Candidate: Rep. Michelle Teska
Office: Ohio House
District: 55
OAMF Rating: 95% (record)

——Rating Information——-
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

When our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE becomes available, you can find it at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Rep. Angie King
Office: Ohio House
District: 84
OAMF Rating: 95% , (Record)

——Rating Information——-
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

When our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE becomes available, you can find it at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Jeff Black
Office: Domestic Relations Judge
County: Lake
OAMF Rating: A

———————-
When our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE becomes available, you can find it at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Shelby Hunt
Office: State Central Committee
District: Senate 20
OAMF Rating: 100% (Survey)

———————-
When our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE becomes available, you can find it at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Anna Breen
Office: State Central Committee
District: Senate 20
OAMF Rating: 100% (Survey)

———————-
When our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE becomes available, you can find it at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Vivek Ramaswamy
Office: Governor
OAMF Rating: A (survey)

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

When our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE becomes available, you can find it at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Sen. Kristina Roegner
Office: State Treasurer
OAMF Rating: 89%, B+ (Record)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Jay Edwards
Office: State Treasurer
OAMF Rating: 95%, A (Record)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Linda Caudill
Office: State Central Committee
District: Senate 8
OAMF Rating: 100% (Survey)

———————-

Find our full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

Find out how incumbents and candidates scored on medical freedom before you vote!

Early voting for the May 5 primary has already begun so get to those polls and vote for candidates that will help us PASS Pro-Medical freedom legislation! We NEED YOUR VOTE!

Click on the link below and scroll down to download the red highlighted OAMF 2026 PRIMARY Voter Guide!! ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️

https://www.ohioamf.org/elections

Candidate: Mike Kahoe
Office: Ohio House
District: 31
OAMF Rating: (Refused Survey)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Dave Joyce
Office: U.S. HOUSE
District: OH- 14
OAMF Rating: D (Record- No Survey)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Larry Kidd
Office: OH House
District: 93
OAMF Rating: (No Survey)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Frank Hoagland
Office: OH House
District: 96
OAMF Rating: (No Survey)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Margaret Briem
Office: U.S. HOUSE
District: OH-13
OAMF Rating: A (Survey)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

Candidate: Robert Sprague
Office: Secretary of State
OAMF Rating: (No Survey)

Get the full 2026 Primary OAMF VOTER GUIDE at: https://ohioamf.org/elections

———Rating Information———
Incumbent ratings are based on medical freedom voting record, sponsorship and co-sponsorship of medical freedom legislation, including legislation that protects children from medical harm as well as their survey answers, public or email commentary on medical freedom issues, and any work done behind the scenes with house/senate members to advocate for or against OAMF supported legislation. Only incumbents can recieve an A+, because they have a verifiable record.

Candidate ratings are based on survey answers, public commentary on medical freedom issues, and the public support or promotion of OAMF supported legislation. Candidates do not have a voting record yet, so the highest rating they can receive is an A.

While the POLITICO polling numbers are a bit lower than the Brownstone Institute’s poll earlier this year, the fact remains that the MAJORITY of REPUBLICANS (56%) and a significant portion of Democrats (46%) WANT MEDICAL FREEDOM.

Yet, Ohio House and Senate LEADERSHIP continue to IGNORE their Republican BASE by BLOCKING “Right 2 Try” (HB 12/ SB209) and “Conscientious Right 2 Refuse Act” (HB 112). This is creating an APATHETIC VOTER BASE that could cost us the Governor’s race and House & Senate seats around the state.
——————————

“Results from the March poll of 3,851 U.S. adults conducted by Public First show that a plurality of Americans question the safety of vaccines, support reducing the number administered and believe that people’s right to decide what they put in their bodies is more important than preventing the spread of disease.”

The largest share of POLITICO Poll respondents — 41 percent — said REPUBLICANS as a political party ARE MOST WORRIED about VACCINE side effects. BUT they were more DIVIDED over WHICH PARTY “would CHALLENGE BIG PHARMACEUTICAL companies” — 29 percent favored Republicans while 33 percent said Democrats would. The remainder was DIVIDED among those who don’t know or who think both parties or neither PARTY would take on the industry.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2026/04/14/poll-rfk-maha-vaccine-safety-americans-00869088?utm_campaign=april14morningnote&utm_medium=email&utm_source=iterable&utm_content=morningnote

Fantastic News!! 🙌🏼🇺🇸🙌🏼🇺🇸🙌🏼