Forwarded from Sanjeev Sabhlok PUBLIC CHANNEL (Sanjeev Sabhlok)
The WHO is a TRULY CRIMINAL organisation. They have removed from their website the following link to their own bulletin: https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/
It is now found at: https://web.archive.org/web/20201118164707/https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/
Why did they remove this 2011 bulletin? Because it talks EXPLICITLY about "pandemics of fear".
"The repeated pandemic health scares caused by an avian H5N1 and a new A(H1N1) human influenza virus are part of the culture of fear. Worst-case thinking replaced balanced risk assessment. Worst-case thinking is motivated by the belief that the danger we face is so overwhelmingly catastrophic that we must act immediately. Rather than wait for information, we need a pre-emptive strike. But if resources buy lives, wasting resources wastes lives".
"In both pandemics of fear, the exaggerated claims of a severe public health threat stemmed primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts. In the highly competitive market of health governance, the struggle for attention, budgets and grants is fierce. The pharmaceutical industry and the media only reacted to this welcome boon."
It is now found at: https://web.archive.org/web/20201118164707/https://www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/89/7/11-089086/en/
Why did they remove this 2011 bulletin? Because it talks EXPLICITLY about "pandemics of fear".
"The repeated pandemic health scares caused by an avian H5N1 and a new A(H1N1) human influenza virus are part of the culture of fear. Worst-case thinking replaced balanced risk assessment. Worst-case thinking is motivated by the belief that the danger we face is so overwhelmingly catastrophic that we must act immediately. Rather than wait for information, we need a pre-emptive strike. But if resources buy lives, wasting resources wastes lives".
"In both pandemics of fear, the exaggerated claims of a severe public health threat stemmed primarily from disease advocacy by influenza experts. In the highly competitive market of health governance, the struggle for attention, budgets and grants is fierce. The pharmaceutical industry and the media only reacted to this welcome boon."
Individuals vaccinated against Pertussis are at higher risk of multiple sclerosis.
“Subclinical Bordetella pertussis colonization of the nasopharynx persists in highly vaccinated populations, and B. pertussis toxin is a potent adjuvant that, when co-administered with neural antigens, induces neuropathology in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, the principle animal model of multiple sclerosis. Building on these observations with supporting epidemiologic and biologic evidence, we propose that, contrary to conventional wisdom that subclinical pertussis infections are innocuous to hosts, B. pertussis colonization is an important cause of multiple sclerosis.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724970/
“Subclinical Bordetella pertussis colonization of the nasopharynx persists in highly vaccinated populations, and B. pertussis toxin is a potent adjuvant that, when co-administered with neural antigens, induces neuropathology in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, the principle animal model of multiple sclerosis. Building on these observations with supporting epidemiologic and biologic evidence, we propose that, contrary to conventional wisdom that subclinical pertussis infections are innocuous to hosts, B. pertussis colonization is an important cause of multiple sclerosis.”
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26724970/
PubMed
The potential role of subclinical Bordetella Pertussis colonization in the etiology of multiple sclerosis - PubMed
It is established that (1) subclinical Bordetella pertussis colonization of the nasopharynx persists in highly vaccinated populations, and (2) B. pertussis toxin is a potent adjuvant that, when co-administered with neural antigens, induces neuropathology…
Humans defend one another from abusers. Sheep run away, hoping that other sheep will be eaten instead.
This is factually true: https://www.ahpra.gov.au/News/2021-03-09-vaccination-statement.aspx
No vaccine should be approved without a proof that it does not cause IgE sensitisation to any of its contents, including any impurities. Any subsequent, sporadic, accidental etc induction of IgE to vaccine contents should incur instant statutory liability on the manufacturer, with substantial penalties and compensation payable to those affected. When this is done, we can talk again about the merits of vaccination, but until then all vaccines should be considered poison.
