In conclusione, lâIres premiale Ăš solo un bonus una tantum, circoscritto, limitato e poco efficace per la patrimonializzazione delle imprese. Lâopposto dellâAiuto alla crescita economica (Ace) abolita dal 2024. Questâultima, infatti: a) riguardava lâuniverso delle imprese; b) era un elemento strutturale del sistema e garantiva un risparmio di imposta a regime di ben 2,7 miliardi di euro allâanno; c) stava contribuendo positivamente al rafforzamento patrimoniale delle societĂ .
https://lavoce.info/archives/106833/i-capricci-dellires-premiale/
https://lavoce.info/archives/106833/i-capricci-dellires-premiale/
Lavoce.info
I capricci dellâIres premiale | S. Giannini e A. Zanardi
LâIres premiale Ăš solo un bonus limitato, poco efficace per la patrimonializzazione delle imprese. Lâopposto dellâAce abolita dal 2024. In piĂč, a paritĂ di scelte di investimento, le aziende ne ricaveranno benefici fiscali molto differenziati.
The bottom line is that, for 20 years or more, including the months prior to the election, voter perception was more reflective of reality than the incumbent statistics. Our research revealed that the data collected by the various agencies is largely accurate. Moreover, the people staffing those agencies are talented and well-intentioned. But the filters used to compute the headline statistics are flawed. As a result, they paint a much rosier picture of reality than bears out on the ground.
Take, as a particularly egregious example, what is perhaps the most widely reported economic indicator: unemployment. Known to experts as the U-3, the number misleads in several ways. First, it counts as employed the millions of people who are unwillingly under-employed â that is, people who, for example, work only a few hours each week while searching for a full-time job. Second, it does not take into account many Americans who have been so discouraged that they are no longer trying to get a job. Finally, the prevailing statistic does not account for the meagerness of any individualâs income. Thus you could be homeless on the streets, making an intermittent income and functionally incapable of keeping your family fed, and the government would still count you as âemployed.â
I donât believe those who went into this past election taking pride in the unemployment numbers understood that the near-record low unemployment figures â the figure was a mere 4.2 percent in November â counted homeless people doing occasional work as âemployed.â But the implications are powerful. If you filter the statistic to include as unemployed people who canât find anything but part-time work or who make a poverty wage (roughly $25,000), the percentage is actually 23.7 percent. In other words, nearly one of every four workers is functionally unemployed in America today â hardly something to celebrate.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/02/11/democrats-tricked-strong-economy-00203464
Take, as a particularly egregious example, what is perhaps the most widely reported economic indicator: unemployment. Known to experts as the U-3, the number misleads in several ways. First, it counts as employed the millions of people who are unwillingly under-employed â that is, people who, for example, work only a few hours each week while searching for a full-time job. Second, it does not take into account many Americans who have been so discouraged that they are no longer trying to get a job. Finally, the prevailing statistic does not account for the meagerness of any individualâs income. Thus you could be homeless on the streets, making an intermittent income and functionally incapable of keeping your family fed, and the government would still count you as âemployed.â
I donât believe those who went into this past election taking pride in the unemployment numbers understood that the near-record low unemployment figures â the figure was a mere 4.2 percent in November â counted homeless people doing occasional work as âemployed.â But the implications are powerful. If you filter the statistic to include as unemployed people who canât find anything but part-time work or who make a poverty wage (roughly $25,000), the percentage is actually 23.7 percent. In other words, nearly one of every four workers is functionally unemployed in America today â hardly something to celebrate.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2025/02/11/democrats-tricked-strong-economy-00203464
POLITICO
Voters Were Right About the Economy. The Data Was Wrong.
Hereâs why unemployment is higher, wages are lower and growth less robust than government statistics suggest.
- Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu: âYou must remember what Amalek has done to you, says our Holy Bible. And we do remember.â This is a reference invoking the Biblical story of the total destruction of the Amalek by the Israelites, which Biblical passage reads in the relevant part: âSpare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses.â
- President Isaac Herzog: âItâs an entire nation out there that is responsible. Itâs not true this rhetoric about civilians not aware not involved. Itâs absolutely not true. ⊠and we will fight until we break their backbone.â
Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant:
- Israel is âimposing a complete siege on Gaza. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel. Everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.â
- âGaza wonât return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything. If it doesnât take one day, it will take a week. It will take weeks or even months, we will reach all places.â
- Minister for National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir: â[t]o be clear, when we say that Hamas should be destroyed, it also means those who celebrate, those who support, and those who hand out candy â theyâre all terrorists, and they should also be destroyed.â
- Minister of Energy and Infrastructure Israel Katz: âAll the civilian population in Gaza is ordered to leave immediately. We will win. They will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.â
- Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich: âWe need to deal a blow that hasnât been seen in 50 years and take down Gaza.â
- Minister of Amihai Eliyahu: âThe north of the Gaza Strip, more beautiful than ever. Everything is blown up and flattened, simply a pleasure for the eyes ⊠We must talk about the day after. In my mind, we will hand over lots to all those who fought for Gaza over the years and to those evicted from Gush Katifâ [a former Israeli settlement]. âThere is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza.â
- Minister of Agriculture Avi Dichter: âWe are now actually rolling out the Gaza Nakba.â [This term, âNakba,â is a reference to the forced expulsion of around 750,000 Palestinians during the war that established Israel as an independent state. Israeli historian Ilan Pappe refers to it as The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.]
- Knesset Deputy Speaker and Foreign Affairs and Security Committee Member Nissim Vaturi: âNow we all have one common goal â erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth.â
- Israeli Reservist Major General and adviser to the Defense Minister Giora Eiland:
- "The people should be told that they have two choices; to stay and to starve, or to leave. If Egypt and other countries prefer that these people will perish in Gaza, this is their choice.â
- âIsrael has no interest in the Gaza Strip being rehabilitated and this is an important point that needs to be made clear to the Americans.â
- âThe State of Israel has no choice but to make Gaza a place that is temporarily, or permanently, impossible to live in.â
- âWho are the âpoorâ women of Gaza? They are all the mothers, sisters or wives of Hamas murderers. . . . The international community warns us of a humanitarian disaster in Gaza and of severe epidemics. We must not shy away from this, as difficult as that may be. After all, severe epidemics in the south of the Gaza Strip will bring victory closer . . . It is precisely its civil collapse that will bring the end of the war closer. When senior Israeli figures say in the media âItâs either us or themâ we should clarify the question of who is âthemâ. âTheyâ are not only Hamas fighters with weapons, but also all the âcivilianâ officials, including hospital administrators and school administrators, and also the entire Gaza population who enthusiastically supported Hamas and cheered on its atrocities on October 7th.â
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/01/israel-has-no-defense
- President Isaac Herzog: âItâs an entire nation out there that is responsible. Itâs not true this rhetoric about civilians not aware not involved. Itâs absolutely not true. ⊠and we will fight until we break their backbone.â
Minister of Defense Yoav Gallant:
- Israel is âimposing a complete siege on Gaza. No electricity, no food, no water, no fuel. Everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and we are acting accordingly.â
- âGaza wonât return to what it was before. We will eliminate everything. If it doesnât take one day, it will take a week. It will take weeks or even months, we will reach all places.â
- Minister for National Security Itamar Ben-Gvir: â[t]o be clear, when we say that Hamas should be destroyed, it also means those who celebrate, those who support, and those who hand out candy â theyâre all terrorists, and they should also be destroyed.â
- Minister of Energy and Infrastructure Israel Katz: âAll the civilian population in Gaza is ordered to leave immediately. We will win. They will not receive a drop of water or a single battery until they leave the world.â
- Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich: âWe need to deal a blow that hasnât been seen in 50 years and take down Gaza.â
- Minister of Amihai Eliyahu: âThe north of the Gaza Strip, more beautiful than ever. Everything is blown up and flattened, simply a pleasure for the eyes ⊠We must talk about the day after. In my mind, we will hand over lots to all those who fought for Gaza over the years and to those evicted from Gush Katifâ [a former Israeli settlement]. âThere is no such thing as uninvolved civilians in Gaza.â
- Minister of Agriculture Avi Dichter: âWe are now actually rolling out the Gaza Nakba.â [This term, âNakba,â is a reference to the forced expulsion of around 750,000 Palestinians during the war that established Israel as an independent state. Israeli historian Ilan Pappe refers to it as The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine.]
