Universal Basic Income
Let's take a look at 2 sentences of this BBC article published on 15th May 2021: "Universal Basic Income to be tested in Wales."
Quote:
1 - "Plaid Cymru (Lib Dems) supported a Welsh pilot for a Universal Basic Income in order "to prepare for a future where work may have a different role in the economy as a result of automation and the application of AI and related technologies"."
This leads back to Yuval Noah Harrari's "useless class" that spoke at Davos and that we've covered here.
The disruption that is brought on by the banks' "Going Direct Reset" and the "Great Reset", is and will continue to be huge... (Still believe COVID is the cause of the disruption? or is COVID an unintentional or perhaps intentional useful excuse? They call it an opportunity)
2 - "Welsh Conservatives said: "The Joseph Rowntree Foundation is clear that UBI is not the answer to solving poverty, in fact they claim it can actually increase poverty."
It may seem good and sound good to some but ultimately, if they pay everybody a basic amount regardless of income, it's going to create a rise in prices and unless they change the tax brackets, you may even end up paying a higher percentage of your income to the State.
There is one certainty that will come out of UBI:
Your dependency on government.
If prices go up because of UBI and you can't afford anything without UBI, you're going to have to learn how to be a poney, jump through hoops and more than likely have to 'behave' according to government. This leads to Operant Conditioning on steroids:
The aSocial Credit Score system.
It is a collectivist social system with social rewards and punishments in order to manipulate society towards wanted behaviours determined by government. B.F. Skinner would be proud. See next post. for more.
3 - "to prepare for a future where work may have a different role in the economy(...)"
What does that mean? Work is the economy. Everybody's labour is what makes the economy and gives it value... so what different role could our labour have?
Crypto Mining:
Perhaps this Microsoft patent "WO2020060606: CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA" is going to be the new labour.
Mining crypto currency using your body's activity.
What activity? Physical? Biological? Both? Will you get to see that crypto? Is Microsoft going to develop the tech and become a 'crypto bank' in the future and will charge you a fee?
Regardless of how it operates, crypto mining from your body fits nicely into the Social Credit Score control system.
Conclusion:
UBI is a trade off for your individual rights and freedom. It's a ridiculously small pay-off/bribe for a top-down societal control system, pioneered by multinational and supranational corporations and governments alike that will use tech to coerce you and take over, to quote Klaus Schwab, the 'physical, digital and biological world' for 'the greater good'. The word "everything", has more meaning now than ever.
UBI won't be rolled out without the use of tech.
Good luck Wales, it's a no from me. Swiping left.
Let's take a look at 2 sentences of this BBC article published on 15th May 2021: "Universal Basic Income to be tested in Wales."
Quote:
1 - "Plaid Cymru (Lib Dems) supported a Welsh pilot for a Universal Basic Income in order "to prepare for a future where work may have a different role in the economy as a result of automation and the application of AI and related technologies"."
This leads back to Yuval Noah Harrari's "useless class" that spoke at Davos and that we've covered here.
The disruption that is brought on by the banks' "Going Direct Reset" and the "Great Reset", is and will continue to be huge... (Still believe COVID is the cause of the disruption? or is COVID an unintentional or perhaps intentional useful excuse? They call it an opportunity)
2 - "Welsh Conservatives said: "The Joseph Rowntree Foundation is clear that UBI is not the answer to solving poverty, in fact they claim it can actually increase poverty."
It may seem good and sound good to some but ultimately, if they pay everybody a basic amount regardless of income, it's going to create a rise in prices and unless they change the tax brackets, you may even end up paying a higher percentage of your income to the State.
There is one certainty that will come out of UBI:
Your dependency on government.
If prices go up because of UBI and you can't afford anything without UBI, you're going to have to learn how to be a poney, jump through hoops and more than likely have to 'behave' according to government. This leads to Operant Conditioning on steroids:
The aSocial Credit Score system.
