Forwarded from AffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Совсем скоро запуск ШЕСТОГО проекта на RU GEO от создателей APEX, EVA, KUSH, BANDA и LEEBET!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from AffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
Там Бласк придумал сканировать/скриншотить сайты что бы мониторить размещения, по сути они нашли все сайты аффилиатов, каждый день скриншотят их и фиксируют, что бы контролировать размещения слота
ЧТо бы избежать хуйни когда менеджер раз в квартал присылает тебе один скрин "всё супер, лого стоит" — а по факту оно там провисело два дня из тридцати, и ты про это узнаёшь только когда партнёр уже слился
Пока выкатывают вроде как только Бразилию, но на очереди и другие ГЕО! Плюсы очевидны:
• смотреть на конкурентов (в Бразилии мы нашли 315 сайтов)
• смотреть, кто размещается у конкурентов
• смотреть обьем трафика
Тоже самое вайб кодить в NeBlask я не планирую, может чуть попозже, когда они все ГЕО выкатят и я смогу просто собрать все сайты котоыре они мониторят, короче если это кому надо, идем в Blask! А NeBlask подтянется позже!
P.S. На скрине - размещение бренда Bet da Sorte
ЧТо бы избежать хуйни когда менеджер раз в квартал присылает тебе один скрин "всё супер, лого стоит" — а по факту оно там провисело два дня из тридцати, и ты про это узнаёшь только когда партнёр уже слился
Пока выкатывают вроде как только Бразилию, но на очереди и другие ГЕО! Плюсы очевидны:
• смотреть на конкурентов (в Бразилии мы нашли 315 сайтов)
• смотреть, кто размещается у конкурентов
• смотреть обьем трафика
Тоже самое вайб кодить в NeBlask я не планирую, может чуть попозже, когда они все ГЕО выкатят и я смогу просто собрать все сайты котоыре они мониторят, короче если это кому надо, идем в Blask! А NeBlask подтянется позже!
P.S. На скрине - размещение бренда Bet da Sorte
Forwarded from AffPapa! Клуб спящих бизнесменов! Потрачено!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Совсем скоро запуск ШЕСТОГО проекта на RU GEO от создателей APEX, EVA, KUSH, BANDA и LEEBET!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Myth: Cut the prelander, send native clicks straight to the offer for a faster funnel.
Wrong, almost always — and the people who say it are thinking like search marketers. Native clicks arrive cold, curious, and uncommitted. Direct-linking burns that curiosity at the door.
The prelander's job isn't decoration. It bridges the thumbnail's promise to the offer's reality and filters tire-kickers before they bounce off your money page.
When direct-link actually wins:
— Ultra-simple offers (app install, single email sweep) where the LP is already the prelander.
— Markets where compliance bans the advertorial bridge anyway.
Everywhere else, prelander beats direct-link on net ROI even though direct-link looks cheaper per click. Cheaper clicks to a colder offer is not a strategy. It's a discount on disappointment.
Wrong, almost always — and the people who say it are thinking like search marketers. Native clicks arrive cold, curious, and uncommitted. Direct-linking burns that curiosity at the door.
The prelander's job isn't decoration. It bridges the thumbnail's promise to the offer's reality and filters tire-kickers before they bounce off your money page.
When direct-link actually wins:
— Ultra-simple offers (app install, single email sweep) where the LP is already the prelander.
— Markets where compliance bans the advertorial bridge anyway.
Everywhere else, prelander beats direct-link on net ROI even though direct-link looks cheaper per click. Cheaper clicks to a colder offer is not a strategy. It's a discount on disappointment.
Forwarded from Ебучий Google ADS 🤡
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
( Остров проклятых )
https://t.me/+_K1fUqPoJ8ExMWMy
https://t.me/+LdJ0ohSwKzQ5OWQ6
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from high profit — low life
⚡️ AffPapa теперь официально принадлежит Иванову
Евгений Юрьич продолжает издеваться над опозорившимся этим летом AffPapa. Вслед за базой контактов к маэстро ушел еще и товарный знак конторы...
