#گروه_بریکس 🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇧🇷🇿🇦
@PoliticalCompass
برزیل، روسیه، هند و چین چهار کشوریاند که اقتصادهای نوظهور قرن بیست و یکم تلقی میشوند.
این چهار کشور در سال ۲۰۰۹ میلادی پیمانی را بنیان نهادند که بریک نام گرفت و پس از آنکه در سال ۲۰۱۱ میلادی آفریقای جنوبی هم وارد این ائتلاف شد نام این اتحادیه به بریکس تغییر یافت.
🔹هسته اصلی بریکس را گروه «ریک» تشکیل میدهد که مراد از آن کشورهای روسیه، هندوستان و چین است و در اوایل سالهای دهه ۱۹۹۰ میلادی و با ابتکار روسیه تشکیل شده بود؛ اما با پیوستن برزیل به این مجموعه بریک متولد شد.
🔹پس از تأسیس بریک در سال ۲۰۰۹ آفریقای جنوبی تلاشهای فراوانی برای پیوستن به این گروه انجام داد و در پی آن بعد از نشست وزرای امور خارجه بریک در سال ۲۰۱۰ در نیویورک با عضویت آفریقای جنوبی موافقت شد و این کشور از سال ۲۰۱۱ رسماً عضو این گروه شد و پس از آن عنوان بریک به بریکس تغییر یافت.
🔹اهداف بریکس
–اصلاح ساختار اقتصادی و مالی جهانی که توجهی به افزایش وزن اقتصادی کشورهای بریکس و سایر اقتصادهای در حال ظهور ندارد.
–تقویت استانداردها و اصول قوانین و قواعد بینالمللی در راستای جلوگیری و ممانعت از نقض حاکمیت دیگر کشورها و بیاثرسازی سیاستهای قدرت.
–تعامل، همکاری و مشارکت به صورت گسترده مسائل، معضلات و موضوعات مربوط به مدرنیزه کردن اجتماعی و اقتصادی
–حمایت کامل از تمامی بخشهای اقتصادی تمامی اعضا
@PoliticalCompass
➕بریکس چه امتیاز، قابلیت و توانمندی برای رسیدن به اهداف دارد؟
➖امتیاز سیاسی–امنیتی
دو عضو دائم در شورای امنیت سازمان ملل، چهار کشور دارنده فناوری ساخت سلاح هستهای، نقش فعال در سازمانهای بینالمللی نظیر گروه ۲۰، گروه ۸، گروه ۷۷، سازمان کشورهای غیرمتعهد، عضویت در سازمانهای منطقهای مهم مانند سازمان شانگهای(چین)،سازمان کشورهای مشترکالمنافع و پیمان امنیت جمعی(روسیه)، مرکوسور و اتحادیه کشورهای آمریکای جنوبی(برزیل) و اتحادیه آسیای جنوبی(هند)
➖امتیاز جمعیتی– اقتصادی
%۴۳ جمعیت جهان، ۳۰% مساحت خاک جهان، ۲۵% اقتصاد، ۱۵% تجارت جهانی و ۴۵% نیروی کار جهان، بالای ۳۰% تولید ناخالص داخلی جهان.
➕در مسیر همبستگی اعضای بریکس موانعی وجود دارد که تا رفع نشوند قدرتیابی بریکس با وجود تمام پتانسیلهای قوی که دارد ناکام خواهد ماند:
➖اولین و مهمترین مانع غرب و ایالات متحده خواهد بود. چرا که به اهمیت بریکس پی برده و خط مشی بریکس در رقابت با نهادهای غربی اقتصاد جهانی بر آنان مشهود است. غرب با تکیه بر اختلافاندازی میان اعضا و نزدیک شدن به هریک از آنها و نیز در صورت نیاز ایجاد مشکلات داخلی برای هریک سعی در تضعیف این گروه خواهد داشت. نمونههای بارز این موضوع در دوران اوباما مشهود بوده و اینکه ترامپ نیز دیدگاه مساعدی به این گروه ندارد.
➖عامل دوم ناهمگونیهای میان اعضا میباشد. مدل اقتصادی این کشورها با یکدیگر همخوانی ندارد و الگوی روسی و چینی رشد با الگوی برزیلی و هندی که نزدیک به سرمایهداری غرب بوده است ناهمگون میباشد. آفریقای جنوبی از لحاظ اقتصادی چندان همخوانی با بقیه اعضا ندارد.