Anthropogenic Climate Change Hypothesis Refuted
Since Humlum 2013 we know beyond any doubt that human emissions of CO2 are not the primary driver of global temperature. Humlum has shown, by analysing the official climate data-sets, that the rate of change of global temperature shows zero sensitivity to the rate of change of CO2 concentration, which precludes the possibility of CO2 driving the global temperature.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257343053_The_phase_relation_between_atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_and_global_temperature
Humlum’s study has attracted criticism for his largely speculative, alternative explanation of climate change, but nobody has even attempted to refute his primary conclusion, that the rate of global warming does not increase in response to an increased rate of CO2 emissions, which is a necessary feature of anthropogenic climate change models.
Since Humlum 2013 we know beyond any doubt that human emissions of CO2 are not the primary driver of global temperature. Humlum has shown, by analysing the official climate data-sets, that the rate of change of global temperature shows zero sensitivity to the rate of change of CO2 concentration, which precludes the possibility of CO2 driving the global temperature.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257343053_The_phase_relation_between_atmospheric_carbon_dioxide_and_global_temperature
Humlum’s study has attracted criticism for his largely speculative, alternative explanation of climate change, but nobody has even attempted to refute his primary conclusion, that the rate of global warming does not increase in response to an increased rate of CO2 emissions, which is a necessary feature of anthropogenic climate change models.
ResearchGate
(PDF) The phase relation between atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperature
PDF | Using data series on atmospheric carbon dioxide and global temperatures we investigate the phase relation (leads/lags) between these for the... | Find, read and cite all the research you need on ResearchGate
Forwarded from Michael Kowalik
Considering that the offical reasons to authorise these vaccines are blatant lies, distortions of statistics and science, combined with suppression of life-saving medication, indeed mass murder, then by taking any of these vaccines for whatever reason you are telling them that you agree with their actions, you endorse their lies, and THIS is wrong. Covid vaccination is also an issue of critical mass; the more people get vaccinated the more leverage the criminals in power have to force the vaccine on others, either directly or via social and economic discrimination. Under these conditions, getting vaccinated is complicity in a crime against humanity.
Don’t agree to any verbal conversation or meetings regarding Covid vaccination. This is a critical matter. Insist on written communication, because you need time to carefully consider your employer’s reasoning.
The story of Uncle Bevan Costello
“Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello this week received his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.” (10 Sep 2021) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-10/remote-indigenous-towns-regional-queensland-vaccine-uptake/100445986
6 days later...
“Shockwaves felt through South Burnett following sudden death of 'much loved' Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello.” https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-16/vale-uncle-bevan-costello/100466064
“Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello this week received his second dose of the Pfizer vaccine.” (10 Sep 2021) https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-10/remote-indigenous-towns-regional-queensland-vaccine-uptake/100445986
6 days later...
“Shockwaves felt through South Burnett following sudden death of 'much loved' Cherbourg elder Uncle Bevan Costello.” https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-16/vale-uncle-bevan-costello/100466064
www.abc.net.au
Uncle Bevan's community has among the lowest COVID vaccination rates in the nation — but supply isn't the biggest problem
Myths and misinformation online have caused residents of remote Indigenous communities to fear the vaccine. But efforts from elders and teens are encouraging others to roll up their sleeves and get the jab. WARNING: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers…
My letter to my local GP. I advise ALL of you to write a similar letter to your local GP or health clinic.
Dear Doctor,
I am one of your local patients and I want to express my strong objection to the Covid-19 vaccination mandate imposed on your clinic by the Chief Health Officer.
Covid-19 vaccination mandates are unethical:
Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, species-typical, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. Source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107026
Moreover, since death is a possible side effect of Covid vaccines, then mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics, and cannot be allowed. Primum non nocere!
Covid-19 vaccines cause harm:
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine associated with no improvement in mortality but higher rate of all-cause serious adverse events.
According Pfizer-funded randomised controlled study (“Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine”) the rate of serious adverse events is substantially higher in the vaccinated arm of the study vs. placebo (Table S3). No statistically significant effect on mortality has been demonstrated.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1
COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on All Cause Severe Morbidity.
“All cause severe morbidity” in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statically significant increase in “all cause severe morbidity" in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.
https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf
Fully-vaccinated 3.9x more likely to die with Delta than the Unvaccinated.