Как проверить:
1. Перейти по ссылке
2. Ввести 2026793242
3. Ахуеть от беспомощности AffPapa
Такие сегодня новости, такая life...
High Profit — Low Life | Прислать сплетню
Евгений Юрьич продолжает издеваться над опозорившимся этим летом AffPapa. Вслед за базой контактов к маэстро ушел еще и товарный знак конторы...
Как проверить:
1. Перейти по ссылке
2. Ввести 2026793242
3. Ахуеть от беспомощности AffPapa
Такие сегодня новости, такая life...
High Profit — Low Life | Прислать сплетню
Myth: Listicle prelanders always beat advertorials — they're proven.
No. "Proven" by whom, on what offer, in which year? The listicle ("7 things…") won big in 2018 and got copied to death. Audiences pattern-match it as an ad now.
The real tradeoff is intent temperature:
— Advertorial / editorial story: warms a cold, skeptical reader who needs a narrative before they'll trust the offer. Slower, higher converting on considered purchases.
— Listicle: faster scan, better for impulse and curiosity buys, worse when the click is already jaded.
Match the format to the buyer's heat, not to last year's case study. Supposedly listicles are a cheat code. They're a format the whole vertical wore out while you weren't looking. The fresh angle out-converts the famous one.
No. "Proven" by whom, on what offer, in which year? The listicle ("7 things…") won big in 2018 and got copied to death. Audiences pattern-match it as an ad now.
The real tradeoff is intent temperature:
— Advertorial / editorial story: warms a cold, skeptical reader who needs a narrative before they'll trust the offer. Slower, higher converting on considered purchases.
— Listicle: faster scan, better for impulse and curiosity buys, worse when the click is already jaded.
Match the format to the buyer's heat, not to last year's case study. Supposedly listicles are a cheat code. They're a format the whole vertical wore out while you weren't looking. The fresh angle out-converts the famous one.
Forwarded from В арбитраже денег нет?
ЕЮ Иванов продолжает кошмарить АффПапу, конторку, которая накинула говна на вентилятор этим летом. Тогда в AffPapa не знали, с каким говном идут бодаться, поэтому заслуженно проиграли. 😏
На этот раз ЕЮ зарегал товарный знак AffPapa — совсем скоро имя компании будет официально принадлежать ему. Чтобы убедиться в трушности мува, переходим по ссыл-Очке и вводим серийный номер: 2026793242. Там видим, что заявка на регистрацию подана лично Евгением Юрьичем.
Всё это выглядит забавно, но давайте не забывать, в какой сфере мы работаем и что реально может произойти с жирным троллем за воровство нейминга. Впрочем, толстому не привыкать отхватывать пиздов за проделки в интернете, поэтому ждем очередную фотку разбитого ебала и длинный пост с извинениями. 😏😏😏
В арбитраже денег нет 💵
На этот раз ЕЮ зарегал товарный знак AffPapa — совсем скоро имя компании будет официально принадлежать ему. Чтобы убедиться в трушности мува, переходим по ссыл-Очке и вводим серийный номер: 2026793242. Там видим, что заявка на регистрацию подана лично Евгением Юрьичем.
Всё это выглядит забавно, но давайте не забывать, в какой сфере мы работаем и что реально может произойти с жирным троллем за воровство нейминга. Впрочем, толстому не привыкать отхватывать пиздов за проделки в интернете, поэтому ждем очередную фотку разбитого ебала и длинный пост с извинениями. 😏😏😏
В арбитраже денег нет 💵
Myth: Retarget with display banners — native is for prospecting only.
Wrong. You've got the layers backwards. Display banners get scrolled past by people who already know your brand; banner blindness is brutal on warm audiences. Native, dressed as a recommendation, sneaks past that filter precisely because it doesn't look like the ad they ignored yesterday.
