Remember the Excommunication of Bishop Williamson was Lifted by Pope Benedict XVI
Which means he is a bishop of the Catholic Church and we owe him respect and such we must pray for him
Which means he is a bishop of the Catholic Church and we owe him respect and such we must pray for him
π3π2
βπ£π π₯ βππ₯π
Photo
πCraptists supporting Abortion
Forwarded from Thermopylae
πΊπΈ - Traditional Catholic Bishop Richard Williamson has passed away from hemorrhage on frontal lobe.
In your charity, please pray for his soul.
Follow: @ThermopylaeNews
In your charity, please pray for his soul.
Follow: @ThermopylaeNews
π7π2
Forwarded from Propaganda Posters
1934 illustration of far right american activist charles coughlin, from the left wing magazine 'new masses'
https://redd.it/1i6xrir
@r_propagandaposters
https://redd.it/1i6xrir
@r_propagandaposters
Propaganda Posters
1934 illustration of far right american activist charles coughlin, from the left wing magazine 'new masses' https://redd.it/1i6xrir @r_propagandaposters
Leftists have been calling us nazis for a while
π±2πΏ1
Forwarded from Thermopylae
π»π¦ π¬π§ - Contrary to misinformation report by Regina Martyrum House, Bishop Richard Williamson has not yet passed away and is still alive in bed according to witness.
In your charity, please still pray for his health and soul.
Follow: @ThermopylaeNews
In your charity, please still pray for his health and soul.
Follow: @ThermopylaeNews
Disregard the disinformation
By the Grace of God Bishop Williamson is bedridden but still alive
By the Grace of God Bishop Williamson is bedridden but still alive
π10β€1
Forwarded from Silverback Groyper
I was at the March for Life yesterday. I saw a group of people who were born as a result of rape. They were wonderful people. It's horrible that there are people who think they'd have been better off murdered in the womb.
β€12π1
Funny how sede are still saying Pope Francis is trying ban the TLM
Despite him protecting it
Despite him protecting it
WE FORMALLY SEVER OUR TIES TO THE HERETICAL CHANNEL OF π
@CATHOLICSIRL
Until they FORMALLY APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR HERESY.
@CATHOLICSIRL
Until they FORMALLY APOLOGIZE FOR THEIR HERESY.
π9
Forwarded from The Marauder Project
Melchizedek, priest king of the God Most High, offering a sacrifice of bread and wine upon the return of Abraham, who had just conquered the kings of the East.
β€13
Forwarded from The Marauder Project
The reason the Church fought so hard against "salvation by faith alone" is that this is an incredibly reductionist view of faith.
The reductionist view of "Faith Alone" uses the same words as Paul the Apostle in Romans, Ephesians, and Galatians, but the Protestant term conveys a different meaning than Paul's. In those passages, Paul says we are not saved by "works", but he does not share the same understanding of that term as Protestantism. Paul's "works" are very obviously works of the Old Covenant - circumcision, ritual washing, and dietary restrictions. He says this quite explicitly in Romans, and you should enter into all readings of "works" that he writes with this understanding. But this is not what Protestantism holds as "works". "Works" under Protestantism is an incredibly vague term, and can even include repentance and prayer depending on who you ask. Paul would have considered this outrageous, as repentance is absolutely necessary for faith to be had to begin with. One comes to knowledge of God, understands they are broken and need His grace, and confess their sins to Him and put their trust in Him - this is the "act" of repentance, possible by the grace of God, and the FIRST step to increasing in faith. Using the false paradigm of Protestantism, this would seem to indicate that the order of events go: Grace > Work (repentance) > Faith
In reality, "works" and "faith" are wrapped up together, both necessitating each other. These separable terms are ONLY around due to Protestantism making the false separation. The Church would otherwise call these things like prayer and repentance "acts of faith", not "works", but unfortunately too much credit was given to the Reformers in their false semantic debates.
So how does Protestantism have a reductionist view of faith?
Protestantism holds that faith is basically a magical, amorphous substance. Protestantism cuts off faith as an end product of repentance and prayer (because that would insinuate "works" cause "faith"), and therefore they are left with this view that God's grace creates this mystical, undefinable stuff in you that causes you to believe in God by no decision of your own. And the thing is that it's incredibly easy to disprove. All you have to do is this: when they say "salvation by faith alone", you say "how much faith?"
The reductionist view of "Faith Alone" uses the same words as Paul the Apostle in Romans, Ephesians, and Galatians, but the Protestant term conveys a different meaning than Paul's. In those passages, Paul says we are not saved by "works", but he does not share the same understanding of that term as Protestantism. Paul's "works" are very obviously works of the Old Covenant - circumcision, ritual washing, and dietary restrictions. He says this quite explicitly in Romans, and you should enter into all readings of "works" that he writes with this understanding. But this is not what Protestantism holds as "works". "Works" under Protestantism is an incredibly vague term, and can even include repentance and prayer depending on who you ask. Paul would have considered this outrageous, as repentance is absolutely necessary for faith to be had to begin with. One comes to knowledge of God, understands they are broken and need His grace, and confess their sins to Him and put their trust in Him - this is the "act" of repentance, possible by the grace of God, and the FIRST step to increasing in faith. Using the false paradigm of Protestantism, this would seem to indicate that the order of events go: Grace > Work (repentance) > Faith
In reality, "works" and "faith" are wrapped up together, both necessitating each other. These separable terms are ONLY around due to Protestantism making the false separation. The Church would otherwise call these things like prayer and repentance "acts of faith", not "works", but unfortunately too much credit was given to the Reformers in their false semantic debates.
So how does Protestantism have a reductionist view of faith?
Protestantism holds that faith is basically a magical, amorphous substance. Protestantism cuts off faith as an end product of repentance and prayer (because that would insinuate "works" cause "faith"), and therefore they are left with this view that God's grace creates this mystical, undefinable stuff in you that causes you to believe in God by no decision of your own. And the thing is that it's incredibly easy to disprove. All you have to do is this: when they say "salvation by faith alone", you say "how much faith?"
π₯11
Idk why some people think you have to worship Hitler in order to truly hate the jews
Newsflash:
The hatred of the Christkillers didnβt start or will end with Hitler
In fact Karl Lueger, a Austrian Politician was one of the most famous jew haters of his time and some say he inspired Hitler
I understand why some of you may like him
He gave great speeches, brought up a lot of good points, made a popular movement
You can get inspired to a point
But we are not trying to be another version of him because we actually want to win permanently
Newsflash:
The hatred of the Christkillers didnβt start or will end with Hitler
In fact Karl Lueger, a Austrian Politician was one of the most famous jew haters of his time and some say he inspired Hitler
I understand why some of you may like him
He gave great speeches, brought up a lot of good points, made a popular movement
You can get inspired to a point
But we are not trying to be another version of him because we actually want to win permanently