🔹اعضای بریکس معتقد هستند این گروه حامی کشورهای در حال توسعه و کشورهای جنوب و برقرارکننده تعادل و عدالت اقتصادی در مقابله با نظام پولی و بانکی غربی است
🔹ناهمگونی سیاسی هم میان اعضا مایه اختلاف است. نظامهای سیاسی اعضا متفاوت و در مواردی میتواند خطمشی نامناسب با دیگران اختیار کنند. برای مثال در موضوع بحرانهای خاورمیانه موضع چین و روسیه متفاوت از بقیه اعضا بوده است. در عین حال در مواردی میتوانند رقیب سیاسی هم محسوب شوند. برای مثال روسیه، چین و هند در حوزه آسیا و یا مشکلات مرزی چین و هند.
@PoliticalCompass
🔹اهداف هریک از اعضا در پیوستن به بریکس متفاوت است و از حداقل همپوشانی برخوردار میباشد.
تقاضا برای پیوستن به این گروه از سوی کشورهای در حال توسعه بالا است. الحاق همگی به این گروه انسجام داخلی را از بین میبرد و عدم پذیرش نیز با اهداف آن در حمایت از این دسته کشورها در تعارض است.
این دلایل به همراه موارد دیگر، شکنندگی بریکس را نشان میدهند اما قدرتمندی و تاثیرگذاری آن در گرو حل این آسیبها خواهد بود.
همچنین مسائل و بحرانهای مهم جهانی به شدت مورد توجه بریکس بوده است.
چنین مواردی به خوبی نشان میدهد که رویکرد بریکس کلیت مسائل جهانی و تاثیرگذاری ویژه بر این مسائل میباشد. به نظر میرسد که بریکس توانایی این اثرگذاری را با توجه به پتانسیل ویژهاش هم در بعد اقتصادی و هم در بعد سیاسی و اجتماعی داراست اما این مهم تنها در صورت توجه ویژه اعضا به بریکس و نیز ارائه راهکارهای عملی برای رفع موانع پیشرفت و انسجام آن انجام خواهد شد.
منابع:
#گروه_بریکس 🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇧🇷🇿🇦
@PoliticalCompass
@PoliticalCompass
برزیل، روسیه، هند و چین چهار کشوریاند که اقتصادهای نوظهور قرن بیست و یکم تلقی میشوند.
این چهار کشور در سال ۲۰۰۹ میلادی پیمانی را بنیان نهادند که بریک نام گرفت و پس از آنکه در سال ۲۰۱۱ میلادی آفریقای جنوبی هم وارد این ائتلاف شد نام این اتحادیه به بریکس تغییر یافت.
🔹هسته اصلی بریکس را گروه «ریک» تشکیل میدهد که مراد از آن کشورهای روسیه، هندوستان و چین است و در اوایل سالهای دهه ۱۹۹۰ میلادی و با ابتکار روسیه تشکیل شده بود؛ اما با پیوستن برزیل به این مجموعه بریک متولد شد.
🔹پس از تأسیس بریک در سال ۲۰۰۹ آفریقای جنوبی تلاشهای فراوانی برای پیوستن به این گروه انجام داد و در پی آن بعد از نشست وزرای امور خارجه بریک در سال ۲۰۱۰ در نیویورک با عضویت آفریقای جنوبی موافقت شد و این کشور از سال ۲۰۱۱ رسماً عضو این گروه شد و پس از آن عنوان بریک به بریکس تغییر یافت.
🔹اهداف بریکس
–اصلاح ساختار اقتصادی و مالی جهانی که توجهی به افزایش وزن اقتصادی کشورهای بریکس و سایر اقتصادهای در حال ظهور ندارد.
–تقویت استانداردها و اصول قوانین و قواعد بینالمللی در راستای جلوگیری و ممانعت از نقض حاکمیت دیگر کشورها و بیاثرسازی سیاستهای قدرت.
