Forwarded from Rahul Patel
AuroraStore_v3_Beta_06.apk
5.8 MB
#Changelog :
1. Fixed BulkUpdates
2. Fixed Notification issues
3. Added About App segment
4. Minor UI changes
5. Added support for multi threaded downloads
6. Added option to choose between notification providers
#Installtion bug on MIUI & H2OS is due to shameless modification of packagemanager by Mi & OP, I need to have a device running MIUI to fix it.
7. Improve Google App filter logic
1. Fixed BulkUpdates
2. Fixed Notification issues
3. Added About App segment
4. Minor UI changes
5. Added support for multi threaded downloads
6. Added option to choose between notification providers
#Installtion bug on MIUI & H2OS is due to shameless modification of packagemanager by Mi & OP, I need to have a device running MIUI to fix it.
7. Improve Google App filter logic
Comprehensive list of apps for privacy oriented people.
Taken from (r/privacytoolsio)
Windows/Linux:
https://enchiridion.red/2019/1/18/desktop-apps/
Android:
https://enchiridion.red/2019/1/18/mobile-apps/
Taken from (r/privacytoolsio)
Windows/Linux:
https://enchiridion.red/2019/1/18/desktop-apps/
Android:
https://enchiridion.red/2019/1/18/mobile-apps/
Telegram CEO Pavel @Durov writes about New Telegram Updates "Taking Back Our Right to Privacy" : https://t.me/durov/102
Telegram
Du Rove's Channel
It’s been 23 years since I first used a private messaging service, and 16 years since I first built my own. The number of electronic private conversations I’ve had over those years is enormous. I am certain this is also the case for you.
Over the last 10…
Over the last 10…
The copyright lobby invites European parliamentarians to eat and drink again the night before the vote
A supposed e-mail in English sent this morning by an organization representing record labels to the Members of the European Parliament, invites the latter to "an evening of discussions, food and drink" with artists, producers, journalists and other content creators
https://twitter.com/markusreuter_/status/1110103557603237889
#eu
A supposed e-mail in English sent this morning by an organization representing record labels to the Members of the European Parliament, invites the latter to "an evening of discussions, food and drink" with artists, producers, journalists and other content creators
https://twitter.com/markusreuter_/status/1110103557603237889
#eu
Twitter
Markus Reuter
Am Abend vor der Abstimmung lädt die Urheberrechts-Lobby nochmal zum Essen und Trinken für die EU-Abgeordneten. #Artikel13 #lobbying
Apple announces Apple Card credit card, partnering with Goldman Sachs and Mastercard
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/25/18277417/apple-pay-credit-card-announcement-goldman-sachs-event-2019
Comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19484572
#apple #credit #card #cc
https://www.theverge.com/2019/3/25/18277417/apple-pay-credit-card-announcement-goldman-sachs-event-2019
Comments
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19484572
#apple #credit #card #cc
The Verge
Apple announces Apple Card credit card
Coming summer 2019.
Man stole $122m from Facebook and Google by sending them random bills, which the companies dutifully paid
Last week, Evaldas Rimasauskas of Lithuania plead guilty to US wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering charges, admitting that he had stolen $99m from Facebook and $23m from Google between 2013 and 2015, by sending them random bills, which the companies dutifully paid.
https://boingboing.net/2019/03/24/evaldas-rimasauskas.html
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/22/phishing-scam-us-tech-companies-tricked-100-million-lithuanian-man
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/lithuanian-man-pleads-guilty-wire-fraud-theft-over-100-million-fraudulent-business
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/lithuanian-pleads-guilty-to-stealing-100-million-from-google-facebook/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-fraud-tech/lithuanian-pleads-guilty-in-u-s-to-massive-fraud-against-google-facebook-idUSKCN1R12FB
#hero #expropiation #robinhood #freeEvaldas #google #fb
Last week, Evaldas Rimasauskas of Lithuania plead guilty to US wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering charges, admitting that he had stolen $99m from Facebook and $23m from Google between 2013 and 2015, by sending them random bills, which the companies dutifully paid.
