This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
FYI - Mark your diaries for this Thurs & Fri:
Patrick Henningsen will be moderating two of the panels on Friday, "Vaccine Passports" with Dr. Mike Yeadon + guests TBC, and "Justice Hour" with Reiner Fuellmich + guests TBC.
A lot of good material both days. Worth checking out...
https://doctors4covidethics.org/save-the-date-covid-19-interdisciplinary-symposium/
Patrick Henningsen will be moderating two of the panels on Friday, "Vaccine Passports" with Dr. Mike Yeadon + guests TBC, and "Justice Hour" with Reiner Fuellmich + guests TBC.
A lot of good material both days. Worth checking out...
https://doctors4covidethics.org/save-the-date-covid-19-interdisciplinary-symposium/
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
"Even if one assumes protection against severe covid-19, given its very low incidence in children, an extremely high number would need to be vaccinated in order to prevent one severe case. Meanwhile, a large number of children with very low risk for severe disease would be exposed to vaccine risks, known and unknown.
Thus far, Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine has been judged by Israel’s government as likely linked to symptomatic myocarditis, with an estimated incidence between 1 in 3000 to 1 in 6000 in men ages 16 to 24.
Furthermore, the long term effects of gene-based vaccines, which involve novel vaccine platforms, remain essentially unknown.
In terms of the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from children to adults, this is also low and decreasing, though not negligible. School teachers are more likely to get SARS-CoV-2 from other adults than they are from their students. The contribution of schools to community transmission has been consistently low across jurisdictions. In addition, considering estimates that 42% of those aged 5 to 17 years in the US are now post-covid, this should only lower the risk of transmission from children. Add to this the fact that most adults in rich western countries have received at least one dose of covid-19 vaccine—around 80% of UK adults now have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, whether from past infection or from vaccination—and it seems the opportunities for children to be vectors of transmission to adults are dwindling.
Given all these considerations, the assertion that vaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2 will protect adults remains hypothetical.
Even if we were to assume this protection does exist, the number of children that would need to be vaccinated to protect just one adult from a bout of severe covid-19—considering the low transmission rates, the high proportion of children already being post-covid, and most adults being vaccinated or post-covid—would be extraordinarily high. Moreover, this number would likely compare unfavourably to the number of children that would be harmed, including for rare serious events.
A separate, but crucial question is one of ethics. Should society be considering vaccinating children, subjecting them to any risk, not for the purpose of benefiting them but in order to protect adults? We believe the onus is on adults to protect themselves. In multiple jurisdictions around the world, the vast majority of adults, including those that are at high risk, have not been fully vaccinated against covid-19. If the goal is to protect adults, shouldn’t efforts be focused on ensuring adults are fully vaccinated rather than targeting children? Further, it is highly inequitable to be vaccinating very low risk children in wealthy countries while many vulnerable adults in low-income countries have not had any doses.
There is no need to rush to vaccinate children against covid-19—the vast majority stands little to benefit, and it is ethically dubious to pursue a hypothetical protection of adults while exposing children to harms, known and unknown."
Elia Abi-Jaoude, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
Peter Doshi, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
Claudina Michal-Teitelbaum, Preventive Medicine, Independent Researcher, Lyon, France
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/13/covid-19-vaccines-for-children-hypothetical-benefits-to-adults-do-not-outweigh-risks-to-children/
"Even if one assumes protection against severe covid-19, given its very low incidence in children, an extremely high number would need to be vaccinated in order to prevent one severe case. Meanwhile, a large number of children with very low risk for severe disease would be exposed to vaccine risks, known and unknown.
Thus far, Pfizer’s mRNA vaccine has been judged by Israel’s government as likely linked to symptomatic myocarditis, with an estimated incidence between 1 in 3000 to 1 in 6000 in men ages 16 to 24.
Furthermore, the long term effects of gene-based vaccines, which involve novel vaccine platforms, remain essentially unknown.
In terms of the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from children to adults, this is also low and decreasing, though not negligible. School teachers are more likely to get SARS-CoV-2 from other adults than they are from their students. The contribution of schools to community transmission has been consistently low across jurisdictions. In addition, considering estimates that 42% of those aged 5 to 17 years in the US are now post-covid, this should only lower the risk of transmission from children. Add to this the fact that most adults in rich western countries have received at least one dose of covid-19 vaccine—around 80% of UK adults now have SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, whether from past infection or from vaccination—and it seems the opportunities for children to be vectors of transmission to adults are dwindling.