–تعامل، همکاری و مشارکت به صورت گسترده مسائل، معضلات و موضوعات مربوط به مدرنیزه کردن اجتماعی و اقتصادی
–حمایت کامل از تمامی بخشهای اقتصادی تمامی اعضا
@PoliticalCompass
➕بریکس چه امتیاز، قابلیت و توانمندی برای رسیدن به اهداف دارد؟
➖امتیاز سیاسی–امنیتی
دو عضو دائم در شورای امنیت سازمان ملل، چهار کشور دارنده فناوری ساخت سلاح هستهای، نقش فعال در سازمانهای بینالمللی نظیر گروه ۲۰، گروه ۸، گروه ۷۷، سازمان کشورهای غیرمتعهد، عضویت در سازمانهای منطقهای مهم مانند سازمان شانگهای(چین)،سازمان کشورهای مشترکالمنافع و پیمان امنیت جمعی(روسیه)، مرکوسور و اتحادیه کشورهای آمریکای جنوبی(برزیل) و اتحادیه آسیای جنوبی(هند)
➖امتیاز جمعیتی– اقتصادی
%۴۳ جمعیت جهان، ۳۰% مساحت خاک جهان، ۲۵% اقتصاد، ۱۵% تجارت جهانی و ۴۵% نیروی کار جهان، بالای ۳۰% تولید ناخالص داخلی جهان.
➕در مسیر همبستگی اعضای بریکس موانعی وجود دارد که تا رفع نشوند قدرتیابی بریکس با وجود تمام پتانسیلهای قوی که دارد ناکام خواهد ماند:
➖اولین و مهمترین مانع غرب و ایالات متحده خواهد بود. چرا که به اهمیت بریکس پی برده و خط مشی بریکس در رقابت با نهادهای غربی اقتصاد جهانی بر آنان مشهود است. غرب با تکیه بر اختلافاندازی میان اعضا و نزدیک شدن به هریک از آنها و نیز در صورت نیاز ایجاد مشکلات داخلی برای هریک سعی در تضعیف این گروه خواهد داشت. نمونههای بارز این موضوع در دوران اوباما مشهود بوده و اینکه ترامپ نیز دیدگاه مساعدی به این گروه ندارد.
➖عامل دوم ناهمگونیهای میان اعضا میباشد. مدل اقتصادی این کشورها با یکدیگر همخوانی ندارد و الگوی روسی و چینی رشد با الگوی برزیلی و هندی که نزدیک به سرمایهداری غرب بوده است ناهمگون میباشد. آفریقای جنوبی از لحاظ اقتصادی چندان همخوانی با بقیه اعضا ندارد.
🔹اعضای بریکس معتقد هستند این گروه حامی کشورهای در حال توسعه و کشورهای جنوب و برقرارکننده تعادل و عدالت اقتصادی در مقابله با نظام پولی و بانکی غربی است
🔹ناهمگونی سیاسی هم میان اعضا مایه اختلاف است. نظامهای سیاسی اعضا متفاوت و در مواردی میتواند خطمشی نامناسب با دیگران اختیار کنند. برای مثال در موضوع بحرانهای خاورمیانه موضع چین و روسیه متفاوت از بقیه اعضا بوده است. در عین حال در مواردی میتوانند رقیب سیاسی هم محسوب شوند. برای مثال روسیه، چین و هند در حوزه آسیا و یا مشکلات مرزی چین و هند.
@PoliticalCompass
🔹اهداف هریک از اعضا در پیوستن به بریکس متفاوت است و از حداقل همپوشانی برخوردار میباشد.
تقاضا برای پیوستن به این گروه از سوی کشورهای در حال توسعه بالا است. الحاق همگی به این گروه انسجام داخلی را از بین میبرد و عدم پذیرش نیز با اهداف آن در حمایت از این دسته کشورها در تعارض است.
این دلایل به همراه موارد دیگر، شکنندگی بریکس را نشان میدهند اما قدرتمندی و تاثیرگذاری آن در گرو حل این آسیبها خواهد بود.
همچنین مسائل و بحرانهای مهم جهانی به شدت مورد توجه بریکس بوده است.
چنین مواردی به خوبی نشان میدهد که رویکرد بریکس کلیت مسائل جهانی و تاثیرگذاری ویژه بر این مسائل میباشد. به نظر میرسد که بریکس توانایی این اثرگذاری را با توجه به پتانسیل ویژهاش هم در بعد اقتصادی و هم در بعد سیاسی و اجتماعی داراست اما این مهم تنها در صورت توجه ویژه اعضا به بریکس و نیز ارائه راهکارهای عملی برای رفع موانع پیشرفت و انسجام آن انجام خواهد شد.
منابع:
#گروه_بریکس 🇷🇺🇮🇳🇨🇳🇧🇷🇿🇦
@PoliticalCompass
مقایسه #ناتو_و_گروه_بریکس
#ناتو
#گروه_بریکس
BRICS VS NATO: The differences and how they compare
Comparing BRICS and NATO is very difficult as the BRICS bloc is still relatively small and new establishing in 2006, while NATO is large and was founded in 1949.
