AHPRA is a regulatory authority responsible for licensing of medical practitioners. According to AHPRA, doctors are not permitted to generally advice patients not to submit to vaccination, even if their advice is supported by the best available scientific evidence, because, according to AHPRA, such advice contradicts the best available scientific evidence. Makes sense? In short, injecting patients with a veritable poison is not to be questioned, or you will lose your medical licence. But if you have any questions about vaccines, ask your Doctor. How about this circular reasoning? Doctors who maintain their registration under these absurd conditions are themselves complicit in a crime agaist humanity.

https://www.ahpra.gov.au/documents/default.aspx?record=WD21/30751&dbid=AP&chksum=zrOQ56xJaaLbasNxLDyqMA%3d%3d

Fully-vaccinated 3.9x more likely to die with Delta than the Unvaccinated

The official data (Public Health England) shows that deaths within 28 days of positive Delta-Covid diagnosis are occuring at roughly 3.9 times the rate among the fully vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Table 5 on page 22: 1,091 Fully vaccinated died vs. 536 unvaccinated. The number of full vaccinated individuals in the study is 113,823 and the number of unvaccinated individuals in the study is 219,716. The Relative Risk of Death for fully vaccinated Vs not vaccinated: (1091 / 113823) / (537 / 219716) = 3.92

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf

Pfizer’s own study shows substantially higher rate of serious adverse events in the vaccinated vs. placebo

I have previously discussed the fact that, according to Pfizer’s own safety trial, the relative risk of death is higher for the vaccinated vs placebo, but the trend is more statistically significant in regard to Serius Adverse Events (SAE). In short, the vaccinated had twice as many SAEs as the placebo arm of the study. Notably, adverse events were reported only within one month post the second dose.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1

No mater what happens, do not despair. Watch the mechanics of existence unfold before you. Watch even your own death. The metaphysical footprint of your /integrity/ will last forever, whereas all aberrations will perish because they are contrary to the metaphysical order of being, its generative /symmetry/. But what is this ORDER>? The Ancients gave it various names, various symbolic represtations: GOD, The Golden Rule, Anthropos (Aner-Ops)... I call it (precisely) this^. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3737433

Vaccines are intended to augment our healthy, species-typical constitution, which is the objective standard of human health. Vaccines are therefore inherently unhealthy, contrary to the medical standard of health; biotechnological augmentation that sacrifices health for functional advantage or future convenience (transhumanism).

https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2021/03/30/is-transhumanism-a-health-problem/

A warning to employers who are implementing the COVID vaccination mandates. By implementing an unethical government mandate you are still ethically liable for implementing it; following unethical or criminal orders is no excuse; ignorance is also no excuse. Moreover, the government “mandates” related to Covid vaccination are unlawful, because they were not passed by a majority vote of the parliament, nor can unethical requirements have the force of law even if passed by the parliament. https://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/council/petitions/electronic-petitions/view-e-petitions/details/12/374

I have been advised by SIRA (a NSW government agency responsible for regulating the statutory insurance schemes) that, in the event of a work-related death due to Covid-19 vaccination requirement, the NSW workers compensation scheme pays the following compensation benefits:

- A lump sum death benefit (currently $838,750.00)

- Weekly benefits to dependent children (currently $150.20 per child per week)

- Funeral expenses (up to $9,000)

- Costs of transporting body (where applicable).

If you or your family member were denied your preferred treatment for Covid, coerced to comply with procedures that the patient found unethical or degrading, received any medical procedure without being informed about the ‘worst case scenario’ documented risk of side effects, the limitations of scientific knowledge about possible long term side effects, or not asked for consent by a healthcare provider in Victoria (including hospitals), you can make an official complaint here: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/participation-and-communication/making-a-complaint AND HERE: https://hcc.vic.gov.au/public/about-complaints

If your grandma is dying of cancer, or a child falls and breaks a leg, and then tests positive for Covid while at the hospital, despite having no Covid symptoms, she will be counted as a Covid Hospitalisation. https://hosppeds.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/05/18/hpeds.2021-006084 AND HERE https://hosppeds.aappublications.org/content/early/2021/05/18/hpeds.2021-005919

A Simple Argument Against Workplace Vaccination Requirement

I have attempted to simplify my published argument against vaccine mandates (https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793981) for general use. My preferred persuasion strategy in dealing with any employer who requires employees to be vaccinated against Covid is as follows:

1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?

2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employer requires an employee to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, the employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their participation?

If the employer would answer YES to point 1 (a provable fact), then YES to point 2 necessarily follows, and this implies an acknowledgment that the employer intends to violate the right to life in the course of employment.

The effect of these questions is independent of whether the vaccination requirement arises from a government mandate. If an murderous policy arises from a government mandate, your employer is still liable for willingly implementing it. The purpose of the above questions is to demonstrate that the policy violates the right to life, and to indirectly warn your employer that they are making themselves liable.

Failing to respond directly and honestly to an explicit question about workplace health and safety would in itself be incriminating; possibly already a violation of OH&S legal obligations.

A Notice to Church Leaders

If a vaccine can sometimes cause the death of healthy people, then vaccine mandates are in effect a form of legal coercion to participate in an activity where some percentage of people are expected to die as a result of their coerced participation. This implies that the mandating authority violates the right to life of some people, arbitrarily killing a few healthy humans for the alleged benefit of the many. The classic name for such a barbaric arrangement is ‘human sacrifice’. How do you feel about it?

Information is not true unless it is necessarily true; truth is necessitated by the logical integrity of everything that exists. That which stands apart from the systemic integrity is always a lie, an illusion. Apprehension of the world is a study of its integrity, which in turn determines our own integrity. Only an integrated being can act as one.

Doing otherwise would be misrepresenting an ideology as a professional judgement. There is one ethical solutions to this dilemma: openly denounce the regulator on ethical grounds and declare to every patient that you are not allowed to have an independent professional opinion on this question. It follows that any doctor administering or promoting vaccines under these conditions acts unethically.

My Open Letter to the Governor-General of Australia, General David Hurley.
Dear Governor-General,

I am a philosopher and the author of “Ethics of Vaccine Refusal” published in the BMJ Journal of Medical Ethics. https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/25/medethics-2020-107026

Several categories of Australian workers are subject to Covid-19 vaccination requirements, imposed by the state governments. Moreover, universal discrimination against the unvaccinated is on the verge of being implemented as part of the ‘new normal’.

Please consider the following moral question: Since vaccines can sometimes cause death of healthy people, then vaccine mandates are in effect a form of legal coercion to participate in an activity where a percentage of people are expected to die as a result of their coerced participation. This implies that the mandating authority violates the right to life of some people, arbitrarily killing a few healthy humans for the alleged benefit of the many. The classic name for such a barbaric arrangement is ‘human sacrifice’. How does the Governor-General feel about coerced human sacrifice of the few for the benefit of the many?

Vaccine mandates also imply that all children are born in a defective, inherently harmful state that must be technologically augmented to allow their unrestricted participation in society, and this constitutes discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate characteristics of the human race. Will the Governor-General have the courage and moral integrity to use the Sovereign Prerogative to avert this crime against humanity?