This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇦🇺 AUSTRALIA
Plandemic Crisis Actors…
Yes, crisis actors are a real thing.
This pandemic is soooo scary that they need to hire people to be sick.
Wake up!!
Plandemic Crisis Actors…
Yes, crisis actors are a real thing.
This pandemic is soooo scary that they need to hire people to be sick.
Wake up!!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A Tyrant’s Wet Dream
🇦🇺 AUSTRALIA
Stunning revelation unvaccinated Australians will only be locked out of pubs, restaurants and hairdressers for THREE WEEKS as bombshell details from national Covid-19 roadmap emerge
September 13, 2021
• NSW will require evidence of Covid vaccination to enter pubs in October
• But once state hits 80 per cent double dose rate, requirement is removed
• It will then be up to owners to decide if they will allow unvaccinated to enter
• Revelation was made by Deputy Premier John Barilaro on Monday morning
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9983945/Covid-19-Unvaccinated-Australians-locked-pubs-THREE-WEEKS-NSW.html
Stunning revelation unvaccinated Australians will only be locked out of pubs, restaurants and hairdressers for THREE WEEKS as bombshell details from national Covid-19 roadmap emerge
September 13, 2021
• NSW will require evidence of Covid vaccination to enter pubs in October
• But once state hits 80 per cent double dose rate, requirement is removed
• It will then be up to owners to decide if they will allow unvaccinated to enter
• Revelation was made by Deputy Premier John Barilaro on Monday morning
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9983945/Covid-19-Unvaccinated-Australians-locked-pubs-THREE-WEEKS-NSW.html
Mail Online
Stunning revelation unvaccinated Australians will only be locked out of pubs, restaurants and hairdressers for THREE WEEKS as bombshell…
The Deputy Premier said vaccine passports will only be mandatory when the state's Covid-19 vaccination rate is between 70 and 80 per cent.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Apple introduces the Macintosh in 1984.
Forwarded from Dr. Simon
Sustaining the Control Group
Many people keep on asking me: “Dr. Simon, what’s the endgame?” I have been thinking about it a lot, and I must admit that I can only speculate. Based on the available indications, I came up with the following hypotheses:
Every well-designed study should consist of a control group to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by isolating the effect of an independent variable. In this case, the independent variable is “receiving a treatment” (i.e. getting vaccinated). All variables apart from the treatment should be kept constant between the two groups and adequately represent the population. Clinical trials, however, hardly included any people from the risk group.
1. I think their main objective is to get rid of the control group. The longer we have a high proportion of the global population that remains unjabbed, the easier it is to see the effects on the treatment group, which is the jabbed people.
2. Currently, we see that global governments do everything they can to prevent the existence of a long-term control group. Potential adverse effects then won’t be attributable to the vaccine anymore. That means that side effects such as cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases such as Alzheimer's, menstrual disorders, and maybe even infertility can be blamed on anything.
3. The main goal to take a vaccine is to protect oneself, not others. I believe that it is no coincidence that the official narrative shifted towards “protecting others”. Without that blatant lie, there’d be no basis to impose an experimental drug on the whole global population.
4. Even though this common cold virus poses no danger to healthy children and young adults, vaccine passports (some countries like Lithuania even call them opportunity passports which makes me throw up) are used to blackmail whole generations to be part of an experiment without a proper control group.
5. Worldwide, lots of data is being manipulated. In many countries, people who get hospitalised are automatically registered as Covid-positive. Also, the fraudulent Drosten-PCR test most likely results in >80-90% false-positive results, which continues to fuel the artificially generated pandemic.
6. They do not have much time to achieve their goal to get >90% vaccinated; otherwise, the difference between the two groups will be painfully evident (even though they’d try everything to cover up the evidence). As we can see, a high degree of compliance is not enough, so billions of tax money are used to intimidate and threaten you so you’ll eventually consent.
7. One last thought - people from South America or Asia who take vaccines such as Sinovac (i.e. non-vector or mRNA vaccines) are not allowed to enter the EU. In my opinion, this is part of the game, and I still don’t dare to let my mind wander along this dystopian train of thought.
Those in power and involved in this global conspiracy are desperate. Some countries such as Israel almost got their whole population vaccinated and even boostered, and their official numbers are worse than last year. The German minister of health even said that vaccinated people should not get tested anymore as otherwise, the pandemic would never end. They are not hiding it anymore, but some people still believe in everything they say. To those still standing firm, I can only give one piece of advice:
“PLEASE REMAIN IN THE CONTROL GROUP.”
This is your contribution to scientific integrity and exposing the truth. And let’s not forget that the claims of the media do not represent the truth but rather empirical evidence that is based on hard data. But that data requires a control group. And that control group needs you.
