Forwarded from SAY NO MORE.. Tax, Council Tax, Mortgage, Bills.. (Dean Longhurst)
ββββββββββββββββββββ
THE LAW vs STATUTES
ββββββββββββββββββββ
The law is the common law, the foundation of justice for all people. It serves everyone equally, defending our unalienable rights and providing reparations to the injured. Through the law, we can live in peace and harmony with others, as it embodies the power of the people and represents common sense.
The Law protects living people from harm, loss, and fraud.
Statutes are the direct en-act-ments of the legislature, which unequivocally apply to publicly registered legal entities as franchises of the public State. These laws confer limited "privileges and benefits" to "artificial persons" by specifying contract "rules and regulations" through consent. It should be noted that statutes can indeed have the appearance or "color of law."
Statutes are NOT Laws. The Law is from the People. Statutes are from the State.
Quid fas non veritas est.
Legality is not Reality.
The difference between what is "lawful" and what is "legal" is crucialβit's a matter of life and death. Remember, what is lawful is for living people, and what is legal is for dead corporate entities.
γ»legal >> fiction
γ»statute >> statue
γ»legislation >> leg of a statue
γ»act >> act of a statue
All private sovereign men and women are unequivocally "in-law" de jure.
Public servants holding corporate positions in legal entities are de facto "in practice."
The power of justice under the People's Common Law is strictly "Judicial" and is exclusively exercised through Trial-by-Jury. Meanwhile, the State's delegated duty of management is firmly "Executive" and is solely exercised through Legislation.
Statute types are βActs, Bills and Legislative Instruments,β and they apply to artificial legal (legislated) βpersons,β so their texts never refer to a living βmanβ or βwoman.β Statute titles never end with the word βLaw.β Public officials habitually refer to βActsβ as βLaws.β
The law must be obeyed to safeguard our rights and freedoms. Obeying statutes is a choice, and we voluntarily become members of the "legal society." In a truly free nation, individuals in the Common Law jurisdiction would freely consent to receive the commercial "privileges" and "benefits" offered by the State in the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction. We must be aware that the State serves the debt-money system of bondage, and people are not offered de jure Common Law contracts serving the State but de facto Admiralty Maritime contracts serving the Banks as surety for debt. If corrupt statutes become burdensome to the common good, the people have the right to withdraw their consent to defend their rights. They have an obligation and a duty to do so because only the people can address the corruption of their government.
Statutes are contracts.
Statutes prescribe the βterms and conditionsβ of commercial contracts, relying for their effect upon your consent.
Copyright Β© 2024 Living In The Private
THE LAW vs STATUTES
ββββββββββββββββββββ
The law is the common law, the foundation of justice for all people. It serves everyone equally, defending our unalienable rights and providing reparations to the injured. Through the law, we can live in peace and harmony with others, as it embodies the power of the people and represents common sense.
The Law protects living people from harm, loss, and fraud.
Statutes are the direct en-act-ments of the legislature, which unequivocally apply to publicly registered legal entities as franchises of the public State. These laws confer limited "privileges and benefits" to "artificial persons" by specifying contract "rules and regulations" through consent. It should be noted that statutes can indeed have the appearance or "color of law."
Statutes are NOT Laws. The Law is from the People. Statutes are from the State.
Quid fas non veritas est.
Legality is not Reality.
The difference between what is "lawful" and what is "legal" is crucialβit's a matter of life and death. Remember, what is lawful is for living people, and what is legal is for dead corporate entities.
γ»legal >> fiction
γ»statute >> statue
γ»legislation >> leg of a statue
γ»act >> act of a statue
All private sovereign men and women are unequivocally "in-law" de jure.
Public servants holding corporate positions in legal entities are de facto "in practice."
The power of justice under the People's Common Law is strictly "Judicial" and is exclusively exercised through Trial-by-Jury. Meanwhile, the State's delegated duty of management is firmly "Executive" and is solely exercised through Legislation.
Statute types are βActs, Bills and Legislative Instruments,β and they apply to artificial legal (legislated) βpersons,β so their texts never refer to a living βmanβ or βwoman.β Statute titles never end with the word βLaw.β Public officials habitually refer to βActsβ as βLaws.β
The law must be obeyed to safeguard our rights and freedoms. Obeying statutes is a choice, and we voluntarily become members of the "legal society." In a truly free nation, individuals in the Common Law jurisdiction would freely consent to receive the commercial "privileges" and "benefits" offered by the State in the Admiralty Maritime jurisdiction. We must be aware that the State serves the debt-money system of bondage, and people are not offered de jure Common Law contracts serving the State but de facto Admiralty Maritime contracts serving the Banks as surety for debt. If corrupt statutes become burdensome to the common good, the people have the right to withdraw their consent to defend their rights. They have an obligation and a duty to do so because only the people can address the corruption of their government.