It is a collectivist social system with social rewards and punishments in order to manipulate society towards wanted behaviours determined by government. B.F. Skinner would be proud. See next post. for more.
3 - "to prepare for a future where work may have a different role in the economy(...)"
What does that mean? Work is the economy. Everybody's labour is what makes the economy and gives it value... so what different role could our labour have?
Crypto Mining:
Perhaps this Microsoft patent "WO2020060606: CRYPTOCURRENCY SYSTEM USING BODY ACTIVITY DATA" is going to be the new labour.
Mining crypto currency using your body's activity.
What activity? Physical? Biological? Both? Will you get to see that crypto? Is Microsoft going to develop the tech and become a 'crypto bank' in the future and will charge you a fee?
Regardless of how it operates, crypto mining from your body fits nicely into the Social Credit Score control system.
Conclusion:
UBI is a trade off for your individual rights and freedom. It's a ridiculously small pay-off/bribe for a top-down societal control system, pioneered by multinational and supranational corporations and governments alike that will use tech to coerce you and take over, to quote Klaus Schwab, the 'physical, digital and biological world' for 'the greater good'. The word "everything", has more meaning now than ever.
UBI won't be rolled out without the use of tech.
Good luck Wales, it's a no from me. Swiping left.
BBC News
Universal basic income to be tested in Wales - BBC News
It means adults regardless of income, will be given money to cover essential living costs.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
What's your aSocial Credit Score?
A good episode of Black Mirror to watch that encompasses an aSocial Credit Score system lead by hi-tech contact lenses and phones, is 'Nosedive'. (Season 3, Episode 1)
Here is an extract.
TruthStream Media - Aaron & Melissa Dykes.
Aired on 27-12-2019
A good episode of Black Mirror to watch that encompasses an aSocial Credit Score system lead by hi-tech contact lenses and phones, is 'Nosedive'. (Season 3, Episode 1)
Here is an extract.
TruthStream Media - Aaron & Melissa Dykes.
Aired on 27-12-2019
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Kicking the plug down in the crypto mine.
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In the name of health: Heil Schwab, march to Mussolini and salute Stalin.
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
COVID 19 The Great Reset -Klaus Schwab.pdf
2.3 MB
Here is a freebie for all you conspiracy theorists out there, in case you want to follow along and read an evil document.
Smells like... conspiracy against the people.
One of the passages read out by Richard Grove. p72 of the pdf:
"The public scrutiny of private companies will increase, particularly (but not only) for all the businesses that benefited from public money. Some countries will nationalize, while others will prefer to take equity stakes or to provide loans.
In general, there will be more regulation covering many different issues, such as workers’ safety or domestic sourcing for certain goods. Businesses will also be held to account on social and environmental fractures for which they will be expected to be part of the solution. As an add-on, governments will strongly encourage public-private partnerships so that private companies get more involved in the mitigation of global risks.
Irrespective of the details, the role of the state will increase and, in doing so, will materially affect the way business is conducted. To varying degrees, business executives in all industries and all countries will have to adapt to greater government intervention."
Is it me or does the above also read a bit like a roadmap? Perhaps Herr Klaus has a good perception of things and where they may lead.
Reading between the lines of this is terrifying...
There is also a lot of frustrating parts in his book as we see a clear attempt to blur the lines and conflate Covid-19 with 'climate change' (which ties in with IPCC, U.N., Maurice Strong and Rockefeller) p107:
"The research, still embryonic but expanding fast, hasn’t proved yet that a link of causation exists, but it unambiguously exposes a strong correlation between air pollution and the spread of the coronavirus and its severity. It seems that air pollution in general, and the concentration of particulate matter in particular, impair the airways – the lungs’ first line of defence – meaning that people (irrespective of their age) who live in highly polluted cities will face a greater risk of catching COVID-19 and dying from it."