Thank you with all my heart,
Dr. Simon @Goddek
Many people keep on asking me: “Dr. Simon, what’s the endgame?” I have been thinking about it a lot, and I must admit that I can only speculate. Based on the available indications, I came up with the following hypotheses:
Every well-designed study should consist of a control group to establish a cause-and-effect relationship by isolating the effect of an independent variable. In this case, the independent variable is “receiving a treatment” (i.e. getting vaccinated). All variables apart from the treatment should be kept constant between the two groups and adequately represent the population. Clinical trials, however, hardly included any people from the risk group.
1. I think their main objective is to get rid of the control group. The longer we have a high proportion of the global population that remains unjabbed, the easier it is to see the effects on the treatment group, which is the jabbed people.
2. Currently, we see that global governments do everything they can to prevent the existence of a long-term control group. Potential adverse effects then won’t be attributable to the vaccine anymore. That means that side effects such as cardiovascular diseases, autoimmune diseases such as Alzheimer's, menstrual disorders, and maybe even infertility can be blamed on anything.
3. The main goal to take a vaccine is to protect oneself, not others. I believe that it is no coincidence that the official narrative shifted towards “protecting others”. Without that blatant lie, there’d be no basis to impose an experimental drug on the whole global population.
4. Even though this common cold virus poses no danger to healthy children and young adults, vaccine passports (some countries like Lithuania even call them opportunity passports which makes me throw up) are used to blackmail whole generations to be part of an experiment without a proper control group.
5. Worldwide, lots of data is being manipulated. In many countries, people who get hospitalised are automatically registered as Covid-positive. Also, the fraudulent Drosten-PCR test most likely results in >80-90% false-positive results, which continues to fuel the artificially generated pandemic.
6. They do not have much time to achieve their goal to get >90% vaccinated; otherwise, the difference between the two groups will be painfully evident (even though they’d try everything to cover up the evidence). As we can see, a high degree of compliance is not enough, so billions of tax money are used to intimidate and threaten you so you’ll eventually consent.
7. One last thought - people from South America or Asia who take vaccines such as Sinovac (i.e. non-vector or mRNA vaccines) are not allowed to enter the EU. In my opinion, this is part of the game, and I still don’t dare to let my mind wander along this dystopian train of thought.
Those in power and involved in this global conspiracy are desperate. Some countries such as Israel almost got their whole population vaccinated and even boostered, and their official numbers are worse than last year. The German minister of health even said that vaccinated people should not get tested anymore as otherwise, the pandemic would never end. They are not hiding it anymore, but some people still believe in everything they say. To those still standing firm, I can only give one piece of advice:
“PLEASE REMAIN IN THE CONTROL GROUP.”
This is your contribution to scientific integrity and exposing the truth. And let’s not forget that the claims of the media do not represent the truth but rather empirical evidence that is based on hard data. But that data requires a control group. And that control group needs you.
Thank you with all my heart,
Dr. Simon @Goddek
Teens 50X More Likely to Have Heart Disease after COVID Shots than All Other FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 Combined – CDC Admits True but Still Recommends It
September 14, 2021
http://te.legra.ph/Teens-50X-More-Likely-to-Have-Heart-Disease-after-COVID-Shots-than-All-Other-FDA-Approved-Vaccines-in-2021-Combined--CDC-Admits--09-13
September 14, 2021
http://te.legra.ph/Teens-50X-More-Likely-to-Have-Heart-Disease-after-COVID-Shots-than-All-Other-FDA-Approved-Vaccines-in-2021-Combined--CDC-Admits--09-13
Telegraph
Teens 50X More Likely to Have Heart Disease after COVID Shots than All Other FDA Approved Vaccines in 2021 Combined – CDC Admits…
All Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version). Visit and follow us on Instagram at @crg_globalresearch. *** Data released by the U.S. Government…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“I was a normal girl until I got vaccinated”...
🇧🇷 BRAZIL
COVID-19: Pregnant Women and Their Unborn Babies Dying in Brazil as Deaths Set to Pass 500k Mark
Researchers say the P1 variant has started infecting and killing pregnant women and their unborn children in startling numbers.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-pregnant-women-unborn-babies-dying-brazil-deaths-set-pass-500k-mark/5755588
COVID-19: Pregnant Women and Their Unborn Babies Dying in Brazil as Deaths Set to Pass 500k Mark
Researchers say the P1 variant has started infecting and killing pregnant women and their unborn children in startling numbers.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-pregnant-women-unborn-babies-dying-brazil-deaths-set-pass-500k-mark/5755588
Bizarre neck twitch.
Reptillian spasm or cgi glitch or ???
Reptillian spasm or cgi glitch or ???
Forwarded from Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸
This is my SUMMARY of three documents from Joy Garner, which are included below. Perhaps you know of her study at TheControlGroup.org.
“We reject the idea that anyone must accept this garbage as a condition of employment.”
