18. Literature has demonstrated that natural immunity is durable, completed, and superior to vaccination immunity to SARs-CoV-2. mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna both have been linked to myocarditis, especially in young males between 16-24 years old,2 The majority of young new Army aviators are in their early twenties. We know there is a risk of myocarditis with each mRNA vaccination. We additionally now know that vaccination does not necessarily prevent infection or transmission of SARs-CoV-2Therefore individuals fully vaccinated with mRNA vaccines have at least two independent risk factors for myocarditis after vaccination. Additional boaster shots add more risk. It is impossible to perform a risk/benefit analysis on the use of mRNA as counter measures to SARs-CoV-2 without further data… Use of mRNA vaccines in our fighting force, presents a risk of undetermined magnitude, in a population in which less than 20 active-duty personnel out of 1.4 million, died of the underlying SARs- CoV-2.
Notice what Lieutenant Colonel Long said about Secretary of Defense Austin allowing Unit personnel to use force to vaccinate soldiers?
“Secretary of Defense Austin’s order in relation to Covid Vaccine mandates made this week. In an information paper, it was stated that, “Unit personnel should use only as much force as necessary to assist medical personnel with immunizations.” The use of force to administer a medical treatment or therapy against the will of a mentally competent individual constitutes medical battery and universally violates medical ethics.”
“Secretary of Defense Austin’s order in relation to Covid Vaccine mandates made this week. In an information paper, it was stated that, “Unit personnel should use only as much force as necessary to assist medical personnel with immunizations.” The use of force to administer a medical treatment or therapy against the will of a mentally competent individual constitutes medical battery and universally violates medical ethics.”
The bold print says it all
39. The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows:
1 a) None of the ordered Emergency Use Covid 19 vaccines can or will provide better immunity than an infection-recovered person;
2 b) All three of the EUA Covid 19 vaccines (Comirnaty is not available), in the age group and fitness level of my patients, are more risky, harmful and dangerous than having no vaccine at all, whether a person is Covid recovered or facing a Covid 19 infection;
3 c) Direct evidence exists and suggests that all persons who have received a Covid 19 Vaccine are damaged in their cardiovascular system in an irreparable and irrevocable manner;
4 d) Due to the Spike protein production that is engineered into the user’s genome, each such recipient of the Covid 19 Vaccines already has micro clots in their cardiovascular system that present a danger to their health and safety;
5 e) That such micro clots over time will become bigger clots by the very nature of the shape and composition of the Spike proteins being produced and said proteins are found throughout the user’s body, including the brain;
39. The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows:
1 a) None of the ordered Emergency Use Covid 19 vaccines can or will provide better immunity than an infection-recovered person;
2 b) All three of the EUA Covid 19 vaccines (Comirnaty is not available), in the age group and fitness level of my patients, are more risky, harmful and dangerous than having no vaccine at all, whether a person is Covid recovered or facing a Covid 19 infection;
3 c) Direct evidence exists and suggests that all persons who have received a Covid 19 Vaccine are damaged in their cardiovascular system in an irreparable and irrevocable manner;
4 d) Due to the Spike protein production that is engineered into the user’s genome, each such recipient of the Covid 19 Vaccines already has micro clots in their cardiovascular system that present a danger to their health and safety;
5 e) That such micro clots over time will become bigger clots by the very nature of the shape and composition of the Spike proteins being produced and said proteins are found throughout the user’s body, including the brain;
What’s a botnet?
Everybody’s phones & devices were the botnet “against” Facebook for hours. How calculated.
Genius really. They used the Internet against itself. IoT.
I’ll spare you technical jargon, but If you wanna understand it, look up the 2016 research paper published by the University of Tel Aviv on DDoS.
Everybody’s phones & devices were the botnet “against” Facebook for hours. How calculated.
Genius really. They used the Internet against itself. IoT.
I’ll spare you technical jargon, but If you wanna understand it, look up the 2016 research paper published by the University of Tel Aviv on DDoS.