He doesn't mention any source for his above 'research' and sometimes intentionally confuses the reader. I haven't read all of it, just bits of it but it reads like his other book, 'The 4th Industrial Revolution', it is a slow going and frustrating book full of misleading concepts, lies by omission, hints and blatant intentional distortion of facts.
Another quote page 11: "At the time of writing (June 2020), the pandemic continues to worsen globally."
This Covid-19: The Great Reset book was published 13th July 2020. I'm no publishing expert but if lockdowns started in mid March 2020 and Klaus started writing his book shortly after with some help from ghost writers still up to June, he would have written it in 2 maybe 3 months max and published it in less than 1 month, that has to be a new world record.
One of the passages read out by Richard Grove. p72 of the pdf:
"The public scrutiny of private companies will increase, particularly (but not only) for all the businesses that benefited from public money. Some countries will nationalize, while others will prefer to take equity stakes or to provide loans.
In general, there will be more regulation covering many different issues, such as workers’ safety or domestic sourcing for certain goods. Businesses will also be held to account on social and environmental fractures for which they will be expected to be part of the solution. As an add-on, governments will strongly encourage public-private partnerships so that private companies get more involved in the mitigation of global risks.
Irrespective of the details, the role of the state will increase and, in doing so, will materially affect the way business is conducted. To varying degrees, business executives in all industries and all countries will have to adapt to greater government intervention."
Is it me or does the above also read a bit like a roadmap? Perhaps Herr Klaus has a good perception of things and where they may lead.
Reading between the lines of this is terrifying...
There is also a lot of frustrating parts in his book as we see a clear attempt to blur the lines and conflate Covid-19 with 'climate change' (which ties in with IPCC, U.N., Maurice Strong and Rockefeller) p107:
"The research, still embryonic but expanding fast, hasn’t proved yet that a link of causation exists, but it unambiguously exposes a strong correlation between air pollution and the spread of the coronavirus and its severity. It seems that air pollution in general, and the concentration of particulate matter in particular, impair the airways – the lungs’ first line of defence – meaning that people (irrespective of their age) who live in highly polluted cities will face a greater risk of catching COVID-19 and dying from it."
He doesn't mention any source for his above 'research' and sometimes intentionally confuses the reader. I haven't read all of it, just bits of it but it reads like his other book, 'The 4th Industrial Revolution', it is a slow going and frustrating book full of misleading concepts, lies by omission, hints and blatant intentional distortion of facts.
Another quote page 11: "At the time of writing (June 2020), the pandemic continues to worsen globally."
This Covid-19: The Great Reset book was published 13th July 2020. I'm no publishing expert but if lockdowns started in mid March 2020 and Klaus started writing his book shortly after with some help from ghost writers still up to June, he would have written it in 2 maybe 3 months max and published it in less than 1 month, that has to be a new world record.
Telegram
Open Minds
Extract from "Maurice Strong is dead" - James Corbett.
Aired 01/12/2015.
- Maurice Strong, a Club of Rome member and strong background in working in the petro-chemical industry for the Rockefellers, organised the 1992 Rio Earth summit under the United Nations…
Aired 01/12/2015.
- Maurice Strong, a Club of Rome member and strong background in working in the petro-chemical industry for the Rockefellers, organised the 1992 Rio Earth summit under the United Nations…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Sssshh Julia, you're not supposed to talk about it yet! It's a surprise!
Julia Hartley-Brewer from TalkRadio and Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch, a civil rights NGO, discuss Social Credit Score system knocking on the door in the UK under the guise of a 'health passport'.
The policies are now obvious, it's slowly hitting mainstream and this government is subjugating it's people.
Note: TalkRadio, Fox News, Skynews Australia are part of the Rupert Murdoch empire. They seem to be pro-freedom and pro-vaccine... for now.
Aired 20-05-2021
Julia Hartley-Brewer & Silkie Carlo on TalkRadio
Julia Hartley-Brewer from TalkRadio and Silkie Carlo, director of Big Brother Watch, a civil rights NGO, discuss Social Credit Score system knocking on the door in the UK under the guise of a 'health passport'.
