Forwarded from Quart E
Hancock's reward for towing the line and killing the elderly in the UK 😠
21st Century Wire (Official)
It's time to flip the script on the Health & Safety clergy... ⚡️Dr Mark Changizi: Precautionary Principle Demands Authorities Prove Their Policies Are ‘Safe and Effective’ https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/10/12/changizi-precautionary-principle-demands-authorities…
Everyone need to watch this and use this argument going forward.
21st Century Wire (Official)
Wow. If this is true, then what a bunch of criminal con artists we have running the US government... 🇺🇸 Where is #Biden's Executive Order Mandating the #Vaccine? Does it Exist? https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/10/11/where-is-the-biden-executive-order-mandating…
The Big Lie: there is no Executive Order on Fed Vaccine Mandates - #Biden was bluffing all along…
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Stop Testing Asymptomatics
When medical mass testing includes asymptomatics & the disease affects a small minority of the population, a very small margin of error in the testing process will mathematically result in the false positives being many times more than the real positives.
This has been confirmed by the WHO, in December 2020, when they issued a directive with these words:
“Healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts.”
This effectively means that it is not enough to simply say that a positive test is a Covid19 case, but that to determine a Covid19 case symptoms are also required, as well as indications as to whether a close contact is or has recently been ill with Covid19. Therefore, asymptomatics testing positive should not be considered as Covid cases in principle, rendering their testing unnecessary and superfluous.
Bayes Theorem points to the increase of the probability that a positive test is real if the tested person also has clear symptoms. Those interested in the mathematical calculations can refer to the Bayes Theorem and a Bayes calculator tool or formula.
Further to this, to prevent asymptomatic people who overcame the disease already to keep testing positive long after, it is essential that the cycle thresholds at which any RT-PCR tests calls a positive are set at 24 cycle thresholds and that certainly they do not exceed 28, and that the assay in use has been thoroughly examined for correspondence to an isolate of the pathogen in question
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
When medical mass testing includes asymptomatics & the disease affects a small minority of the population, a very small margin of error in the testing process will mathematically result in the false positives being many times more than the real positives.
This has been confirmed by the WHO, in December 2020, when they issued a directive with these words:
“Healthcare providers are encouraged to take into consideration testing results along with clinical signs and symptoms, confirmed status of any contacts.”
This effectively means that it is not enough to simply say that a positive test is a Covid19 case, but that to determine a Covid19 case symptoms are also required, as well as indications as to whether a close contact is or has recently been ill with Covid19. Therefore, asymptomatics testing positive should not be considered as Covid cases in principle, rendering their testing unnecessary and superfluous.
Bayes Theorem points to the increase of the probability that a positive test is real if the tested person also has clear symptoms. Those interested in the mathematical calculations can refer to the Bayes Theorem and a Bayes calculator tool or formula.
Further to this, to prevent asymptomatic people who overcame the disease already to keep testing positive long after, it is essential that the cycle thresholds at which any RT-PCR tests calls a positive are set at 24 cycle thresholds and that certainly they do not exceed 28, and that the assay in use has been thoroughly examined for correspondence to an isolate of the pathogen in question
https://nulluslocussinegenio.com/2021/03/23/the-monotti-protocol/
Forwarded from Fearless Report
“Hundreds of thousands of troops remain unvaccinated” with deadline to vaccinate approaching.
Pilots and ATC are refusing the vax and shutting down airlines.
GOOD. No one anywhere should comply with a totalitarian regime.
#DoNotComply
@CandaceOwens
Pilots and ATC are refusing the vax and shutting down airlines.
GOOD. No one anywhere should comply with a totalitarian regime.
#DoNotComply
@CandaceOwens
Mail Online
Hundreds of thousands of U.S. troops remain unvaccinated with deadline to have shots now less than eight weeks away
Hundreds of thousands of US servicemembers remain unvaccinated or are only partially vaccinated against COVID as the deadlines to do so nears under an August directive by the DoD.
Forwarded from Fearless Report
Are any one of his team mates going to take a stance against this blatant discrimination?
@CandaceOwens
@CandaceOwens
New York Post
Nets ban Kyrie Irving from team until he’s vaccinated
Exactly one week before the Nets kick off their regular season against the Bucks, the team announced Kyrie Irving will not practice or play with the team – even during away games, where he is...