So… Facebook.
Zuck’s $7 billion “loss” isn’t an actual loss unless he sold off Facebook stock during the crash. Unrealized loss when your stock drops in value only becomes realized when sold. And it’s already up.
Everyone thinks Zuckerburg lost a trove and that’s all anyone seems focused on.
Reality?
$7b is nothing compared to what he'd stand to lose if the anti-trust case was prosecuted against him.
Everyone is pointing at Zuck and saying “ooh, it cost him $7b dollars”
What actually happened?
He just spent $7b (without actually spending $7b) and curb stomped the Internet and Congress.
Zuck’s $7 billion “loss” isn’t an actual loss unless he sold off Facebook stock during the crash. Unrealized loss when your stock drops in value only becomes realized when sold. And it’s already up.
Everyone thinks Zuckerburg lost a trove and that’s all anyone seems focused on.
Reality?
$7b is nothing compared to what he'd stand to lose if the anti-trust case was prosecuted against him.
Everyone is pointing at Zuck and saying “ooh, it cost him $7b dollars”
What actually happened?
He just spent $7b (without actually spending $7b) and curb stomped the Internet and Congress.
But only certain parts of Congress, because the whole point of this charade is to make a statement of power.
Cue the Senate Congressional hearing, Political Operative and Intelligence actor Frances Haugen.
Cue the Senate Congressional hearing, Political Operative and Intelligence actor Frances Haugen.
So what we have here is a pre-positioned mover that was assigned to the entity in 2019 ahead of the 2020 election for specific intelligence purposes.
We already know that intelligence agencies across the world work with Facebook & Tech Giants for user & online demographics, CounterIntel & surveillance efforts. Everybody does, and I discussed this much earlier in the channel.
The headline of the most recent WSJ article published after the hearing today says "tougher regulations" but what the content of the article demonstrates is that the Federal Government is attempting to publicly & legally assume full-access control of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp etc for persistent surveillance - even though they’ve been working with Zuck a while already. He’s cool with it too btw.
Frances Haugen was "hired" 2 years ago to work on "election integrity" and counterespionage with Facebook. Now she's gathered a ton of internal documents and come out as a “whistleblower” to testify before Congress that the Federal Government should create a special Surveillance entity that has full access to all Facebook systems and user data to maintain accountability.
The headline of the most recent WSJ article published after the hearing today says "tougher regulations" but what the content of the article demonstrates is that the Federal Government is attempting to publicly & legally assume full-access control of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp etc for persistent surveillance - even though they’ve been working with Zuck a while already. He’s cool with it too btw.
Frances Haugen was "hired" 2 years ago to work on "election integrity" and counterespionage with Facebook. Now she's gathered a ton of internal documents and come out as a “whistleblower” to testify before Congress that the Federal Government should create a special Surveillance entity that has full access to all Facebook systems and user data to maintain accountability.
She advocates to repeal Section 230 so that Big Tech can be “held liable” if it doesn't promote content per recommendations set forth by Federal "guidelines" derived by their full access audit and oversight entity.
Basically if Zuck doesn't promote what content "they" want promoted he can get his peepee slapped. That’s fine with him, cause he’s already doing it and that’s the whole point of this - to make it legal & get the public perception on board with it.
Basically if Zuck doesn't promote what content "they" want promoted he can get his peepee slapped. That’s fine with him, cause he’s already doing it and that’s the whole point of this - to make it legal & get the public perception on board with it.
Because that’s right, she wants to also work European regulators for persistent surveillance.
Oh and surprise surprise -
Zuckerberg has been calling for all this to happen himself, and lawmakers are "shocked" at how much unanimity there is in this decision to essentially "federalize" the large tech platforms.
Zuckerberg has been calling for all this to happen himself, and lawmakers are "shocked" at how much unanimity there is in this decision to essentially "federalize" the large tech platforms.