Piping Stress Analysis (PSA Group)
2.47K subscribers
673 photos
124 videos
53 files
10 links
Piping & Pipeline Stress Analysis
Piping Stress Analysis Training
CAESAR II Static Training
CAESAR II Dynamic Training
Special Support Design by FEA
Special Item Design

E-mail: ir.psa.co@gmail.com
Tel: (+98)912 816 2070
@Akbar_Daneshvar
Download Telegram
Sample air-cooler model
PIPE SUPPORT TYPES
Standard Beam Support
Pipe is rested on or secured to a support member usually consisting of a
standard structural shape. I-beam, wide flange beam, angle, channel etc.
The pipe may be secured to this member with a stabilizing U-bolt. (Fig. 1 & 2.)
Figure 1. Typical I-Beam Pipe Support
Figure 2. U-Bolt Stabilized Beam Supports
Saddle Clamp
Pipe is clamped between two rolled plates, one of these plates has a structural element welded to it which attaches the pipe to the support structure. (Fig. 3 & 4.)
Figure 3. Typical Half Saddle Clamp
Figure 4. Full Saddle Clamp
Welded Supports
This type of support involves welding a part to the pipe and then it is usually
free to move at the interface to the support. There are a number of variations
on this theme, this is a common approach for insulated piping systems. (Fig.
5.)
Figure 5. Typical Welded Pipe Support
Others
There are a number of other methods used, such as flange bolt supports,
various type of pipe hangers and other specialty type supports, however the
first two categories account statistically for better than 95% of support points
on a typical offshore structure.
The industry has long been aware of the problem, but has failed to appreciate the true causes; this is evidenced by some of the solutions that have been implemented to stop the problem which have actually accelerated the problem.
Rubber Pads & Liners
As previously stated, it was thought that the metal-to-metal contact was the
main problem, hence if this were eliminated the problem would also be
eliminated. The use of rubber pads of some type has been and is still thought
to solve the problem. Not true (Fig. 8.) In fact, rubber pads under pipes do a
wonderful job of reducing the life of the pipe. The crevice that was formed
without the rubber pad is mild in comparison to the new crevice, which now
has the ability to actually suck water in (by capillary action). Not only is it
better at getting water in, it is better at holding it, since air circulation and
natural evaporation is eliminated. The situation is further worsened by the
length of the crevice which allows an oxygen concentration gradient to go
from full natural concentration to anaerobic in a few centimeters.
Figure 8. Rubber Pads Accelerate Crevice Corrosion
Fiberglass Pads
Contoured pads attached to the pipe at support points (Fig. 9.) Obviously another attempt to eliminate metal to metal contact. This is better than the rubber pads but still allows a crevice to be formed at the pipe surface.
Figure 9. Fiberglass Contoured Pads Still Risk Crevice Corrosion
Welded Supports
The welded support is a viable solution. However it adds significant cost to a typical project both in terms of construction and inspection. In some situations it would be undesirable to make so many external longitudinal welds to a pressured piping system.
The Optimal Solution
Clearly the solution to this problem must address the root causes of the problem, and should have certain features that make application practical.
The important features of one successful solution that is in widespread use throughout the offshore community are as follows:
1. The crevices at the pipe surface and the ability to trap and hold water in contact with the pipe surface must be eliminated.
2. As a secondary concern, metal-to-metal contact should be eliminated.
3. The solution should allow easy maintenance and inspection of the pipe at the support point.
4. The system must provide complete support to the piping system.
5. The system will ideally be non size-specific.
6. Must be applicable to new construction and retrofits, and should
require no hot work to install.
7. Must be cost effective.
The half round, high strength thermo-plastic rod (Fig. 10), meets all of the above requirements. The half round configuration minimizes the crevice at the pipe and allows no water accumulation. The standoff provided allows easy inspection and maintenance at the support. The metal-to-metal contact is eliminated, and if used with an insulated bolt (Fig.11), the pipe can be totally isolated from the support structure. The low cost material has been selected and configured to optimize compressive strength while exhibiting very low creep, excellent u.v. stability is also a material feature. The material can be deployed as a continuous dressing to the top of a pipe support beam (Fig.12) , or can be integrated with a stabilizing U-bolt (Fig.13). Either way allows cold work installation for new construction or retrofit applications.
When using U-bolts it is important to apply a polyolefin sleeve over the shank of the bolt. This reduces the risk of cracking the paint film around the pipe as the bolt is torqued down. The olefins provide the right combination of hardness an durability to protect the pipe paint but avoid setting up a capillary crevice around the circumference of the pipe.
Figure 10. The Half-Round Pipe Support Interface
Figure 11. Rod Installed With Polyolefin Sheathed U-Bolt
re 12. Rod Installed as Beam Dressing