#Google has quietly started accessing #Gmail users’ private emails and attachments to train its #AI models
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/11/22/gmail-explainer-how-to-stop-google-ai-from-snooping-through-your-emails/
#stalking #surveillance #why
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/11/22/gmail-explainer-how-to-stop-google-ai-from-snooping-through-your-emails/
#stalking #surveillance #why
Breitbart
Gmail Explainer: How to Stop Google AI from Snooping Through Your Emails
Google has quietly started accessing Gmail users' private emails and attachments to train its AI models, requiring manual opt-out to avoid participation. To make the process even trickier, Gmail users have to opt out in two separate places for the change…
This misleading #Australia Labor Government ‘survey’ is designed to show that you WANT a digital #ID and broad social media #surveillance
If you tick ANYTHING except NONE OF THE ABOVE – you are in fact ASKING the Australian Government to IMPOSE a DIGITAL ID on you and you family.
From George Christensen
There is a LABOR GOV 'survey' circulating that is designed to manipulate you into agreeing to the DIGITAL ID.
The URL for the survey is https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/digital-duty-care and here GREAT CARE is SUGGESTED in selecting the responses you give to that survey:
Q1: What kinds of harmful experiences or content should platforms prevent for Australians UNDER 18?
• Bullying and harassment, including volumetric attacks (‘pile ons’)
• Online hate speech against individuals or groups
• Pornography
• Content that promotes harmful behaviour (e.g. self-harm, suicide, extreme dieting)
• Online dares and challenges that could cause injury
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q2: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for UNDER 18s?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive features (autoplay, notifications)
• AI companions that behave inappropriately
• Ephemeral content (e.g. disappearing messages)
• Quantifiable social metrics (e.g. likes)
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q3: What harmful content should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Bullying and harassment
• Hate speech
• Violent pornography
• Content that promotes self-harm or drug use
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q4: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive design
• AI chatbots
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q5: What should platforms include in their dispute systems?
• Reports about harmful content
• Disputes over removed material
• Disputes about banned accounts
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q6: What types of platforms should the duty of care apply to?
• Social media
• Dating apps
• Messaging apps
• Gaming platforms
• App stores
• Search engines
• AI tools like ChatGPT
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q7: Do you have other comments?
Paste this or write something like it in your own words:
I do not support any Digital Duty of Care. This appears to be an attempt to revive the rejected “misinformation and disinformation” agenda, which would give the government indirect control over what adults may read, watch, or say online. Adults should be free to access lawful material without state permission. Protecting children from pornography and other harms can be achieved through existing laws, enforcement, and parental tools, not a new censorship regime.
If you tick ANYTHING except NONE OF THE ABOVE – you are in fact ASKING the Australian Government to IMPOSE a DIGITAL ID on you and you family.
From George Christensen
There is a LABOR GOV 'survey' circulating that is designed to manipulate you into agreeing to the DIGITAL ID.
The URL for the survey is https://www.infrastructure.gov.au/have-your-say/digital-duty-care and here GREAT CARE is SUGGESTED in selecting the responses you give to that survey:
Q1: What kinds of harmful experiences or content should platforms prevent for Australians UNDER 18?
• Bullying and harassment, including volumetric attacks (‘pile ons’)
• Online hate speech against individuals or groups
• Pornography
• Content that promotes harmful behaviour (e.g. self-harm, suicide, extreme dieting)
• Online dares and challenges that could cause injury
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q2: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for UNDER 18s?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive features (autoplay, notifications)
• AI companions that behave inappropriately
• Ephemeral content (e.g. disappearing messages)
• Quantifiable social metrics (e.g. likes)
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q3: What harmful content should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Bullying and harassment
• Hate speech
• Violent pornography
• Content that promotes self-harm or drug use
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q4: What harmful features or products should platforms prevent for ADULTS?
• Algorithms that push harmful content
• Addictive design
• AI chatbots
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q5: What should platforms include in their dispute systems?
• Reports about harmful content
• Disputes over removed material
• Disputes about banned accounts
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q6: What types of platforms should the duty of care apply to?
• Social media
• Dating apps
• Messaging apps
• Gaming platforms
• App stores
• Search engines
• AI tools like ChatGPT
• None of the above (TICK ONLY THIS OPTION)
Q7: Do you have other comments?
