Lothrop Stoddard on the work of Prescott F. Hall, another prominent Eugenicist who echoed similar sentiments, and was the first to really bring the issue into the spotlight, brutally opposing mass immigration from Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe:

“Every true American should know about this great patriot, who, though he lived and died practically unknown to the general public, was, more than any other man, the preparer of that "great awakening" which, beginning in 1914, culminated in the Johnson Act of 1924, which closed our gates to mass-immigration and thus saved America from impending ruin. Prescott F. Hall was unquestionably the first to grasp the full peril of the “ New Immigration.” He came to this conclusion as far,back as the late eighties, when he was barely grown to man’s estate. Once his keen vision had pierced to the heart of the matter, he devoted his whole life to this supremely vital cause. At first he stood quite alone. Gradually he gathered about him a small group, mostly young men of Boston and vicinity, like himself, who founded the Immigration Restriction League in the year 1894. From then on this little band fought a discouraging fight, apparently making scant headway against the prevailing temper of the times, but in reality sowing seeds which were to produce a rich harvest of “success. Of course, it was always the leader, Prescott Hall, who bore the brunt of the battle. Renouncing a brilliant legal career (he is the author of standard legal text-books and was considered one of the ablest minds of the Massachusetts bar), Prescott Hall devoted his modest means and delicate health to the patriotic cause with an intensity which unquestionably shortened his days. His untimely death, early in the year 1921, prevented him from witnessing the triumph of the Johnson Act of 1924. Yet he died in the serene conviction that the tide had definitely turned and that victory was nigh. It was the author’s deep privilege to have personally known this great spirit, though only in his last days. Perhaps when future generations come to realise the debt they owe him, Prescott F. Hall wiil be remembered os he surely was: one of the saviors of our country.”

Being a Globalist (mainly, what it implies) and anti-Patriotic/Nationalist is a sin in Catholic Moral Theology.

It is Catholic Doctrine that nations have the right to self-preservation, and to maintain their sacred differences. Those who would oppose their government’s laws prohibiting miscegenation, etc, would be acting contrary to the Catholic Faith.

« Disrespect for one’s country is felt when one is imbued with anti-nationalistic doctrines (e.g., the principles of Internationalism which hold that loyalty is due to a class, namely, the workers of the world or a capitalistic group, and that country should be sacrificed to selfish interests; the principle of Humanitarianism, which holds that patriotism is incompatible with love of the race; the principle of Egoism which holds that the individual has no obligations to society); it is practiced when one speaks contemptuously about country, disregards its good name or prestige, subordinates its rightful pre-eminence to a class, section, party, personal ambition, or greed, etc. »

- McHugh and Callan, Moral Theology, Volume II, p. 414

What Keith Woods and Joel Davis just don’t understand about our position on UBI is that it will be digital and come with strings attached, therefore it’s not free money, it’s all part of the move toward a cashless society where we don’t even have ownership or a legal claim to our own money in our own bank accounts to spend as we wish.

UBI will not be free money, because it’s NOT money. Think of it more like digital coupons that will most likely have “use by” dates and are only accepted at select stores — no gun stores ;). That might still sound fine to you, but imagine this becoming the norm for our people. This is how they will ease us further into slavery.

You could argue that we already use digital money via credit/debit cards, and that obviously is a problem, but at least it’s still legally our money in our digital accounts — we still have a legal claim to this digital money, to say that this is ours to spend as we wish — but that won’t be the case with UBI, we can’t even say that “this UBI money is our money” because it won’t be ours and it won’t even be money as we know it. Again, It’ll be more like digital coupons or foodstamps rather than money we can spend freely on whatever we want.

We got a taste of this already here in America with attempts by gun control advocacy groups lobbying credit card companies to track firearms purchases. Why would the people that hate us do such a thing? We all know why. This issue will be even worse with UBI.

The system is already pushing for legislation (without much luck thankfully) to further track and control how we spend our own money when it’s digital numbers in a bank’s database, imagine how much more control they’ll have when instead of money, we’re all hooked on UBI coupons that we think are money while there’s less real money circulating within the NWO-UBI-saturated economy.

This is true, but then again I don’t think anyone is advocating for the sort of strings-attached UBI that the system is trying to implement, not even Keith.

I find it bizarre how many on the DR instantly assume that Keith and Joel have the worst possible intentions regarding UBI, and don’t just want to give struggling white-working class families, especially mothers, free money with no strings attached.

What exactly is the point of these posts? Did the author even read what Joel or I wrote?

Us: "Some form of basic income is probably inevitable due to automation trends so we should demand it be universal with no strings attached"

Response: "you guys defended universal basic income but actually this thing I have imagined that wouldn't be universal, basic, or an income would be bad for us and here's why"

????

“Our digital money in our bank cards are still legally ours to spend as we wish”
bank freezing already happens though, look at the Canadian truckers. And once again, no one is arguing for a basic vouchered system tied to social credit and our argument was we should be making a case against that.

And again, why is it apparently taken for granted in the online right that the globalists are just about to implement a basic income system? Where was this announced? Where is the elite support? As I showed in a previous post, figures like Larry Fink and Bill Gates oppose UBI or are more concerned with getting people back in the office waging.

This seems like one of those consensus things where people on the right have an idea of how a technocratic evil elite should behave and then insist that this must be the plan, the same reasoning they used to promise that covid lockdowns would never end because an evil elite would never just drop new authoritarian powers, that the evil elite would surely transition covid passports into a social credit system, that there would surely be global monkeypox lockdowns etc. etc.

https://t.me/hapaperspective/7876

People believe this shit?

🇩🇪❌🇺🇸📃 — Tonight, on German-Speaking social medias the hashtag #Kriegserkläerung (Declaration of War) is trending, as some German nationalist netizens accuse the US of doing the NS1/NS2 sabotages, which according to them is akin to a Declaration of War by the Americans against Germany

White Texans are now an official minority in their own state.

I wonder what the implications of this will be in the long-run when the state becomes vast-majority Mexican? Will they try and become a part of Mexico? Will there be another Mexican-American war to try and reconquer the state once these savages have full control of Texas? Only time will tell.

This is why the efforts of men like James Polk and Zachary Taylor to keep the state of Texas a citadel for the White races should be appreciated. Without their sacrifices to protect the White citizens of Texas, there would have never been a Texas; it would’ve never been a great state, and it would still be Mexico - which it will certainly become more akin to in the years and decades to come if nothing is done to prevent White replacement.

In a by-gone-age the higher races had succeeded in conquering Mexican territory, when men were men and had a sense of racial feeling, when leaders were leaders. Now we are seeing the consequences of White men turning a blind eye to the sacrifices of their ancestors by becoming content with America being invaded by an inferior, barbaric, and savage race of inbred mestizos. Hey, but as long as it’s done legally, right?