A ‘prophecy’ that can be intentionally fulfilled is not prophecy, but policy.

In saying that something ‘exists’ or is ‘true’ you only assert that your idea of that something ought to be accepted by everyone else as something that ought to be accepted by everyone.

https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/what-is-truth-like

Violent teenagers who think they are tough for prowling shopping centres are not in the least deterred by the prospect of going to juvie prison, where they get free meals and play computer games between workouts at the gym or a swim in the pool. If violent criminality were punished by mandatory enlistment in the army “to fight Putin”, they would instantly become pacifists. This is coming soon.

It is extremely naive to believe that any elected ‘leader’ or ‘parliament’ has any say on how the trillion dollar business they represent (the ‘nation-state’) is managed. Any significant decisions are inescapably a network effect of the interests of the primary stake-holders, the real owners of the ‘nation-state’, and politicians are just avatars of this deterministic process. Moreover, the primary stakeholders are transnational entities, for whom nation-states are mere subsidiaries that can be invested in or liquidated for the benefit of the greater corporate vision. The only possible way of influencing this process is to generate a more persuasive vision of self-interest of the stakeholders. This is primarily a philosophical challenge.

Conscious agency is renunciated thought voluntary obedience.

Biometric ID (for “age verification”) will allow not only to limit access to some online content, but to record everything you read or look at online. This kind of information will be in the hands of the worst possible people.

I want to ‘panic buy’ 2 million barrels of diesel, but I have nowhere to store it. Does anyone have a spare storage facility I could use? Where do ‘panic buyers’ store their fuels? My two panic buying jerry cans are already full, but I need them for the lawnmower.

The desire to control others is rooted in anxiety, which entails that government and wealth are inherently pathological obsessions. Both obsessions presuppose denial of natural justice, of natural law, and constitute an attempt to cheat God. The natural law is inescapable, inseparable from ‘being’; it enforces itself.

Government/politics and business/wealth are manifestations of metal illness.

It makes sense to use a narrative decoy when engaging in domestic sabotage (by some other means). This is especially important for maintaining psychological stability of the useful idiots who work for various Gov departments that participate in emergency management. They all need a story to tell themselves and their families, a story simple enough to understand but too complex to refute without professional risk.

Those who identify as something that they are not, deny their own existence.

Government/State is a mental illness; a paranoid, psychotic fixation on coercively controlling the behaviour of others. It attracts the most mentally disordered individuals, seeking to collectively normalise their antisocial tendencies. Their words have no meaning.

I avoid having opinions. Political narratives are not ‘knowable’ except as something given for us to believe. When a general inference is possible, I may share it, but the conclusion may seem unrelated. Political contingencies feed into the reasoning, but any objective conclusion must exclude the narrative contingencies. An objective argument works for any contingency.

The use of biometric information without explicit consent of the owner is theft. You can claim ownership of your labour or sue for injury only because you own your body. Nobody has a better claim of ownership over your body than you. Assert your ownership.

You are not allowed to just squander your life. Squandering of a life uses up valuable energy and resources, makes a mess, generates pollution, and someone has to pay for all that being managed. If your rulers detect that you are squandering your life they will immediately repossess your life as ‘abandoned property’, use your waste for their own profit.

There is no such thing as ‘National interest’, only private interest. Any appeal to institutional value is only a cover for private interests.

Does everyone consciously analyse information in their imagination, constructs mental arguments, and experiences thought as an internal monologue, or does this only apply to some people?

Looks like I will no longer be selling my book via CIA Amazon:)

It is unclear how the comprehension of language could be the same for people who think in language vs those who do not. How do they know what words mean if words do not correspond to their thoughts?