ATTENTION: There it is. #Inflation. Subtract 6% (more likely it’s at least double that number) from every thing you earn and own. That’s how it works. Know who the real threat is to peace and stability: Remember that government did that, not a virus.
Forwarded from Mark Changizi
THEM: Of course I’m for freedom.
ME: Well, that’s good to—
THEM: It’s the best carrot we have for motivating good behavior.
ME:
THEM: Otherwise it’s just sticks.
ME: Well, that’s good to—
THEM: It’s the best carrot we have for motivating good behavior.
ME:
THEM: Otherwise it’s just sticks.
Michael Gunner here going after the unvaxxed in Aussie’s NT…
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Shades of Benito and Adolph? Australian Northern Territory is going full #fascist here: "Every worker who interacts with the public is a 'frontline worker' in our economy - and must be jabbed."
🇺🇸 President #Biden May Be Caught in FBI Probe Into Hunter: Shared Bank Accounts May Be Used to Fund His Son’s 2018 Drug and Prostitution Binge:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/10/13/joe-biden-may-be-caught-in-fbi-probe-into-hunter-shared-bank-accounts-may-be-used-to-fund-his-sons-2018-drug-and-prostitution-binge/
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/10/13/joe-biden-may-be-caught-in-fbi-probe-into-hunter-shared-bank-accounts-may-be-used-to-fund-his-sons-2018-drug-and-prostitution-binge/
Is the Covid Shot or Vaccine Passport/Digital ID a modern day ‘Mark of the Beast’?
Forwarded from NoRisk_NoReward
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
⚠️ sombre message that I didn’t particularly enjoy making. Some thoughts and beliefs on where we are headed. Speaking openly and honestly. I have been asked where I see things going, this is my PERSONAL belief. Take it or leave it. I am not trying to ‘convert’ anyone to think this way or change anyone’s mind. It’s a response to a question I’m asked a lot.
The rapidly increasing rate of censorship. More platforms are compromised. Part of the agenda. The importance of the ‘vaccines’ in the globalist/NWO plan/strategy. General overview.
The way things are headed. Forerunners. End times. Last of the last days. Mark of the Beast system foundations being laid NOW. What to expect. I respect everyone’s view and opinions whether they are the same or different to my own. Not intended to debate or argue. It’s just an answer to a question. Maybe some will identify with this and be provoked. If not, move on and discard. Thank you.
The rapidly increasing rate of censorship. More platforms are compromised. Part of the agenda. The importance of the ‘vaccines’ in the globalist/NWO plan/strategy. General overview.
The way things are headed. Forerunners. End times. Last of the last days. Mark of the Beast system foundations being laid NOW. What to expect. I respect everyone’s view and opinions whether they are the same or different to my own. Not intended to debate or argue. It’s just an answer to a question. Maybe some will identify with this and be provoked. If not, move on and discard. Thank you.
Forwarded from BREAKING HEADLINES
Approved Version of Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Still Not Available in US
READ: https://breakingheadlines.news/RoV4xd
@BREAKINGHEADLINES
READ: https://breakingheadlines.news/RoV4xd
@BREAKINGHEADLINES
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Everyone, please be aware that Twitter speedily censors innocent people reporting what they believe is an adverse effect after covid19 vaccination.
We’re not surprised. But it’s shocking that a bright person, formerly in good health, is now fighting a blood cell cancer.
Now, I don’t know if it is a causative link. But neither does Twitter!! They declare everything not crisply on narrative “misinformation”.
In the current case, there’s nothing in past Tweets to suggest this is a habit. On the contrary, the most striking sense I gained from skimming through past Tweets is how moderate & courteous they were.
https://twitter.com/michaelrobison/status/1446421361795162114?s=21
I used the notoriety around Michael Robison’s case to slip in that the manufacturers own studies DO NOT SHOW A REDUCTION IN ALL-CAUSES MORTALITY from covid19 vaccination.
Let us assume, for the purpose of a “thought experiment”, that the covid19 vaccines were highly effective & also safe. I think what we’d expect to see, over time, is that the greater the % population vaccinated, the closer to normal would be the death rate. A crisper relationship would be expected if death rates were adjusted for age, and a yet clearer relationship to vaccination.
What can we conclude from this? I cannot think of any other explanation than these two:
1. The vaccines in fact don’t work. The increased death rates compared with normal was due to the virus itself.
2. While the vaccines do work & reduce covid19 deaths, the vaccines are also CAUSING deaths in appreciable numbers.
Looking at VAERS, I was immediately struck by the huge increase in thromboembolic events, such as pulmonary embolisms reported at well over 400X the prior rate (all other vaccines).