This approach is called a “Retaliation Firing” and it can get you triple your normal pay from an abusive employer.
Review this plan with the lawyer who will help you implement it. The Lawyer will collect from the damages awards at the end, so he can take your case without requiring a retainer. He should get an order that the employer continues to pay you (even if they fire you) throughout the court battle, and establish that you are entitled to Damages for any adverse action they take against you.
1. Do not QUIT your job. You would lose valuable rights.
2. Do not sign anything your employer puts in front of you. They want you to surrender your rights. They want you to ‘voluntarily' get the EUA product.
3. File a complaint with OSHA and your state labor board and any version of OSHA that exists in your state, BEFORE the employer specified deadline. This is an “instant checkmate” against the employer. Any firing that occurs after this has been filed will be presumed to be retaliatory. The complaint must begin with, “There is no public health purpose served by these discriminatory rights violations, interventions, and actions. In fact, these interventions are causing a public health hazard.”
a. Provide EVIDENCE. Include data, facts, links to articles and peer reviewed papers. Many are offered in her documents attached.
b. Whistleblowers should include direct fact, eye-witness testimony, your sworn account, photos, video, etc.
c. Read the attached documents for additional ideas and data from her on how to write your complaint. She offers to personally help you.
4. The next day, present a copy of the complaint to the employer. Steadfastly confirm your intentions.
Study her documents below:
Cover Letter, “Protect Yourself by Knowing Your Rights” , “Protection for Employees Who Refuse…"
for fuller explanation, links to resources, and to confirm the assertion that NONE of these interventions are protecting the “public health” is true and correct.
“We reject the idea that anyone must accept this garbage as a condition of employment.”
This approach is called a “Retaliation Firing” and it can get you triple your normal pay from an abusive employer.
Review this plan with the lawyer who will help you implement it. The Lawyer will collect from the damages awards at the end, so he can take your case without requiring a retainer. He should get an order that the employer continues to pay you (even if they fire you) throughout the court battle, and establish that you are entitled to Damages for any adverse action they take against you.
1. Do not QUIT your job. You would lose valuable rights.
2. Do not sign anything your employer puts in front of you. They want you to surrender your rights. They want you to ‘voluntarily' get the EUA product.
3. File a complaint with OSHA and your state labor board and any version of OSHA that exists in your state, BEFORE the employer specified deadline. This is an “instant checkmate” against the employer. Any firing that occurs after this has been filed will be presumed to be retaliatory. The complaint must begin with, “There is no public health purpose served by these discriminatory rights violations, interventions, and actions. In fact, these interventions are causing a public health hazard.”
a. Provide EVIDENCE. Include data, facts, links to articles and peer reviewed papers. Many are offered in her documents attached.
b. Whistleblowers should include direct fact, eye-witness testimony, your sworn account, photos, video, etc.
c. Read the attached documents for additional ideas and data from her on how to write your complaint. She offers to personally help you.
4. The next day, present a copy of the complaint to the employer. Steadfastly confirm your intentions.
Study her documents below:
Cover Letter, “Protect Yourself by Knowing Your Rights” , “Protection for Employees Who Refuse…"
for fuller explanation, links to resources, and to confirm the assertion that NONE of these interventions are protecting the “public health” is true and correct.
Forwarded from ⊙ EARTH 2.0 GENESIS
Proof That Rothschilds Patented Covid-19 Biometric Tests in 2015 and 2017.
Both were filed and updated years ago, but they were SCHEDULED to be made public in September 2020. This is sufficient evidence that they knew in 2015 what’s going to happen in September 2020!
First Registration: Netherlands, Oct. 13, 2015 - https://nl.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/inpadocPatentFamily?CC=US&NR=2020279585A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20200903&DB=&locale=nl_NL
Second Registration: USA, Oct. 13, 2015-
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/61/a3/0d/3d91325d909386/US20200279585A1.pdf
So how did Mr. Richard A. Rothschild know to create a system and method for testing for a disease that didn’t exist, and know exactly how the disease will be called, including the year in which the disease will be discovered?
Both were filed and updated years ago, but they were SCHEDULED to be made public in September 2020. This is sufficient evidence that they knew in 2015 what’s going to happen in September 2020!
First Registration: Netherlands, Oct. 13, 2015 - https://nl.espacenet.com/publicationDetails/inpadocPatentFamily?CC=US&NR=2020279585A1&KC=A1&FT=D&ND=3&date=20200903&DB=&locale=nl_NL
Second Registration: USA, Oct. 13, 2015-
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/61/a3/0d/3d91325d909386/US20200279585A1.pdf
So how did Mr. Richard A. Rothschild know to create a system and method for testing for a disease that didn’t exist, and know exactly how the disease will be called, including the year in which the disease will be discovered?