The official data (Public Health England) shows that deaths within 28 days of positive Delta-Covid diagnosis are occuring at roughly 3.9 times the rate among the fully vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Table 5 on page 22: 1,091 Fully vaccinated died vs. 536 unvaccinated. The number of full vaccinated individuals in the study is 113,823 and the number of unvaccinated individuals in the study is 219,716. The Relative Risk of Death with Delta for fully vaccinated Vs not vaccinated: (1091 / 113823) / (537 / 219716) = 3.92
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf
Astra Zeneca Covid Vaccine causes subclinical auto-immunity in 67% of vaccinated individuals.
“We detected non-platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies in 67% of the vaccinated individuals... Our results offer an important insight into the ongoing investigations regarding the underlying multifactorial pathophysiology of thrombotic events induced by the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine.”
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/712/htm
It is my personal position, that any doctor or clinic who would comply with this harmful and unethical vaccine mandate is not fit to practice medicine, and I would no longer be a patient at that clinic. I hope you will vigorously resist this mandate.
Dear Doctor,
I am one of your local patients and I want to express my strong objection to the Covid-19 vaccination mandate imposed on your clinic by the Chief Health Officer.
Covid-19 vaccination mandates are unethical:
Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, species-typical, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. Source: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-107026
Moreover, since death is a possible side effect of Covid vaccines, then mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics, and cannot be allowed. Primum non nocere!
Covid-19 vaccines cause harm:
Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine associated with no improvement in mortality but higher rate of all-cause serious adverse events.
According Pfizer-funded randomised controlled study (“Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine”) the rate of serious adverse events is substantially higher in the vaccinated arm of the study vs. placebo (Table S3). No statistically significant effect on mortality has been demonstrated.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159v1
COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on All Cause Severe Morbidity.
“All cause severe morbidity” in the treatment group and control group was calculated by adding all severe events reported in the clinical trials. Severe events included both severe infections with COVID-19 and all other severe adverse events in the treatment arm and control arm respectively. This analysis gives reduction in severe COVID-19 infections the same weight as adverse events of equivalent severity. Results prove that none of the vaccines provide a health benefit and all pivotal trials show a statically significant increase in “all cause severe morbidity" in the vaccinated group compared to the placebo group.
https://www.scivisionpub.com/pdfs/us-covid19-vaccines-proven-to-cause-more-harm-than-good-based-on-pivotal-clinical-trial-data-analyzed-using-the-proper-scientific--1811.pdf
Fully-vaccinated 3.9x more likely to die with Delta than the Unvaccinated.
The official data (Public Health England) shows that deaths within 28 days of positive Delta-Covid diagnosis are occuring at roughly 3.9 times the rate among the fully vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Table 5 on page 22: 1,091 Fully vaccinated died vs. 536 unvaccinated. The number of full vaccinated individuals in the study is 113,823 and the number of unvaccinated individuals in the study is 219,716. The Relative Risk of Death with Delta for fully vaccinated Vs not vaccinated: (1091 / 113823) / (537 / 219716) = 3.92
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1014926/Technical_Briefing_22_21_09_02.pdf
Astra Zeneca Covid Vaccine causes subclinical auto-immunity in 67% of vaccinated individuals.
“We detected non-platelet activating anti-PF4 antibodies in 67% of the vaccinated individuals... Our results offer an important insight into the ongoing investigations regarding the underlying multifactorial pathophysiology of thrombotic events induced by the ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccine.”
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/712/htm
It is my personal position, that any doctor or clinic who would comply with this harmful and unethical vaccine mandate is not fit to practice medicine, and I would no longer be a patient at that clinic. I hope you will vigorously resist this mandate.
Let me be clear on the question of First Nations and Native Sovereignty
The indigenous sovereignty movement is a separatist, nativist, race-tribe prioritarianism. It is highly analogous to the philosophical roots of Nazism, essentially the Blood and Soil rhetoric without U-Boats. This is on top of the fact that tribalism is the most rudimentary historical form of racism. And no, they will not SAVE YOU or PROTECT you from the “belligerent occupiers”, they are just exploiting a crisis to gain your consent to their misguided separatist claims, and then to race-based taxation (to pay for your squatting on THEIR land, because “you were not first”, you were second and you will always be secondary). They are no doubt used by foreign interests to split up Australia into a patchwork of weak statelets based on Stone Age customs. I am a first generation migrant, I recognise Humanity as the highest, universal value, and I will Not be a second-class citizen, nor will anyone else on my watch.
