Voting implies consent to the existing “laws”. These are the terms and conditions of being re-presented:)

Likes don’t make right.

It is not that most academics, professionals, spiritual leaders and politicians don’t ‘know’ anything; they cannot even consistently define ‘truth’. Their speech about ‘truth’ has no meaning.

If you cannot formally define ‘truth’ without relying on contingent, undefined terms, but you use the term ‘truth’ as if it were meaningful, then your words have no stable meaning, and all you ever say is ‘I’. Every concept reduces to the primitive elements of consciousness - ‘I’, ‘and’ and ‘not’ - and the structure of contingent meaning is ‘not I and not-I, or else it is nothing.

The pre-requisite of freedom/independence (therefore conscious agency) is not to rely in your judgement on contingent premises asserted by anyone else. If you believe the news, or the government, or the experts, or your doctor, or your spiritual leader, or any other source of information, then your reality is determined by others and you cannot be free but only an instrument of their will.

They don’t need to add anything toxic or infectious to vaccines to harm you. Vaccines, by design, and by definition, damage the immune system, and then the job is finished by nature. It therefore makes sense for the perpetrators to sustain the controversy about ‘what is in the vaccines’ in order to maintain plausible deniability about the systemic intent of vaccination per se.

Vaccines are not intended to make you live longer. No vaccine manufacturer claims, or can legally claim, that their product does that. All we can prove (a priori) is that vaccines, by design, make everyone unhealthy. Everything else is confabulation.

Vaccination against any disease makes us more susceptible to every other disease, because all vaccines damage our healthy immune system.

A further question would be whether any nominal ‘disease’ is objectively a disease (objectively unhealthy) or a beneficial stage in the process of collective survival. The objective standard of health (explained in the attached article) necessitates that we ought to regard any endemic, viral or bacterial challenges as healthy, since they are statistically normal. The concept of disease is thus logically limited to species-atypical interventions, which includes vaccines and most pharmaceuticals.

https://substack.com/@michaelkowalik/note/c-91437447

The reason Australia does not mass produce or import cars that run on LPG or natural gas is because an abundant, local and secure fuel-source is not consitent with the agenda of our rulers.

Injectable vaccines cause immunodeficiency, which causes more severe reactions to endemic viral challenges. Doctors are quacks trained to push whatever the pharmaceutical industry has to sell, and to follow orders. They call it ‘knowledge’.

Medical doctors expect us to believe that they can program the immune system better than millions of years of natural evolution. There should be a special Darwin Award for believing that:)

If your entire moral argument reduces to “I believe X is wrong”, “I oppose X and support Y”, “X is against my values”, you implicitly validate, as a matter of principle, the right to assert the opposite belief, and you are thus committed to solving moral conflicts by force alone. This is an admission that your only moral standard is domination by violence, and by that standard you choose to be judged.

When the corporate media deny something, they call it ‘refutation’. When someone refutes an assertion of the corporate media, the they call it ‘denial’.

A monarch is just a sovereign citizen who murders the most people.

A ‘prophecy’ that can be intentionally fulfilled is not prophecy, but policy.

In saying that something ‘exists’ or is ‘true’ you only assert that your idea of that something ought to be accepted by everyone else as something that ought to be accepted by everyone.

https://michaelkowalik.substack.com/p/what-is-truth-like

Violent teenagers who think they are tough for prowling shopping centres are not in the least deterred by the prospect of going to juvie prison, where they get free meals and play computer games between workouts at the gym or a swim in the pool. If violent criminality were punished by mandatory enlistment in the army “to fight Putin”, they would instantly become pacifists. This is coming soon.

It is extremely naive to believe that any elected ‘leader’ or ‘parliament’ has any say on how the trillion dollar business they represent (the ‘nation-state’) is managed. Any significant decisions are inescapably a network effect of the interests of the primary stake-holders, the real owners of the ‘nation-state’, and politicians are just avatars of this deterministic process. Moreover, the primary stakeholders are transnational entities, for whom nation-states are mere subsidiaries that can be invested in or liquidated for the benefit of the greater corporate vision. The only possible way of influencing this process is to generate a more persuasive vision of self-interest of the stakeholders. This is primarily a philosophical challenge.

Conscious agency is renunciated thought voluntary obedience.

Biometric ID (for “age verification”) will allow not only to limit access to some online content, but to record everything you read or look at online. This kind of information will be in the hands of the worst possible people.