Outlaw Medical Mandates
260 subscribers
171 photos
32 videos
35 files
597 links
medicalmandates.org - Medical mandates are based on assumptions. When the assumptions are FALSE, medical mandates are WRONG. They should be OUTLAWED, everywhere, forever.
Download Telegram
Components of mRNA Technology “Could Lead to Significant Adverse Events in One or More of Our Clinical Trials,” said Moderna, back in August, now we’re seeing their predictions come true.
Thanks to John Hall for sharing on the fb group re-sharing here, let’s get this group active!! 👊🏼💪🏽
More truth about vaccine-induced care home deaths
Forwarded from Liz Evans
The UKMFA, Lawyers for Liberty and The Workers Union of England have published an Open Letter to Employers demanding Covid-19 Vaccination of Employees, for employees and potential employees to share with employers who are proposing to mandate Covid-19 vaccines on their employees. It outlines the legal rights of the employee to informed consent, bodily autonomy and medical freedom, and relevant employment law protections afforded to employees. It summarises the legal duties of employers. It also summarises the potential risks of Covid-19 vaccines and the trial data which indicates that Covid-19 vaccines do NOT prevent infection or transmission of the virus. Please share far and wide - this should protect workers from unlawful mandates and stop them being sacked for refusing to comply.

https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/5fa5866942937a4d73918723/6017f56ad166465fb9025da6_UKMFA_L4L_Workers_Union-Employers_Vaccine_Open_Letter.pdf
What’s ‘R’?
The Ferguson report tells us, R at the beginning was 2.4, based on Chinese data. Fine. Let’s just humour the germ theory for a second...

Epidemiologists have a FORMULA to work out what %age of us should be vaccinated to “eradicate” a disease. Ok, let’s just humour them for a second...

The formula is 1-1/R(0), where R(0) is “R” at the time of the first “infection” in a population...

Do the maths and you get 58%.

58% vaccination rate for the UK is all they need, if their THEORIES were correct.

60 mill in the UK. 58% is 35 million. 2 doses gives you 70 million. They’ve ordered around 2 billion. They’re complaining of lack of supply (bullshit).

First, do you think the proportion of people wishing to decline the vaccine justifies the intense focus on eradicating “vaccine hesitancy” and suppressing our views to this effect? I DON’T.

Second, do you think they could have ensured availability of adequate supplies so they’re not in a position to blame lack of supply for people dying because they’re not getting their second dose on time? I DO.

They could have quietly gone about their business of getting supplies and getting the stupid vax out to those who are stupid enough to queue up for it, and they’d have easily caught 62% of the population without a fuss.

But no. They are AFRAID of us, of our power, of the fact we know the truth and the fact that human beings resonate with the truth when they hear it. They need to employ underhand tactics and spread lies and harmful disinformation because it’s the only way they know how to reach people.

Well, the sun shines warmly and invitingly while the wind blows harsh and cold. People will hear us and warm to us, because we are the sun of truth. People are dying, and their relatives may be currently blind but they will eventually hear the truth because we are consistent in our message, we do not change goalposts, contradict ourselves or play games.

Every soul has the source of inherent, unlimited wisdom and the potential to see the light.

So we will win this fight.
Jesus Christ they were at it back in 2009 - take a look at this 2-min clip - word for word what we’ve heard last year, listen to the harrowing tone of this controlled newsreader too. But they failed back then, as they didn’t quite plan the psyop and psychological manipulation quite as hard as they’ve now done. It took them ten years folks to iron out the details in their stupid plan, all their billions, and we have nothing, just fighting with truth and we’re still winning. https://youtu.be/-CGuduXqDOs
Lies, lies, lies, lies... he did have the vaccine... he didn’t have the vaccine... which is it? If all the hits from a Google search now tell you he didn’t have it, and this video clip is now nowhere to be found, does it mean this reporter got it wrong?
Look at this genius SPIN on the story of genocide currently happening in our care homes across the world:

The spineless controlled reporter Ciara O’Loughlin frames it as though it’s because these people hadn’t got their second shot yet, and that the public aren’t adhering to guidelines.

But if you’ve been following what’s been happening in the trials, like I have, you know the first shot is meant to produce the bulk of the increased antibodies to this poxy virus. (Most participants started out with antibodies!!).

The second dose didn’t make that much of a difference. It’s just a booster. Most trial subjects didn’t get the second dose! Because they got sick from the first!!!

So, even if the care home had that one “case” just prior to the rollout, this “vaccine” if effective, should have given the residents a decent amount of immunity to the disease, but it clearly didn’t. They the same way as those in the trials (for all the vaccines!!) - they got sick after the first dose. Except, unlike the trial participants, these were exceptionally frail guinea pigs and sadly didn’t survive the evil experiment.

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/health/galway-nursing-home-hit-by-tidal-wave-of-covid-19-appeals-for-help-after-12-residents-die-from-virus-40039504.html
Forwarded from Mina Dew
Answering this question I’ve just been asked by a CACUK cohort:

“If Dr Reiner Fuellmich wins his global class action lawsuit, can victims of this covid19 crimes against humanity claim compensation from all institutions, individuals etc who are actually supporting the official covid19 propaganda and measures? I'm talking about not just money, but liquidating all assets these anti-human criminals have and give it all to those who have suffered and to those who lost loved ones etc.

“Rather than compensation from taxpayers as a collective, because many of those taxpayers, like myself, are absolutely against the official covid19 propaganda and measures”


Answer:

1. The Fuellmich case is not yet a global class action, nor has the Fuellmich team’s work been applied to any part of the UK as yet.

2. CACUK is a negligence case against government officials for harms suffered by people in the UK only. It can be seen as a parallel case to the Fuellmich case, which is currently running in Germany, the US and Canada.

3. CACUK is a civil case, not a criminal case. There are no “victims” in a civil case, only “claimants.” (A separate criminal case is being pursued elsewhere.)

4. If the case wins, you cannot claim compensation from any individual or institution who supports the measures. Only the named defendant can be ordered to pay damages and this is decided by the judge(s). If you have a claim against a particular company, you must pursue that separately as a personal claim.

5. The defendant in a civil case is not found “guilty” of a crime and is not called a “criminal” from a legal standpoint. If the case were to escalate to the ICC, that may change.

6. As to the source of any compensatory funds, that depends on whether the defendant is liable in their personal capacity or as part of an organisation.

Hope that helps. Please feel free to ask any questions you need clarified in the CACUK Community Chat group and I will try my best to answer them.
Forwarded from Power To The People UK
Decline PCR Testing .pages
813.6 KB