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) 5 member states from South America, Africa, Asia and Eurasia was founded on principles of cooperation, trade, non-interference, equality, and mutual benefit.
While NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) consisting of 29 member states from North America, Europe and Turkey, was founded on the principles of collective defense and security of the North Atlantic area, defending each other when needed (an attack on one NATO country is an attack on all).
Initially, NATO was established as an organisation to prevent another world war, to build trade partners and hedge against the feared communism of the time. Today it is well noted by economist that NATO has helped its member states, by boosting not only trade but their economies, education systems, innovation and entrepreneurship.
BRICS can therefore be seen as a NATO in the beginning stages per se, BRICS only being established in 2006 known then as BRIC, is an association of major emerging economies similar to NATO but with less focus on defence and military actions. Today BRICS (with the joining of South Africa) is more interested in the development of it member states in these key areas: economy, business and trade, education, agriculture, health, technology, science and trade.
BRICS countries contribute up to 23.2%, $18.6 trillion of Global GDP, the 5 countries make up over 3 billion in population numbers or 42.58% of the global population. While NATO’s population size of over 900 million people and the GDP of all NATO members combined, makes up almost $40 trillion.
So if we can use NATO as measuring stick as to where BRICS can go or how big it can become, then it is clear that BRICS is far from reaching its full potential as yet. All the five BRICS members are still classified as developing nations. While NATO is full of developed countries whom have already reach the heights of their individual peaks.
Source: theinfographicsshow.com
مقایسه #ناتو_و_گروه_بریکس
#ناتو
#گروه_بریکس
#ناتو
#گروه_بریکس
BRICS VS NATO: The differences and how they compare
Comparing BRICS and NATO is very difficult as the BRICS bloc is still relatively small and new establishing in 2006, while NATO is large and was founded in 1949.
BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) 5 member states from South America, Africa, Asia and Eurasia was founded on principles of cooperation, trade, non-interference, equality, and mutual benefit.
While NATO (the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) consisting of 29 member states from North America, Europe and Turkey, was founded on the principles of collective defense and security of the North Atlantic area, defending each other when needed (an attack on one NATO country is an attack on all).
Initially, NATO was established as an organisation to prevent another world war, to build trade partners and hedge against the feared communism of the time. Today it is well noted by economist that NATO has helped its member states, by boosting not only trade but their economies, education systems, innovation and entrepreneurship.
BRICS can therefore be seen as a NATO in the beginning stages per se, BRICS only being established in 2006 known then as BRIC, is an association of major emerging economies similar to NATO but with less focus on defence and military actions. Today BRICS (with the joining of South Africa) is more interested in the development of it member states in these key areas: economy, business and trade, education, agriculture, health, technology, science and trade.
BRICS countries contribute up to 23.2%, $18.6 trillion of Global GDP, the 5 countries make up over 3 billion in population numbers or 42.58% of the global population. While NATO’s population size of over 900 million people and the GDP of all NATO members combined, makes up almost $40 trillion.
So if we can use NATO as measuring stick as to where BRICS can go or how big it can become, then it is clear that BRICS is far from reaching its full potential as yet. All the five BRICS members are still classified as developing nations. While NATO is full of developed countries whom have already reach the heights of their individual peaks.
Source: theinfographicsshow.com
مقایسه #ناتو_و_گروه_بریکس
#ناتو
#گروه_بریکس
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
USA vs BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa) Who Would Win?
Are we currently on the brink of seeing a shift towards new global superpowers? If we look at the power wielded by any nation right now, the United States could be said to be in a globally dominant position.
Before it, Great Britain and its empire was the dominant global force, and prior to that there is a long line of countries that have at one time sat at the apex of the global economy, culture, science, and military strength.
Great nations may also decline, a concept known as declinism, while simultaneously other nations are busy evolving into powerful states.
What is BRICS?
BRICS is an acronym standing for the five countries it represents: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The acronym at first was just BRIC, until South Africa made an appeaance in the association in 2010. BRIC was formally started in 2006 when the first BRIC meeting was held, under the aegis of a mutual agreement to boost each member country’s development. Not only developments relating to economy, business and trade, but also education, agriculture, health, technology, science and the arts.
What is the economy of BRICS like?