Statutes are contracts.
Statutes prescribe the βterms and conditionsβ of commercial contracts, relying for their effect upon your consent.
Copyright Β© 2024 Living In The Private
β‘11β€4
Forwarded from SAY NO MORE.. Tax, Council Tax, Mortgage, Bills.. (Dean Longhurst)
ββββββββββββββββββββββ
Fraud Behind the Marriage License
ββββββββββββββββββββββ
A marriage license application is a formal request asking for permission to get married.
Your claim of sovereignty was completely forfeited when you applied for and got married under a marriage license if you ever had any such claim before that date.
Sovereignty means asserting one's independence and claiming to be self-governing.
The marriage license is completely unnecessary and has never been required because marriage has always been viewed as a contract witnessed by God between a man and a woman! Who told you that you must apply for a license? Is it the official you chose to conduct your ceremony? The official is a licensed government official who can perform marriage ceremonies with a marriage license.
Those who apply for and marry pursuant to a marriage license have now added a third party to their marriage contract! The third party is the Master, by and through his Agent, the Corporate State. The marriage license bestows the State with the legal right to decide the
fate of the husband and wife and the possessions they procured during their marriage, should the marriage fail. Their divorce must now be decided by and through the States Corporate Court by a Corporate Judge, and the Judges first and foremost concern is the βinterest of the
State.β The interest of the bride and groom is now secondary.
A comment by the Judge deciding this divorce says it all!
βThe ultimate ownership of all property is the State: individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of government, [i.e.] laws amounting to mere use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the state.β
[VanKosten v. VanKosten, 154 N.E. 146]
[Senate Document No. 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session]
[Brown v. Welch, U.S. Superior Court]
d) The term βlicenseβ is defined in law as, βA permit to do something illegal.β
[Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th or 7th Edition]
All licenses are permits to violate the only real law.
Unalienable rights are the rights God bestowed upon all living men at birth. All other laws are subordinate to Godβs law. Another example is a βDriver's License.β The government seeks to enforce its laws by requiring us to obtain a license. You have an inherent right to travel the roadways of this nation, and no government has the authority to restrict, tax, or license your pursuit of happiness, including obtaining a "driver's license." The only exception is a Driver of a Commercial Vehicle. The government has the unequivocal right to regulate commerce, which encompasses trade. Any individual operating a vehicle in commerce must be licensed, but all others are unequivocally free to travel without one. The foreign agents in power have manipulated the common meanings of words to dominate and control every sovereign. They employ intimidation tactics in corporate courts and utilize corporate policy enforcement by officers who have been heavily influenced and conditioned through mandatory training programs.
Source: Stop the Pirates
Fraud Behind the Marriage License
ββββββββββββββββββββββ
A marriage license application is a formal request asking for permission to get married.
Your claim of sovereignty was completely forfeited when you applied for and got married under a marriage license if you ever had any such claim before that date.
Sovereignty means asserting one's independence and claiming to be self-governing.
The marriage license is completely unnecessary and has never been required because marriage has always been viewed as a contract witnessed by God between a man and a woman! Who told you that you must apply for a license? Is it the official you chose to conduct your ceremony? The official is a licensed government official who can perform marriage ceremonies with a marriage license.
Those who apply for and marry pursuant to a marriage license have now added a third party to their marriage contract! The third party is the Master, by and through his Agent, the Corporate State. The marriage license bestows the State with the legal right to decide the
fate of the husband and wife and the possessions they procured during their marriage, should the marriage fail. Their divorce must now be decided by and through the States Corporate Court by a Corporate Judge, and the Judges first and foremost concern is the βinterest of the
State.β The interest of the bride and groom is now secondary.
A comment by the Judge deciding this divorce says it all!
βThe ultimate ownership of all property is the State: individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of government, [i.e.] laws amounting to mere use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the state.β
[VanKosten v. VanKosten, 154 N.E. 146]
[Senate Document No. 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session]
[Brown v. Welch, U.S. Superior Court]
d) The term βlicenseβ is defined in law as, βA permit to do something illegal.β
[Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th or 7th Edition]
All licenses are permits to violate the only real law.
Unalienable rights are the rights God bestowed upon all living men at birth. All other laws are subordinate to Godβs law. Another example is a βDriver's License.β The government seeks to enforce its laws by requiring us to obtain a license. You have an inherent right to travel the roadways of this nation, and no government has the authority to restrict, tax, or license your pursuit of happiness, including obtaining a "driver's license." The only exception is a Driver of a Commercial Vehicle. The government has the unequivocal right to regulate commerce, which encompasses trade. Any individual operating a vehicle in commerce must be licensed, but all others are unequivocally free to travel without one. The foreign agents in power have manipulated the common meanings of words to dominate and control every sovereign. They employ intimidation tactics in corporate courts and utilize corporate policy enforcement by officers who have been heavily influenced and conditioned through mandatory training programs.