Paste this or write something like it in your own words:
I do not support any Digital Duty of Care. This appears to be an attempt to revive the rejected “misinformation and disinformation” agenda, which would give the government indirect control over what adults may read, watch, or say online. Adults should be free to access lawful material without state permission. Protecting children from pornography and other harms can be achieved through existing laws, enforcement, and parental tools, not a new censorship regime.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NOW - DHS Secretary Noem announces over a billion dollars will be invested in new security screening technology at airport checkpoints, "not just to keep travellers safe, but also to make sure that we're getting them to their locations and to their destinations safely"
@disclosetv
#dhs #zog
@disclosetv
#dhs #zog
#TSA to charge $18 fee for travelers without Real ID or passport
https://archive.ph/EvIyA
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2025/11/21/tsa-security-fee-wrong-id/
Comments
https://archive.ph/EvIyA
https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/2025/11/21/tsa-security-fee-wrong-id/
Comments
archive.ph
TSA to charge $18 fee for travelers without proper ID - The Washingto…
archived 21 Nov 2025 22:10:13 UTC
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Windows 10 Reaches End of Life as Windows 11 Pushes Users Into an AI-First Ecosystem
#Windows 10 is officially at the end — and #Microsoft is pushing millions into Windows 11 whether they like it or not. Broken migrations, disabled keyboards and mice, forced app updates, AI-first monitoring… it’s all part of an ecosystem tightening its grip.
If you want to understand what’s changing inside Windows — and why so many people are pushing back — this story is for you.
🪧 Read the full article on Substack
📲 Grab privacy gear
—
🫶 @takebackourtech
📩 WEBSITE & NEWSLETTER | 🎥 VIDEOS| XMPP | SUBSTACK
#why
#Windows 10 is officially at the end — and #Microsoft is pushing millions into Windows 11 whether they like it or not. Broken migrations, disabled keyboards and mice, forced app updates, AI-first monitoring… it’s all part of an ecosystem tightening its grip.
If you want to understand what’s changing inside Windows — and why so many people are pushing back — this story is for you.
🪧 Read the full article on Substack
📲 Grab privacy gear
—
🫶 @takebackourtech
📩 WEBSITE & NEWSLETTER | 🎥 VIDEOS| XMPP | SUBSTACK
#why
NoGoolag
#Durov #macron #Candace https://x.com/durov/status/1992652934677709259
Well-connected people have told me that the French intelligence services are not exactly unknown for assassinations, a point supported by public sources:
Forwarded from The Daily Psyop (PsyopDailyScheduler)
This Is Who Let The Dancing Israelis Go Free
🔗SOURCE ➡️ ĐⱤØ₲Ø
Related: 6/16 — Israel: We Will Dance Again
8/25/24 — The Dancing Israelis
5/20/24 — On the day arrest warrants are headed for Netanyahu, all these new stories about 9/11 appear.
4/7 — Netanyahu Talking about 9/11 before it happens
Follow us on Minds / X / Substack
Boost This Channel
Follow ➡️ @PsyopDaily
🔗SOURCE ➡️ ĐⱤØ₲Ø
Related: 6/16 — Israel: We Will Dance Again
8/25/24 — The Dancing Israelis
5/20/24 — On the day arrest warrants are headed for Netanyahu, all these new stories about 9/11 appear.
4/7 — Netanyahu Talking about 9/11 before it happens
Follow us on Minds / X / Substack
Boost This Channel
Follow ➡️ @PsyopDaily
Answer to Hakeem by the Science Experts of The Great Imperial Interdimensional Multiversal Holy DAO of @NoGoolag
Please send it to the TBOT post to liberate others from these accusations
https://t.me/takebackourtech/2036
No we're not CIA, NASA is
Jerm, the one that wrote that crap, is a narcissist militant NASA shill. He's banned and censored many that tried to explain him this in his telegram group whenever he posts these ragebaits.
And then he's butthurt because famous flat earthers know this and refuse to make his 0 effort shows while he drinks.
Ignore him
1. "If you want to persuade someone to change their view, mocking them is a terrible strategy—it only makes them less likely to listen."
1. We were all indoctrinated by the jesuit masonic CIA NASA lie of space balls. Many of us recognized it's a mkultra psyop programing after each and every vaxxtard tried to gaslight us calling us flat earthers. Well if you're such an idiot to inject poison we had to question everything and research that too, surprise.
2. "Pointing out holes in the official narrative doesn't make your position true. If A is false, it doesn't follow that B is true. Everyone knows NASA is theatre, but that doesn't make the flat-Earth argument true."
2. Strawgay fallacy, nobody claimed that, but if nasa could have done all their claims, they would not have gotten caught faking it thousands of times. AI CGI may fool you better soon
3. "To convince me Earth is flat, provide direct evidence. For instance, if you believe in a dome, show evidence of it. If you claim an ice wall surrounds Earth, provide evidence of the entire wall—not just a photo of a 5 km subsection. Is there really no drone footage of it? How can you claim it exists if you've never seen it?"
