Pantopia Reading Nook 📰🚩
512 subscribers
597 photos
3 videos
66 files
3.56K links
The news channel of the Pantopia Community. We publish articles, short essays, videos and all kinds of media around leftist theory.

Looking for books? Check out @pantopialibrary
Group chat: @pantopiagroup
Download Telegram
The FCC’s “Delete, Delete, Delete” docket is being used as a platform for corporate broadcasters to push for sweeping deregulation of media ownership and competition rules. Proposals include eliminating the national TV ownership cap, which currently prevents a single corporation from owning stations that reach more than 39% of U.S. households—a limit in place to prevent excessive concentration of influence. Broadcasters argue it is outdated and hinders competition with streaming platforms, and removing it would enable large mergers like Nexstar-Tegna. Another key proposal is repealing local ownership limits, which restrict a company from owning more than two TV stations or an excessive number of radio stations in a single market, rules designed to ensure diverse local media voices since 1964. Finally, the dual network rule, which prevents mergers between the four major broadcast networks (ABC, CBS, Fox, NBC), is also targeted, with industry arguing it no longer serves the public interest in today’s media landscape.

The process benefits from an open-ended timeline, a political climate blending regulatory power with administration influence, and the 2024 Supreme Court decision weakening deference to agency expertise. Critics warn that fully realizing this agenda would lead to unprecedented media consolidation, diminished local news, and greater corporate alignment with political interests, worsening the broader information crisis threatening democracy.

https://www.openmarketsinstitute.org/publications/the-corner-newsletter-the-fccs-delete-the-public-interest-initiative-october-8th-2025
ared Abbott argues that rebuilding a working-class political majority in the U.S. requires more than union organizing or local experiments; it needs a supportive political and legal environment, economic populist candidates, and long-term community engagement. Working-class voters, now increasingly drifting from Democrats—especially non-college-educated and multiracial groups—are crucial for winning national elections and for countering far-right influence in local communities.

Progressives should run candidates who unapologetically challenge corporate power and highlight working-class struggles, as this messaging resonates strongly with these voters. Electing candidates from working-class backgrounds also boosts credibility and advocacy for pro-worker policies. Bold progressive economic platforms—covering wages, labor rights, public investment, and redistribution—are broadly popular among working-class voters, but Democrats often fail to foreground them, allowing conservatives to dominate the economic populist narrative.

Abbott warns against two failed strategies: “Trump Lite” cultural triangulation and passive “rope-a-dope” approaches, emphasizing instead authentic engagement on local terms. Long-term investment in political and civic infrastructure—persistent organizing, local offices, and community services—is critical to rebuild trust in progressive politics. Ultimately, a durable working-class majority depends on combining electoral power, economic populist leadership, and sustained local presence to deliver meaningful material improvements and reshape political expectations.

https://jacobin.com/2025/10/working-class-strategy-dealignment-populism/
Perhaps most consequentially, Israel is now dramatically reducing the amount of aid that it will allow to enter the strip, dropping the total number of permitted daily truckloads from 600 — the amount aid officials say is needed to help alleviate famine — to 300.

Israel claims that this reduced number of trucks will carry only humanitarian aid. But Al Jazeera reported Thursday that many of the shipments have contained commercial products, which are unaffordable for the vast majority of Gazans. Meanwhile, Israel has continued to carry out attacks within Gaza, killing at least nine Palestinians who allegedly got too close to Israeli military facilities in the strip.

https://responsiblestatecraft.org/gaza-ceasefire-deal/
Trump-led appropriations bills have also starved maritime capacity. In Trump’s most recent appropriations bill, the Small Shipyard Grant Program, one of the few federal mechanisms for helping grow shipbuilding capacity, received $8.75 million, a record low and less than half of the $21 million it received during the Biden administration.

For shipyards competing against heavily subsidized foreign rivals, these grants often determine whether they can afford to modernize equipment like cranes and welding machines or fall further behind. Demand for the grants has consistently exceeded supply, with applications surpassing available funds by more than five times. Underfunding the program not only reduces its effectiveness but also signals a retreat at a time when foreign shipyards are receiving significant government support.

https://washingtonmonthly.com/2025/10/09/trump-shipbuilding-failure/
«Le fiamme distrussero l’abitazione intera», scrive la premier nella sua autobiografia “Io sono Giorgia”. «No, i danni riguardavano una finestra», dice chi ha comprato l’immobile subito dopo. I ricordi del portinaio: quando arrivarono i vigili del fuoco lo trovarono con una pompa in mano mentre era intento a disperdere il fumo, le fiamme erano divampate solo nella cameretta e rovinato la finestra. Forse una porta.

https://www.editorialedomani.it/fatti/meloni-io-sono-giorgia-incendio-casa-roma-underdog-governo-y8v9ogjo
In Chicago, former Harold Washington ran on a very similar social democratic platform during his 1983 mayoral campaign. Once he assumed office, Chicago’s business elite blocked his attempts to expand public programs and redistribute wealth. He eventually compromised with capital in hopes that maintaining investment in the city would generate a large enough tax base to fund a robust social safety net.

Young argues that progressive parliamentary politics cannot meet the challenge of capital strikes without the support of a militant working-class movement on the ground. For Mamdani to implement even part of his agenda, the Left will need to mobilize ordinary New Yorkers on a mass scale. As a member of NYC-DSA himself, Mamdani has a background in democratic movement politics, and members of DSA and the broader left helped propel his campaign to victory over Cuomo. He may be able to lean on these organizations for political capital — for instance, to build and mobilize support across the city for his agenda in the face of opposition by “moderate” local and state lawmakers.

Bernie Sanders, as mayor of Burlington, Vermont, was essentially forced to construct a “parallel city government” to counteract a hostile city council’s attempts to undermine his ability to govern. Mamdani and his supporters should take lessons from Sanders’s mayoralty to heart; a recent rally in Brooklyn with Sanders suggests that the would-be mayor is doing so.

But this is only half the battle. Because of the threat of capital strikes as well as the influence of corporate lobbies and the large donors who fund most political campaigns, political and economic elites only begin to accept significant popular reforms when discontent with the status quo reaches a critical level. Socialist organizers and politicians can help channel discontent into tangible demands, like those in Mamdani’s platform, and as mayor, Mamdani can use his institutional platform to give these demands greater political legitimacy.

Grassroots organizations like DSA can, in turn, give him leverage in negotiations with the state legislature and the governor through strategic demonstrations, legislative pressure campaigns, and primary challenges against intransigent lawmakers. This dynamic can create a mutually reinforcing relationship between Mamdani’s office and his grassroots supporters.

Organized labor can also play a critical role in creating bottom-up pressure, despite the preemptions of post-Taft-Hartley American labor law. While unions are legally barred from engaging in strike activity as political advocacy, it hasn’t stopped labor from using its collective power to push for political change. Cross-union coalitions like Labor for Palestine, for example, are currently mobilizing members to pressure their unions to divest their pension funds from Israeli apartheid. And networks of union members can organize and participate in mass demonstrations in support of progressive policy issues — just last year, UAW Labor for Palestine members participated in mass protests against Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to Congress.

Unions also often mobilize their members to pack city council meetings as a pressure tactic to win stronger statutory protections for workers’ rights.

https://jacobin.com/2025/10/mamdani-nyc-mayor-labor-dsa/
Pantopia Reading Nook 📰🚩 pinned «In Chicago, former Harold Washington ran on a very similar social democratic platform during his 1983 mayoral campaign. Once he assumed office, Chicago’s business elite blocked his attempts to expand public programs and redistribute wealth. He eventually compromised…»