I BELEIVE IN ONE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC CHURCH.

(The above rites of Christianity are ALL 100% CATHOLIC.... AND IN FULL COMMUNION WITH ROME)

ISLAMIC SODOMITES

Subscribe to our Official YouTube Channel

GUYS... THIS IS A SCAMMER LARPING AS ONE OF OUR OUR CHANNELS .

Kindly note that our Channels 1)@prothate1 and
2)@CATHOLICAPOLOGETICSANDPOLEMICS

Will never DM you asking you for money or anything

A Craptist channel posted this
Did they forget that the Europeans who took part in the reconquista were Catholic?
They would hate them and align with the Muslim had they been there

THE HOLY CATHOLIC CHURCH 🇻🇦 IS TRULY ONE HOLY CATHOLIC AND APOSTOLIC..... AS WE PROFESS IN THE CREED . 🥇✝ 🇻🇦❤️‍🔥

Eastern Orthodoxy is NOT ONE , NOT HOLY , NOT CATHOLIC, And Although It is APOSTOLIC.... it's unfortunately SCHISMATIC.

EASTERN ORTHODOXY has Ordained Women deacons, it has Permitted divorce and remarriage , it has allowed Contraceptives with "no dogmatic Objection" Although the Church fathers and the true Catholic faith were clear that Contraception is A sin . Recently it has come to Light that Orthodoxy allows animal sacrifices as well . Something which again the Church , the ecumenical Councils and THE HOLY BIBLE have condemned

BIG PAGAN/PAJEET L

Pagans will always LOSE

St Basil himself says that the creed of Constantinople 381 added to the nicene creed and even was open to additions about the incarnation.

Well well well, I guess the consensus of fathers support the addition of the Filioque after all

Firstly , Constantinople 1 Wouldn't be an Ecumenical council unless a Pope Validated and RATIFIED IT as a Council .It would have been a Mere Synod without Papal ratification

So what gave the Orthodox easterners the right to Add the the Latter half of the Creed to the existing Nicene Creed.
(Because the Creed we recite today is the Nicene-Constantinopolitan creed) .

If an Orthodox considers adding one word to the Creed to be "another creed," then wouldn't removing large chunks of the original Nicene Creed also qualify as "another creed"? If an Orthodox were to retort, "But the filioque clause is heretical, so it corrupts the Creed," then the Orthodox condemn themselves for being in communion with the Western Church, which taught the filioque. As Orthodox author Edward Siecienski notes, "by the late sixth century the filioque achieved a level of acceptance in the West bordering on unanimity,.

The Numerous Church fathers accepted the Filioque as well... the Orthodox have No reason to Reject it