🔥 OGU Summer Event

You can earn these awards throughout this event (End date: August 20th)

⚠️ Bingo (@guest) Steps Down from OGU Staff

After 4 years of service, Bingo has decided to step away from the OGU staff team. From his official moderation duties to countless BTS contributions, he has been a pillar of the community.

Thank you for everything, Bingo! Good luck with whatever comes next. 👑

⚠️ Deal Dispute Reopened

Read the post i referred to get some context

Current update is OGU's Admin Arc advised Kacper to reopen the deal dispute if he has any new proof to show, kacper argues that cupid has some connection to a known scammer banned onsite aka Roxivity, in which he suspects he is the scammer on an alt account.

💬What do you think?

‼️ Cupid’s response:

I’m going to respond to this because this reopened dispute is mostly repeating the same points with extra speculation added on top.

First off, I understand the buyer lost a lot to him and I get why he’s upset. But being upset and having suspicions doesn’t automatically make me responsible for what happened. The main accusation is that I failed to secure the account properly. That still hasn’t been proven. The minecraft account was secured properly and I got reputable people to vouch I did, which I showed staff + they can DM them directly and ask.

No actual evidence has been shown that I skipped steps or failed to secure something properly, he just keeps adding his assumptions. The argument is basically “the account got recovered later, so Cupid must have messed up.” That’s not proof. Accounts can get recovered for a lot of reasons. The next big point is me releasing without buyer confirmation. This is being framed like I instantly released everything without thinking, which isn’t true at all. I secured the account and waited over an hour (its only 1h i was supposed to wait) before releasing. In Minecraft deals, that is completely normal. Anyone who regularly deals with MC accounts knows this.

The added claims about roxivity also don’t change anything regarding me. Even if staff finds roxivity suspicious (which he isnt), that still doesn’t connect back to me. Wallet transfers, DMs, previous ownership, none of that proves I worked with anyone or acted improperly. At the end of the day, this dispute was reopened because staff said to reopen if there was actual new evidence that contradicted the original verdict. I’m not seeing that here. But I'm not going to sit here and ignore it since he mentioned it, roxivity told me he bought east account (Zyger MM'd and secured it for him and waited full 24h, instead of his typical 1h before releasing). Roxivity knows the victim and offered him 50% of the profit he makes (out of his own kindness).

'he "bought" that mc back like 3 weeks ago but I still didnt get anything back so I decided to reopen this DD.' - He doesnt owe you anything

What I see is the same timeline, same accusations, and more theories built around.

Also staff, feel free to DM me on telegram if you want me to name you known MCs that have been pb'd after secured properly


Anyways, "kacper" can continue replying to this dd and stating the same stuff over and over again
but this is my only response unless staff ask me to reply to something else, thanks.

⚡️TL:DR

Kacper is presenting speculation rather than the required new evidence, as the account was secured properly according to standard 1-hour protocols.

‼️ OGU’s Staff Eviona response to the deal dispute

"this is an example of a really similar case to mine (nearly 1:1)." the deal dispute you sent as an example actually proves our verdict is correct. if you read the verdict carefully, it says: "secure - you simply rushed the process and assumed all sessions were logged out. after secured you should've waited an hour in case there were active microsoft sessions. instead you released the funds 1 minute after you thought the account was fully secured." 

 in your case, cupid waited more than an hour. so your own defense contradicts your own statements.

‼️ The deal dispute has been marked as invalid

‼️The deal disputes are now marked as valid and jerry aka atif has been banned

⚠️ Deal Dispute

What Happened:
The buyer agreed to sell two Telegram usernames, @earbud and @earbuds (worth over $1,100), to a Telegram user named ⁠@possession⁠ (ID: 6452230728) for $2,200. The buyer tried to add the official middleman Faiq, but the scammer pulled him into a second group chat with a fake Faiq account.

Unknowingly, the buyer sent the NFTs to the scammer's TON wallet.
Immediately after, the messages were deleted and the buyer was blocked.

The Twist & Connection to @scholar:
Within an hour, the stolen handles were transferred to @scholar's personal TON wallet. When confronted, Scholar claimed he had just "bought" them from someone.
However, blockchain records tell a different story:
There is zero record of any payment sent from Scholar's wallet to the scammer for the usernames.

The scammer's wallet has a history of receiving multiple stolen NFTs from different victims and forwarding them straight to Scholar without receiving payment.

The scammer's wallet actually sent a massive payment of 1,632 Gram directly to Scholar's wallet just 25 hours ago.
The buyer believes ⁠@possession⁠ is either Scholar's alt account used for scamming, or they are working closely together in a mass scamming ring.

Current Status:
Scholar currently has the freshly stolen ⁠@earbud⁠ and ⁠@earbuds⁠ up for sale in his Telegram channel (⁠t.me/supplier⁠). The buyer has submitted full blockchain proof and screenshots to staff in hopes of getting their usernames back.

TL;DR: Buyer got exit-scammed for @earbud and @earbuds via a fake Faiq MM group. The stolen handles went straight to @scholar’s wallet with zero proof of payment, and blockchain history shows the scammer actively sending crypto and stolen assets directly to Scholar.

⚠️ OGU Staff Bevo has officially resigned from his staff position

⚠️Scholar’s response:

⚠️ The deal dispute is marked as invalid, scholar showed proof to staff which proved his innocence.

👑A New Chapter for @Reach: Leadership Restructuring Brings Major Ecosystem Changes

Some notable changes are taking place in the marketplace lineup. The username proxy initiative @Reach, which first started as a collaborative effort between mak (@cool) and Vol (@kingpin), has completely shifted its management structure.

Well known market figures fame (@fame) and cold (@cold) have officially joined the venture. By each acquiring a matching one-third stake from mak, the three now hold equal ownership over the project.

With the original channel now fully rebranded to @edge by mak and Vol, it is worth noting a quick piece of context for the community. Vol currently holds a permanent ban on the OGU forum, which dates back to a 2023 site ruling regarding an unresolved $18,000 deal dispute.

🌟@OGUWire

❌OGU IS DOWN?

🔔Looks like oguser.com is currently offline for some users but it seems using a vpn temporarily resolves the issue.

❓Let me know if it’s working for you.

🔗 https://oguser.com/Thread-How-are-we-holding-up-after-OGU-being-down

😱The main domain OGUser.com is officially back under the forum's control and is now fully up and running again.

🔴What Happened:
After Namecheap put the domain on hold, it was unexpectedly released without any warning. An unknown buyer immediately sniped the domain and listed it for a massive $50,000 on Spaceship.

✔️However, OGU has successfully reacquired the domain.

❓What About Meta Services?

There is currently no ETA on when Meta related services will return, but the team is hopeful they can bring them back in a way that avoids any future registrar issues.

🖥@OGUWire