This is factually true: https://www.ahpra.gov.au/News/2021-03-09-vaccination-statement.aspx

No vaccine should be approved without a proof that it does not cause IgE sensitisation to any of its contents, including any impurities. Any subsequent, sporadic, accidental etc induction of IgE to vaccine contents should incur instant statutory liability on the manufacturer, with substantial penalties and compensation payable to those affected. When this is done, we can talk again about the merits of vaccination, but until then all vaccines should be considered poison.

Anthropogenic Climate Change Hypothesis Refuted

Since Humlum 2013 we know beyond any doubt that human emissions of CO2 are not the primary driver of global temperature. Humlum has shown, by analysing the official climate data-sets, that the rate of change of global temperature shows zero sensitivity to the rate of change of CO2 concentration, which precludes the possibility of CO2 driving the global temperature.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257343053_The_phase_relation_between_atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_and_global_temperature

Humlum’s study has attracted criticism for his largely speculative, alternative explanation of climate change, but nobody has even attempted to refute his primary conclusion, that the rate of global warming does not increase in response to an increased rate of CO2 emissions, which is a necessary feature of anthropogenic climate change models.

Considering that the offical reasons to authorise these vaccines are blatant lies, distortions of statistics and science, combined with suppression of life-saving medication, indeed mass murder, then by taking any of these vaccines for whatever reason you are telling them that you agree with their actions, you endorse their lies, and THIS is wrong. Covid vaccination is also an issue of critical mass; the more people get vaccinated the more leverage the criminals in power have to force the vaccine on others, either directly or via social and economic discrimination. Under these conditions, getting vaccinated is complicity in a crime against humanity.

Don’t agree to any verbal conversation or meetings regarding Covid vaccination. This is a critical matter. Insist on written communication, because you need time to carefully consider your employer’s reasoning.

The story of Uncle Bevan Costello

“Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello this week received his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.” (10 Sep 2021) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-10/remote-indigenous-towns-regional-queensland-vaccine-uptake/100445986

6 days later...

“Shockwaves felt through South Burnett following sudden death of 'much loved' Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello.” https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-16/vale-uncle-bevan-costello/100466064

Any medical practitioner who would inject themselves with this veritably unnecessary and deadly foreign substance is not fit to practice medicine.

My letter to my local GP. I advise ALL of you to write a similar letter to your local GP or health clinic.

Dear Doctor,

I am one of your local patients and I want to express my strong objection to the Covid-19 vaccination mandate imposed on your clinic by the Chief Health Officer.

Covid-19 vaccination mandates are unethical:

Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, species-typical, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. Source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107026

Moreover, since death is a possible side effect of Covid vaccines, then mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics, and cannot be allowed. Primum non nocere!

Covid-19 vaccines cause harm:

Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine associated with no improvement in mortality but higher rate of all-cause serious adverse events.

According Pfizer-funded randomised controlled study (“Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine”) the rate of serious adverse events is substantially higher in the vaccinated arm of the study vs. placebo (Table S3). No statistically significant effect on mortality has been demonstrated.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1

COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on All Cause Severe Morbidity.

“All cause severe morbidity” in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statically significant increase in “all cause severe morbidity" in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.

https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf

Fully-vaccinated 3.9x more likely to die with Delta than the Unvaccinated.

The official data (Public Health England) shows that deaths within 28 days of positive Delta-Covid diagnosis are occuring at roughly 3.9 times the rate among the fully vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Table 5 on page 22: 1,091 Fully vaccinated died vs. 536 unvaccinated. The number of full vaccinated individuals in the study is 113,823 and the number of unvaccinated individuals in the study is 219,716. The Relative Risk of Death with Delta for fully vaccinated Vs not vaccinated: (1091 / 113823) / (537 / 219716) = 3.92

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf

Astra Zeneca Covid Vaccine causes subclinical auto-immunity in 67% of vaccinated individuals.

“We detected non-platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies in 67% of the vaccinated individuals... Our results offer an important insight into the ongoing investigations regarding the underlying multifactorial pathophysiology of thrombotic events induced by the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine.”

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/712/htm

It is my personal position, that any doctor or clinic who would comply with this harmful and unethical vaccine mandate is not fit to practice medicine, and I would no longer be a patient at that clinic. I hope you will vigorously resist this mandate.

