Is the vaccine safe for YOU?

1. The specific batch and vile of the vaccine given to you has not been tested (if it were used in a trial then it would not be available to you); a different batch and vile was tested, and no two instances of a manufactured product can ever be identical.

2. Moreover, the safety of the vaccine was never tested in YOU and for YOU; it was tested in other people and for THOSE people. We are not biochemically identical, and individual genetic mutations can make a difference between life and death when exposed to the same antigens.

No medication can be deemed safe for YOU until it is tested in YOU, therefore every medical product is, in essence, experimental - when given for the first time to a person.

Some legal maxims to remember:

Lex non patitur absurdum (The law does not allow an absurdity)

Lex Angliae nunquam sine parliamento mutari potest (The law of England can never be changed without an act of parliament)

https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/council/petitions/electronic-petitions/view-e-petitions/details/12/374

Vaccine Induced Antibody Dependent Enhancement

When you administer a COVID-19 vaccine, you create IgE (anti-parasitic) mediated allergy to the COVID-19 virus, and IgG (protective) antibodies to the same virus. Initially IgG has the upper hand, but it is relatively short lived, whereas IgE lasts for decades. Sneezing when re-infected with Covid is a symptom of vaccine-induced IgE antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), and this is already being reported, a new symptom. As the vaccine induced IgG immunity wanes, the IgE ADE will get worse. It is there, every vaccine will cause a degree of ADE, this is just how the immune system reacts to insect bites (vaccines are like insect bites, with the adjuvant ensuring that the immune system will react) but for now IgG dominates.

Here are some studies showing this effect in influenza vaccinated individuals:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21448311/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-3083.2005.01710.x

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26188254/

And this one demonstrates the effect of booster-vaccines for IgE production:

https://www.jimmunol.org/content/188/1_Supplement/113.9

A note on the history of knowledge

Over the last several days I was revisiting some of my old textbooks in mathematics and engineering, just to refresh my memory about some evaluation principles, and I became aware of something that has eluded me when I was first learning those principles. Every modern product conceals a relatively recent, structural transformation of human understanding, a staggering feat of mutually dependent insights, discoveries, mathematical theorems, leading to more analytically complex evaluations and higher order theorems. For example, every machine-made product would involve the application of Calculus, which in itself is a phenomally expansive domain of theorems and proofs, but Calculus itself would not be possible without the principles of inequalities and the generalised Binomial theorem. All structural engineering (for example, your humble jetliner) involves not just calculus but an equally expansive domain of structural theorems (buckling, crippling, fatigue, flutter, elasticity, plasticity, theory of wing sections), complex algebra, aerodynamics theorems, systems theorems, gas dynamics, electronics, metallurgy. Each of the theorems in these fields was discovered and formulated by someone, in some cases involving a lifetime effort to discover just one fact, one useful theorem, on which another human could build and discover something else. For every originator that we know of, there would be countless others who dedicated their whole life to study but failed to discover anything of substance, and history will not remember them.

The origin of this metaphysical transformation can be traced to Ancient Greece, to Euclid, Pythagoras, and above all, to Aristotle, who has formalised the ultimate rule, the One Law of this world on which every other law, indeed reality itself, depends. Aristotle articulated this One Law in three intuitive forms: non-contradiction (https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2018/03/16/how-be-rational-about-being-right/), identity (https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2019/02/26/the-law-of-identity/), excluded middle (https://culturalanalysisnet.wordpress.com/2019/08/23/the-law-of-excluded-middle/). Nevertheless, it took nearly 2 millenia for these original insights to bear fruit. Some 400-500 years ago, the European continent was uniquely possessed by insatiable curiosity, a metaphysical drive towards understanding that could rely on the early Greek theorems and proofs for further exploration of being. Copernicus, Galileo and Kepler were the next wave of pioneers, followed by Newton and Leibniz, and then by innumerable others, in an explosion of creativity that we are now consuming with animal ignorance, and sometimes with resentment, of the centuries of work and ingenuity inside it. Until you study what you use and consume, you do not even know yourself.

The WHO is a TRULY CRIMINAL organisation. They have removed from their website the following link to their own bulletin: https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/

It is now found at: https://web.archive.org/web/20201118164707/https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/

Why did they remove this 2011 bulletin? Because it talks EXPLICITLY about "pandemics of fear".

"The repeated pandemic health scares caused by an avian H5N1 and a new A(H1N1) human influenza virus are part of the culture of fear. Worst-case thinking replaced balanced risk assessment. Worst-case thinking is motivated by the belief that the danger we face is so overwhelmingly catastrophic that we must act immediately. Rather than wait for information, we need a pre-emptive strike. But if resources buy lives, wasting resources wastes lives".

"In both pandemics of fear, the exaggerated claims of a severe public health threat stemmed primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts. In the highly competitive market of health governance, the struggle for attention, budgets and grants is fierce. The pharmaceutical industry and the media only reacted to this welcome boon."

Individuals vaccinated against Pertussis are at higher risk of multiple sclerosis.

“Subclinical Bordetella pertussis colonization of the nasopharynx persists in highly vaccinated populations, and B. pertussis toxin is a potent adjuvant that, when co-administered with neural antigens, induces neuropathology in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, the principle animal model of multiple sclerosis. Building on these observations with supporting epidemiologic and biologic evidence, we propose that, contrary to conventional wisdom that subclinical pertussis infections are innocuous to hosts, B. pertussis colonization is an important cause of multiple sclerosis.”

