Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom
2.12K subscribers
3.01K photos
236 videos
2.1K links
OAMF is a 501(c)(4) advocating for your right to choose or refuse any medical treatment or procedure. We keep you up to date on legislative calls-to-action affecting your freedom, & provide OH citizens with a medical freedom voter guide each election.
Download Telegram
We are thankful that President Trump pulled the U.S. out of the WHO and that he is saying we have Hantavirus “under control” on our own without the WHO.

This is a good time to remind Ohioans that we PASSED a provision of HB 73 “Dave and Angie patient and health provider protection act” in 2024 that PROTECTS the STATE of OHIO specifically against the WHO having any jurisdiction here. (Please read the law below.)

That said, Ohio must still secure law for medical free speech / Right to Try (HB 12) and “Right to Refuse” (HB 112) or Ohioans will again die due to treatment refusal and suffer injuries and deaths due to vaccine mandates in the next pandemic- and there WILL be one.
13👍3
If the goal of the Flu vaccine is to prevent influenza, then why would big pharma manufacture a NASAL version that allows 91% of people who receive it to SPREAD it to others?
Isn’t the vaccine program supposed to be all about “health” and “science”?

Here’s what Dr. Lockdown says about the Flu vaccine. She’s always done a stellar job at making life-saving, data based recommendations... 🙄😒

“Flu vaccination can help keep you from getting sick, missing work or school, and prevent flu-related hospitalization and death,” said ODH Director Amy Acton, MD, MPH. “Getting vaccinated is especially important for older adults, young children, pregnant women, and people with long-term health conditions who are more vulnerable to serious flu complications.”
————————————

Commentary from our friends at Michigan for Vaccine Choice:

🚨 Breaking: 🚨
New peer-reviewed study exposes major shedding risks from the nasal flu vaccine (FluMist).

A study in *Clinical Infectious Diseases* (NIH-funded) found that 91.2% of healthy adults shed influenza A or B RNA in their noses within the first week after getting the live attenuated vaccine.

- Peaked at 92% on Day 1
- Still shedding in 23% on Day 5
- 9% still positive on Day 7

FluMist contains live, lab-engineered viruses designed to replicate in your nose — and yes, they can be shed through nasal secretions for up to 28 days, according to the FDA label. Live virus has been cultured as late as Day 28. A documented case of vaccine-strain transmission to an unvaccinated child already exists.

This means recently vaccinated adults and children can unknowingly spread vaccine-strain flu to infants, elderly relatives, immunocompromised family, or coworkers.

Read the full study here:
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciag294/8672548?login=false
—————————————
🤬9🤔1
🚨DATA CENTERS IMMUNITY ALERT🚨 HB 126)

HB 126 was written by the Ohio Chamber of Commerce and introduced by Rep. Meredith Craig & Rep. Adam Matthews. It has already passed the House and could get a vote in Senate Judiciary tomorrow! If a data center causes damage beyond physical property damage, the local government under HB 126 would NOT be able to sue the data center to recover that loss.

Under HB 126, If a disaster happens with respect to a data center – guess who is going to pick up the tab?—- WE ARE!

There’s a situation in Georgia, where the data centers used FAR more water than the owners says it would. Under HB 126 if a data center drains a local community of available water, the community cannot sue for the damage caused to residents or local farmers!!

This bill thus protects Blackstone private equity at the expense of citizens and ohio farmers. It’s up for a vote in judiciary committee tomorrow!!

EMAIL JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBERS & SENATE PRESIDENT MCCOLLEY TODAY!

“Protect our right to sue data centers if they strip water from our local water supply or our farmlands! VOTE NO on HB 126.”

📫📫📫📫📫📫
Mccolley@ohiosenate.org,
blessing@ohiosenate.gov; cutrona@ohiosenate.gov; gavarone@ohiosenate.gov; manning@ohiosenate.gov; reynolds@ohiosenate.gov
2🙏2
GREAT WORK! Your VOICE was HEARD!
There was NO VOTE today on HB 126, (the bill that included immunity from public nuisance lawsuits for Data Centers)

KEEP those EMAILS going to make sure it stays that way! Let’s kill HB 126!
👏121
HB 126 - IS a BIG TECH IMMUNITY BILL
that socializes the costs and privatizes the profits by giving big businesses immunity from “public nuisance” lawsuits regarding their products. Data Centers are NOT exempted in this bill and under Ohio case Data Center servers ARE considered “PRODUCTS”. In fact, this ”selling of products” is how they are qualifying under OH tax code to receive TAX ABATEMENTS!

What does public nuisance mean?

* A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public. *

What does public nuisance immunity look like under HB 126?

It gives legal protection to some of the most powerful industries on earth even when their products malfunction and cause catastrophic harm. The protected companies (which include Data Centers, Google, META, and producers of AI ) keep the profits while the public picks up the cleanup bill.

EXAMPLES:

DATA CENTER AI FAILURES:
If an AI system shuts down the power grid, crashes financial systems, misfires military technology, or causes mass infrastructure failures: The taxpayer pays for that and the corporation walks away.

DATA CENTERS & WATER SHORTAGES:
Massive data centers consume enormous amounts of water and electricity.
If communities face water shortages, massive reductions in water pressure or infrastructure strain: The public pays the costs of that because the corporations won’t be liable for that.

SELF-DRIVING CAR DISASTERS:
If autonomous vehicles malfunction at scale and cause thousands of crashes across Ohio highways leads to increased need for Police response, EMS, Fire survives and can lead to Road closures that lead to increased costs to the Ohio taxpayers. The tech companies are off the hook.

GOOGLE, META, AI, AND CHILDREN:
If AI systems fuel mass manipulation, delusion, addiction, or mental health crises among children and teenagers that require increased community services for families, or School or community services to adress those issues, your taxdolllars pay for it- not the corporations who caused it.

