Three Members of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee have told Politico that the National Security Threat caused by a New Russian Capability is “Disturbing” but that it is a Longer-Term Concern “Not a Today thing” and that, “It is a Serious Issue but not an Immediate Crisis.”
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757830434166022660
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757830434166022660
X (formerly Twitter)
OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) on X
Three Members of the U.S. House Intelligence Committee have told Politico that the National Security Threat caused by a New Russian Capability is “Disturbing” but that it is a Longer-Term Concern “Not a Today thing” and that, “It is a Serious Issue but not…
U.S. Defense Officials have confirmed that the “national security threat” has to do with a space-based capability by the Russian military.
https://twitter.com/JacquiHeinrich/status/1757840362838622384
https://twitter.com/JacquiHeinrich/status/1757840362838622384
X (formerly Twitter)
Jacqui Heinrich (@JacquiHeinrich) on X
More: Pentagon official tells me this threat has to do with space.
Intelligence related to the “National Security Threat” announced today by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee has reportedly now been made Available to all Members of Congress in the Senate and House of Representatives.
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757838588996198727
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757838588996198727
X (formerly Twitter)
OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) on X
Intelligence related to the “National Security Threat” announced today by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee has reportedly now been made Available to all Members of Congress in the Senate and House of Representatives.
The National Security Threat reportedly involves the Russian Military attempting the Deployment of Nuclear Weapons into Space for use against Satellites.
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757856303127413041
https://twitter.com/sentdefender/status/1757856303127413041
X (formerly Twitter)
OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) on X
The National Security Threat reportedly involves the Russian Military attempting the Deployment of Nuclear Weapons into Space for use against Satellites.
I don't want to go full conspiracy theorist, but the timing of the announcement of the Russian space nukes just happens to follow Tucker's interview with Putin, which suggests that Russia isn't an immediate threat to US national security.
n January 2018, as part of the 16-Year Plan to Destroy America, Q highlighted the CIA's efforts to weaponize space.
▪️NASA was intentionally weakened to prevent US space dominance.
▪️Bad actors would take down military satellites.
▪️They would replace military satellites with weapons of mass destruction—specifically, space-based EMPs. (Nuclear weapons are not necesary. An EMP is sufficient to disable satellites.)
▪️The use of EMPs in space would leave the world helpless.
▪️NASA was intentionally weakened to prevent US space dominance.
▪️Bad actors would take down military satellites.
▪️They would replace military satellites with weapons of mass destruction—specifically, space-based EMPs. (Nuclear weapons are not necesary. An EMP is sufficient to disable satellites.)
▪️The use of EMPs in space would leave the world helpless.
In a unanimous 9-0 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the Biden administration in a case revolving around the question of whether or not people can sue federal agencies.
While the Biden administration argued that federal agencies were immune from these lawsuits—the U.S. Supreme Court rejected this argument and has now opened the door for many more lawsuits to be filed in the near future.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/u-s-supreme-court-issues-9-0-ruling-facts-matter-5585861
While the Biden administration argued that federal agencies were immune from these lawsuits—the U.S. Supreme Court rejected this argument and has now opened the door for many more lawsuits to be filed in the near future.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/u-s-supreme-court-issues-9-0-ruling-facts-matter-5585861
EpochTV
US Supreme Court Issues 9–0 Ruling | Facts Matter
The Supreme Court just ruled against the Biden administration in a case revolving around the question of whether or not people can sue federal agencies.
Special Counsel Robert Hur plans to testify before Congress in an open Hearing in March regarding his report on President Biden's mishandling of classified documents.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-hur-testify-publicly-damning-report-revealed-bidens-memory-age-issues-report.amp
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/special-counsel-hur-testify-publicly-damning-report-revealed-bidens-memory-age-issues-report.amp
Fox News
Special Counsel Hur to testify publicly on damning report that revealed Biden’s memory, age issues: report
Special Counsel Robert Hur will testify before a House committee regarding his report that revealed President Biden's significant memory issues.
Joe Biden claims he wasn't involved in the prosecution of President Trump, but three separate prosecutors reportedly met with White House aides before indicting Trump.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/14/prosecutors-reportedly-met-with-biden-admin-before-3-trump-indictments/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/02/14/prosecutors-reportedly-met-with-biden-admin-before-3-trump-indictments/
Breitbart
Prosecutors Reportedly Met with Biden Admin Before 3 Trump Indictments
Three separate prosecutors reportedly met with White House aides before indicting former President Donald Trump, President Joe Biden's political opponent.
John Podesta was behind the Biden administration’s decision to halt U.S. liquefied natural gas exports.
His brother, Tony Podesta, is a lobbyist for foreign LNG companies.
Follow the money.
https://freebeacon.com/energy/john-podesta-was-behind-bidens-decision-to-pause-natural-gas-exports-his-lobbyist-brother-stands-to-benefit/
His brother, Tony Podesta, is a lobbyist for foreign LNG companies.
Follow the money.
https://freebeacon.com/energy/john-podesta-was-behind-bidens-decision-to-pause-natural-gas-exports-his-lobbyist-brother-stands-to-benefit/
The Washington Free Beacon
John Podesta Was Behind Biden’s Decision To Pause Natural Gas Exports. His Lobbyist Brother Stands To Benefit.