Together BRICS is a powerful conglomerate, accounting for 42.58 percent of the world’s population and according to the International Monetary Fund, about 22 percent of the world GDP. Compared to the United States, in terms of size alone, it’s Goliath staring down at David. If we look at the numbers, BRICS has a combined population of about 3.6 billion people. The USA has a population of just 325 million people. The U.S. GDP is the biggest in the world at 18 trillion-plus dollars, although BRICS combined has a GDP of 37 trillion dollars. The U.S. is not expected to make any headway on BRICS any time soon regarding economic growth, with its estimated growth to be around 2 percent over the next few years. BRICS is expected to see growth of around 5 percent. In an article in the Atlantic published in 2012, Goldman Sachs projected that China’s GDP alone would be equal to America’s by 2027, and then leap past it. In regard to economy, BRICS nations are ascending quickly. This growth, it’s believed, will lead to much stronger militaries, especially those of China and India.
How much do BRICS countries spend on military?
Right now, the U.S. spends more on its military than any other nation, with a defense budget of 639 billion dollars for 2018. It’s such a large budget, that even 5 emerging nations’ defense budgets together don’t exceed it. According to the Global Firepower index, Brazil’s military budget is currently 24.5 billion dollars, Russia’s is 44.6 billion, India’s is 51 billion, China’s is 161.7 billion and South Africa’s is 4.6 billion. Combined, BRICS countries have a defense budget of 286.4 billion dollars. This is even more astonishing when you consider that China and India are both in the top countries for highest military expenditures.
How much manpower do BRICS countries have?
In terms of feet on the ground, you probably already know the U.S. is severely outmanned. The U.S. has 1.3 million active military personnel, and a further 811,000 acting as reserve personnel. China alone has 4.6 million total personnel, India 3.4 million, Russia 3.2 million, Brazil 2.1 million, and South Africa 106,000. In total, that is almost 13.5 million people ready to fight.
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
USA vs BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa) Who Would Win?
Are we currently on the brink of seeing a shift towards new global superpowers? If we look at the power wielded by any nation right now, the United States could be said to be in a globally dominant position.
Before it, Great Britain and its empire was the dominant global force, and prior to that there is a long line of countries that have at one time sat at the apex of the global economy, culture, science, and military strength.
Great nations may also decline, a concept known as declinism, while simultaneously other nations are busy evolving into powerful states.
What is BRICS?
BRICS is an acronym standing for the five countries it represents: Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. The acronym at first was just BRIC, until South Africa made an appeaance in the association in 2010. BRIC was formally started in 2006 when the first BRIC meeting was held, under the aegis of a mutual agreement to boost each member country’s development. Not only developments relating to economy, business and trade, but also education, agriculture, health, technology, science and the arts.
What is the economy of BRICS like?
Together BRICS is a powerful conglomerate, accounting for 42.58 percent of the world’s population and according to the International Monetary Fund, about 22 percent of the world GDP. Compared to the United States, in terms of size alone, it’s Goliath staring down at David. If we look at the numbers, BRICS has a combined population of about 3.6 billion people. The USA has a population of just 325 million people. The U.S. GDP is the biggest in the world at 18 trillion-plus dollars, although BRICS combined has a GDP of 37 trillion dollars. The U.S. is not expected to make any headway on BRICS any time soon regarding economic growth, with its estimated growth to be around 2 percent over the next few years. BRICS is expected to see growth of around 5 percent. In an article in the Atlantic published in 2012, Goldman Sachs projected that China’s GDP alone would be equal to America’s by 2027, and then leap past it. In regard to economy, BRICS nations are ascending quickly. This growth, it’s believed, will lead to much stronger militaries, especially those of China and India.
How much do BRICS countries spend on military?
Right now, the U.S. spends more on its military than any other nation, with a defense budget of 639 billion dollars for 2018. It’s such a large budget, that even 5 emerging nations’ defense budgets together don’t exceed it. According to the Global Firepower index, Brazil’s military budget is currently 24.5 billion dollars, Russia’s is 44.6 billion, India’s is 51 billion, China’s is 161.7 billion and South Africa’s is 4.6 billion. Combined, BRICS countries have a defense budget of 286.4 billion dollars. This is even more astonishing when you consider that China and India are both in the top countries for highest military expenditures.
How much manpower do BRICS countries have?
In terms of feet on the ground, you probably already know the U.S. is severely outmanned. The U.S. has 1.3 million active military personnel, and a further 811,000 acting as reserve personnel. China alone has 4.6 million total personnel, India 3.4 million, Russia 3.2 million, Brazil 2.1 million, and South Africa 106,000. In total, that is almost 13.5 million people ready to fight.