Let me be clear on the question of First Nations and Native Sovereignty

The indigenous sovereignty movement is a separatist, nativist, race-tribe prioritarianism. It is highly analogous to the philosophical roots of Nazism, essentially the Blood and Soil rhetoric without U-Boats. This is on top of the fact that tribalism is the most rudimentary historical form of racism. And no, they will not SAVE YOU or PROTECT you from the “belligerent occupiers”, they are just exploiting a crisis to gain your consent to their misguided separatist claims, and then to race-based taxation (to pay for your squatting on THEIR land, because “you were not first”, you were second and you will always be secondary). They are no doubt used by foreign interests to split up Australia into a patchwork of weak statelets based on Stone Age customs. I am a first generation migrant, I recognise Humanity as the highest, universal value, and I will Not be a second-class citizen, nor will anyone else on my watch.

Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. The argument is fully developed in my BMJ paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793981

Moreover, since Covid vaccines are known to occasionally cause death of healthy people, mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their mandatory participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics. Primum non nocere!

As long as masks are mandatory, as long as we are in lockdown and under martial law with a biotechnological apartheid being implemented as we speak, we are not participating in a legitimate scientific debate with the official point of view; we are at war, and information is their primary weapon.

An email I sent today to Craig Kelly. I hope he can help (06.10.2021)

Dear Craig,

I am a philosopher of ethics with my current research-focus on vaccine mandates. I have published a paper in the BMJ on this topic: https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/25/medethics-2020-107026

I have contacted several regulatory agencies (SIRA, Australian Government Department of Health, Mr Gavrielatos at SafeWork NSW, Australian Medical Association, and today Safe Work Australia) with some basic, ethically and legally relevant questions about a possible conflict between Covid-19 vaccine mandates and workplace safety. I have received only generic responses; not one agency or person contacted has explicitly answered my two questions, which were formulated as follows:

1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?

2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their mandatory participation?

I find it extremely concerning that the agencies responsible for workplace safety and health of Australian people are tacitly refusing to answer such fundamental and legally critical questions about workplace safety. Would you be willing to apply some pressure to get these questions explicitly addressed by the Commonwealth government?

Can you assist?

Regards,
Michael Kowalik
https://philpeople.org/profiles/michael-kowalik

AMA has tacitly refused to answer my two simple questions:

1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?

2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their mandatory participation?

If they are morally and legally right, then why are they afraid to explicitly answer these basic questions?

My Letter to the City of Melbourne CEO

ATTN: Justin Hanney, CEO

REF: your statement (dated 6 Oct 2021) on the Covid-19 vaccination requirement for City of Melbourne employees and for customer access to certain facilities. https://www.melbourne.vic.gov.au/news-and-media/Pages/Statement-from-City-of-Melbourne-CEO-Justin-Hanney.aspx

I am an expert in medical ethics and I want to share with you my paper, recently published in the BMJ, in which I address the issue of vaccine mandates. In summary, vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, species-typical, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. Paper link: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793981 Media Release: https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2021/03/01/discrimination-on-the-basis-of-vaccination-status-is-inherently-wrong/

Regarding the vaccine requirement for your employees and customers, I want to ask you two ethically relevant questions:

1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?

2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their mandatory participation?

My letter to Peter Singer, Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University and Melbourne University, named the world's “third most influential contemporary thinker" by the Gottlieb Duttweiler Institute.

Dear Peter,

I have read your article in which you argue in favour of mandatory vaccination on the basis of the seat-belt analogy. I have recently argued that mandatory vaccination is not ethically analogous to mandatory seatbelts because wearing seatbelts when driving does not alter our biological constitution, but vaccines do. Vaccination is an irreversible medical procedure, not just a behavioural preference. Paper link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107026. Media Release with some additional details: https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2021/03/01/discrimination-on-the-basis-of-vaccination-status-is-inherently-wrong/

The argument goes deeper than the seat-belt analogy. Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate biological characteristics of the human race, implying that all children are born in a defective, inherently harmful state, and can be discriminated against unless they submit to biotechnological augmentation. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. It is also at odds with the medical standard of human health: https://blogs.bmj.com/medical-ethics/2021/03/30/is-transhumanism-a-health-problem/

Moreover, since Covid vaccines are known to occasionally cause death of healthy people, mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their mandatory participation. The same argument can be constructed for vaccination being required as a condition of access to venues or services.

Regards,

Michael Kowalik
https://philpeople.org/profiles/michael-kowalik

Because you will have to say NO, sooner or later. With every act of submission it will become harder to do so, so you might just as well say NO now.