Biden administration climate envoy John Podesta was behind the administration’s decision to pause U.S. liquified natural gas exports. His brother Tony Podesta could reap the benefits as a longtime lobbyist for foreign Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) companies—including…
Air Force & Space Force Unveil Major Overhaul To Prepare For War With China
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/air-force-space-force-announce-major-overhaul-prepare-war-china
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/air-force-space-force-announce-major-overhaul-prepare-war-china
ZeroHedge
Air Force & Space Force Unveil Major Overhaul To Prepare For War With China
"We are out of time," Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall said.
Forwarded from PatriotAU️️️ (PatriotAU)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
JUST IN: MSNBC admits defeat, says Fani Willis will be disqualified because she allegedly “lied to the court.”
“This is epic, this is monumental... Fani Willis lied to the court, it’s game over for her. She will be disqualified.”
MSNBC was reacting to statements from Willis' former friend Robin Yeartie who said she has no doubt Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade had a “romantic” relationship in 2019 & on.
This suggests Willis lied to the court when she claimed there was no romantic relationship in 2021 between the two.
“You have no doubt that their romantic relationship was in effect from 2019 until the last time you spoke with her?” attorney Ashleigh Merchant asked.
“No doubt,” Yeartie replied.
Collin Rugg
“This is epic, this is monumental... Fani Willis lied to the court, it’s game over for her. She will be disqualified.”
MSNBC was reacting to statements from Willis' former friend Robin Yeartie who said she has no doubt Willis and prosecutor Nathan Wade had a “romantic” relationship in 2019 & on.
This suggests Willis lied to the court when she claimed there was no romantic relationship in 2021 between the two.
“You have no doubt that their romantic relationship was in effect from 2019 until the last time you spoke with her?” attorney Ashleigh Merchant asked.
“No doubt,” Yeartie replied.
Collin Rugg
As I understand the possible consequences under GA law, a DQ of Willis would automatically DQ the entire Fulton County DA's Office.
The case would then have to be taken over by a different GA DA. I'm not sure what process is involved in that re-assignment, whether it would be by the State AG or by a supervising Court.
I don't know if the case would move out of Fulton County to the County where the other DA is located.
But it certainly will derail the case for months if not a year or more.
It would also open the case up to re-evaluation as to its legal merit and factual strength by the new DA.
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1758200910784970889
The case would then have to be taken over by a different GA DA. I'm not sure what process is involved in that re-assignment, whether it would be by the State AG or by a supervising Court.
I don't know if the case would move out of Fulton County to the County where the other DA is located.
But it certainly will derail the case for months if not a year or more.
It would also open the case up to re-evaluation as to its legal merit and factual strength by the new DA.
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1758200910784970889
X (formerly Twitter)
Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) on X
As I understand the possible consequences under GA law, a DQ of Willis would automatically DQ the entire Fulton County DA's Office.
The case would then have to be taken over by a different GA DA. I'm not sure what process is involved in that re-assignment…
The case would then have to be taken over by a different GA DA. I'm not sure what process is involved in that re-assignment…
Hamas collapse underway: Exhausted terrorists emerge out of tunnels & surrender to IDF across Gaza, defense journalist @alonbd reports via @MaarivOnline ;
Terror operatives say they were running out of water, haven’t heard from their commanders in weeks
https://twitter.com/IsraelRadar_com/status/1758198798684180907
Terror operatives say they were running out of water, haven’t heard from their commanders in weeks
https://twitter.com/IsraelRadar_com/status/1758198798684180907
X (formerly Twitter)
Israel Radar (@IsraelRadar_com) on X
Hamas collapse underway: Exhausted terrorists emerge out of tunnels & surrender to IDF across Gaza, defense journalist @alonbd reports via @MaarivOnline; terror operatives say they were running out of water, haven’t heard from their commanders in weeks
…
…
As a GENERAL PROPOSITION -- when a Judge is inclined to rule against a particular participant, that Judge allows the participant to say pretty much anything and everything he/she wants. It's called "protecting the record."
What that does is cut-off the losing party from being able to claim "You didn't give me a chance to say everything I wanted to say, blah, blah, blah."
All it really does is eat up time, but the extra time spent in the hearing is a small fraction of what would be required if the judge was reversed and the matter had to be done over again.
I suspect that if Judge McAfee was of the opinion that Willis' conduct was simply unprofessional and unethical, but not disqualifying -- taking the worst case spin on everything presented by the defendants -- he would not be allowing his to grind on with Willis on the stand. But to let her say everything she wants to say, he has to let the questioning continue.
https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1758250170150694987?s=20
What that does is cut-off the losing party from being able to claim "You didn't give me a chance to say everything I wanted to say, blah, blah, blah."
All it really does is eat up time, but the extra time spent in the hearing is a small fraction of what would be required if the judge was reversed and the matter had to be done over again.
I suspect that if Judge McAfee was of the opinion that Willis' conduct was simply unprofessional and unethical, but not disqualifying -- taking the worst case spin on everything presented by the defendants -- he would not be allowing his to grind on with Willis on the stand. But to let her say everything she wants to say, he has to let the questioning continue.
https://x.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1758250170150694987?s=20
X (formerly Twitter)
Shipwreckedcrew (@shipwreckedcrew) on X
As a GENERAL PROPOSITION -- when a Judge is inclined to rule against a particular participant, that Judge allows the participant to say pretty much anything and everything he/she wants. It's called "protecting the record."
What that does is cut-off the…
What that does is cut-off the…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Andy Biggs explains the "Russian space nukes" stunt that Mike Turner pulled yesterday.