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
How strong are BRICS ground units?
Workforce aside, the USA still spends more than all these other countries. So where does the money go? In terms of land equipment, the USA has around 5,884 tanks, 41,000 armored fighting vehicles, 1,934 self-propelled guns, 1,299 towed artillery, and 1,331 multiple-launch rocket systems. Most of this equipment is the latest in military innovations, with the U.S. continually developing more advanced war machines such as its latest battle tank, the M1A2 SEP v4.
Russia and China, the two strongest of the BRICS militaries, alone make a formidable force on the ground. If the two nations were to form a military duo, they’d have over 24,000 main battles tanks, over 35,000 armored fighting vehicles, almost 8,000 self-propelled guns, over 12,000 towed artillery and over 5,000 multiple launch rocket systems. As well as having strong fleets of tanks, the two countries are currently developing two new tanks that are rated as highly as the new M1A2, in China’s VT-4 and Russia’s T-14 Armata.
India also has some modern land equipment, and is currently investing billions of its new money into thousands of pieces of new artillery. This will include a fleet of Arjun MK-II third-generation battle tanks. Brazil has modern weapons, much of which was bought from the USA, the world’s biggest arms exporter. It’s most extolled land weapon is its almost 400-strong fleet of German-made Leopard 1 tanks that it acquired in 2006.
How strong is BRICS air force?
If the USA can’t compete on the ground, it certainly can in the air. The United States air force is by far the most advanced in the world. The number of modern aircraft alone in the U.S. air force can match a number of leading nations put together. This can be credited to the U.S. air force having a bigger budget than any other nation’s entire military budget.
From its 13,444 aircrafts, the U.S. can choose from a number of some of the world’s most advanced machines. This includes almost a thousand F-16 Fighting Falcons, 195 F-22A Raptors, 257 F-15E Strike Eagles, a large fleet of McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornets and F/A-18E Super Hornets, as well as its new pride of the skies, a fleet of F-35A Lightning IIs.
As we said, no air force comes close to this, but Russia, India and China have highly rated equipment and are often part of lists containing what is said to be the world’s best air forces. It’s worth noting that the latter two countries are investing heavily in aerial military developments. Russia’s most advanced aircraft is it’s highly rated Sukhoi Su-35, followed by its Sukhoi Su-27s and MiG-31 interceptors, all of which are part of a fleet of 3,000 aircraft. That’s why Russia usually follows the U.S. on the most powerful list.
India also has a considerable cache of aircraft, including Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKIs and Mikoyan MiG-29s, as well as the respected French-built multi-role fighter, the Dassault Mirage 2000. China is perhaps playing catch-up, but it’s doing a good job. Its fleet consists of Russia’s Su-35s and Su-27s but the country is also looking to match America’s F-35 with its own Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter. Brazil’s most modern aircraft, the Saab JAS 39 Gripen multirole fighter, is another top ten aerial fighting machine. Currently the South African air force has nothing that compares to its BRICS partners.
How strong is BRICS navy?
As we take to the seas, again the United States spends as much on its navy – about 170 billion dollars – as other countries could only hope to spend on all military branches. Much of this money goes on infrastructure, operations and maintenance, personnel, research and development, as well as acquiring new ships. The USA currently leads the world in terms of aircraft carriers, owning 11 of them.
It’s currently developing the Gerald R. Ford class super-carrier, which should help bolster the navy’s position as a global leader. These ships are of great importance as they are in effect floating militaries.
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
How strong are BRICS ground units?
Workforce aside, the USA still spends more than all these other countries. So where does the money go? In terms of land equipment, the USA has around 5,884 tanks, 41,000 armored fighting vehicles, 1,934 self-propelled guns, 1,299 towed artillery, and 1,331 multiple-launch rocket systems. Most of this equipment is the latest in military innovations, with the U.S. continually developing more advanced war machines such as its latest battle tank, the M1A2 SEP v4.
Russia and China, the two strongest of the BRICS militaries, alone make a formidable force on the ground. If the two nations were to form a military duo, they’d have over 24,000 main battles tanks, over 35,000 armored fighting vehicles, almost 8,000 self-propelled guns, over 12,000 towed artillery and over 5,000 multiple launch rocket systems. As well as having strong fleets of tanks, the two countries are currently developing two new tanks that are rated as highly as the new M1A2, in China’s VT-4 and Russia’s T-14 Armata.