The policies are now obvious, it's slowly hitting mainstream and this government is subjugating it's people.
Note: TalkRadio, Fox News, Skynews Australia are part of the Rupert Murdoch empire. They seem to be pro-freedom and pro-vaccine... for now.
Aired 20-05-2021
Julia Hartley-Brewer & Silkie Carlo on TalkRadio
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Presidential club.
August 1974, Gerald Ford became the 38th President of the United States following Richard Nixon's resignation. He appointed Nelson Rockefeller as his Vice-President.
Heinz Kissinger, CFR and Trilateral member and Nelson's protégé, was already the Secretary of State under Nixon, and Ford kept him in that position which he held up to 1977.
In the meantime, in 1974, Jimmy Carter, whom nobody had even heard of, became a Trilateral member and became chairman of the Democratic National Committee's congressional campaigns the following year.
At the end of President Ford's term in 1977, Jimmy Carter became the 39th President of the United States and appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski, a CFR member, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission and David Rockefeller's protégé, as his National Security Advisor. Jimmy Carter must have been a very talented politician to enter politics in 1974 and to become president 3 years later.
More info on the Trilateral Commission here with Antony Sutton and here
August 1974, Gerald Ford became the 38th President of the United States following Richard Nixon's resignation. He appointed Nelson Rockefeller as his Vice-President.
Heinz Kissinger, CFR and Trilateral member and Nelson's protégé, was already the Secretary of State under Nixon, and Ford kept him in that position which he held up to 1977.
In the meantime, in 1974, Jimmy Carter, whom nobody had even heard of, became a Trilateral member and became chairman of the Democratic National Committee's congressional campaigns the following year.
At the end of President Ford's term in 1977, Jimmy Carter became the 39th President of the United States and appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski, a CFR member, co-founder of the Trilateral Commission and David Rockefeller's protégé, as his National Security Advisor. Jimmy Carter must have been a very talented politician to enter politics in 1974 and to become president 3 years later.
More info on the Trilateral Commission here with Antony Sutton and here
The Revision of the United Nations Charter: 1950. Part I
At the end of WWII, it was obvious that the League of Nations was a failure and that a new and 'better' organisation needed to be created. Therefore, the U.N. was established in 1945.
The victors didn't see eye to eye and there was a debate as to where the headquarters ought to be. They settled for New York city., on Nelson Rockefeller's land (bought by his dad) which was given to the U.N. The Soviets and the allied powers still had their differences and a call for a revision of the UN charter came around in 1950.
There were multiple suggestions to establish a world government. One person openly talking about it was James P. Warburg, CFR member and son of Paul Warburg, a wealthy banker and co-conspirator of the Federal Reserve Act 1913. Here is the transcript of the hearing.
Quote:
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."
At the end of WWII, it was obvious that the League of Nations was a failure and that a new and 'better' organisation needed to be created. Therefore, the U.N. was established in 1945.
The victors didn't see eye to eye and there was a debate as to where the headquarters ought to be. They settled for New York city., on Nelson Rockefeller's land (bought by his dad) which was given to the U.N. The Soviets and the allied powers still had their differences and a call for a revision of the UN charter came around in 1950.
There were multiple suggestions to establish a world government. One person openly talking about it was James P. Warburg, CFR member and son of Paul Warburg, a wealthy banker and co-conspirator of the Federal Reserve Act 1913. Here is the transcript of the hearing.
Quote:
"We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."
The Revision of the United Nations Charter: 1950. Part II
What is interesting is that the transcript of that hearing is nowhere to be found on the government website of the 'Office of the Historian' but there is an editorial note here with part of the transcript where they are debating world government.
Quote: "(...) the purposes and principles written into the Charter of the United Nations are, in essence, a summary of the foreign policy of the American people."
- Dean Rusk, Deputy Under Secretary of State -
After advocating against a world government, 2 years later in 1952, Dean Rusk became the President of the Rockefeller Foundation.
