Carbon dioxide (CO2) Facts on Telegram by GRT : the true behind global greenhouse gas emissions / planet pollution
95 subscribers
1.2K photos
65 videos
7 files
163 links
Download Telegram
It's time to stop taking excuses using bullshit facts https://t.me/AnimalFreaks/1526
We in Switzerland, USA, Russia, etc. pollute too much. Based on EU data, China has a CO2 pro capita of 8.73, EU 6.27, Global 4.81, Germany 8.06, Switzerland 4.02 (but we are still pollute a lot, check https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/239), USA 14.24, United Arab Emirates 19.47!

So stop to check such things just based on % or total pollution, since a lot other factors are needed to consider: 1) where do all our products come from? YES, MADE IN CHINA! 2) We are in 8 billion, in 2080 10 billion https://perma.cc/F5ZZ-MLFV BUT USA has just 337 million, while China 1.43 billion! https://perma.cc/7X99-P58K 3) if you check old data, USA was already much higher in the past! when GDP of China was low!

The world’s top 1% of emitters produce over 1000 times more CO2 than the bottom 1% https://perma.cc/9WTF-4AHY

Per capita CO₂ emissions, 2021 https://perma.cc/R9PF-9RRX

CO2 emissions of all world countries https://perma.cc/K9G2-7SML

How large are inequalities in global carbon emissions – and what to do about it? https://perma.cc/8FZ8-FCNG

9 Charts Explain Per Capita Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Country https://perma.cc/G52J-93RL

First image: https://t.me/AnimalFreaks/1530

Sources: Environmental Science and Pollution Research Allocation of carbon emission quotas based on global equality perspective, Morocco's Road to a Climate-Resilient Energy Transition: Emissions Drivers, Solutions, and Barriers, Predictors of national CO2 emissions: do international commitments matter?, Carbon dioxide emissions from the electricity sector in major countries: a decomposition analysis, Climate Change and Africa, Consumption-based versus production-based accounting of CO2 emissions: Is there evidence for carbon leakage?, Disaggregated environmental impacts of non-renewable energy and trade openness in selected G-20 countries: the conditioning role of technological innovation, Allocating a 2 °C cumulative carbon budget to countries, etc.
Russia is nothing better with CO2 pollution per capita with 13.52, like you can see in all previous pictures or on @PollutionFacts

Remember that WWF is no more active in Russia ... https://t.me/RussianTelegramFreaks/1244

Learn more how you can reduce pollution with over 10 important tips, no matter if you are a vegan or not!
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram/122
Backup https://perma.cc/RRG8-NGXK https://perma.cc/Y4QA-QR33

Or about how you think / act:
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/142
Backup https://perma.cc/VN9N-LAZ3

Узнайте больше о том, как уменьшить загрязнение окружающей среды, воспользовавшись более чем 10 важными советами, независимо от того, являетесь ли вы веганом или нет!
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram/122
Бэкап https://perma.cc/RRG8-NGXK https://perma.cc/Y4QA-QR33

Или о том, как вы думаете/действуете:
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/142
Бэкап https://perma.cc/VN9N-LAZ3
Greenhouse gas emissions per capita in the European Union (EU-27) in 1990 and 2021, by country https://perma.cc/XQJ6-F2PC
Eating less meat 'like taking 8m cars off road' https://perma.cc/D3F3-YGMH

based on: Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts

Like we wrote previously here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/292
or here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/215
https://t.me/FoodWasteTelegram
https://t.me/PollutionFacts

or better exactly here
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/12
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/15
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/20
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/58

For both land use and eutrophication, there is a large difference between the high meat-eaters and all other groups. For eutrophication, the low-meat diet has an impact that is 57.4% (49.6– 68.4%) of the high-meat-eating group. For land use, the impact of low meat-eaters is 43.8% (20.7–65.4%) of the high meat-eaters.

Dietary impacts of vegans were 25.1% (95% uncertainty interval, 15.1–37.0%) of
high meat-eaters (≥100 g total meat consumed per day) for greenhouse
gas emissions, 25.1% (7.1–44.5%) for land use, 46.4% (21.0–81.0%) for water use, 27.0% (19.4–40.4%) for eutrophication and 34.3% (12.0–65.3%) for biodiversity.

Based on the National Diet and Nutrition Survey, which estimated that in 2016–2019, the average consumption of all meat (that is, processed and unprocessed meat including poultry but excluding fish) in 19–64 year olds was 99 g d−1, and 77 g d−1 in the 65+ age group.

Another reason why a ⅓, ⅔ vegan diet, a flexible vegan diet (or a full vegan diet) are a good options to save our planet, without forcing people to be 100% vegan

About that you can find more
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/164
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/165
https://t.me/VeganFactsTelegram/19
https://t.me/SwitzerlandFacts/265
https://t.me/PollutionFacts/16
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/94
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/113
https://t.me/VeganNutritionTelegram/114