You are looking at the malicious ad-in source code… which was used to set up the entire “Russia hacked the DNC” narrative.
If you have not already seen Revealing Ukraine...
I highly recommend investing the time to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhu3lfgHhCI&rco=1
I highly recommend investing the time to watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jhu3lfgHhCI&rco=1
YouTube
Revealing Ukraine
Igor Lopatonok and Oliver Stone Documentary.
“Revealing Ukraine” by Igor Lopatonok continues investigations on of the ongoing Ukrainian crisis following “Ukraine on Fire”. In addition, it analyzes the current political backstage and its dangerous potential…
“Revealing Ukraine” by Igor Lopatonok continues investigations on of the ongoing Ukrainian crisis following “Ukraine on Fire”. In addition, it analyzes the current political backstage and its dangerous potential…
Seth Rich - Brian Huddleston vs FBI.pdf
3 MB
The court document here sheds more light on the continuous legal struggle to have the FBI disclose Seth Rich's work laptop for forensic analysis, amidst assertions that it holds keys to not only his unsolved murder but also to debunking the extensively disputed narrative of Russian interference in U.S. political affairs. The document unequivocally refers to the Russian collusion investigation as a hoax, further emphasizing disputes over the concealment of crucial evidence. If you're following the saga to compel the FBI to unveil Seth Rich's laptops for inspection and to understand the real story behind the "Russian Collusion Hoax," stay tuned for more updates.
Now might be a good time to join us at: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_Chat
And subscribe to UNLEASHED - Hijacking the Matrix here: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_HijackingtheMatrix
Now might be a good time to join us at: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_Chat
And subscribe to UNLEASHED - Hijacking the Matrix here: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_HijackingtheMatrix
Here are some of the prime arguments in this Response in Opposition to Motion
1) Legal Frivolity of the Motion for Summary Judgment: The plaintiff argues that the defendants' motion for summary judgment is legally frivolous. It is emphasized that the government cannot assert wholesale blanket exemptions when a large number of documents are under consideration. Instead, the government is required to produce a Vaughn index, detailing each document withheld and the reasons for its withholding, as supported by legal precedents.
2) Failure to Meet the Burden of Demonstrating Exemptions: The plaintiff contends that the defendants have failed to demonstrate the applicability of the exemptions invoked for each document or segment withheld. A Vaughn index is necessary to correlate each document with a particular FOIA exemption, and the defendants have not provided a detailed analysis or justification for withholding the documents. The argument highlights that the defendants have not met their burden to show that the withheld portions are not segregable from the disclosed material.
3) Bad Faith by the Defendants: The plaintiff accuses the defendants of acting in bad faith, notably by changing their stance on the existence of responsive documents about Seth Rich and attempting to delay proceedings without justification. The plaintiff also criticizes the defendants for not engaging in negotiations for a resolution and for their lack of effort in examining the laptops in question to determine their relevance to ongoing investigations. This argument also touches on the significance of metadata which, if related to the DNC emails published by Wikileaks, could potentially reveal a motive for murder.
4) Russian Collusion Investigation as a Hoax: The plaintiff asserts that the Russian collusion investigation was a sham, implying that any Exemption 7(a) argument based on this investigation should not be accepted. This argument suggests that the underlying investigation was pretextual or not conducted in good faith.
1) Legal Frivolity of the Motion for Summary Judgment: The plaintiff argues that the defendants' motion for summary judgment is legally frivolous. It is emphasized that the government cannot assert wholesale blanket exemptions when a large number of documents are under consideration. Instead, the government is required to produce a Vaughn index, detailing each document withheld and the reasons for its withholding, as supported by legal precedents.
2) Failure to Meet the Burden of Demonstrating Exemptions: The plaintiff contends that the defendants have failed to demonstrate the applicability of the exemptions invoked for each document or segment withheld. A Vaughn index is necessary to correlate each document with a particular FOIA exemption, and the defendants have not provided a detailed analysis or justification for withholding the documents. The argument highlights that the defendants have not met their burden to show that the withheld portions are not segregable from the disclosed material.
3) Bad Faith by the Defendants: The plaintiff accuses the defendants of acting in bad faith, notably by changing their stance on the existence of responsive documents about Seth Rich and attempting to delay proceedings without justification. The plaintiff also criticizes the defendants for not engaging in negotiations for a resolution and for their lack of effort in examining the laptops in question to determine their relevance to ongoing investigations. This argument also touches on the significance of metadata which, if related to the DNC emails published by Wikileaks, could potentially reveal a motive for murder.
4) Russian Collusion Investigation as a Hoax: The plaintiff asserts that the Russian collusion investigation was a sham, implying that any Exemption 7(a) argument based on this investigation should not be accepted. This argument suggests that the underlying investigation was pretextual or not conducted in good faith.
Oz Resurrected
Humpty Dumpty is about to have GREAT fall.
And no, I haven't forgotten about you, Humpty.
😉
😉
During the Fed's haste in raiding two of Sean Combs' residences, one in Beverly Hills and the other in Miami, they conveniently forgot to ground his private jet. Sean "Diddy" Combs' private jet, a black Gulfstream G550 with the tail number N1969C, was reportedly tracked flying to none other than Antigua, an island in the West Indies, which is part of the country of Antigua and Barbuda in the Caribbean.
However, what you might not know is that he has not one (1) but two (2) super-yachts, both of which are currently nestled in the Mediterranean just outside of Monaco, a sovereign city-state located on the French Riviera.
Join us to chat about this at: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_Chat
Also be sure to subscribe to UNLEASHED - Hijacking the Matrix here: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_HijackingtheMatrix
However, what you might not know is that he has not one (1) but two (2) super-yachts, both of which are currently nestled in the Mediterranean just outside of Monaco, a sovereign city-state located on the French Riviera.
Join us to chat about this at: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_Chat
Also be sure to subscribe to UNLEASHED - Hijacking the Matrix here: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_HijackingtheMatrix
Telegram
UNLEASHED
Hijacking the Matrix
Join us to chat about this at: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_Chat
Also be sure to subscribe to UNLEASHED - Hijacking the Matrix here: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_HijackingtheMatrix
Also be sure to subscribe to UNLEASHED - Hijacking the Matrix here: https://t.me/UNLEASHED_HijackingtheMatrix
Telegram
UNLEASHED
Hijacking the Matrix