https://boingboing.net/2019/03/24/evaldas-rimasauskas.html
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/mar/22/phishing-scam-us-tech-companies-tricked-100-million-lithuanian-man
https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/lithuanian-man-pleads-guilty-wire-fraud-theft-over-100-million-fraudulent-business
https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/lithuanian-pleads-guilty-to-stealing-100-million-from-google-facebook/
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-fraud-tech/lithuanian-pleads-guilty-in-u-s-to-massive-fraud-against-google-facebook-idUSKCN1R12FB
#hero #expropiation #robinhood #freeEvaldas #google #fb
Boing Boing
Man stole $122m from Facebook and Google by sending them random bills, which the companies dutifully paid
Last week, Evaldas Rimasauskas of Lithuania plead guilty to US wire fraud, aggravated identity theft, and money laundering charges, admitting that he had stolen $99m from Facebook and $23m from Goo…
Firefox Lockbox launches on Android to keep passwords safe
https://www.xda-developers.com/firefox-lockbox-android
#passwords #firefox #ff #lockbox
https://www.xda-developers.com/firefox-lockbox-android
#passwords #firefox #ff #lockbox
xda-developers
Firefox Lockbox launches on Android to keep passwords safe
Firefox Lockbox has a strong integration and synchronization capabilities with the company's own browser, Mozilla Firefox.
Firefox Lockbox: Android App with Adjust-Tracker
Immediately after the start a lot of information is sent to the analysis company Adjust (headquarters San Francisco, USA) [app.adjust.com]...(...)
The privacy statement linked in the app refers to Firefox. There I don't find any information about Firefox Lockbox or which data the app shares when with which third party.
Furthermore, telemetry data is sent to Mozilla [incoming.telemetry.mozilla.org]:...(...)
By now Mozilla should actually know that tracking or the transmission of telemetry data is not well received by the more data protection-sensitive target group. In addition, the above-mentioned data is transmitted before consent is given to the data protection declaration.
https://www.kuketz-blog.de/firefox-lockbox-android-app-mit-adjust-tracker/
#android #app #firefox #LockBox #adjust #tracker #kuketz #why
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_ES
Immediately after the start a lot of information is sent to the analysis company Adjust (headquarters San Francisco, USA) [app.adjust.com]...(...)
The privacy statement linked in the app refers to Firefox. There I don't find any information about Firefox Lockbox or which data the app shares when with which third party.
Furthermore, telemetry data is sent to Mozilla [incoming.telemetry.mozilla.org]:...(...)
By now Mozilla should actually know that tracking or the transmission of telemetry data is not well received by the more data protection-sensitive target group. In addition, the above-mentioned data is transmitted before consent is given to the data protection declaration.
https://www.kuketz-blog.de/firefox-lockbox-android-app-mit-adjust-tracker/
#android #app #firefox #LockBox #adjust #tracker #kuketz #why
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_DE
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_EN
📡@cRyPtHoN_INFOSEC_ES
Forwarded from Du Rove's Channel
How did you like the privacy-focused update of Telegram?
Anonymous Poll
55%
Awesome, keep it up! 👍
45%
Awful, take it back 👎
Article 13 of the copyright law went ahead directly because some deputies made a convenient 'mistake' when voting
Translation from:
https://www.genbeta.com/actualidad/articulo-13-ley-copyright-salio-adelante-forma-directa-porque-algunos-diputados-se-equivocaron-al-votar
Yesterday, at the headquarters of the European Parliament in Strasbourg, one of the most tense days was remembered. As we already know, the MEPs voted in favor of approving the copyright directive, which with its articles 13 and 11, now renumbered to 15 and 17, can change the way we use the Internet, particularly with regard to the management of the rights in content platforms and how the search engines and aggregators show the linked media.
The directive went ahead in the Eurochamber of Strasbourg with 348 votes in favor, 274 against and 36 abstentions. A difference so great that it can not be thought that it was due to generalized misconceptions. Ramón Tremosa, European MEP of the ALDE group, voted in favor of being against the board, and has corrected his vote a posteriori. However, in another of the key moments of the day, more MEPs mistakenly voted, and later they corrected their vote (see page 51 of this document http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+PV+20190326+RES-RCV+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN ).
