Bilderberg Group & The Trilateral Commission

(For the duration of these posts, do not forget that Pfizer is a Rockefeller owned company. It is worth noting that the Rockefeller Empire, in tandem with JP Morgan Chase owns over half of the pharmaceutical interests in the United States. It is the largest drug manufacturing combine in the world. (Research Rockefeller Foundation)).

Lord Victor Rothschild and Laurance Rockefeller hand picked 100 of the world's elite to form The Bilderberg Group, a policy forming globalist group which has met annually since 1954. The group gave birth to what is now the European Union (EU), with the ultimate goal of a one world government [Hatch, Doubleday 1962]. The group also pushed the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the founding of the World Trade Organization (WTA).

Founding members include:

- General Walter Bedell Smith
(Director, CIA, US Ambassador to Moscow, and US Secretary of State under Eisenhower)
- Colin Gubbins
(Director, British Special Operations Executive)
- Prince Bernhard of Germany
(Original chairman)
- Queen Juliana of the Netherlands
- Lord Carrington, UK

Founding Governing Council includes:

- Stansfield Turner
(Director, CIA)
- Henry Kissinger
(Director of the Special Studies Project for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund)
- Robert Ellsworth
(Deputy Secretary of Defense, U.S. Ambassador to NATO, Assistant to the President, U.S. Congress Member, Chairman & Founding Director Hamilton BioVentures)
- Andrew Schoenberg
(Royal Institute for International Affairs)
- John Louden, N.M. Rothschild
- C.L. Sulzberger, New York Times

The American Delegation for The Bilderberg Group was founded & led by David Rockefeller.

Spokesman for the American Delegation under David Rockefeller:
- Charles Douglas Jackson
(Vice President of Time magazine, delegate to the United Nations (UN), Special Assistant to the President, Publisher of Life Magazine

Bilderberg policy is carried out by a 35 member Bilderberg Steering Committee, including an inner circle "Advisory Committee".

Committee members have included:

- David Rockefeller
- Henry Kissinger
- James Wolfenson
(President, World Bank)
- Jessica Matthews
(President, Carnegie Endowment For International Peace)
- Jorma Ollia
(Chairman & CEO, Nokia)

All American members of the Steering Committee are also members of CFR (Council of Foreign Relations), and most members cross-pollinate The Trilateral Commission, co-founded by David Rockefeller.

Approximately one third of its members come from the government and political sector while the remaining two thirds represent finance, industry, labor, education and the media.

The meetings have been hosted by The Rothschild Family, and 1962 and 1973 meetings were hosted by The Wallenberg Family, the most powerful family in Sweden and holders of significant stake in Pharmaceutical giant AstraZeneca.

Meetings are sealed off from the public and the press, with the exception of an authorized press conference at the conclusion of each meeting. Resorts and hotels where the meetings are held are cleared of residents and all visitors, with security provided by Soldiers, Armed Guards, Secret Service, State and local police.

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

- David Rockefeller
Bilderberg Group, Baden Germany
June 1991

Freedom. EVERYDAY 🇦🇺
Volume up.

AUS🇦🇺

Switzerland 🇨🇭

18. Literature has demonstrated that natural immunity is durable, completed, and superior to vaccination immunity to SARs-CoV-2. mRNA vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna both have been linked to myocarditis, especially in young males between 16-24 years old,2 The majority of young new Army aviators are in their early twenties. We know there is a risk of myocarditis with each mRNA vaccination. We additionally now know that vaccination does not necessarily prevent infection or transmission of SARs-CoV-2Therefore individuals fully vaccinated with mRNA vaccines have at least two independent risk factors for myocarditis after vaccination. Additional boaster shots add more risk. It is impossible to perform a risk/benefit analysis on the use of mRNA as counter measures to SARs-CoV-2 without further data… Use of mRNA vaccines in our fighting force, presents a risk of undetermined magnitude, in a population in which less than 20 active-duty personnel out of 1.4 million, died of the underlying SARs- CoV-2.