What is interesting is that the transcript of that hearing is nowhere to be found on the government website of the 'Office of the Historian' but there is an editorial note here with part of the transcript where they are debating world government.
Quote: "(...) the purposes and principles written into the Charter of the United Nations are, in essence, a summary of the foreign policy of the American people."
- Dean Rusk, Deputy Under Secretary of State -
After advocating against a world government, 2 years later in 1952, Dean Rusk became the President of the Rockefeller Foundation.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Medical Technocracy busted
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Virus origin and conflict of interest everywhere.
It is no longer a secret that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been studying coronavirus for a long time. Probably 15-20 years.
However, TV doesn't put all the pieces together for you. We will.
The open conspiracy Lancet letter
Here is a Lancet article dated 19 FEB 2020 written BEFORE any declaration of a world pandemic. It was written by Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance "a nonprofit non-governmental organization that supports various programs on global health and pandemic prevention with headquarters in New York City". He got his colleagues to put their names on the bottom.
Daszak was also a close collaborator of "China's bat woman" Shi Zhengli, a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin in the Wuhan lab.
Quote:
"We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."
"We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus.
We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the frontline!"
If the above was written before the declaration of a worldwide pandemic, it seems they knew that SARS-COV-2 could be bad and it is also somewhat clear that they were trying to pre-empt any possible criticism of their collaborative work in and with China.
There is more.
The emails
Here are the emails mentionned in the above video obtained through a freedom of information request.
Email from Daszak to Baric: 06 FEB 2020 (13 days BEFORE the Lancet article)
Quote:
Subject of the email: "No need for you to sign the "Statement" Ralph"
"(...)you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn't work in a counterproductive way."
"We'll then put it out in a way that doesn't link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice. "
These emails above confirm their concerns of being investigated and wanting to cover-up their involvement and their work. The second part of the last quote suggests they may even play pretend in the future to be independent in case they get asked to provide expertise.
But wait, there is more.
The Hegelian pharmaceutical dialectic
As seen in the emails above, one of the epidemiologists involved in coronavirus research is Dr Ralph Baric.
Well... looks like he and Dr Fauci had the patents through NIAID-NIH to develop an mRNA injection in collaboration with Moderna on 17 DECEMBER 2019, BEFORE ANY PANDEMIC DECLARED and to therefore profit from the sales.
See p105 to 109 of this pdf which lists patents and agreements.
And for the pièce de résistance.
Moderna, a 'start-up' company created in 2010, has never brought a product to market until the SARS-COV-2 pandemic 2020...
Where do they get their money from?
This article dated October 2013 reads:
"Moderna Therapeutics is announcing later today it has snagged a grant worth as much as $24.6 million over the next five years from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). (...)
The deal is the latest coup for Moderna, a 3 year-old startup that turned heads in the biotech industry in March when it secured a huge $240 million upfront payment from ASTRAZENECA to collaborate on 40 different mRNA drug candidates. (...)
But it has quietly been doing work behind the scenes on a small $700,000 DARPA grant this year to prove that its mRNA technology is more than just science fiction."
Not only that but, as we have mentioned in a previous post here, in October 2020:
"Moderna received a further $56 Million to Enable Small-Scale, Rapid Mobile Manufacturing of Nucleic Acid Vaccines and Therapeutics."
These are rapid on-the-spot manufacturing of mRNA injectables. Sounds like chemical warfare stuff...
Questions and outrage anybody?
Further source material here
It is no longer a secret that the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been studying coronavirus for a long time. Probably 15-20 years.
However, TV doesn't put all the pieces together for you. We will.
The open conspiracy Lancet letter
Here is a Lancet article dated 19 FEB 2020 written BEFORE any declaration of a world pandemic. It was written by Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance "a nonprofit non-governmental organization that supports various programs on global health and pandemic prevention with headquarters in New York City". He got his colleagues to put their names on the bottom.