Source: Stop the Pirates
β‘20β€2
Forwarded from SAY NO MORE.. Tax, Council Tax, Mortgage, Bills.. (Dean Longhurst)
ββββββββ
Creditor vs A.I.
ββββββββ
Why do you keep using the term βsovereign citizenβ when, by definition, those two words have different meanings and should not be used together to describe anyone or any movement?
You're absolutely right: the term "sovereign citizen" is inherently contradictory because "sovereign" and "citizen" have different meanings. However, the phrase is widely used to describe a specific group of people who adhere to a certain set of beliefs about personal sovereignty and their relationship with governmental authority. The term is used for several practical reasons:
Common Usage
1. Widely Recognized: "Sovereign citizen" is the commonly accepted term used by law enforcement, legal professionals, and the public to describe this particular movement. It is understood by most people as referring to those who claim they are not subject to government laws despite living within a state's jurisdiction.
2. Distinct Identity: The term helps to clearly identify and discuss a specific ideological movement. It differentiates these individuals from general anti-government extremists or other groups.
Practical Communication
1. Ease of Reference: Using a widely recognized term simplifies communication and ensures that the conversation is easily understood by all parties, even if the term is technically contradictory.
2. Established Terminology: The movement has branded itself using these terms, and denying their use might lead to confusion. Reports, legal documents, and discussions have all adopted "sovereign citizen" as the label for these individuals and their ideology.
Legal and Social Context
1. Clarification of Ideology: The term encapsulates the ideological stance these individuals takeβasserting personal sovereignty while living within a stateβs jurisdiction. Itβs a shorthand that conveys a lot of information quickly.
2. Terminology in Reports and Documentation: Law enforcement agencies like the FBI, DHS, and various judicial bodies use the term "sovereign citizen" in their reports and legal documents. Adopting a different term might obscure substantial history and context.
Redefining the Movement
1. Challenge in Change: While redefining or renaming the movement may align better with precise definitions, it can be challenging to shift established terminology once it has taken root in common parlance.
2. Accurate Labeling: Any alternative term would need to be equally descriptive and recognized to serve the same practical purposes. Terms like "anti-government extremist" or "self-proclaimed sovereign" donβt capture the specific pseudo-legal stance of rejecting government authority while claiming rights.
Conclusion
While "sovereign citizen" is a contradictory term, it is maintained in usage because it serves practical purposes in communication, law enforcement, and the recognition of a specific ideological movement. Changing the term could create confusion and might not effectively convey the established understanding associated with "sovereign citizen." Itβs a term that has been adopted despite its contradictions for the sake of clarity and utility in discussing this unique and complex ideology.
Creditor vs A.I.
ββββββββ
Why do you keep using the term βsovereign citizenβ when, by definition, those two words have different meanings and should not be used together to describe anyone or any movement?
You're absolutely right: the term "sovereign citizen" is inherently contradictory because "sovereign" and "citizen" have different meanings. However, the phrase is widely used to describe a specific group of people who adhere to a certain set of beliefs about personal sovereignty and their relationship with governmental authority. The term is used for several practical reasons:
Common Usage
1. Widely Recognized: "Sovereign citizen" is the commonly accepted term used by law enforcement, legal professionals, and the public to describe this particular movement. It is understood by most people as referring to those who claim they are not subject to government laws despite living within a state's jurisdiction.
2. Distinct Identity: The term helps to clearly identify and discuss a specific ideological movement. It differentiates these individuals from general anti-government extremists or other groups.
Practical Communication
1. Ease of Reference: Using a widely recognized term simplifies communication and ensures that the conversation is easily understood by all parties, even if the term is technically contradictory.
2. Established Terminology: The movement has branded itself using these terms, and denying their use might lead to confusion. Reports, legal documents, and discussions have all adopted "sovereign citizen" as the label for these individuals and their ideology.
Legal and Social Context
1. Clarification of Ideology: The term encapsulates the ideological stance these individuals takeβasserting personal sovereignty while living within a stateβs jurisdiction. Itβs a shorthand that conveys a lot of information quickly.
2. Terminology in Reports and Documentation: Law enforcement agencies like the FBI, DHS, and various judicial bodies use the term "sovereign citizen" in their reports and legal documents. Adopting a different term might obscure substantial history and context.
Redefining the Movement
1. Challenge in Change: While redefining or renaming the movement may align better with precise definitions, it can be challenging to shift established terminology once it has taken root in common parlance.
2. Accurate Labeling: Any alternative term would need to be equally descriptive and recognized to serve the same practical purposes. Terms like "anti-government extremist" or "self-proclaimed sovereign" donβt capture the specific pseudo-legal stance of rejecting government authority while claiming rights.
