Being a Globalist (mainly, what it implies) and anti-Patriotic/Nationalist is a sin in Catholic Moral Theology.

It is Catholic Doctrine that nations have the right to self-preservation, and to maintain their sacred differences. Those who would oppose their government’s laws prohibiting miscegenation, etc, would be acting contrary to the Catholic Faith.

« Disrespect for one’s country is felt when one is imbued with anti-nationalistic doctrines (e.g., the principles of Internationalism which hold that loyalty is due to a class, namely, the workers of the world or a capitalistic group, and that country should be sacrificed to selfish interests; the principle of Humanitarianism, which holds that patriotism is incompatible with love of the race; the principle of Egoism which holds that the individual has no obligations to society); it is practiced when one speaks contemptuously about country, disregards its good name or prestige, subordinates its rightful pre-eminence to a class, section, party, personal ambition, or greed, etc. »

- McHugh and Callan, Moral Theology, Volume II, p. 414

What Keith Woods and Joel Davis just don’t understand about our position on UBI is that it will be digital and come with strings attached, therefore it’s not free money, it’s all part of the move toward a cashless society where we don’t even have ownership or a legal claim to our own money in our own bank accounts to spend as we wish.

UBI will not be free money, because it’s NOT money. Think of it more like digital coupons that will most likely have “use by” dates and are only accepted at select stores — no gun stores ;). That might still sound fine to you, but imagine this becoming the norm for our people. This is how they will ease us further into slavery.

You could argue that we already use digital money via credit/debit cards, and that obviously is a problem, but at least it’s still legally our money in our digital accounts — we still have a legal claim to this digital money, to say that this is ours to spend as we wish — but that won’t be the case with UBI, we can’t even say that “this UBI money is our money” because it won’t be ours and it won’t even be money as we know it. Again, It’ll be more like digital coupons or foodstamps rather than money we can spend freely on whatever we want.

We got a taste of this already here in America with attempts by gun control advocacy groups lobbying credit card companies to track firearms purchases. Why would the people that hate us do such a thing? We all know why. This issue will be even worse with UBI.

The system is already pushing for legislation (without much luck thankfully) to further track and control how we spend our own money when it’s digital numbers in a bank’s database, imagine how much more control they’ll have when instead of money, we’re all hooked on UBI coupons that we think are money while there’s less real money circulating within the NWO-UBI-saturated economy.

This is true, but then again I don’t think anyone is advocating for the sort of strings-attached UBI that the system is trying to implement, not even Keith.

I find it bizarre how many on the DR instantly assume that Keith and Joel have the worst possible intentions regarding UBI, and don’t just want to give struggling white-working class families, especially mothers, free money with no strings attached.

What exactly is the point of these posts? Did the author even read what Joel or I wrote?

Us: "Some form of basic income is probably inevitable due to automation trends so we should demand it be universal with no strings attached"

Response: "you guys defended universal basic income but actually this thing I have imagined that wouldn't be universal, basic, or an income would be bad for us and here's why"

????

“Our digital money in our bank cards are still legally ours to spend as we wish”
bank freezing already happens though, look at the Canadian truckers. And once again, no one is arguing for a basic vouchered system tied to social credit and our argument was we should be making a case against that.

And again, why is it apparently taken for granted in the online right that the globalists are just about to implement a basic income system? Where was this announced? Where is the elite support? As I showed in a previous post, figures like Larry Fink and Bill Gates oppose UBI or are more concerned with getting people back in the office waging.

This seems like one of those consensus things where people on the right have an idea of how a technocratic evil elite should behave and then insist that this must be the plan, the same reasoning they used to promise that covid lockdowns would never end because an evil elite would never just drop new authoritarian powers, that the evil elite would surely transition covid passports into a social credit system, that there would surely be global monkeypox lockdowns etc. etc.

https://t.me/hapaperspective/7876

People believe this shit?

🇩🇪❌🇺🇸📃 — Tonight, on German-Speaking social medias the hashtag #Kriegserkläerung (Declaration of War) is trending, as some German nationalist netizens accuse the US of doing the NS1/NS2 sabotages, which according to them is akin to a Declaration of War by the Americans against Germany

White Texans are now an official minority in their own state.

I wonder what the implications of this will be in the long-run when the state becomes vast-majority Mexican? Will they try and become a part of Mexico? Will there be another Mexican-American war to try and reconquer the state once these savages have full control of Texas? Only time will tell.

This is why the efforts of men like James Polk and Zachary Taylor to keep the state of Texas a citadel for the White races should be appreciated. Without their sacrifices to protect the White citizens of Texas, there would have never been a Texas; it would’ve never been a great state, and it would still be Mexico - which it will certainly become more akin to in the years and decades to come if nothing is done to prevent White replacement.

In a by-gone-age the higher races had succeeded in conquering Mexican territory, when men were men and had a sense of racial feeling, when leaders were leaders. Now we are seeing the consequences of White men turning a blind eye to the sacrifices of their ancestors by becoming content with America being invaded by an inferior, barbaric, and savage race of inbred mestizos. Hey, but as long as it’s done legally, right?