Praying Medic News
20.4K subscribers
1.78K photos
880 videos
2 files
3.14K links
Download Telegram
Three Members of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee have told Politico that the National Security Threat caused by a New Russian Capability is “Disturbing” but that it is a Longer-Term Concern “Not a Today thing” and that, “It is a Serious Issue but not an Immediate Crisis.”

https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757830434166022660
U.S. Defense Officials have confirmed that the “national security threat” has to do with a space-based capability by the Russian military.

https://twitter.com/JacquiHeinrich/status/1757840362838622384
I don't want to go full conspiracy theorist, but the timing of the announcement of the Russian space nukes just happens to follow Tucker's interview with Putin, which suggests that Russia isn't an immediate threat to US national security.
n January 2018, as part of the 16-Year Plan to Destroy America, Q highlighted the CIA's efforts to weaponize space.

▪️NASA was intentionally weakened to prevent US space dominance.

▪️Bad actors would take down military satellites.

▪️They would replace military satellites with weapons of mass destruction—specifically, space-based EMPs. (Nuclear weapons are not necesary. An EMP is sufficient to disable satellites.)

▪️The use of EMPs in space would leave the world helpless.
In a unanimous 9-0 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration in a case revolving around the question of whether or not people can sue federal agencies.

While the Biden administration argued that federal agencies were immune from these lawsuits—the U.S. Supreme Court rejected this argument and has now opened the door for many more lawsuits to be filed in the near future.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/u-s-supreme-court-issues-9-0-ruling-facts-matter-5585861
🍿
Soros knows that information warfare will move from the internet domain to the radio domain.

That's why he's buying radio stations.

(In December and January, I had 5 dreams related to FM radio station operations.)
Forwarded from PatriotAU️️️ (PatriotAU)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
JUST IN: MSNBC admits defeat, says Fani Willis will be disqualified because she allegedly “lied to the court.”

“This is epic, this is monumental... Fani Willis lied to the court, it’s game over for her. She will be disqualified.”

MSNBC was reacting to statements from Willis' former friend Robin Yeartie who said she has no doubt Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade had a “romantic” relationship in 2019 & on.

This suggests Willis lied to the court when she claimed there was no romantic relationship in 2021 between the two.

“You have no doubt that their romantic relationship was in effect from 2019 until the last time you spoke with her?” attorney Ashleigh Merchant asked.

“No doubt,” Yeartie replied.

Collin Rugg
As I understand the possible consequences under GA law, a DQ of Willis would automatically DQ the entire Fulton County DA's Office.

The case would then have to be taken over by a different GA DA. I'm not sure what process is involved in that re-assignment, whether it would be by the State AG or by a supervising Court.

I don't know if the case would move out of Fulton County to the County where the other DA is located.

But it certainly will derail the case for months if not a year or more.

It would also open the case up to re-evaluation as to its legal merit and factual strength by the new DA.
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1758200910784970889
As a GENERAL PROPOSITION -- when a Judge is inclined to rule against a particular participant, that Judge allows the participant to say pretty much anything and everything he/she wants. It's called "protecting the record."

What that does is cut-off the losing party from being able to claim "You didn't give me a chance to say everything I wanted to say, blah, blah, blah."

All it really does is eat up time, but the extra time spent in the hearing is a small fraction of what would be required if the judge was reversed and the matter had to be done over again.

I suspect that if Judge McAfee was of the opinion that Willis' conduct was simply unprofessional and unethical, but not disqualifying -- taking the worst case spin on everything presented by the defendants -- he would not be allowing his to grind on with Willis on the stand. But to let her say everything she wants to say, he has to let the questioning continue.

https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1758250170150694987?s=20
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andy Biggs explains the "Russian space nukes" stunt that Mike Turner pulled yesterday.