Daszak was also a close collaborator of "China's bat woman" Shi Zhengli, a Chinese virologist who researches SARS-like coronaviruses of bat origin in the Wuhan lab.
Quote:
"We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin."
"We want you, the science and health professionals of China, to know that we stand with you in your fight against this virus.
We invite others to join us in supporting the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of Wuhan and across China. Stand with our colleagues on the frontline!"
If the above was written before the declaration of a worldwide pandemic, it seems they knew that SARS-COV-2 could be bad and it is also somewhat clear that they were trying to pre-empt any possible criticism of their collaborative work in and with China.
There is more.
The emails
Here are the emails mentionned in the above video obtained through a freedom of information request.
Email from Daszak to Baric: 06 FEB 2020 (13 days BEFORE the Lancet article)
Quote:
Subject of the email: "No need for you to sign the "Statement" Ralph"
"(...)you, me and him should not sign this statement, so it has some distance from us and therefore doesn't work in a counterproductive way."
"We'll then put it out in a way that doesn't link it back to our collaboration so we maximize an independent voice. "
These emails above confirm their concerns of being investigated and wanting to cover-up their involvement and their work. The second part of the last quote suggests they may even play pretend in the future to be independent in case they get asked to provide expertise.
But wait, there is more.
The Hegelian pharmaceutical dialectic
As seen in the emails above, one of the epidemiologists involved in coronavirus research is Dr Ralph Baric.
Well... looks like he and Dr Fauci had the patents through NIAID-NIH to develop an mRNA injection in collaboration with Moderna on 17 DECEMBER 2019, BEFORE ANY PANDEMIC DECLARED and to therefore profit from the sales.
See p105 to 109 of this pdf which lists patents and agreements.
And for the pièce de résistance.
Moderna, a 'start-up' company created in 2010, has never brought a product to market until the SARS-COV-2 pandemic 2020...
Where do they get their money from?
This article dated October 2013 reads:
"Moderna Therapeutics is announcing later today it has snagged a grant worth as much as $24.6 million over the next five years from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). (...)
The deal is the latest coup for Moderna, a 3 year-old startup that turned heads in the biotech industry in March when it secured a huge $240 million upfront payment from ASTRAZENECA to collaborate on 40 different mRNA drug candidates. (...)
But it has quietly been doing work behind the scenes on a small $700,000 DARPA grant this year to prove that its mRNA technology is more than just science fiction."
Not only that but, as we have mentioned in a previous post here, in October 2020:
"Moderna received a further $56 Million to Enable Small-Scale, Rapid Mobile Manufacturing of Nucleic Acid Vaccines and Therapeutics."
These are rapid on-the-spot manufacturing of mRNA injectables. Sounds like chemical warfare stuff...
Questions and outrage anybody?
Further source material here
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Great Democide Amplifier
(You dropped your book. In case you want to follow along. 😊)
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
(You dropped your book. In case you want to follow along. 😊)
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Tip: Use the pinned messages at the top to navigate through the different sections.
Click here to go back to the very beginning.
P.S.No posts on Sundays and Mondays only get one post, usually a movie suggestion.
Click here to go back to the very beginning.
P.S.No posts on Sundays and Mondays only get one post, usually a movie suggestion.
Extracts from 'Covid19: The Great Reset' - Klaus Schwab.
p.107-108: Richard Grove read the sections.
Spoiler alert, p.109 is creepy.
Quote:
"The second [possible direction of the post-pandemic era could be] spurred by a different narrative, in which businesses and governments are emboldened by a new social conscience (...): the moment must be seized to take advantage of this unique window of opportunity to redesign a more sustainable economy for the greater good of our societies."
Sounds like we've got morally superior rulers that are going to tell us how it's going to be. The end justifies the means... "for the greater good."
Houston, we've got a problem...
p.107-108: Richard Grove read the sections.
Spoiler alert, p.109 is creepy.