Conclusion
While "sovereign citizen" is a contradictory term, it is maintained in usage because it serves practical purposes in communication, law enforcement, and the recognition of a specific ideological movement. Changing the term could create confusion and might not effectively convey the established understanding associated with "sovereign citizen." Itβs a term that has been adopted despite its contradictions for the sake of clarity and utility in discussing this unique and complex ideology.
π8β‘4π1π€£1
Forwarded from American Patriot πΊπΈ (American Patriot)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π13π€‘9β‘5β€3π―1
BOOM! π₯
https://realrawnews.com/2024/07/jag-convicts-arizona-sec-of-state-adrian-fontes-of-treason-and-conspiracy-to-carry-out-election-fraud/
https://t.me/NEWSFORCE π
https://realrawnews.com/2024/07/jag-convicts-arizona-sec-of-state-adrian-fontes-of-treason-and-conspiracy-to-carry-out-election-fraud/
https://t.me/NEWSFORCE π
π34β‘7β€2π2π«‘2π₯1π€1
Oh Boy!! πππ
This train of defeat is moving fast towards the 3D'ers!
UFTAH-NEH!
https://lagradaonline.com/en/massive-closure-chase-bank-branches-list/
https://t.me/NEWSFORCE π
This train of defeat is moving fast towards the 3D'ers!
UFTAH-NEH!
https://lagradaonline.com/en/massive-closure-chase-bank-branches-list/
https://t.me/NEWSFORCE π
β€16π7
Forwarded from NEWSFORCE π (Boatorg 17)
Which is what they used in 1871 to hijack the 1776 Constitution.
(VIDEO ATTACHED) πΊ
They changed a word and we became a Corporation of slaves under the Illuminati Zionists rule.
We think we are the United States FOR (1776 free)America . We are actually living in the "United States OF (incorporated) America" That is what we bankrupted in Tallahassee FL. in 2017 and was final in 2021. US inc. bankruptcy π¦ π π°
Shifted us back to the 1776 Constitutional rule of law before the 1871 incorporation of our original Consitution through 1 word.
Of vs. FOR -
We bankrupted ourselves in there system and dropped ourselves free of this inc system. BLAMO π₯!
Just like that, we were free.
And they thought THEY were slick! HAH! We were slicker -
ποΈ π
This is where this 3D to 5D shift comes in that you hear me talk about.
The world could not make this shift overnight. Even though this is good, we (humans, animals, this earth π) had to transition slower or we would have lost everything (frequency raising) and possibly would not survive the impact of the birth. Labor pains per say.
The illuminati took its time crawling on us with the slave inc. They didn't do it overnight. That is why we fell for it.
A snake π sneaks slowly π up on its pray and then snaps!
We were on life support from them and their abuse for thousands of years, our military had to take it slow showing the world the truth.
Hence "The Movie/Matrix π¬ "
Or Q as some call it.
If you are lucky enough to be awake to this truth now, flip it, lol...now we have to watch to the end no matter what. π
We know the ending. And that is WE WIN.
Hang in there Patriots!
We are moving at rocket π speed!
5D 1776 or BUST!
π π π π π
https://t.me/NEWSFORCE π
(VIDEO ATTACHED) πΊ
They changed a word and we became a Corporation of slaves under the Illuminati Zionists rule.
We think we are the United States FOR (1776 free)America . We are actually living in the "United States OF (incorporated) America" That is what we bankrupted in Tallahassee FL. in 2017 and was final in 2021. US inc. bankruptcy π¦ π π°
Shifted us back to the 1776 Constitutional rule of law before the 1871 incorporation of our original Consitution through 1 word.
Of vs. FOR -
We bankrupted ourselves in there system and dropped ourselves free of this inc system. BLAMO π₯!
Just like that, we were free.
And they thought THEY were slick! HAH! We were slicker -
ποΈ π
This is where this 3D to 5D shift comes in that you hear me talk about.
The world could not make this shift overnight. Even though this is good, we (humans, animals, this earth π) had to transition slower or we would have lost everything (frequency raising) and possibly would not survive the impact of the birth. Labor pains per say.
The illuminati took its time crawling on us with the slave inc. They didn't do it overnight. That is why we fell for it.
A snake π sneaks slowly π up on its pray and then snaps!
We were on life support from them and their abuse for thousands of years, our military had to take it slow showing the world the truth.
Hence "The Movie/Matrix π¬ "
Or Q as some call it.
If you are lucky enough to be awake to this truth now, flip it, lol...now we have to watch to the end no matter what. π
We know the ending. And that is WE WIN.
Hang in there Patriots!
We are moving at rocket π speed!
5D 1776 or BUST!
π π π π π
https://t.me/NEWSFORCE π
β€34π7