- Knesset Deputy Speaker and Foreign Affairs and Security Committee Member Nissim Vaturi: âNow we all have one common goal â erasing the Gaza Strip from the face of the earth.â
- Israeli Reservist Major General and adviser to the Defense Minister Giora Eiland:
- "The people should be told that they have two choices; to stay and to starve, or to leave. If Egypt and other countries prefer that these people will perish in Gaza, this is their choice.â
- âIsrael has no interest in the Gaza Strip being rehabilitated and this is an important point that needs to be made clear to the Americans.â
- âThe State of Israel has no choice but to make Gaza a place that is temporarily, or permanently, impossible to live in.â
- âWho are the âpoorâ women of Gaza? They are all the mothers, sisters or wives of Hamas murderers. . . . The international community warns us of a humanitarian disaster in Gaza and of severe epidemics. We must not shy away from this, as difficult as that may be. After all, severe epidemics in the south of the Gaza Strip will bring victory closer . . . It is precisely its civil collapse that will bring the end of the war closer. When senior Israeli figures say in the media âItâs either us or themâ we should clarify the question of who is âthemâ. âTheyâ are not only Hamas fighters with weapons, but also all the âcivilianâ officials, including hospital administrators and school administrators, and also the entire Gaza population who enthusiastically supported Hamas and cheered on its atrocities on October 7th.â
https://www.currentaffairs.org/news/2024/01/israel-has-no-defense
www.currentaffairs.org
Israel Has No Defense
After South Africa laid out a damning case of genocidal intent against Israel in international court, Israel responded by shrugging it off, hardly even mounting a defense. Meanwhile, Netanyahu insisted that âNo one will stop us, not The Hague⊠and not anyoneâŠ
Kim Lane Scheppele argues that Trump is following Viktor OrbĂĄnâs authoritarian model, consolidating power in the executive branch, bypassing checks and balances, and attacking democratic institutions. She highlights Trumpâs ties to OrbĂĄn, including through Project 2025, which was influenced by Hungarian think tanks. OrbĂĄn has used similar tactics in Europe, strengthening far-right movements and undermining democratic norms. Trumpâs rapid executive actions aim to reshape government before opposition can respond, mirroring OrbĂĄnâs strategy of breaking institutions before courts or political resistance can intervene.
https://truthout.org/video/trump-embraces-authoritarian-playbook-of-hungarian-dictator-viktor-orban/
https://truthout.org/video/trump-embraces-authoritarian-playbook-of-hungarian-dictator-viktor-orban/
Truthout
Trump Embraces Authoritarian Playbook of Hungarian Dictator Viktor OrbĂĄn
Princeton professor Kim Lane Scheppele points out that OrbĂĄn was actually involved in the design of Project 2025.
Dallâinizio del XX secolo fino al 2008, lâaumento del Pil pro capite Ăš stato piĂč o meno lo stesso per gli Stati uniti e lâEurozona. Da allora, tuttavia, il divario Ăš aumentato in modo significativo. Ă avvenuto quando le economie dellâeurozona hanno scelto di attuare dure politiche di austeritĂ , con un conseguente forte calo relativo. Anche in questo caso, dopo la pandemia da Covid 19, le politiche espansive in Europa sono state meno incisive che negli Stati uniti, il che ha determinato unâaltra divergenza. Se lâEuropa si sta allontanando dagli Stati uniti in termini di Pil pro capite, non Ăš perchĂ© ci stiamo muovendo verso nuovi indicatori di ricchezza o nuove ambizioni ecologiche. Ă semplicemente perchĂ© siamo meno coerenti dal punto di vista della gestione macroeconomica. Riconoscere questo problema, come fa il rapporto di Draghi, Ăš un passo importante. Identifica la necessitĂ di maggiori spese e investimenti. Tuttavia, quando si entra nei dettagli di ciĂČ che il rapporto propone, dubito che si possa arrivare a esiti positivi. Per esempio, sostiene che lâEuropa manca di competitivitĂ , ma non Ăš cosĂŹ. In realtĂ , lâEuropa Ăš molto competitiva: nel complesso, ha unâeccedenza commerciale. Quindi, nel confronto con gli Stati uniti, il problema dellâEuropa non Ăš che ha bisogno di una maggiore competitivitĂ , ma piuttosto di una maggiore produttivitĂ , che non Ăš la stessa cosa. Questo Ăš legato alle politiche di innovazione e allo sviluppo delle imprese. Ă molto importante sottolineare questa differenza.