3. The burden of proof relies on those making the extraordinary claims, they should prove it. Think, gas pressure needs a container, we don't believe rockets can pass those barriers (your religion may call it van Allen belts)
Many of us just tried to search a real non edited photography of your full ball earth from your alleged spaceships or satellites, not collages or paintings. Try. "It's photoshopped because it has to be" is not a valid answer.
We have plenty of videos from amateur balloons and rockets though, with non fish eye cameras, horizon stays flat and at eye level (doesn't go down), search jtolan videos for example.
But no full photos or videos from "space", neither you do. Also independent exploration of "the poles" is forbidden.
4. "Put another way, make an argument FOR Earth being flat; not an argument AGAINST Earth being a globe."
4. There's plenty of arguments for anyone that wants to research it. No one will convince you after your whole life of NASA propaganda. It's like trying to show evidences to vaxxtards and that only took them a few months of brainwashing, only you will convince yourself when you research it.
You could start here:
Proof that
NASA Lies
https://youtu.be/F-QkRmMgHcA
Steelman arguments and history of the deception:
Flat Earth 101
https://youtu.be/dbeOu33lkgA
History of your space balls deception:
https://t.me/BallMemes/6746
Extra, it's not flat because a book says so, but all ancient religions and cultures except nasa just happen to be right, if you care:
Biblical Cosmology
https://youtu.be/hrMxRU0dzSs
Or watch any #documentary@ballmemes or Schooling the globers series #witsit@ballmemes or #debate@ballmemes
Please send it to the TBOT post to liberate others from these accusations
https://t.me/takebackourtech/2036
No we're not CIA, NASA is
Jerm, the one that wrote that crap, is a narcissist militant NASA shill. He's banned and censored many that tried to explain him this in his telegram group whenever he posts these ragebaits.
And then he's butthurt because famous flat earthers know this and refuse to make his 0 effort shows while he drinks.
Ignore him
1. "If you want to persuade someone to change their view, mocking them is a terrible strategy—it only makes them less likely to listen."
1. We were all indoctrinated by the jesuit masonic CIA NASA lie of space balls. Many of us recognized it's a mkultra psyop programing after each and every vaxxtard tried to gaslight us calling us flat earthers. Well if you're such an idiot to inject poison we had to question everything and research that too, surprise.
2. "Pointing out holes in the official narrative doesn't make your position true. If A is false, it doesn't follow that B is true. Everyone knows NASA is theatre, but that doesn't make the flat-Earth argument true."
2. Strawgay fallacy, nobody claimed that, but if nasa could have done all their claims, they would not have gotten caught faking it thousands of times. AI CGI may fool you better soon
3. "To convince me Earth is flat, provide direct evidence. For instance, if you believe in a dome, show evidence of it. If you claim an ice wall surrounds Earth, provide evidence of the entire wall—not just a photo of a 5 km subsection. Is there really no drone footage of it? How can you claim it exists if you've never seen it?"
3. The burden of proof relies on those making the extraordinary claims, they should prove it. Think, gas pressure needs a container, we don't believe rockets can pass those barriers (your religion may call it van Allen belts)
Many of us just tried to search a real non edited photography of your full ball earth from your alleged spaceships or satellites, not collages or paintings. Try. "It's photoshopped because it has to be" is not a valid answer.
We have plenty of videos from amateur balloons and rockets though, with non fish eye cameras, horizon stays flat and at eye level (doesn't go down), search jtolan videos for example.
But no full photos or videos from "space", neither you do. Also independent exploration of "the poles" is forbidden.
4. "Put another way, make an argument FOR Earth being flat; not an argument AGAINST Earth being a globe."
4. There's plenty of arguments for anyone that wants to research it. No one will convince you after your whole life of NASA propaganda. It's like trying to show evidences to vaxxtards and that only took them a few months of brainwashing, only you will convince yourself when you research it.
You could start here:
Proof that
NASA Lies
https://youtu.be/F-QkRmMgHcA
Steelman arguments and history of the deception:
Flat Earth 101
https://youtu.be/dbeOu33lkgA
History of your space balls deception:
https://t.me/BallMemes/6746
Extra, it's not flat because a book says so, but all ancient religions and cultures except nasa just happen to be right, if you care:
Biblical Cosmology
https://youtu.be/hrMxRU0dzSs
Or watch any #documentary@ballmemes or Schooling the globers series #witsit@ballmemes or #debate@ballmemes
Telegram
#TBOT: Take Back Our Tech
I'm not convinced that Earth is flat, but I'm open to being convinced. Flat-Earth advocates often come across as militant and binary, relying on logical fallacies, which is off-putting.
1. If you want to persuade someone to change their view, mocking them…
1. If you want to persuade someone to change their view, mocking them…