Notice what Lieutenant Colonel Long said about Secretary of Defense Austin allowing Unit personnel to use force to vaccinate soldiers?

“Secretary of Defense Austin’s order in relation to Covid Vaccine mandates made this week. In an information paper, it was stated that, “Unit personnel should use only as much force as necessary to assist medical personnel with immunizations.” The use of force to administer a medical treatment or therapy against the will of a mentally competent individual constitutes medical battery and universally violates medical ethics.”

The bold print says it all

39. The subject matter of this Motion for a Preliminary Injunction and its devastating effects on members of the military compel me to conclude and conduct accordingly as follows:
1 a)  None of the ordered Emergency Use Covid 19 vaccines can or will provide better immunity than an infection-recovered person;
2 b)  All three of the EUA Covid 19 vaccines (Comirnaty is not available), in the age group and fitness level of my patients, are more risky, harmful and dangerous than having no vaccine at all, whether a person is Covid recovered or facing a Covid 19 infection;
3 c)  Direct evidence exists and suggests that all persons who have received a Covid 19 Vaccine are damaged in their cardiovascular system in an irreparable and irrevocable manner;
4 d)  Due to the Spike protein production that is engineered into the user’s genome, each such recipient of the Covid 19 Vaccines already has micro clots in their cardiovascular system that present a danger to their health and safety;
5 e)  That such micro clots over time will become bigger clots by the very nature of the shape and composition of the Spike proteins being produced and said proteins are found throughout the user’s body, including the brain;

What’s a botnet?

Everybody’s phones & devices were the botnet “against” Facebook for hours. How calculated.

Genius really. They used the Internet against itself. IoT.

I’ll spare you technical jargon, but If you wanna understand it, look up the 2016 research paper published by the University of Tel Aviv on DDoS.

So… Facebook.

Zuck’s $7 billion “loss” isn’t an actual loss unless he sold off Facebook stock during the crash. Unrealized loss when your stock drops in value only becomes realized when sold. And it’s already up.

Everyone thinks Zuckerburg lost a trove and that’s all anyone seems focused on.

Reality?

$7b is nothing compared to what he'd stand to lose if the anti-trust case was prosecuted against him.

Everyone is pointing at Zuck and saying “ooh, it cost him $7b dollars”

What actually happened?

He just spent $7b (without actually spending $7b) and curb stomped the Internet and Congress.

But only certain parts of Congress, because the whole point of this charade is to make a statement of power.

Cue the Senate Congressional hearing, Political Operative and Intelligence actor Frances Haugen.

She's claiming that the problem with Facebook is that they don't censor enough.

Acting on 3% of "hate speech and divisive political content" to acting on 100% is a 33 fold increase in censorship. This is what she's actually advocating.

So what we have here is a pre-positioned mover that was assigned to the entity in 2019 ahead of the 2020 election for specific intelligence purposes.

We already know that intelligence agencies across the world work with Facebook & Tech Giants for user & online demographics, CounterIntel & surveillance efforts. Everybody does, and I discussed this much earlier in the channel.

The headline of the most recent WSJ article published after the hearing today says "tougher regulations" but what the content of the article demonstrates is that the Federal Government is attempting to publicly & legally assume full-access control of Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp etc for persistent surveillance - even though they’ve been working with Zuck a while already. He’s cool with it too btw.

Frances Haugen was "hired" 2 years ago to work on "election integrity" and counterespionage with Facebook. Now she's gathered a ton of internal documents and come out as a “whistleblower” to testify before Congress that the Federal Government should create a special Surveillance entity that has full access to all Facebook systems and user data to maintain accountability.

She advocates to repeal Section 230 so that Big Tech can be “held liable” if it doesn't promote content per recommendations set forth by Federal "guidelines" derived by their full access audit and oversight entity.

Basically if Zuck doesn't promote what content "they" want promoted he can get his peepee slapped. That’s fine with him, cause he’s already doing it and that’s the whole point of this - to make it legal & get the public perception on board with it.