Quote:
"The second [possible direction of the post-pandemic era could be] spurred by a different narrative, in which businesses and governments are emboldened by a new social conscience (...): the moment must be seized to take advantage of this unique window of opportunity to redesign a more sustainable economy for the greater good of our societies."
Sounds like we've got morally superior rulers that are going to tell us how it's going to be. The end justifies the means... "for the greater good."
Houston, we've got a problem...
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The quantum mergers: Google, NASA and A.I.
Article in the video
Whitney Webb and Jason Burmas: 'Could internet censorship get any worse? Yes it can with Whitney Webb'.
Aired 27-11-2020
Article in the video
Whitney Webb and Jason Burmas: 'Could internet censorship get any worse? Yes it can with Whitney Webb'.
Aired 27-11-2020
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Postman's Technopoly.
Quotes:
"This is why it's possible to say almost anything without contradiction providing you begin your utterance with the words:
'A study has shown', 'Scientists now tell us'."
"It is why in a technopoly there can be no transcendent sense of purpose or meaning, no social coherence."
Adolf Eichmann: "I have no responsibility for the human consequences of my decisions. I am only responsible for the efficiency of my part of the bureaucracy which must be maintained at all cost."
Eichmann was an expert.
"Technopoly experts claim dominion not only over technical matters but also over social, psychological and moral affairs."
Richard: "For every technology that's new and that we adopt, we have to give up something from our past. For every new tech, another tech goes out the door and they are changing tech so fast, it is no longer about our needs but about their end game."
Fabian Socialism was covered here and here.
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Quotes:
"This is why it's possible to say almost anything without contradiction providing you begin your utterance with the words:
'A study has shown', 'Scientists now tell us'."
"It is why in a technopoly there can be no transcendent sense of purpose or meaning, no social coherence."
Adolf Eichmann: "I have no responsibility for the human consequences of my decisions. I am only responsible for the efficiency of my part of the bureaucracy which must be maintained at all cost."
Eichmann was an expert.
"Technopoly experts claim dominion not only over technical matters but also over social, psychological and moral affairs."
Richard: "For every technology that's new and that we adopt, we have to give up something from our past. For every new tech, another tech goes out the door and they are changing tech so fast, it is no longer about our needs but about their end game."
Fabian Socialism was covered here and here.
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Monday Night Movie Suggestion:
"Gattaca" - 1997 - Directed by Andrew Niccol.
Movie type: Science fiction/Dystopia
Summary: A genetic registry database uses biometrics to classify those so created as "valids" while those conceived naturally and more susceptible to genetic disorders are known as "in-valids". Genetic discrimination is illegal, but in practice genotype profiling is used to identify valids to qualify for professional employment while in-valids are relegated to menial jobs.
Vincent Freeman, who was conceived outside the eugenics program, struggles to overcome genetic discrimination to realize his dream of going into space.
Click here to view and/or download
"Gattaca" - 1997 - Directed by Andrew Niccol.
Movie type: Science fiction/Dystopia
Summary: A genetic registry database uses biometrics to classify those so created as "valids" while those conceived naturally and more susceptible to genetic disorders are known as "in-valids". Genetic discrimination is illegal, but in practice genotype profiling is used to identify valids to qualify for professional employment while in-valids are relegated to menial jobs.
Vincent Freeman, who was conceived outside the eugenics program, struggles to overcome genetic discrimination to realize his dream of going into space.
Click here to view and/or download
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Raking Davos' muck
Quote:
"Public relations developed as a direct response to the attacks of the muckrakers and the others on the 'trusts' in the first 2 decades of the 20th century. (...) Public Relations was a defensive reaction against public suspicion."
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld
Quote:
"Public relations developed as a direct response to the attacks of the muckrakers and the others on the 'trusts' in the first 2 decades of the 20th century. (...) Public Relations was a defensive reaction against public suspicion."
Aired on 29/11/2020
Presented by Richard Grove - GrandTheftWorld