question? Send it in.
Use exclusive, partner-specific codes whenever a code is attached to a partner. Here's why it beats public codes for attribution.
A public 'SAVE20' code leaks everywhere — coupon aggregators scrape it, customers find it via search, and you pay commission on sales no partner influenced. Worse, it lets last-click coupon sites claim credit for traffic your content partners drove.
— Give each meaningful partner a unique code (PARTNERNAME15). Now attribution is clean even when their tracking link gets stripped, and you can shut off one leaky code without nuking the campaign.
— Reserve public codes for owned channels (email, on-site) where you don't pay commission.
This also fixes the influencer problem: their audience uses the code instead of a link, and you can still pay correctly.
Caveat: monitor for code leakage to aggregator sites. A partner's 'exclusive' code on RetailMeNot is just an expensive public code.
Got a question? Send it in.
Q: Should I cap revenue-share earnings or leave them uncapped?
Leave them uncapped by default — caps are the fastest way to lose your best partners. A partner who hits your ceiling and watches their effort stop earning will move that traffic to a competitor immediately.
Use caps only in two specific cases:
— Time-limited or trailing revshare where lifetime payouts could exceed customer LTV (cap by deal: e.g., revshare for 24 months, then it ends).
— Bonus or top-up programs you can't sustain at scale.
If your worry is margin, fix the rate, not the ceiling. An uncapped 15% is healthier than a capped 30% — it scales linearly with your own revenue and never punishes success.
The alternative to capping: declining tiers, where the rate gently steps down past a volume threshold. Partners keep earning more in absolute terms while your blended margin holds.
Caveat: any cap, however reasonable, must be in the terms before signup. Retroactive caps are how programs get publicly torched.
Got a question? Send it in.
Leave them uncapped by default — caps are the fastest way to lose your best partners. A partner who hits your ceiling and watches their effort stop earning will move that traffic to a competitor immediately.
Use caps only in two specific cases:
— Time-limited or trailing revshare where lifetime payouts could exceed customer LTV (cap by deal: e.g., revshare for 24 months, then it ends).
— Bonus or top-up programs you can't sustain at scale.
If your worry is margin, fix the rate, not the ceiling. An uncapped 15% is healthier than a capped 30% — it scales linearly with your own revenue and never punishes success.
The alternative to capping: declining tiers, where the rate gently steps down past a volume threshold. Partners keep earning more in absolute terms while your blended margin holds.
Caveat: any cap, however reasonable, must be in the terms before signup. Retroactive caps are how programs get publicly torched.
Got a question? Send it in.