The vote on amendments to the directive was not made due to errors in the vote of some MEPs
The copyright directive was voted in full directly. Before that, the great hope of stopping it for its detractors was the turn to vote on amendments, among which there were some that requested the elimination of article 13 and 11 of the directive (which would return to their original form of 2016, that of the proposal of the European Commission). That is, it would have been approved, except with those two critical articles. It was the possibility that Julia Reda, one of the most critical MEPs, considered in her blog https://juliareda.eu/2019/03/copyright-vote-explained
However, the amendments could not be voted on individually, because 317 MEPs voted against being able to do so, compared to 312 who voted in favor and 24 who abstained. Hours later we learned, by the changes in registered votes, that Gerolf Annemans, Johannes Cornelis van Baalen, Dita Charanzová, Martina Dlabajová, Antanas Guoga, Eva Joly, Jo Leinen, Peter Lundgren, Michèle Rivasi, Kristina Winberg have modified their negative vote to an in favor one Subtracting those of the two MEPs who have modified their in favor vote to against, and one that changed from against to abstention, we have left 320 votes in favor for 309 against.
In the end, we win even if it does not count:
After the corrections of vote (which have no consequences), the first vote would have been won. Vote that could have allowed to take out articles 13 and 11 (17 and 15 in final version) of the Directive
The problem is that the corrections of votes have no consequences, so there is nothing in the hands of the MEPs. It is very sad that due to a procedural issue, the process can not be reopened and debate changes to the most controversial articles of the directive. It will have to be the Council of the European Union that decides the final destination of the copyright directive.
#eu #copyright
Translation from:
https://www.genbeta.com/actualidad/articulo-13-ley-copyright-salio-adelante-forma-directa-porque-algunos-diputados-se-equivocaron-al-votar
Yesterday, at the headquarters of the European Parliament in Strasbourg, one of the most tense days was remembered. As we already know, the MEPs voted in favor of approving the copyright directive, which with its articles 13 and 11, now renumbered to 15 and 17, can change the way we use the Internet, particularly with regard to the management of the rights in content platforms and how the search engines and aggregators show the linked media.
The directive went ahead in the Eurochamber of Strasbourg with 348 votes in favor, 274 against and 36 abstentions. A difference so great that it can not be thought that it was due to generalized misconceptions. Ramón Tremosa, European MEP of the ALDE group, voted in favor of being against the board, and has corrected his vote a posteriori. However, in another of the key moments of the day, more MEPs mistakenly voted, and later they corrected their vote (see page 51 of this document http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+PV+20190326+RES-RCV+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN ).
The vote on amendments to the directive was not made due to errors in the vote of some MEPs
The copyright directive was voted in full directly. Before that, the great hope of stopping it for its detractors was the turn to vote on amendments, among which there were some that requested the elimination of article 13 and 11 of the directive (which would return to their original form of 2016, that of the proposal of the European Commission). That is, it would have been approved, except with those two critical articles. It was the possibility that Julia Reda, one of the most critical MEPs, considered in her blog https://juliareda.eu/2019/03/copyright-vote-explained
However, the amendments could not be voted on individually, because 317 MEPs voted against being able to do so, compared to 312 who voted in favor and 24 who abstained. Hours later we learned, by the changes in registered votes, that Gerolf Annemans, Johannes Cornelis van Baalen, Dita Charanzová, Martina Dlabajová, Antanas Guoga, Eva Joly, Jo Leinen, Peter Lundgren, Michèle Rivasi, Kristina Winberg have modified their negative vote to an in favor one Subtracting those of the two MEPs who have modified their in favor vote to against, and one that changed from against to abstention, we have left 320 votes in favor for 309 against.
In the end, we win even if it does not count:
After the corrections of vote (which have no consequences), the first vote would have been won. Vote that could have allowed to take out articles 13 and 11 (17 and 15 in final version) of the Directive
The problem is that the corrections of votes have no consequences, so there is nothing in the hands of the MEPs. It is very sad that due to a procedural issue, the process can not be reopened and debate changes to the most controversial articles of the directive. It will have to be the Council of the European Union that decides the final destination of the copyright directive.
#eu #copyright
Genbeta
El artículo 13 de la ley de copyright salió adelante de forma directa porque algunos diputados se equivocaron al votar
Durante el día de ayer, en la sede del Parlamento Europeo de Estrasburgo se vivió uno de los días de más tensión que se recuerdan. Como ya sabemos, los...