The useful division of labor:
— Native: top of funnel discovery AND mid-funnel re-engagement via fresh editorial angles.
— Display: cheap reminder frequency, cart abandonment, dynamic product feeds — mechanical, not persuasive.
Using display for the persuasion job and native for prospecting only is a habit, not a strategy. Native's whole edge is camouflage. Why would you waste that on strangers and then hand the warm, persuadable audience to the format they've been trained to ignore?
Wrong. You've got the layers backwards. Display banners get scrolled past by people who already know your brand; banner blindness is brutal on warm audiences. Native, dressed as a recommendation, sneaks past that filter precisely because it doesn't look like the ad they ignored yesterday.
The useful division of labor:
— Native: top of funnel discovery AND mid-funnel re-engagement via fresh editorial angles.
— Display: cheap reminder frequency, cart abandonment, dynamic product feeds — mechanical, not persuasive.
Using display for the persuasion job and native for prospecting only is a habit, not a strategy. Native's whole edge is camouflage. Why would you waste that on strangers and then hand the warm, persuadable audience to the format they've been trained to ignore?
Myth: MGID and RevContent are just "cheaper Taboola" — same game, lower CPC.
No. The lower CPC isn't a discount; it's a different product. Tier-2 native networks sell looser inventory with thinner fraud controls. You're not buying the same traffic cheaper — you're buying riskier traffic that requires more hands-on policing to break even.
When tier-2 earns its place:
— You have a tracker, a tight blocklist discipline, and an offer with margin to absorb waste.
— You're farming volume for a numbers-game vertical (sweeps, leadgen) where cleanup pays.
When it doesn't:
— Thin margins, no time to babysit site lists, brand-sensitive client work.
Treating MGID like cheap Taboola gets people wrecked. Allegedly it's the same traffic for less. It's different traffic that costs less because it's worth less — unless you do the work.
No. The lower CPC isn't a discount; it's a different product. Tier-2 native networks sell looser inventory with thinner fraud controls. You're not buying the same traffic cheaper — you're buying riskier traffic that requires more hands-on policing to break even.
When tier-2 earns its place:
— You have a tracker, a tight blocklist discipline, and an offer with margin to absorb waste.
— You're farming volume for a numbers-game vertical (sweeps, leadgen) where cleanup pays.
When it doesn't:
— Thin margins, no time to babysit site lists, brand-sensitive client work.
Treating MGID like cheap Taboola gets people wrecked. Allegedly it's the same traffic for less. It's different traffic that costs less because it's worth less — unless you do the work.
Myth: Add a viewability vendor (IAS, DV) and you'll know your native ads are seen.
Wrong about what it proves. Viewability tools confirm pixels entered the viewport for a second. That is not attention — that's geometry. A native widget can be 100% "viewable" at the bottom of an article nobody read past paragraph one.
The better signal is engaged time and scroll depth on your own prelander, plus the click-to-conversion ratio. Those measure whether a human cared, not whether a div was technically on-screen.
When viewability vendors are worth it:
— Big brand spend where you need a third-party number for the deck.
When they're theater:
— Performance buying, where "70% viewable" tells you nothing about why CPA is climbing.
Viewability measures the easiest-to-game thing in the chain. Supposedly it's quality assurance. It's a reassuring number, sold by the people reassured by it.
Wrong about what it proves. Viewability tools confirm pixels entered the viewport for a second. That is not attention — that's geometry. A native widget can be 100% "viewable" at the bottom of an article nobody read past paragraph one.
The better signal is engaged time and scroll depth on your own prelander, plus the click-to-conversion ratio. Those measure whether a human cared, not whether a div was technically on-screen.
When viewability vendors are worth it:
— Big brand spend where you need a third-party number for the deck.
When they're theater:
— Performance buying, where "70% viewable" tells you nothing about why CPA is climbing.
Viewability measures the easiest-to-game thing in the chain. Supposedly it's quality assurance. It's a reassuring number, sold by the people reassured by it.