Not 400% (4X) over, but 400 times over!!!
So from the options above, I concluded that Option 2 applies. Of course it’s possible to see a blend, for example, rather limited benefits, offset by vaccination induced fatalities. This conclusion fits well with the extraordinary rates of blood clots / bleeding pathologies reported.
These observations are simple, drawn from public data & follow the underlying mechanistic pathology (that spike protein initiates blood clots, something I assert was known to the research scientists at Pfizer, Moderna, AZ & JNJ, before they finalised the basic designs they’d chosen. I couldn’t have completed this assignment).
I’d have resigned if I couldn’t have complied with the guidance.
If you didn’t know this or if you had no source or analysis, you’ll find all of this & more at Steve Kirsch’s website. Huge respect for Kirsch. He was busy (being a serial & successful tech entrepreneur), “followed the science” & took his “shots” when they were made available in his state & age threshold.
I don’t believe he was injured, but he has been an - extraordinarily rare thing - open-minded person. Perhaps this mindset is more common in Engineers? Opinions get trumped by inconvenient data all the time.
Steve Kirsch then had friends injured or killed shortly after vaccination & so discovered VAERS.
Over just a few months, he’s built a strong, volunteer force of experts (I believe Robert Malone is among them).
These experts have dug into the VAERS database to a greater extent than FDA or CDC.
Truly appalling but you already know that.
By the way, Kirsch happens to know a few senior figures inside some institutions. So he often sends emails but replies are rare & take the form of late & short and NEVER attempt to offer a countering interpretation / assessment. All they’ll ever say is “We disagree with your interpretation”.
All very odd, since surely those public data directly contradict the mantra that the covid19 vaccinations are “safe & effective”.
Also, as an incentive Kirsch, being wealthy from forming, leading & selling a number of tech companies, is still offering a personal $1 million to anyone who can debunk Team Kirsch’s findings from VAERS. Weeks have passed & not a single vaccine zealot has even taken a shot (ha ha) at this allegedly open goal.
We’re not surprised. But it’s shocking that a bright person, formerly in good health, is now fighting a blood cell cancer.
Now, I don’t know if it is a causative link. But neither does Twitter!! They declare everything not crisply on narrative “misinformation”.
In the current case, there’s nothing in past Tweets to suggest this is a habit. On the contrary, the most striking sense I gained from skimming through past Tweets is how moderate & courteous they were.
https://twitter.com/michaelrobison/status/1446421361795162114?s=21
I used the notoriety around Michael Robison’s case to slip in that the manufacturers own studies DO NOT SHOW A REDUCTION IN ALL-CAUSES MORTALITY from covid19 vaccination.
Let us assume, for the purpose of a “thought experiment”, that the covid19 vaccines were highly effective & also safe. I think what we’d expect to see, over time, is that the greater the % population vaccinated, the closer to normal would be the death rate. A crisper relationship would be expected if death rates were adjusted for age, and a yet clearer relationship to vaccination.
What can we conclude from this? I cannot think of any other explanation than these two:
1. The vaccines in fact don’t work. The increased death rates compared with normal was due to the virus itself.
2. While the vaccines do work & reduce covid19 deaths, the vaccines are also CAUSING deaths in appreciable numbers.
Looking at VAERS, I was immediately struck by the huge increase in thromboembolic events, such as pulmonary embolisms reported at well over 400X the prior rate (all other vaccines).
Not 400% (4X) over, but 400 times over!!!
So from the options above, I concluded that Option 2 applies. Of course it’s possible to see a blend, for example, rather limited benefits, offset by vaccination induced fatalities. This conclusion fits well with the extraordinary rates of blood clots / bleeding pathologies reported.
These observations are simple, drawn from public data & follow the underlying mechanistic pathology (that spike protein initiates blood clots, something I assert was known to the research scientists at Pfizer, Moderna, AZ & JNJ, before they finalised the basic designs they’d chosen. I couldn’t have completed this assignment).
I’d have resigned if I couldn’t have complied with the guidance.
If you didn’t know this or if you had no source or analysis, you’ll find all of this & more at Steve Kirsch’s website. Huge respect for Kirsch. He was busy (being a serial & successful tech entrepreneur), “followed the science” & took his “shots” when they were made available in his state & age threshold.
