🇬🇧 Things are heating up in the UK over the Epstein affair, and while the press have a field day with daily revelations, it is becoming clearer and clearer who will be protected from prosecution and who will be sent to the gallows. Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, formerly known as Prince Andrew, it would seem, has been thrown under a bus by his brother, the King, who could simply take no more of the sleazy reports in the press about underage girls and Andrew selling off secrets relating to the country to Epstein. Something had to be done to make a clear statement, if for nothing else, to protect the British royal family from being dragged down into the sewer with Andrew.

The arrest by UK police of Andrew on the morning of 19th February is interesting as it throws up a number of questions which surely British journalists will not bother asking. Namely, why did it take so long? And perhaps more importantly, who actually made the decision that Andrew had to be arrested?

For Andrew, it seems there is no depth profound enough for his brother King Charles to push the knife in.

☁️ Martin Jay writes

🌐 More on world politics
🚀 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK

📛 The Epstein Files revealed the commitment of neo-atheist icons to the cannibalistic pedophile. Since neo-atheism is committed to Zionism, the relationship between the observant Jew Jeffrey Epstein and neo-atheism cannot be limited to utilitarian support aimed solely at scientific discoveries.

If occultism doesn’t publicly profess everything it believes in, is it possible that militant atheism is the exoteric layer of a Hermetic religion?

☁️ Bruna Frascolla writes

🌐 More analysis
🚀 Subscribe
🌐 Join us on VK