India also has some modern land equipment, and is currently investing billions of its new money into thousands of pieces of new artillery. This will include a fleet of Arjun MK-II third-generation battle tanks. Brazil has modern weapons, much of which was bought from the USA, the world’s biggest arms exporter. It’s most extolled land weapon is its almost 400-strong fleet of German-made Leopard 1 tanks that it acquired in 2006.
How strong is BRICS air force?
If the USA can’t compete on the ground, it certainly can in the air. The United States air force is by far the most advanced in the world. The number of modern aircraft alone in the U.S. air force can match a number of leading nations put together. This can be credited to the U.S. air force having a bigger budget than any other nation’s entire military budget.
From its 13,444 aircrafts, the U.S. can choose from a number of some of the world’s most advanced machines. This includes almost a thousand F-16 Fighting Falcons, 195 F-22A Raptors, 257 F-15E Strike Eagles, a large fleet of McDonnell Douglas CF-18 Hornets and F/A-18E Super Hornets, as well as its new pride of the skies, a fleet of F-35A Lightning IIs.
As we said, no air force comes close to this, but Russia, India and China have highly rated equipment and are often part of lists containing what is said to be the world’s best air forces. It’s worth noting that the latter two countries are investing heavily in aerial military developments. Russia’s most advanced aircraft is it’s highly rated Sukhoi Su-35, followed by its Sukhoi Su-27s and MiG-31 interceptors, all of which are part of a fleet of 3,000 aircraft. That’s why Russia usually follows the U.S. on the most powerful list.
India also has a considerable cache of aircraft, including Russian-made Sukhoi Su-30MKIs and Mikoyan MiG-29s, as well as the respected French-built multi-role fighter, the Dassault Mirage 2000. China is perhaps playing catch-up, but it’s doing a good job. Its fleet consists of Russia’s Su-35s and Su-27s but the country is also looking to match America’s F-35 with its own Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter. Brazil’s most modern aircraft, the Saab JAS 39 Gripen multirole fighter, is another top ten aerial fighting machine. Currently the South African air force has nothing that compares to its BRICS partners.
How strong is BRICS navy?
As we take to the seas, again the United States spends as much on its navy – about 170 billion dollars – as other countries could only hope to spend on all military branches. Much of this money goes on infrastructure, operations and maintenance, personnel, research and development, as well as acquiring new ships. The USA currently leads the world in terms of aircraft carriers, owning 11 of them.
It’s currently developing the Gerald R. Ford class super-carrier, which should help bolster the navy’s position as a global leader. These ships are of great importance as they are in effect floating militaries.
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
The U.S. also has 22 cruisers, 67 destroyers, 8 frigates, 75 submarines, 0 corvettes, 9 amphibious assault ships, 11 mine warfare ships and 55 patrol ships. rines, 0 corvettes, 9 amphibious assault ships, 11 mine warfare ships and 55 patrol ships.
According to National Interest, the USA and the UK will be followed by three countries as the most powerful navies in the near future. You guessed it, those countries are China, India and Russia. While Russia is to be expected, both India and China have been pouring money into their respective navies.
Pundits believe that by 2030, India will have the second largest navy in the world, and will also have its own supercarrier. It currently has one aircraft carrier, 0 cruisers, 11 destroyers, 14 frigates, 15 submarines, 23 corvettes, 0 amphibious assault ships, 7 mine warfare ships and 72 patrol ships. China is on track to have the largest fleet come 2030, and is close to finishing its secret supercarrier, the CV-18. Russia’s greatest threat is its large fleet of 60 submarines, some carrying devastating ballistic missiles. Again, both Brazil and South Africa are not regarded as having strong navies in terms of global power, but together the former triumvirate of BRICS navies would be dominant if they were all on the same side.
What about nuclear capabilities?
The U.S. and Russia own around half of all the nuclear weapons in the world, with China’s small arsenal of around 260 non-deployed weapons being a matter of speculation in terms of numbers. India is said to have around 120 warheads, and is believed to be working on increasing its nuclear arsenal. Brazil and South Africa have no nuclear weapons.
So, do you think the US would stand a chance against BRICS, or would it be a total wipeout? Let us know in the comments!
