๐—ข๐—ณ๐—ณ-๐—š๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฑ ๐—œ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ โ˜˜๏ธ
10.7K subscribers
18.4K photos
10K videos
1.17K files
30.1K links
Download Telegram
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
RT News (Telegram)

โšก๏ธ Israel conducts airstrikes on Damascus - reports (Unverified footage)

Some missiles have been reportedly shot down by Syrian air defenses.

The apparent bombings are the third Israeli strikes on Syria in the past month.

Subscribe to RT t.me/rtnews
The Road To Surfdom

Hayek

There are three main reasons why such a numerous and strong group with fairly homogeneous views is not likely to be formed by the best but rather by the worst elements of any society. By our standards the principles on which such a group would be selected will be almost entirely negative.

Addressing the first reason, Hayek says:

In the first instance, it is probably true that, in general, the higher the education and intelligence of individuals become, the more their views and tastes are differentiated and the less likely they are to agree on a particular hierarchy of values. It is a corollary of this that if we wish to find a high degree of uniformity and similarity of outlook, we have to descend to the regions of lower moral and intellectual standards where the more primitive and โ€œcommonโ€ instincts and tastes prevail.

And this is precisely what happened in Germany prior to the rise of the Third Reich.
Hayek continues:

It is, as it were, the lowest common denominator which unites the largest number of people.โ€

Here comes in the second negative principle of selection: he will be able to obtain the support of all the docile and gullible, who have no strong convictions of their own but are prepared to accept a ready-made system of values if it is only drummed into their ears sufficiently loudly and frequently. It will be those whose vague and imperfectly formed ideas are easily swayed and whose passions and emotions are readily aroused who will thus swell the ranks of the totalitarian party.โ€

Join @OffgridiIreland โ˜˜

https://fee.org/articles/why-the-worst-humans-are-able-to-rise-to-power/
๐Ÿ‘2
One of the inherent contradictions of the collectivist philosophy is that, while basing itself on the humanistic morals which individualism has developed, it is practicable only within a relatively small group. That socialism so long as it remains theoretical is internationalist, while as soon as it is put into practice, whether in Russia or in Germany, it becomes violently nationalist, is one of the reasons why โ€œliberal socialismโ€ as most people in the Western world imagine it is purely theoretical, while the practice of socialism is everywhere totalitarian. Collectivism has no room for the wide humanitarianism of liberalism but only for the narrow particularism of the totalitarian. If the โ€œcommunityโ€ or the state are prior to the individual, if they have ends of their own independent of and superior to those of the individuals, only those individuals who work for the same ends can be regarded as members of the community. It is a necessary consequence of this view that a person is respected only as a member of the group, that is, only if and in so far as he works for the recognized common ends, and that he derives his whole dignity only from this membership and not merely from being a man. Indeed, the very concepts of humanity and therefore of any form of internationalism are entirely products of the individualist view of man, and there can be no place for them in a collectivist system of thought.

Road to serfdom

Join @OffgridiIreland โ˜˜
๐Ÿ‘5