Given all these considerations, the assertion that vaccinating children against SARS-CoV-2 will protect adults remains hypothetical.
Even if we were to assume this protection does exist, the number of children that would need to be vaccinated to protect just one adult from a bout of severe covid-19—considering the low transmission rates, the high proportion of children already being post-covid, and most adults being vaccinated or post-covid—would be extraordinarily high. Moreover, this number would likely compare unfavourably to the number of children that would be harmed, including for rare serious events.
A separate, but crucial question is one of ethics. Should society be considering vaccinating children, subjecting them to any risk, not for the purpose of benefiting them but in order to protect adults? We believe the onus is on adults to protect themselves. In multiple jurisdictions around the world, the vast majority of adults, including those that are at high risk, have not been fully vaccinated against covid-19. If the goal is to protect adults, shouldn’t efforts be focused on ensuring adults are fully vaccinated rather than targeting children? Further, it is highly inequitable to be vaccinating very low risk children in wealthy countries while many vulnerable adults in low-income countries have not had any doses.
There is no need to rush to vaccinate children against covid-19—the vast majority stands little to benefit, and it is ethically dubious to pursue a hypothetical protection of adults while exposing children to harms, known and unknown."
Elia Abi-Jaoude, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
Peter Doshi, Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore
Claudina Michal-Teitelbaum, Preventive Medicine, Independent Researcher, Lyon, France
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/13/covid-19-vaccines-for-children-hypothetical-benefits-to-adults-do-not-outweigh-risks-to-children/
The BMJ
Covid-19 vaccines for children: hypothetical benefits to adults do not outweigh risks to children - The BMJ
As the majority of adults in multiple rich western countries have now received at least one dose of a covid-19 vaccine, the focus is turning to children. While there is [...]More...
Forwarded from David Avocado Wolfe
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Climate Lockdowns” brought to you by the governments and corporations that destroy the environment! Of Course! (1 min 56 seconds)
LIVE in 3 hours time....
Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium: July 29 – 30th, 17.00pm – 22.00pm (UK Time Zone):
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/07/29/doctors-for-covid-ethics-symposium-july-29th-30th-17-00pm-22-00pm-uk-time/
Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium: July 29 – 30th, 17.00pm – 22.00pm (UK Time Zone):
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/07/29/doctors-for-covid-ethics-symposium-july-29th-30th-17-00pm-22-00pm-uk-time/
Forwarded from World Doctors Alliance
Catherine Austin Fitts "You think a snowflake is delicate until you realise that enough of them together will shut down a city" https://www.ukcolumn.org/live
FYI: Patrick will be presenting at 5pm on Covid propaganda, and moderating two other panels at 7pm, and 7:50pm.
WATCH DAY TWO LIVE - Doctors for #Covid Ethics Symposium: Friday July 30th, 17.00pm – 22.00pm UK Time:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/07/29/doctors-for-covid-ethics-symposium-july-29th-30th-17-00pm-22-00pm-uk-time/
WATCH DAY TWO LIVE - Doctors for #Covid Ethics Symposium: Friday July 30th, 17.00pm – 22.00pm UK Time:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/07/29/doctors-for-covid-ethics-symposium-july-29th-30th-17-00pm-22-00pm-uk-time/
FACT: Censoring & restricting the availability/prescription of cheap early treatments like #Ivermectin #Hydroxychloroquine #VitaminD #Zinc etc, is intentional and coordinated across borders - for one single reason: to preserve the special ‘emergency use’ waiver being used to justify the experimental Covid #Vaccines.
By eliminating all other treatment options, they’ve created a faux ‘emergency’ monopoly for gene juice.
By eliminating all other treatment options, they’ve created a faux ‘emergency’ monopoly for gene juice.
The People vs Global Elites: 'What Is Your Compelling Future?'
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/01/patrick-henningsen-on-boiler-room-what-is-your-compelling-future/
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/01/patrick-henningsen-on-boiler-room-what-is-your-compelling-future/
We're going LIVE with the #SundayWire in 2 hours time. Be sure and tune-in...