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724970/

Humans defend one another from abusers. Sheep run away, hoping that other sheep will be eaten instead.

This is how history will remember YOU. Endure!

This is factually true: https://www.ahpra.gov.au/News/2021-03-09-vaccination-statement.aspx

No vaccine should be approved without a proof that it does not cause IgE sensitisation to any of its contents, including any impurities. Any subsequent, sporadic, accidental etc induction of IgE to vaccine contents should incur instant statutory liability on the manufacturer, with substantial penalties and compensation payable to those affected. When this is done, we can talk again about the merits of vaccination, but until then all vaccines should be considered poison.

Anthropogenic Climate Change Hypothesis Refuted

Since Humlum 2013 we know beyond any doubt that human emissions of CO2 are not the primary driver of global temperature. Humlum has shown, by analysing the official climate data-sets, that the rate of change of global temperature shows zero sensitivity to the rate of change of CO2 concentration, which precludes the possibility of CO2 driving the global temperature.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257343053_The_phase_relation_between_atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_and_global_temperature

Humlum’s study has attracted criticism for his largely speculative, alternative explanation of climate change, but nobody has even attempted to refute his primary conclusion, that the rate of global warming does not increase in response to an increased rate of CO2 emissions, which is a necessary feature of anthropogenic climate change models.

Considering that the offical reasons to authorise these vaccines are blatant lies, distortions of statistics and science, combined with suppression of life-saving medication, indeed mass murder, then by taking any of these vaccines for whatever reason you are telling them that you agree with their actions, you endorse their lies, and THIS is wrong. Covid vaccination is also an issue of critical mass; the more people get vaccinated the more leverage the criminals in power have to force the vaccine on others, either directly or via social and economic discrimination. Under these conditions, getting vaccinated is complicity in a crime against humanity.

Don’t agree to any verbal conversation or meetings regarding Covid vaccination. This is a critical matter. Insist on written communication, because you need time to carefully consider your employer’s reasoning.

The story of Uncle Bevan Costello

“Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello this week received his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.” (10 Sep 2021) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-10/remote-indigenous-towns-regional-queensland-vaccine-uptake/100445986

6 days later...

“Shockwaves felt through South Burnett following sudden death of 'much loved' Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello.” https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-16/vale-uncle-bevan-costello/100466064

Any medical practitioner who would inject themselves with this veritably unnecessary and deadly foreign substance is not fit to practice medicine.

My letter to my local GP. I advise ALL of you to write a similar letter to your local GP or health clinic.

Dear Doctor,

I am one of your local patients and I want to express my strong objection to the Covid-19 vaccination mandate imposed on your clinic by the Chief Health Officer.

Covid-19 vaccination mandates are unethical:

Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, species-typical, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. Source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107026

Moreover, since death is a possible side effect of Covid vaccines, then mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics, and cannot be allowed. Primum non nocere!

Covid-19 vaccines cause harm:

Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine associated with no improvement in mortality but higher rate of all-cause serious adverse events.

According Pfizer-funded randomised controlled study (“Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine”) the rate of serious adverse events is substantially higher in the vaccinated arm of the study vs. placebo (Table S3). No statistically significant effect on mortality has been demonstrated.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1

COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on All Cause Severe Morbidity.

“All cause severe morbidity” in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statically significant increase in “all cause severe morbidity" in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf

Fully-vaccinated 3.9x more likely to die with Delta than the Unvaccinated.

The official data (Public Health England) shows that deaths within 28 days of positive Delta-Covid diagnosis are occuring at roughly 3.9 times the rate among the fully vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Table 5 on page 22: 1,091 Fully vaccinated died vs. 536 unvaccinated. The number of full vaccinated individuals in the study is 113,823 and the number of unvaccinated individuals in the study is 219,716. The Relative Risk of Death with Delta for fully vaccinated Vs not vaccinated: (1091 / 113823) / (537 / 219716) = 3.92

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf

Astra Zeneca Covid Vaccine causes subclinical auto-immunity in 67% of vaccinated individuals.

“We detected non-platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies in 67% of the vaccinated individuals... Our results offer an important insight into the ongoing investigations regarding the underlying multifactorial pathophysiology of thrombotic events induced by the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/712/htm

It is my personal position, that any doctor or clinic who would comply with this harmful and unethical vaccine mandate is not fit to practice medicine, and I would no longer be a patient at that clinic. I hope you will vigorously resist this mandate.

Let me be clear on the question of First Nations and Native Sovereignty

The indigenous sovereignty movement is a separatist, nativist, race-tribe prioritarianism. It is highly analogous to the philosophical roots of Nazism, essentially the Blood and Soil rhetoric without U-Boats. This is on top of the fact that tribalism is the most rudimentary historical form of racism. And no, they will not SAVE YOU or PROTECT you from the “belligerent occupiers”, they are just exploiting a crisis to gain your consent to their misguided separatist claims, and then to race-based taxation (to pay for your squatting on THEIR land, because “you were not first”, you were second and you will always be secondary). They are no doubt used by foreign interests to split up Australia into a patchwork of weak statelets based on Stone Age customs. I am a first generation migrant, I recognise Humanity as the highest, universal value, and I will Not be a second-class citizen, nor will anyone else on my watch.