https://open.substack.com/pub/christinemasseyfois/p/fda-lawyer-admits-hpv-and-all-other

Please have a read of this, to me (but not to the author) remarkable exchange between Christine Massey and FDA on a freedom of information act request targeted on the alleged “HPV virus”.

Honestly, to assign a disease to an agent claimed to be causative, the literature ought to be awash with evidence of the existence of said agent and it ought to be simple to respond productively to the request.

That’s not what happened & it’s the same whoever Christine asks, now in the hundreds, all nearly summarized in links within the article.

My conclusion is in my post, attached as an image.

With best wishes
Mike

👉 https://t.me/DrMikeYeadon

Sincere Apology To The Un-Jabbed - source

cOx4kKm4Fb.png (568×514)
https://www.imgbly.com/ib/cOx4kKm4Fb.png

Licence to Kill: Drugs with Consequences—with Dr Mike Yeadon | UKColumn
https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/licence-to-kill-drugs-with-consequences-with-dr-mike-yeadon

Yesterday's vaccine module at "Covid" inquiry

4 mins 22 - "the population were in a phase 4 trial"

How can there ever have been informed consent if people were not told they were in a trial? She clearly states they were. Had people heard those words they may have thought twice about having the jab. And when many of us pointed out it was a trial at the time, we were removed from social media

So much more could be said, but I can hear the lawyer speak throughout this. I've done it myself on many occasions in the past. However, it's no time for professional polite standards which really are nothing other than stopping lawyers from delivering hard truths

This is the biggest crime against humanity worldwide

The new LNP study is out and it's damning

As an aside, youtube removed this and other segments from the inquiry channel, for "medical misinformation". Government inquiry videos removed by a private corporation! It's a disgrace. Don't know if those removed have been reinstated yet

Yesterday's vaccine module at "Covid" inquiry

4 mins 22 - "the population were in a phase 4 trial"

How can there ever have been informed consent if people were not told they were in a trial? She clearly states they were. Had people heard those words they may have thought twice about having the jab. And when many of us pointed out it was a trial at the time, we were removed from social media

So much more could be said, but I can hear the lawyer speak throughout this. I've done it myself on many occasions in the past. However, it's no time for professional polite standards which really are nothing other than stopping lawyers from delivering hard truths

This is the biggest crime against humanity worldwide

The new LNP study is out and it's damning

As an aside, youtube removed this and other segments from the inquiry channel, for "medical misinformation". Government inquiry videos removed by a private corporation! It's a disgrace. Don't know if those removed have been reinstated yet

She wants to ask where yesterday's has gone too....

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2025/01/14/youtube-censored-covid-inquiry-evidence-on-vaccine-harms/

Lifetime in prison for these criminals, don’t let them get away

0l5gmm.jpeg (655×491)
https://files.catbox.moe/0l5gmm.jpeg

wrdv5m.jpeg (1528×1388)
https://files.catbox.moe/wrdv5m.jpeg

7csglx.jpeg (526×526)
https://files.catbox.moe/7csglx.jpeg

Open Letter to Prof. Denis Rancourt - by Eric F Coppolino
https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/open-letter-to-prof-denis-rancourt