They don’t need to add anything toxic or infectious to vaccines to harm you. Vaccines, by design, and by definition, damage the immune system, and then the job is finished by nature. It therefore makes sense for the perpetrators to sustain the controversy about ‘what is in the vaccines’ in order to maintain plausible deniability about the systemic intent of vaccination per se.

Vaccines are not intended to make you live longer. No vaccine manufacturer claims, or can legally claim, that their product does that. All we can prove (a priori) is that vaccines, by design, make everyone unhealthy. Everything else is confabulation.

Vaccination against any disease makes us more susceptible to every other disease, because all vaccines damage our healthy immune system.

A further question would be whether any nominal ‘disease’ is objectively a disease (objectively unhealthy) or a beneficial stage in the process of collective survival. The objective standard of health (explained in the attached article) necessitates that we ought to regard any endemic, viral or bacterial challenges as healthy, since they are statistically normal. The concept of disease is thus logically limited to species-atypical interventions, which includes vaccines and most pharmaceuticals.

https://substack.com/@michaelkowalik/note/c-91437447

The reason Australia does not mass produce or import cars that run on LPG or natural gas is because an abundant, local and secure fuel-source is not consitent with the agenda of our rulers.

Injectable vaccines cause immunodeficiency, which causes more severe reactions to endemic viral challenges. Doctors are quacks trained to push whatever the pharmaceutical industry has to sell, and to follow orders. They call it ‘knowledge’.

Medical doctors expect us to believe that they can program the immune system better than millions of years of natural evolution. There should be a special Darwin Award for believing that:)

If your entire moral argument reduces to “I believe X is wrong”, “I oppose X and support Y”, “X is against my values”, you implicitly validate, as a matter of principle, the right to assert the opposite belief, and you are thus committed to solving moral conflicts by force alone. This is an admission that your only moral standard is domination by violence, and by that standard you choose to be judged.

When the corporate media deny something, they call it ‘refutation’. When someone refutes an assertion of the corporate media, the they call it ‘denial’.

A monarch is just a sovereign citizen who murders the most people.

A ‘prophecy’ that can be intentionally fulfilled is not prophecy, but policy.

In saying that something ‘exists’ or is ‘true’ you only assert that your idea of that something ought to be accepted by everyone else as something that ought to be accepted by everyone.

https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/what-is-truth-like

Violent teenagers who think they are tough for prowling shopping centres are not in the least deterred by the prospect of going to juvie prison, where they get free meals and play computer games between workouts at the gym or a swim in the pool. If violent criminality were punished by mandatory enlistment in the army “to fight Putin”, they would instantly become pacifists. This is coming soon.

It is extremely naive to believe that any elected ‘leader’ or ‘parliament’ has any say on how the trillion dollar business they represent (the ‘nation-state’) is managed. Any significant decisions are inescapably a network effect of the interests of the primary stake-holders, the real owners of the ‘nation-state’, and politicians are just avatars of this deterministic process. Moreover, the primary stakeholders are transnational entities, for whom nation-states are mere subsidiaries that can be invested in or liquidated for the benefit of the greater corporate vision. The only possible way of influencing this process is to generate a more persuasive vision of self-interest of the stakeholders. This is primarily a philosophical challenge.

Conscious agency is renunciated thought voluntary obedience.

Biometric ID (for “age verification”) will allow not only to limit access to some online content, but to record everything you read or look at online. This kind of information will be in the hands of the worst possible people.

I want to ‘panic buy’ 2 million barrels of diesel, but I have nowhere to store it. Does anyone have a spare storage facility I could use? Where do ‘panic buyers’ store their fuels? My two panic buying jerry cans are already full, but I need them for the lawnmower.

The desire to control others is rooted in anxiety, which entails that government and wealth are inherently pathological obsessions. Both obsessions presuppose denial of natural justice, of natural law, and constitute an attempt to cheat God. The natural law is inescapable, inseparable from ‘being’; it enforces itself.

Government/politics and business/wealth are manifestations of metal illness.

It makes sense to use a narrative decoy when engaging in domestic sabotage (by some other means). This is especially important for maintaining psychological stability of the useful idiots who work for various Gov departments that participate in emergency management. They all need a story to tell themselves and their families, a story simple enough to understand but too complex to refute without professional risk.

Those who identify as something that they are not, deny their own existence.