The indigenous sovereignty movement is a separatist, nativist, race-tribe prioritarianism. It is highly analogous to the philosophical roots of Nazism, essentially the Blood and Soil rhetoric without U-Boats. This is on top of the fact that tribalism is the most rudimentary historical form of racism. And no, they will not SAVE YOU or PROTECT you from the “belligerent occupiers”, they are just exploiting a crisis to gain your consent to their misguided separatist claims, and then to race-based taxation (to pay for your squatting on THEIR land, because “you were not first”, you were second and you will always be secondary). They are no doubt used by foreign interests to split up Australia into a patchwork of weak statelets based on Stone Age customs. I am a first generation migrant, I recognise Humanity as the highest, universal value, and I will Not be a second-class citizen, nor will anyone else on my watch.
Vaccine mandates amount to discrimination on the basis of healthy, innate biological characteristics of the human race. This is contrary to the established norms that underwrite our moral intuitions about many other forms of prohibited discrimination. The argument is fully developed in my BMJ paper: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3793981
Moreover, since Covid vaccines are known to occasionally cause death of healthy people, mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their mandatory participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics. Primum non nocere!
Moreover, since Covid vaccines are known to occasionally cause death of healthy people, mandatory vaccination violates the right to life by arbitrarily killing a minority for the benefit of the majority. Specifically, when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect coerced to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a direct result of their mandatory participation. This goes against the fundamental principles of medical and professional ethics. Primum non nocere!
As long as masks are mandatory, as long as we are in lockdown and under martial law with a biotechnological apartheid being implemented as we speak, we are not participating in a legitimate scientific debate with the official point of view; we are at war, and information is their primary weapon.
An email I sent today to Craig Kelly. I hope he can help (06.10.2021)
Dear Craig,
I am a philosopher of ethics with my current research-focus on vaccine mandates. I have published a paper in the BMJ on this topic: https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/25/medethics-2020-107026
I have contacted several regulatory agencies (SIRA, Australian Government Department of Health, Mr Gavrielatos at SafeWork NSW, Australian Medical Association, and today Safe Work Australia) with some basic, ethically and legally relevant questions about a possible conflict between Covid-19 vaccine mandates and workplace safety. I have received only generic responses; not one agency or person contacted has explicitly answered my two questions, which were formulated as follows:
1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?
2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their mandatory participation?
I find it extremely concerning that the agencies responsible for workplace safety and health of Australian people are tacitly refusing to answer such fundamental and legally critical questions about workplace safety. Would you be willing to apply some pressure to get these questions explicitly addressed by the Commonwealth government?
Can you assist?
Regards,
Michael Kowalik
https://philpeople.org/profiles/michael-kowalik
Dear Craig,
I am a philosopher of ethics with my current research-focus on vaccine mandates. I have published a paper in the BMJ on this topic: https://jme.bmj.com/content/early/2021/02/25/medethics-2020-107026
I have contacted several regulatory agencies (SIRA, Australian Government Department of Health, Mr Gavrielatos at SafeWork NSW, Australian Medical Association, and today Safe Work Australia) with some basic, ethically and legally relevant questions about a possible conflict between Covid-19 vaccine mandates and workplace safety. I have received only generic responses; not one agency or person contacted has explicitly answered my two questions, which were formulated as follows:
1. Do you acknowledge that Covid vaccination occasionally causes death of healthy people, even if the overall outcome benefits most people?
2. If yes, do you acknowledge that when an employee is required to receive Covid vaccination as a condition of employment, that employee is in effect required to participate in an activity where some percentage of employees are expected to die as a result of their mandatory participation?
I find it extremely concerning that the agencies responsible for workplace safety and health of Australian people are tacitly refusing to answer such fundamental and legally critical questions about workplace safety. Would you be willing to apply some pressure to get these questions explicitly addressed by the Commonwealth government?
Can you assist?
Regards,
Michael Kowalik
https://philpeople.org/profiles/michael-kowalik