Sources:
https://brics2017.org/English/AboutBRICS/BRICS/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS
https://knoema.com/qhswwkc/us-gdp-growth-forecast-2015-2019-and-up-to-2060-data-and-charts
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/02/the-world-in-2050-when-the-5-largest-economies-are-the-brics-and-us/253160/
http://www.globalfirepower.com/defense-spending-budget.asp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_equipment_of_the_Brazilian_Army
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=100596
http://www.hellotravel.com/stories/top-10-strongest-air-forces-of-world
http://www.secnav.navy.mil/fmc/fmb/Documents/18pres/DON_PB_OVERVIEW.pdf
http://thediplomat.com/2014/04/does-the-us-navy-have-10-or-19-aircraft-carriers/
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-5-most-powerful-navies-2030-16723?page=2
http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/nuclear-arsenals/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nikolas-kozloff/wikileaks-brazils-militar_b_823124.html
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
The U.S. also has 22 cruisers, 67 destroyers, 8 frigates, 75 submarines, 0 corvettes, 9 amphibious assault ships, 11 mine warfare ships and 55 patrol ships. rines, 0 corvettes, 9 amphibious assault ships, 11 mine warfare ships and 55 patrol ships.
According to National Interest, the USA and the UK will be followed by three countries as the most powerful navies in the near future. You guessed it, those countries are China, India and Russia. While Russia is to be expected, both India and China have been pouring money into their respective navies.
Pundits believe that by 2030, India will have the second largest navy in the world, and will also have its own supercarrier. It currently has one aircraft carrier, 0 cruisers, 11 destroyers, 14 frigates, 15 submarines, 23 corvettes, 0 amphibious assault ships, 7 mine warfare ships and 72 patrol ships. China is on track to have the largest fleet come 2030, and is close to finishing its secret supercarrier, the CV-18. Russia’s greatest threat is its large fleet of 60 submarines, some carrying devastating ballistic missiles. Again, both Brazil and South Africa are not regarded as having strong navies in terms of global power, but together the former triumvirate of BRICS navies would be dominant if they were all on the same side.
What about nuclear capabilities?
The U.S. and Russia own around half of all the nuclear weapons in the world, with China’s small arsenal of around 260 non-deployed weapons being a matter of speculation in terms of numbers. India is said to have around 120 warheads, and is believed to be working on increasing its nuclear arsenal. Brazil and South Africa have no nuclear weapons.
So, do you think the US would stand a chance against BRICS, or would it be a total wipeout? Let us know in the comments!
Sources:
https://brics2017.org/English/AboutBRICS/BRICS/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRICS
https://knoema.com/qhswwkc/us-gdp-growth-forecast-2015-2019-and-up-to-2060-data-and-charts
https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/02/the-world-in-2050-when-the-5-largest-economies-are-the-brics-and-us/253160/
http://www.globalfirepower.com/defense-spending-budget.asp
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_equipment_of_the_Brazilian_Army
http://www.navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=100596
http://www.hellotravel.com/stories/top-10-strongest-air-forces-of-world
http://www.secnav.navy.mil/fmc/fmb/Documents/18pres/DON_PB_OVERVIEW.pdf
http://thediplomat.com/2014/04/does-the-us-navy-have-10-or-19-aircraft-carriers/
http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-5-most-powerful-navies-2030-16723?page=2
http://www.icanw.org/the-facts/nuclear-arsenals/
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nikolas-kozloff/wikileaks-brazils-militar_b_823124.html
مقایسه #ایالات_متحده_آمریکا_و_گروه_بریکس
#ایالات_متحده_آمریکا
#گروه_بریکس
@PoliticalCompass —11.pdf
430.3 KB
#نقشه_زنان_در_سیاست
This map is a unique visual tool that captures women’s participation in executive government and in parliament on a given date—1st January 2019.
The map of Women in Politics not only provides a country ranking for both ministerial and parliamentary representation, but also statistics on women in political leadership positions—Heads of State or government, women Speakers of Parliament, as well as ministerial portfolios held by women throughout the world.
Borders are depicted and used on the map in order to present data.
They are not the expression of any opinion concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers or boundaries.
#نقشه_زنان_در_سیاست
@PoliticalCompass
This map is a unique visual tool that captures women’s participation in executive government and in parliament on a given date—1st January 2019.
The map of Women in Politics not only provides a country ranking for both ministerial and parliamentary representation, but also statistics on women in political leadership positions—Heads of State or government, women Speakers of Parliament, as well as ministerial portfolios held by women throughout the world.
Borders are depicted and used on the map in order to present data.
They are not the expression of any opinion concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers or boundaries.
#نقشه_زنان_در_سیاست
@PoliticalCompass