Unâaltra questione fondamentale Ăš che molti paesi europei hanno adottato standard neoliberali piĂč rigidi rispetto agli Stati uniti, soprattutto in materia di politica fiscale. In Germania câĂš il «freno al debito», che fa parte della Costituzione e che blocca un approccio fiscale piĂč attivo. CiĂČ contribuisce alla mancanza di dinamismo dellâeconomia tedesca. Anche la politica europea della concorrenza rappresenta un ostacolo a qualsiasi tipo di solida politica industriale. Sebbene ci siano stati alcuni cambiamenti a livello di discorso pubblico, ci vorrĂ tempo per abbandonare il paradigma che si Ăš instaurato nel corso dei decenni. La relazione di Draghi non affronta gli aspetti legati al quadro dellâintegrazione europea e non si intravede un percorso chiaro verso la trasformazione di tale quadro, il che Ăš molto preoccupante.
Draghi osserva come lâEuropa abbia mancato la trasformazione digitale. Non solo negli Stati uniti, ma anche in Cina e persino in Russia, ci sono forti imprese tecnologiche nazionali che forniscono servizi di tipo nuovo. In Europa non ci sono aziende che forniscono questi servizi, il che significa che gli Stati, le aziende e i cittadini europei sono sottomessi a interessi aziendali di difficile regolamentazione perchĂ© hanno sede allâestero. Lâapproccio adottato finora dallâUe, incentrato sulla protezione dei dati a livello individuale, non Ăš allâaltezza di questa sfida, che richiede un ambizioso progetto pubblico per fornire servizi digitali di base a livello locale e proteggere la sovranitĂ degli Stati europei. A un livello piĂč fondamentale, le politiche economiche su entrambe le sponde dellâAtlantico non dovrebbero puntare ad accelerare la spirale produttivista-consumistica, ma promuovere una trasformazione degli stili di vita, con servizi pubblici piĂč forti e garantendo una rete di sicurezza per la popolazione e un riequilibrio del nostro rapporto con la natura.
https://jacobinitalia.it/che-ce-dopo-il-neoliberismo/
Unâaltra questione fondamentale Ăš che molti paesi europei hanno adottato standard neoliberali piĂč rigidi rispetto agli Stati uniti, soprattutto in materia di politica fiscale. In Germania câĂš il «freno al debito», che fa parte della Costituzione e che blocca un approccio fiscale piĂč attivo. CiĂČ contribuisce alla mancanza di dinamismo dellâeconomia tedesca. Anche la politica europea della concorrenza rappresenta un ostacolo a qualsiasi tipo di solida politica industriale. Sebbene ci siano stati alcuni cambiamenti a livello di discorso pubblico, ci vorrĂ tempo per abbandonare il paradigma che si Ăš instaurato nel corso dei decenni. La relazione di Draghi non affronta gli aspetti legati al quadro dellâintegrazione europea e non si intravede un percorso chiaro verso la trasformazione di tale quadro, il che Ăš molto preoccupante.
