To be honest, I use a bit of everything. I’m usually on educational websites and platforms where I can brush up on my skills, especially for studying. But at the same time, I also spend a fair amount of time on entertainment sites just to unwind after a long day.

The debate over nature and nurture has always been subject of discussion, particularly in fields such as sport and music. Although some people seem to possess a natural aptitude from an early age, I believe that with sufficient dedication and training anyone can achieve a high level of competence.

On the one hand, it is undeniable that certain people possess an innate talent, as a result of genetic predispositions, which helps them to excel at an early age. For example, some athletes naturally have superior coordination or reflexes that give them a competitive advantage in sports. Similarly, in music, a pertinent example can be Micheal Jakson who possess a rare natural charisma, understanding timing, movement, stage, emotion, presence, to name but a few. Such people highlight why they progress way more effortlessly than their peers.

One the other hand, just like all skills, I contend that, music and sports can also be honed through constant iterations, observations, and refinements. Any child who begins taking up musical classes from a young age and, through deliberate practice and years of structured training, can become highly-skilled performer, despite having any natural inborn talent. it is undeniable why people ‘sometimes’ take constant efforts for granted, as it takes years of discipline and consistency to become genuinely exceptional at something, yet such efforts, while time-consuming and discipline-demanding, can compensate for biological predispositions.

In conclusion, while natural ability plays a crucial role in achieving athletic and musical goals, my conviction is that with proper training anyone can become successful sports athletes or musicians.

It is believed by some experts that children should start learning a foreign language at primary school as doing so in secondary school might be ineffective. While this approach offers some disadvantages, I still believe that benefits – reduced academic difficulty and more effective early learning – outweigh the drawbacks.

One of the drawbacks of teaching children a second language in a primary school is information overload. In a primary school, children start laying foundation in rudimentary stuff like literacy, numeracy, critical thinking, to name a few, and adding a foreign language to the curriculum as a compulsory discipline can be burdensome. For example, a child who begins learning basic things at school like reading, writing, and drawing, and it becomes complicated to combine learning a second language. Thus, school curricula should stay unchanged, as it is difficult for children to absorb so much information altogether, let alone a foreign language.

However worrying above-mentioned statements may seem, I still believe that there are more benefits. One merit of learning a foreign language is reduced academic difficulty. Unlike adults, who are more exposed to exam-oriented classes and preoccupied with choosing a suitable career, making learning languages repetitive and redundant, children have a lot of time learning a foreign language. Besides, when children are exposed to learning a language from an early age, they learn faster, thus, having a competitive edge over those who do know such belt on their waist. It is indispensable to start learning as early and many languages as possible.

In conclusion, even though exposing children to learning a language from an early age might appear worrisome, I believe that benefits are far greater, as children have to learn language in this ever-competitive job market landscape, despite the difficulties of foundational baseline involved.