No mater what happens, do not despair. Watch the mechanics of existence unfold before you. Watch even your own death. The metaphysical footprint of your /integrity/ will last forever, whereas all aberrations will perish because they are contrary to the metaphysical order of being, its generative /symmetry/. But what is this ORDER>? The Ancients gave it various names, various symbolic represtations: GOD, The Golden Rule, Anthropos (Aner-Ops)... I call it (precisely) this^. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3737433

Vaccines are intended to augment our healthy, species-typical constitution, which is the objective standard of human health. Vaccines are therefore inherently unhealthy, contrary to the medical standard of health; biotechnological augmentation that sacrifices health for functional advantage or future convenience (transhumanism).

https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2021/03/30/is-transhumanism-a-health-problem/

A warning to employers who are implementing the COVID vaccination mandates. By implementing an unethical government mandate you are still ethically liable for implementing it; following unethical or criminal orders is no excuse; ignorance is also no excuse. Moreover, the government “mandates” related to Covid vaccination are unlawful, because they were not passed by a majority vote of the parliament, nor can unethical requirements have the force of law even if passed by the parliament. https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/council/petitions/electronic-petitions/view-e-petitions/details/12/374

I have been advised by SIRA (a NSW government agency responsible for regulating the statutory insurance schemes) that, in the event of a work-related death due to Covid-19 vaccination requirement, the NSW workers compensation scheme pays the following compensation benefits:

- A lump sum death benefit (currently $838,750.00)

- Weekly benefits to dependent children (currently $150.20 per child per week)

- Funeral expenses (up to $9,000)

- Costs of transporting body (where applicable).

If you or your family member were denied your preferred treatment for Covid, coerced to comply with procedures that the patient found unethical or degrading, received any medical procedure without being informed about the ‘worst case scenario’ documented risk of side effects, the limitations of scientific knowledge about possible long term side effects, or not asked for consent by a healthcare provider in Victoria (including hospitals), you can make an official complaint here: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/participation-and-communication/making-a-complaint AND HERE: https://hcc.vic.gov.au/public/about-complaints

If your grandma is dying of cancer, or a child falls and breaks a leg, and then tests positive for Covid while at the hospital, despite having no Covid symptoms, she will be counted as a Covid Hospitalisation. https://hosppeds.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/05/18/hpeds.2021-006084 AND HERE https://hosppeds.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/05/18/hpeds.2021-005919

A Simple Argument Against Workplace Vaccination Requirement

I have attempted to simplify my published argument against vaccine mandates (https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793981) for general use. My preferred persuasion strategy in dealing with any employer who requires employees to be vaccinated against Covid is as follows:

1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?

2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employer requires an employee to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, the employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their participation?

If the employer would answer YES to point 1 (a provable fact), then YES to point 2 necessarily follows, and this implies an acknowledgment that the employer intends to violate the right to life in the course of employment.

The effect of these questions is independent of whether the vaccination requirement arises from a government mandate. If an murderous policy arises from a government mandate, your employer is still liable for willingly implementing it. The purpose of the above questions is to demonstrate that the policy violates the right to life, and to indirectly warn your employer that they are making themselves liable.

Failing to respond directly and honestly to an explicit question about workplace health and safety would in itself be incriminating; possibly already a violation of OH&S legal obligations.

A Notice to Church Leaders

If a vaccine can sometimes cause the death of healthy people, then vaccine mandates are in effect a form of legal coercion to participate in an activity where some percentage of people are expected to die as a result of their coerced participation. This implies that the mandating authority violates the right to life of some people, arbitrarily killing a few healthy humans for the alleged benefit of the many. The classic name for such a barbaric arrangement is ‘human sacrifice’. How do you feel about it?

Information is not true unless it is necessarily true; truth is necessitated by the logical integrity of everything that exists. That which stands apart from the systemic integrity is always a lie, an illusion. Apprehension of the world is a study of its integrity, which in turn determines our own integrity. Only an integrated being can act as one.

Doing otherwise would be misrepresenting an ideology as a professional judgement. There is one ethical solutions to this dilemma: openly denounce the regulator on ethical grounds and declare to every patient that you are not allowed to have an independent professional opinion on this question. It follows that any doctor administering or promoting vaccines under these conditions acts unethically.

My Open Letter to the Governor-General of Australia, General David Hurley.
Dear Governor-General,

I am a philosopher and the author of “Ethics of Vaccine Refusal” published in the BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics. https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/25/medethics-2020-107026

Several categories of Australian workers are subject to Covid-19 vaccination requirements, imposed by the state governments. Moreover, universal discrimination against the unvaccinated is on the verge of being implemented as part of the ‘new normal’.

Please consider the following moral question: Since vaccines can sometimes cause death of healthy people, then vaccine mandates are in effect a form of legal coercion to participate in an activity where a percentage of people are expected to die as a result of their coerced participation. This implies that the mandating authority violates the right to life of some people, arbitrarily killing a few healthy humans for the alleged benefit of the many. The classic name for such a barbaric arrangement is ‘human sacrifice’. How does the Governor-General feel about coerced human sacrifice of the few for the benefit of the many?

Vaccine mandates also imply that all children are born in a defective, inherently harmful state that must be technologically augmented to allow their unrestricted participation in society, and this constitutes discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate characteristics of the human race. Will the Governor-General have the courage and moral integrity to use the Sovereign Prerogative to avert this crime against humanity?

The anticoagulant drug warfarin (also used as a popular Rat Poison) is widely used to prevent and treat deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and to prevent stroke in patients who have atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, or a prosthetic heart valve. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrcardio.2017.172

If you are affected emotionally by something you see online, it is prudent to assume that it was intended to affect you emotionally, in order to control your behaviour. Emotion is a tactically poor basis for action.

Information is Real only when contextualised as an objective Media Event, not just the Content of the Media (the Container). Nevertheless, the Moral reality persists irrespective of the distinction between Reality and Illusion, because it is a principle of Order (the structure of meaning) that applies to both illusion and reality. For the same reason, your moral integrity in your dreams has the same normative force as your moral integrity in the real, and THIS is the metaphysical reality that ultimately matters, makes you One or breaks you Apart, into contradictory fragments - metaphysical dust.

The vaccine mandates for teachers, construction and healthcare workers are just CHO directives, ie. directives made under Emergency Powers. The parliament cannot delegate powers it does not itself possess, and even the parliament can’t infringe on citizen freedoms without passing a law to that effect by a majority vote of the parliament. The mandate, and all other CHO directives, are unlawful and void. I have condensed this argument into a formal petition to the Victorian Parliament: https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/council/petitions/electronic-petitions/view-e-petitions/details/12/374