Draghi osserva come lâEuropa abbia mancato la trasformazione digitale. Non solo negli Stati uniti, ma anche in Cina e persino in Russia, ci sono forti imprese tecnologiche nazionali che forniscono servizi di tipo nuovo. In Europa non ci sono aziende che forniscono questi servizi, il che significa che gli Stati, le aziende e i cittadini europei sono sottomessi a interessi aziendali di difficile regolamentazione perchĂ© hanno sede allâestero. Lâapproccio adottato finora dallâUe, incentrato sulla protezione dei dati a livello individuale, non Ăš allâaltezza di questa sfida, che richiede un ambizioso progetto pubblico per fornire servizi digitali di base a livello locale e proteggere la sovranitĂ degli Stati europei. A un livello piĂč fondamentale, le politiche economiche su entrambe le sponde dellâAtlantico non dovrebbero puntare ad accelerare la spirale produttivista-consumistica, ma promuovere una trasformazione degli stili di vita, con servizi pubblici piĂč forti e garantendo una rete di sicurezza per la popolazione e un riequilibrio del nostro rapporto con la natura.
https://jacobinitalia.it/che-ce-dopo-il-neoliberismo/
Jacobin Italia
Che câĂš dopo il neoliberismo? - Jacobin Italia
La fase che si Ăš aperta dopo la lunga turbolenza seguita alla crisi del 2008 e alla pandemia, Ăš segnata dal predominio del capitale finanziario che lascia il campo a un nuovo scontro interimperiale, alta inflazione ed emergenza climatica
Pantopia Reading Nook đ°đ© pinned «Dallâinizio del XX secolo fino al 2008, lâaumento del Pil pro capite Ăš stato piĂč o meno lo stesso per gli Stati uniti e lâEurozona. Da allora, tuttavia, il divario Ăš aumentato in modo significativo. Ă avvenuto quando le economie dellâeurozona hanno sceltoâŠÂ»
A new report from World Weather Attribution links the recent Los Angeles wildfires to climate change, stating that rising global temperatures have increased the likelihood of such fires by 35% and their severity by 6%. Vulnerable populations were disproportionately affected. The report coincides with California lawmakers introducing Senate Bill 222, which would allow individuals and insurers to sue fossil fuel companies for wildfire damages. The billâs author, State Sen. Scott Wiener, argues that the industry must pay for disasters fueled by its products. The proposal mirrors New Yorkâs âSuperfundâ law and could serve as a model for federal legislation.
https://truthout.org/articles/report-climate-crisis-significantly-increased-likelihood-of-los-angeles-fires/
https://truthout.org/articles/report-climate-crisis-significantly-increased-likelihood-of-los-angeles-fires/
Truthout
Report: Climate Crisis Significantly Increased Likelihood of Los Angeles Fires
An event like the Los Angeles fires is now likely to happen every 17 years, a World Weather Attribution report said.
Pantopia Reading Nook đ°đ© pinned «For my American friends https://projects.propublica.org/claimfile/»
"I wonât beat around the bush. Microsoft Office doesnât make it easy to opt out of this new AI privacy agreement, as the feature is hidden through a series of popup menus in your settings:On a Windows computer, follow these steps to turn off âConnected Experiencesâ:
File > Options > Trust Center > Trust Center Settings > Privacy Options > Privacy Settings > Optional Connected Experiences > Uncheck box: âTurn on optional connected experiencesâ"
https://medium.com/illumination/ms-word-is-using-you-to-train-ai-86d6a4d87021
File > Options > Trust Center > Trust Center Settings > Privacy Options > Privacy Settings > Optional Connected Experiences > Uncheck box: âTurn on optional connected experiencesâ"
https://medium.com/illumination/ms-word-is-using-you-to-train-ai-86d6a4d87021
Medium
MS Word is Using You to Train AI
How to turn off AI-scraping from your Word documents
"These enduring, midcentury systems arenât worthwhile because theyâre oldâtheyâre worthwhile because they work. The bureaucracies that Trump-Musk-Vought are working so aggressively to dismantle deliver money to institutions that provide food and shelter, prevent corporations from exploiting workers, restrain financial institutions from operating with complete impunity, and on and on. They undergird civil society. The people harmed by Trumpâs and DOGEâs assaults represent a group of people far larger than the handful of goons trying to bring everything down. For any of this to matter, that group of people will need to assert itself."
https://www.nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/doge-nation/
https://www.nplusonemag.com/online-only/online-only/doge-nation/
n+1
DOGE Nation | Mark Krotov
Like Critical Race Theory before itâbut with a supercharged intensity, since each new campaign of right-wing hate has been more aggressive than the lastâDiversity, Equity, and Inclusion has come to stand in for efforts and programs that have nothing at allâŠ