In America, if you profit from a product, you should be responsible for the economic loss to the community when that product causes catastrophic harm that leads to increased burdens on the taxpayers to remedy that harm.

Big Tech is already receives massive tax perks from state and local governments why would we give them liability protections too? OAMF does not support corporations benefiting from massive profits while having no accountability to the public who are absorbing all the risk.

‼️EMAIL JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBERS & SENATE PRESIDENT MCCOLLEY!‼️

“Senate President McColley and members of the Judiciary Committee,

Please Protect our right to public nuisance claims against Data centers so we can protect our communities from footing the bill for the consequences of them depleting our local water supply, straining our infrastructure, negatively effecting our power grid, noise pollution ect. Please Protect Ohioans, Not Big Tech! VOTE NO on HB 126.”

📫📫📫📫📫📫📫📫
Mccolley@ohiosenate.gov,
blessing@ohiosenate.gov; cutrona@ohiosenate.gov; gavarone@ohiosenate.gov; manning@ohiosenate.gov; reynolds@ohiosenate.gov
4
A BAN on state tax ABATEMENTS for Data centers was passed by the legislature in 2025.
DeWine VETOED it.
Speaker Huffman won’t call for a veto over-ride.
The tax breaks could have ended almost a year ago. This is Huffman’s fault. 👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼

“Ohio’s tax break for data centers is costing the state far more than expected, sparking a growing debate among lawmakers over whether Ohio can afford to keep subsidizing some of the world’s biggest tech companies.”

“For years, Ohio has aggressively courted major data center projects from companies including Meta Platforms, Alphabet — the parent company of Google — and Amazon by offering generous sales tax exemptions.”
“Counter measures” refers to drugs, biological products, or devices utilized to diagnose, mitigate, prevent (vaccines), or treat a DECLARED public health EMERGENCY or a pandemic.

Wouldn’t it be nice if we were able to access treatment options without them being denied by our pharmacist? Wouldn’t it be nice if we could have a doctor that could use creative treatment treatments and could talk about them publicly without having their license threatened?

Wouldn’t it be nice if we knew we weren’t discriminated fir refusing an emergency use mRNA vaccine by losing our employment or access to education when most employers and colleges put mandates in place because they are terrified of the virus or an that an outbreak in their facility bei a liability?

Well, if it weren’t for Speaker Matt Huffman and Judiciary Chair Jim Thomas then we could have HB 12 Right 2 Try, and HB 112 - Right to Refuse legislation in place to make sure that we had all of those rights codified into law.

‼️Email Speaker Huffman today‼️
📫📫 Rep78@ohiohouse.gov 📫📫

Ask Huffman if he is going to allow the vote on HB 12 and begin moving HB 112? Or is he going to allow the blood of more Ohio citizens to be on his hands?
DeWine is now RUNNING COVER for Speaker Huffman by “pausing the tax credits” for Data centers so that the pressure is off of Huffman to call for the veto OVER-RIDE that would PERMANENTLY END TAX ABATEMENTS for DATA CENTERS before they go on break from June 11th until November!!!!!

DeWine will pause them long enough for the committee to come up with reasons why tax abatements are a great idea and that we should all be thrilled to see Big Tech getting perks while Ohioans continue to be taxed out of our homes.

Every day we are more shocked at the level of smoke and mirrors BS that comes out of Columbus!

Continue to email Speaker Huffman and ask him to CALL FOR the VETO OVER-RIDE!
📫 Rep78@ohiohouse.gov 📫
6👍5
Monday, June 1st is Public comment hearing in the Ohio Data Center Commission Committee! It’s time to make your concerns and expectations known! (All testimony must be submitted to the committee by noon on Sunday!)

⬇️OAMF instructions on how to submit⬇️
https://www.ohioamf.org/so/52Pvpi1Fp?languageTag=en
Thank you SO much to our friend, and OAMF member, Stephen Petty who volunteered his time today to be an expert witness on the water safety concerns regarding data centers, and the chemicals that are required in their cooling systems.

We were shocked to see Sen. Chavez, attempting to minimize Stephen’s unmatchable credentials and wisdom in the area environmental hygiene and chemical exposure by attempting to minimize his description of the serious risk of PFAS (forever chemicals) by comparing them to the “surfactants” in “soap.”

Below are Stephen Petty’s credentials which Senator Chavez may want to review. And by the way, Stephen is a REPUBLICAN. Water safety issues are non-partisan.
👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼👇🏼

Stephen Petty is a Professional Engineer in 6 states (including Ohio), a Certified Industrial
Hygienist (Expert in Health and Safety) and a Certified Safety Professional (OSHA
Expert). He has worked and lived in Ohio for over 40 years but now spends some time in Florida. He has written the book on Forensic Engineering for the Insurance Industry (nowin its 2nd ed.) based on ~10,000 actual inspections – mostly here in Ohio.

Over the past 25 years, he has been retained and disclosed in nearly 400 legal cases regarding exposure and tested for dioxins, nerve agents, biotoxins, legionella, mold, bacteria and numerous organic and inorganic chemicals. Most recently, he was selected as an
exposure expert in East Palestine.

Mr. Petty also has 10 years experience as a Section Manager for Columbia Gas whose responsibilities included power generation.
👏7
OAMF just received the –5 version of the Medicaid fraud bill HB 795.
OAMF has NOT made a FULL assessment of the bill, but we are providing an update regarding the TOP area of concern for our members regarding the effects on family caregivers outside of DD.

The -5 version has REMOVED the provisions regarding prohibiting Medicaid payment to FAMILY members providing IN HOME care services to a loved one.

If you have concerns beyond those provisions, please continue to contact the Medicaid Committee Members.