I don’t believe he was injured, but he has been an - extraordinarily rare thing - open-minded person. Perhaps this mindset is more common in Engineers? Opinions get trumped by inconvenient data all the time.
Steve Kirsch then had friends injured or killed shortly after vaccination & so discovered VAERS.
Over just a few months, he’s built a strong, volunteer force of experts (I believe Robert Malone is among them).
These experts have dug into the VAERS database to a greater extent than FDA or CDC.
Truly appalling but you already know that.
By the way, Kirsch happens to know a few senior figures inside some institutions. So he often sends emails but replies are rare & take the form of late & short and NEVER attempt to offer a countering interpretation / assessment. All they’ll ever say is “We disagree with your interpretation”.
All very odd, since surely those public data directly contradict the mantra that the covid19 vaccinations are “safe & effective”.
Also, as an incentive Kirsch, being wealthy from forming, leading & selling a number of tech companies, is still offering a personal $1 million to anyone who can debunk Team Kirsch’s findings from VAERS. Weeks have passed & not a single vaccine zealot has even taken a shot (ha ha) at this allegedly open goal.
Twitter
Michael Robison
The CDC, Pfizer, Moderna and J&J know that the instability of IVT use of MRNA is accompanied by the bodies clearing of the Inert 19 Protein Spike by the immune system. When it leaves the cell structure compromised after insertion & clearing…. It results in…
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Setting aside the numbers (not mid-teens thousands of deaths but between 100K & 200K, because only a low, single-figure % of actual adverse events get reported) what’s particularly damning are the following:
1. That there is a time-effect relationship is just obvious. If the adverse events were purely (bad) luck, they’d occur nearly randomly in the days, weeks & months after vaccination. But they don’t. There is a large fraction of post-vaccination deaths in the first few days.
2. There is a striking dose-effect relationship, evidenced in several way. (a) adverse events occur at much higher rates post the 2nd dose than post the first. (b) the Moderna & Pfizer products are of very similar design, mRNA incorporated in lipid nanoparticles. But they differ substantially in doses. Using dose on the X-axis & deaths on the Y-axis, the relationship is eye-poppingly awful. If you haven’t seen the graph, it’s here:
https://gab.com/stkirsch/posts/10703834893350561 B 3
Sorry it’s in GAB, but Kirsch has been banned from Twitter I believe.
Here’s the figure (attached to this post).
3. Fully 70% of the adverse events reported to VAERS either are blood clots / bleeding or have these thromboembolic events as plausible triggers.
So please share with anyone who might benefit from the information
Best wishes & thanks,
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
1. That there is a time-effect relationship is just obvious. If the adverse events were purely (bad) luck, they’d occur nearly randomly in the days, weeks & months after vaccination. But they don’t. There is a large fraction of post-vaccination deaths in the first few days.
2. There is a striking dose-effect relationship, evidenced in several way. (a) adverse events occur at much higher rates post the 2nd dose than post the first. (b) the Moderna & Pfizer products are of very similar design, mRNA incorporated in lipid nanoparticles. But they differ substantially in doses. Using dose on the X-axis & deaths on the Y-axis, the relationship is eye-poppingly awful. If you haven’t seen the graph, it’s here:
https://gab.com/stkirsch/posts/10703834893350561 B 3
Sorry it’s in GAB, but Kirsch has been banned from Twitter I believe.
Here’s the figure (attached to this post).
3. Fully 70% of the adverse events reported to VAERS either are blood clots / bleeding or have these thromboembolic events as plausible triggers.
So please share with anyone who might benefit from the information
Best wishes & thanks,
Mike
Dr Mike Yeadon
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Sample of Injuries Reported in the US VAERS database as of 1st October 2021 in children under 18 years. Data as of 1st October 2021
A total of 64,240 injuries now reported by 16,481 children following a Pfizer injection given in the US.
Link to US database: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
A total of 64,240 injuries now reported by 16,481 children following a Pfizer injection given in the US.
Link to US database: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
VAERS SYMPTOMS CHILDREN 1ST OCTOBER.xlsx
124.4 KB
Attached excel document gives the full list of all injuries reported and input to VAERS (US) for all Covid-19 injections in children (under 18yrs) as of 1st October 2021
Separate tabs also show just the Pfizer and Moderna reactions
Link to database: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php
Separate tabs also show just the Pfizer and Moderna reactions
Link to database: https://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php