This discussion centers on the apparent bias in how the media portrays the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, particularly within American news outlets. Several significant issues can be identified:
1. Media Bias: There is an evident pro-Israel bias in US media, shaping the public's perception of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This bias tends to favor Israel.
2. Underrepresentation of Palestinian Voices: Media outlets often exclude or downplay Palestinian voices and perspectives in their coverage. Palestinian viewpoints receive inadequate representation.
3. Linguistic Manipulation: The language used in media reporting is also a point of concern, specifically the use of terms like "clashes" instead of "assaults." This language choice downplays Israeli responsibility for acts of violence.
4. Selective Reporting of Deaths: There is a significant imbalance in reporting casualties, with Israeli deaths receiving more extensive coverage than Palestinian deaths. This imbalance may lead to a skewed understanding of the conflict.
5. Sidelining of International Law: The media is accused of not adequately addressing Israel's violations of international law, such as its establishment of settlements in occupied territories and its use of force against Palestinians.
6. Reversing Victim and Victimizer: Media outlets sometimes portray Palestinians as the aggressors and Israelis as the victims, contributing to a distorted narrative of the conflict.
In summary, it's crucial to recognize and address these biases in media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to promote a more balanced and informed understanding of this complex issue.
https://fair.org/home/six-tropes-to-look-out-for-that-distort-israel-palestine-coverage/
1. Media Bias: There is an evident pro-Israel bias in US media, shaping the public's perception of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This bias tends to favor Israel.
2. Underrepresentation of Palestinian Voices: Media outlets often exclude or downplay Palestinian voices and perspectives in their coverage. Palestinian viewpoints receive inadequate representation.
3. Linguistic Manipulation: The language used in media reporting is also a point of concern, specifically the use of terms like "clashes" instead of "assaults." This language choice downplays Israeli responsibility for acts of violence.
4. Selective Reporting of Deaths: There is a significant imbalance in reporting casualties, with Israeli deaths receiving more extensive coverage than Palestinian deaths. This imbalance may lead to a skewed understanding of the conflict.
5. Sidelining of International Law: The media is accused of not adequately addressing Israel's violations of international law, such as its establishment of settlements in occupied territories and its use of force against Palestinians.
6. Reversing Victim and Victimizer: Media outlets sometimes portray Palestinians as the aggressors and Israelis as the victims, contributing to a distorted narrative of the conflict.
In summary, it's crucial to recognize and address these biases in media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to promote a more balanced and informed understanding of this complex issue.
https://fair.org/home/six-tropes-to-look-out-for-that-distort-israel-palestine-coverage/
FAIR
Six Tropes to Look Out for That Distort Israel/Palestine Coverage
It is vital that news readers become acquainted with the tropes that dominate coverage of the Israeli occupation.
summary:"The passage discusses the transformation of Westside Mobile Home Park in Durango, Colorado, from a threatened community facing displacement to a cooperative and community land trust model of housing ownership. The residents of the mobile home park organized to counter the sale of the park to a corporation known for raising rents and imposing strict rules. They successfully formed a housing co-operative and purchased the park with the support of Elevation Community Land Trust. Now, the park operates as a community land trust, ensuring that land is removed from the real estate market and owned jointly by residents and the land trust.
This model aims to preserve affordable housing and empower residents to have a say in decisions that impact their lives. It also highlights the rarity of collaborations between housing co-ops and community land trusts, especially in mobile-home communities. The passage emphasizes the historical significance of such models, rooted in the civil rights era, and their role in addressing issues of inequality and racial disparities in homeownership.
Ultimately, the residents of Westside Mobile Home Park now have a sense of ownership and control over their housing, with plans to redevelop the park collectively, increasing their sense of power and possibility for the future."
https://reasonstobecheerful.world/colorado-mobile-home-park-collective-ownership-affordable-housing/
This model aims to preserve affordable housing and empower residents to have a say in decisions that impact their lives. It also highlights the rarity of collaborations between housing co-ops and community land trusts, especially in mobile-home communities. The passage emphasizes the historical significance of such models, rooted in the civil rights era, and their role in addressing issues of inequality and racial disparities in homeownership.
Ultimately, the residents of Westside Mobile Home Park now have a sense of ownership and control over their housing, with plans to redevelop the park collectively, increasing their sense of power and possibility for the future."
https://reasonstobecheerful.world/colorado-mobile-home-park-collective-ownership-affordable-housing/
Reasons to be Cheerful
‘Their Voices Will Be Heard Now’: How a Colorado Community Preserved Affordable Housing
In an unusual approach, a land trust and a co-op collaborated to save a mobile-home park from corporate buyout.
What would such an economy look like? Several key objectives stand out.
1. we must expand and decommodify universal public services.
2. we must establish ambitious public works programs, to build renewable energy capacity, insulate homes, produce and install efficient appliances, restore ecosystems, and innovate socially necessary and ecologically efficient technologies
3. we must introduce a public job guarantee, empowering people to participate in these vital collective projects, doing meaningful, socially necessary work with workplace democracy and living wages.
4. we also need to scale down socially less-necessary forms of production. Fossil fuels are obvious here: we need binding targets to wind this industry down, in a fair and just way.6 But—as degrowth scholarship points out—we also need to reduce aggregate production in other destructive industries (automobiles, airlines, mansions, industrial meat, fast fashion, advertising, weapons, and so on), while extending product lifespans and banning planned obsolescence. This process should be democratically determined, but also grounded in the material reality of ecology and the imperatives of decolonial justice.
5. we urgently need to cut the excess purchasing power of the rich using wealth taxes and maximum income ratios.
https://monthlyreview.org/2023/09/01/the-double-objective-of-democratic-ecosocialism/
1. we must expand and decommodify universal public services.
2. we must establish ambitious public works programs, to build renewable energy capacity, insulate homes, produce and install efficient appliances, restore ecosystems, and innovate socially necessary and ecologically efficient technologies
3. we must introduce a public job guarantee, empowering people to participate in these vital collective projects, doing meaningful, socially necessary work with workplace democracy and living wages.
4. we also need to scale down socially less-necessary forms of production. Fossil fuels are obvious here: we need binding targets to wind this industry down, in a fair and just way.6 But—as degrowth scholarship points out—we also need to reduce aggregate production in other destructive industries (automobiles, airlines, mansions, industrial meat, fast fashion, advertising, weapons, and so on), while extending product lifespans and banning planned obsolescence. This process should be democratically determined, but also grounded in the material reality of ecology and the imperatives of decolonial justice.
5. we urgently need to cut the excess purchasing power of the rich using wealth taxes and maximum income ratios.
https://monthlyreview.org/2023/09/01/the-double-objective-of-democratic-ecosocialism/
Monthly Review
Monthly Review | The Double Objective of Democratic Ecosocialism
Humanity in this moment faces two major crises: one ecological, growing more acute with every planetary boundary passed; the other social, leading to deprivation and despair across the globe.