Episode #383 – ‘At War With Humanity’ with special guests:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/01/episode-383-at-war-with-humanity-with-special-guests/
Episode #383 – ‘At War With Humanity’ with special guests:
https://21stcenturywire.com/2021/08/01/episode-383-at-war-with-humanity-with-special-guests/
Forwarded from Robin Monotti + Cory Morningstar
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
TRENTO, ITALY 🇮🇹 Protest outside the state TV offices.
As this is an information war it makes sense to protest directly in front of state TV studios offices & HQs.
The people are chanting "Venduti" or "sell-outs" in English.
As this is an information war it makes sense to protest directly in front of state TV studios offices & HQs.
The people are chanting "Venduti" or "sell-outs" in English.
Forwarded from No More Lockdowns UK
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Thousands of brave Germans have taken to the streets of Berlin despite the bans on protests. Look at the way they are treated by the fascist thugs of the state. We stand with the peaceful decent people of Germany and the world! 🇩🇪
Forwarded from Peter
Similar story in the hospital of Pontevedra, Spain, "More than 90% of those admitted to Internal Medicine with the virus are double vaccinated": https://www.farodevigo.es/pontevedra/2021/07/31/90-ingresados-virus-medicina-interna-55701964.html
Forwarded from Ehden's Channel
Hi everyone!
Here is "Everything you wanted to know about the Pfizer-Brazil contract" (and why it is 100% real).
Topic covered:
* Contract timeline
* Digital signatures validity and the validations of the contract signers legitimacy
* Full, and I mean FULL review of the contract clauses, which includes A LOT of new revelations. For example, did you know that countries are not allowed to test the dosages they receive?
I also answer question: does Pfizer has a legal right to go after embassies?
Please share it with others, and in case you tweet it, please consider mentioning @eh_den and #PfizerLeak in the tweet.
I (am the) love (that is) you,
Ehden
https://senseofawareness.com/2021/07/31/pfizerleak-exposing-the-pfizer-manufacturing-and-supply-agreement-the-brazilian-job-day-56/
Here is "Everything you wanted to know about the Pfizer-Brazil contract" (and why it is 100% real).
Topic covered:
* Contract timeline
* Digital signatures validity and the validations of the contract signers legitimacy
* Full, and I mean FULL review of the contract clauses, which includes A LOT of new revelations. For example, did you know that countries are not allowed to test the dosages they receive?
I also answer question: does Pfizer has a legal right to go after embassies?
Please share it with others, and in case you tweet it, please consider mentioning @eh_den and #PfizerLeak in the tweet.
I (am the) love (that is) you,
Ehden
https://senseofawareness.com/2021/07/31/pfizerleak-exposing-the-pfizer-manufacturing-and-supply-agreement-the-brazilian-job-day-56/
actionscript.org
DEWA89 > Situs Daftar Slot Gacor Dan Slot Demo Gratis Pragmatic Play
Dewa89 Pragmatic Play merupakan provider situs judi online resmi yang menyediahkan daftar slot online, rtp slot gacor, demo slot gratis dan live casino terpercaya.
Forwarded from Oracle Films
FDA document admits “Covid” PCR test was developed without isolated samples for test calibration, effectively admitting it’s testing something else.
A document just released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples, but rather with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.
In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “Covid” narrative.
It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2. From the document:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data to support a false narrative.
We are now at a crossroads worldwide. The time is upon us to decide if we are going to allow this type of medical fascism to persist, and impact upon the futures of our children. Or if we are finally going to say no to tyrannical government policy.
You can DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT HERE: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
A document just released by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) openly admits that the infamous PCR test for the Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) was developed not with actual samples, but rather with what appears to be genetic material from a common cold virus.
In the FDA document, it is clearly stated that ordinary seasonal flu genetic material was used as the testing marker in the PCR test kits because the authorities knew that many people would test “positive” for it, thus allowing them to use these results to create the “Covid” narrative.
It is somewhat of a lengthy read, but have a look for yourself and see the deception in plain sight. There is no legitimate test out there that accurately identifies the presence of SARS-CoV-2. From the document:
“Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.”
Another revelation in the document is the admission by the FDA that test results are “pooled” together to produce numbers that are inaccurate. The FDA is quite literally manufacturing data to support a false narrative.
We are now at a crossroads worldwide. The time is upon us to decide if we are going to allow this type of medical fascism to persist, and impact upon the futures of our children. Or if we are finally going to say no to tyrannical government policy.
You can DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT HERE: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download