Taking Back Our Right to Privacy - Vote in favour of the new TG privacy setting
Over the last 10-20 years, each of us exchanged millions of messages with thousands of people. Most of those communication logs are stored somewhere in other people’s inboxes, outside of our reach. Relationships start and end, but messaging histories with ex-friends and ex-colleagues remain available forever.
It’s getting worse. Within the next few decades, the volume of our private data stored by our chat partners will easily quadruple.
An old message you already forgot about can be taken out of context and used against you decades later. A hasty text you sent to a girlfriend in school can come haunt you in 2030 when you decide to run for mayor. We have to admit: Despite all of our progress in encryption and privacy, we have very little actual control of our data. We can’t go back in time and erase things for other people.
Well, we couldn’t. Until today. Starting today, we are allowing every Telegram user to delete any message in a private conversation from both sides. It doesn’t matter who sent the message and when – you have complete control over it. You can even wipe out the whole conversation from both sides if you want to. No trace will be left on either side.
We know some people may get concerned about the potential misuse of this feature or about the permanence of their chat histories. We thought carefully through those issues, but we think having control over your own digital footprint should be paramount.
So please leave your vote in favour of the new privacy setting, so that this little extra which has such a great effect on our privacy can be preserved. 👇👇
👉 https://t.me/durov/103 👈
👉 https://t.me/NoGoolag/997 👈
More infos about the last TG update:
https://telegram.org/blog/unsend-privacy-emoji
Or have a look at Durov's Channel here at TG:
https://t.me/durov/102
📡 @NoGoolag
#tg #durov #privacy #vote
Over the last 10-20 years, each of us exchanged millions of messages with thousands of people. Most of those communication logs are stored somewhere in other people’s inboxes, outside of our reach. Relationships start and end, but messaging histories with ex-friends and ex-colleagues remain available forever.
It’s getting worse. Within the next few decades, the volume of our private data stored by our chat partners will easily quadruple.
An old message you already forgot about can be taken out of context and used against you decades later. A hasty text you sent to a girlfriend in school can come haunt you in 2030 when you decide to run for mayor. We have to admit: Despite all of our progress in encryption and privacy, we have very little actual control of our data. We can’t go back in time and erase things for other people.
Well, we couldn’t. Until today. Starting today, we are allowing every Telegram user to delete any message in a private conversation from both sides. It doesn’t matter who sent the message and when – you have complete control over it. You can even wipe out the whole conversation from both sides if you want to. No trace will be left on either side.
We know some people may get concerned about the potential misuse of this feature or about the permanence of their chat histories. We thought carefully through those issues, but we think having control over your own digital footprint should be paramount.
So please leave your vote in favour of the new privacy setting, so that this little extra which has such a great effect on our privacy can be preserved. 👇👇
👉 https://t.me/durov/103 👈
👉 https://t.me/NoGoolag/997 👈
More infos about the last TG update:
https://telegram.org/blog/unsend-privacy-emoji
Or have a look at Durov's Channel here at TG:
https://t.me/durov/102
📡 @NoGoolag
#tg #durov #privacy #vote
Forwarded from Privacy Today
Vote Now For Telegram Privacy
Telegram recently introduced new privacy features wich are vital in an age of practically infinite storage and big data analytics. Unfortunately these are at stake already. Mr. Durov, the founder of Telegram, is running a poll on whether to keep these modifications or not.
For the full story, read these: https://t.me/OpenSourceTelegram/57 and https://t.me/OpenSourceTelegram/60. You may want to link @CloudLeak in your bio in either case since regular chats are not private - Telegram can read them. Even if there are reasons to assume that they are trustworthy at this point in time, letting a 3rd party accumulate all of your personal data isn't advisable.
Please vote here: https://t.me/durov/103
b1cad53b971b45fd923396b6622c3c45 / 20190331Telegram recently introduced new privacy features wich are vital in an age of practically infinite storage and big data analytics. Unfortunately these are at stake already. Mr. Durov, the founder of Telegram, is running a poll on whether to keep these modifications or not.
For the full story, read these: https://t.me/OpenSourceTelegram/57 and https://t.me/OpenSourceTelegram/60. You may want to link @CloudLeak in your bio in either case since regular chats are not private - Telegram can read them. Even if there are reasons to assume that they are trustworthy at this point in time, letting a 3rd party accumulate all of your personal data isn't advisable.
Please vote here: https://t.me/durov/103